Existing studies suggest that, because knowledge is becoming more widely distributed, innovation increasingly needs to occur ‘at the interstices’ of collaborating groups and organizations. Networked innovation processes are therefore emphasized, over more hierarchical or market-based forms, as having distinct advantages for the creation and integration of knowledge. Whilst the structural properties of networks have been heavily scrutinized, there is relatively less understanding of processes, in particular the political dynamics that shape networked innovation. This article aims to develop understanding of networked innovation processes, by identifying and relating the characteristics of networked innovation to the productive, or constraining, effects of different dimensions of power (power of resource, meaning and process). It does this through comparative analysis of three case studies of networked innovation, each involving the development of new technology. This analysis suggests that understanding the politics of networked innovation depends on understanding the generative (and sometimes degenerative) relationship between power, knowledge integration, network formation, and the role of technology. Moreover, the co-ordination of networks, rather than simply their formation, is found to play a particularly crucial role.
Alter, C. & Hage, J.Organizations working together. Newbury Park, CA: Sage , 1993.
2.
Barley, S.R.The alignment of technology and structure through roles and networks . Administrative Science Quarterly, 1990, 35, 61–103 .
3.
Biernacki, P. & Waldorf, D.Snowball sampling – Problems and techniques of chain referral sampling . Sociological Methods & Research, 1981, 10(2), 141–163 .
4.
Boland, R.J. & Tenkasi, R.V.Perspective making and perspective taking in communities of knowing . Organization Science, 1995, 6(4), 350–363 .
5.
Brass D.J. & Burkhardt, E.Centrality and power in organizations. In N. Nohria & R.G. Eccles (Eds), Networks and organizations: Structure, form, and action. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press , 1992, pp. 191–215.
6.
Brown, J.S. & Duguid, P.Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: Towards a unified view of working, learning and innovation . Organization Science, 1991, 2, 40–57 .
7.
Brown, J.S. & Duguid, P.Knowledge and organization: A social-practice perspective . Organization Science, 2001, 12 (2), 198–213 .
8.
Burns, T. & Stalker, G.M.The management of innovation. London: Tavistock Publications , 1961.
9.
Callon, M.The state and technical innovation: A case study of the electrical vehicle in France . Research Policy, 1980, 9, 358–376 .
10.
Carlile, P.R.A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development . Organization Science, 2002, 13 (4), 442–455 .
11.
Castells, M.The rise of the network society. Oxford: Blackwell , 1996.
12.
Ciborra, C.U.From control to drift: The dynamics of global information infrastructures. Oxford: Oxford University Press , 2000.
13.
Clark, P. & Staunton, N.Innovation in technology and organisation. London: Routledge , 1989.
14.
Clark, T. and Salaman, G.The management guru as organizational witch doctor . Organization, 1996, 3, 85–108 .
15.
Conway, S.Informal boundary-spanning communication in the innovation process – An empirical study . Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 1995, 7 (3), 327–442 .
16.
Dawson, P. , Clausen, C. and Nielsen, K.Political processes in management, organization and the social shaping of technology . Technology Analyis and Strategic Management, 2000, 12 (1), 5–15 .
17.
Dougherty, D. & Hardy, C.Sustained product innovation in large, mature organizations: Overcoming innovation-to-organization problems . Academy of Management Journal, 1996, 39 (5), 1120–1153 .
18.
Drazin, R.Professionals and innovation: Structural-functional versus radical-structural perspectives . Journal of Management Studies, 1990, 27 (3), 245–263 .
19.
Eisenhardt, K.M.Building theories from case-study research . Academy of Managementx Review, 1989, 14 (4), 532–550 .
20.
Elg, U. & Johansson, U.Decision making in inter-firm networks as a political process . Organization Studies, 1997, 18 (3), 361–380 .
21.
Foucault, M.Power/Knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972–1977. C. Gordon (Ed.). Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf , 1980.
22.
Galaskiewicz, J.Exchange networks and community politics. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage , 1979.
23.
Gittell, J.H. & Weiss, L.Co-ordination networks within and across organizations: A multilevel framework . Journal of Management Studies, 2004, 41 (1), 127–153 .
24.
Grandori, A. & Soda, G.Inter-firm networks: Antecedents, mechanisms and forms . Organization Studies, 1995, 16, 184–214 .
25.
Granovetter, M.S.The strength of weak ties . American Journal of Sociology, 1973, 78, 1360–1380 .
26.
Gulati, R.Network location and learning: The influence of network resources and firm capabilities on alliance formation . Strategic Management Journal, 1999, 20 (5), 397–420 .
27.
Gulati, R. , Nohria, N. & Zaheer, A.Strategic networks . Strategic Management Journal, 2000, 21 (3), 203–215 .
28.
Hansen, M.T.The search transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organizational sub-units . Administrative Science Quarterly, 1999, 44, 82–111 .
29.
Hardy, C.Understanding power: Bringing about strategic change . British Journal of Management, 1996, Special Issue, 7(1), S3–16 .
30.
Hardy, C. , Phillips, N. & Lawrence, T.B.Resources, knowledge and influence: The organizational effects of interorganizational collaboration . Journal of Management Studies, 2003, 40 (2), 321–347 .
31.
Hickson, D.J. , Hinings, C.R. , Lee, C.A. , Schneck, R.E. & Pennings, J.M. A strategic contingencies theory of intra-organizational power . Administrative Science Quarterly, 1971, 16 (2), 216–229 .
32.
Hislop, D. , Newell, S. , Scarbrough, H. & Swan, J.Networks, knowledge and power: Decision making, politics and the process of innovation . Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 2000, 12 (3), 399–411 .
33.
Ibarra, H.Network centrality, power, and innovation involvement. Determinants of technical and administrative roles . Academy of Management Journal, 1993, 36 (3), 471–501 .
34.
Inkpen, A.C.Creating knowledge through collaboration . California Management Review, 1996, 39 (1), 123–140 .
35.
Jones, O. , Conway, S. & Steward, F.Social interaction and organisational change. London: Imperial College Press , 2001.
36.
Knights, D. & Murray, F.Politics and pain in managing information technology – A Casestudy from insurance . Organization Studies, 1992, 13 (2), 211–228 .
37.
Kreiner, K. & Schultz, M.Informal collaboration in R&D. The formation of networks across organizations . Organization Studies, 1993, 14 (2), 189–209 .
38.
Latour, B.Science in action. Milton Keynes: Open University Press , 1987.
39.
Lave, J. & Wenger, E.Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press , 1991.
40.
Lee, Z. & Lee, J.Y.An ERP implementation case study from a knowledge transfer perspective . Journal of Information Technology, 2000, 15 (4), 281–288 .
41.
Lukes, S.Power: A radical view. London: Macmillan Press , 1974.
42.
Macdonald, S.W.The informal network in an age of advanced telecommunications . Human Systems Management, 1993, 11, 77–87 .
43.
McLoughlin, I. , Badham, R. & Couchman, P.Rethinking political process in technological change: Socio-technical configurations and frames . Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 2000, 12 (1), 17-17 .
44.
Newell, S. , Scarbrough, H. & Swan, J.From global knowledge management to internal electronic fences: Contradictory outcomes of Intranet development . British Journal of Management, 2001, 12 (2), 97–111 .
45.
Newell, S. and Swan, J.Trust and inter-organizational networking . Human Relations, 2000, 53 (10), 1287–1328 .
46.
Nonaka, I. & Takeuchi, H.The knowledge creating company. New York: Oxford University Press , 1995.
47.
Okhuysen, G.A. & Eisenhardt, K.M.Integrating knowledge in groups: How formal interventions enable flexibility . Organization Science, 2002, 13 (4), 370–386 .
48.
Oliver, A.L. & Ebers, M.Networking network studies: An analysis of conceptual configurations in the study of inter-organizational relationships . Organization Studies, 1998, 19 (4), 549–583 .
49.
Oliver, A.L. & Liebeskind, J.P.Three levels of networking for sourcing intellectual capital in biotechnology . International Studies of Management and Organization, 1998, 27 (4), 76–103 .
50.
Orlikowski, W.J.The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations . Organization Science, 1992, 3 (3), 398–427 .
51.
Orlikowski, W.J.Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations . Organization Science, 2000, 11 (4), 404–428 .
52.
Orlikowski, W.J.Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing . Organization Science, 2002, 13 (3), 249–273 .
53.
Orlikowski, W.J. & Gash, D.C.Technological frames – Making sense of information technology in organizations . ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 1994, 12 (2), 174–207 .
54.
Owen-Smith, J. & Powell, W.W.Knowledge networks as channels and conduits: The effects of spillovers in the Boston biotechnology community . Organization Science, 2004, 15 (1), 5–22 .
Pettigrew, A.M.Context and action in the transformation of the firm . Journal of Management Studies, 1987, 24 (6), 649–670 .
57.
Phillips, N. , Lawrence, T.B. & Hardy, C.Inter-organizational collaboration and the dynamics of institutional fields . Journal of Management Studies, 2000, 37 (1), 23–43 .
58.
Powell, W. , Koput, K. & Smith-Doerr, L.Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology . Administrative Science Quarterly, 1996, 41, 116–145 .
59.
Ring, P.S. & Van de Ven, A.H.Developmental processes of cooperative interorganizational relationships . Academy of Management Review, 1994, 19 (1), 90–118 .
60.
Robertson, M. , Scarbrough, H. & Swan, J.Knowledge creation in professional service firms: Institutional effects . Organization Studies, 2003, 24 (6), 831–857 .
61.
Rogers, E.M.Diffusion of innovations, 3rd edn.New York: The Free Press , 1983.
62.
Rogers, E.M.Diffusion of innovations, 4th edn.New York: The Free Press , 1995.
63.
Scarbrough, H. (Ed.) The management of expertise. Oxford: Blackwell , 1996.
64.
Senker, J. & Faulkner, W.Knowledge frontiers: Public sector research and industrial innovation in biotechnology, engineering ceramics and parallel computing. Oxford: Oxford University Press , 1995.
65.
Smith-Ring, P.Processes facilitating reliance on trust in inter-organizational networks. In M. Ebers (Ed.), The formation of inter-organizational networks. Oxford: Oxford University Press , 1997.
66.
Sturdy, A.The adoption of management ideas and practices – Theoretical perspectives and possibilities . Management Learning, 2004, 35 (2), 155–179 .
67.
Swan, J.A. , Newell, S. & Robertson, M.Central agencies in the diffusion and design of technology: A comparison of the UK and Sweden . Organization Studies, 1999, 20, 905–932 .
68.
Swan, J. , Scarbrough, H. & Robertson, M.The construction of ‘communities of practice’ in the management of innovation . Management Learning, 2002, 33 (4), 477–496 .
69.
Tidd, J.Complexity, networks and learning: Integrative themes for research on innovation management . International Journal of Innovation Management, 1997, 1 (1), 1–21 .
70.
Townley, B.Performance appraisal and the emergence of management . Journal of Management Studies, 1993, 30 (2), 221–238 .
71.
Weick, K.E.The social psychology of organizing. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley , 1979.
72.
Wilson, F. , Desmond, J. & Roberts, H.Success and failure of MRPII implementation . British Journal of Management, 1994, 5, 221–240 .
73.
Wolfe, R.A.Organisational innovation: Review, critique and suggested research directions . Journal of Management Studies, 1994, 31, 405–431 .
74.
Yin, R.K.Case study research: Design and methods, 2nd edn.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage , 1994.
