This paper conceptualizes standardization as institutional work to study the emergence of a standard and the deployment of its regulatory power. We rely on unique access to longitudinal archival data for exploring how the FTSE4Good index, a responsible investment index, emerged as a standard for socially responsible corporate behavior. Our results show how three types of standardization work – calculative framing, engaging and valorizing – support the design, legitimation and monitoring processes whereby a standard acquires its regulatory power. Our findings reveal new facets in the dynamics of standardization by approaching standardization as a product of institutional work and in showing how unintended consequences of that work can be recaptured to strengthen the regulatory power of the standard.
AnsariS. M.FissP. C.ZajacE. J. (2010). Made to fit: How practices vary as they diffuse. Academy of Management Review, 35, 67–92.
3.
AravindD.ChristmannP. (2011). Decoupling of standard implementation from certification: Does quality of ISO 14001 implementation affect facilities environmental performance?Business Ethics Quarterly, 21, 73–102.
4.
BeckN.WalgenbachP. (2005). Technical efficiency or adaptation to institutionalized expectations? The adoption of ISO 9000 standards in the German mechanical engineering industry. Organization Studies, 26, 841–866.
5.
BeunzaG.GarudR. (2007). Calculators, lemmings or frame-makers? The intermediary role of security analysts. In CallonM.MilloY.MuniesaF. (Eds.), Market devices (pp. 13–39). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
6.
BoiralO. (2003). ISO 9000: Outside the iron cage. Organization Science, 14, 720–737.
7.
BotzemS.QuackS. (2006). Contested rules and shifting boundaries: International standard-setting in accounting. In DjelicM.-L.Sahlin-AnderssonK. (Eds.), Transnational governance: Institutional dynamics of regulation (pp. 266–286). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8.
BowkerG. C.StarS. L. (1999). Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9.
BrunssonN.JacobssonB. (Eds.) (2000). A world of standards. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10.
CharmazK. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: SAGE.
11.
CoweR. (2002) Increasing the criteria for sustainability indices and SRI investment. Ethical Corporation, 17July.
12.
DéjeanF.GondJ.-P.LecaB. (2004). Measuring the unmeasured: An institutional entrepreneur strategy in an emerging industry. Human Relations, 57, 741–764.
13.
DesrosièresA. (1998). The politics of large numbers: A history of statistical reasoning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
DurandR.McGuireJ. (2005). Legitimating agencies in the face of selection: The case of AACSB. Organization Studies, 26, 165–196.
16.
ElsbachK. D. (1994). Managing organizational legitimacy in the Californian cattle industry: The construction and effectiveness of verbal accounts. Administrative Science Quarterly39, 57–88.
17.
EspelandW. N.StevensM. L. (1998). Commensuration as a social process. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 313–343.
18.
Ethical Corporation (2003). FTSE announces market consultation to develop breast milk substitutes exclusion. T. Webb Ethical Corporation9June2003
19.
Ethical Corporation (2005). Ethical index raises bar for corporate inclusion. P. M. Saha Ethical Corporation16January2005
20.
EspelandW. N.SauderM. (2007). Rankings and reactivity: How public measures recreate social worlds. American Journal of Sociology, 113, 1–40.
21.
EtzionD.FerraroF. (2010). The role of analogy in the institutionalization of sustainability reporting. Organization Science, 21, 1092–1107.
22.
Eurosif (2010). European SRI study. Available at: www.eurosif.org.
23.
FarrowP. (2001). The green funds are growing. Sunday Telegraph, 21October, p. 8.
24.
Financial Times2001. A Footsie index for corporate ethics: The launch this summer of FTSE4Good will put companies’ standards in the spotlight. A. Skorecki, Financial Times, 27April2001:18.
25.
Financial Times, (2001). Ethical indices set to test companies’ claims that they are a force for good: FTSE4Good could change corporate behaviour. A. Skorecki, Financial Times, 3March2001:16.
26.
Financial Times (2002). FTSE tightens criteria for ethical index. A. Skorecki, Financial Times, 22May2002:30.
27.
FoucaultM. (1970). The order of things: An archaeology of the human sciences. London: Tavistock Publications.
28.
FransenL. W.KolkA. (2007). Global rule-setting for business: A critical analysis of multi-stakeholder standards. Organization, 14, 667–684.
29.
FTSE (2006). Adding values to your investment: FTSE4Good Index Series – 5 Year Review. London: FTSE Group.
30.
GarudR.JainS.KumaraswamyA. (2002). Institutional entrepreneurship in the sponsorship of common technological standards: The case of Sun Microsystems and Java. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 196–214.
31.
GilbertD. U.RascheA.WaddockS. (2011). Accountability in a global economy: The emergence of international accountability standards. Business Ethics Quarterly, 21, 23–44.
32.
GlaserB. G.StraussA. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Hawthorn: Aldine de Gruyter.
33.
GlynnM. A.AbzugR. (2002). Institutionalizing identity: Symbolic isomorphism and organizational names. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 267–280.
34.
GreenS. E. (2004). A rhetorical theory of diffusion. Academy of Management Review, 29, 653–669.
35.
Guardian (2001). The big names who are out in the cold: A new FTSE index highlighting the companies which take their social responsibilities seriously has its share of surprises. P. Inman The Guardian14July2001:4
36.
HedmoT.Sahlin-AnderssonK.WedlinL. (2006). The emergence of a European regulatory field of management education. In DjelicM.-L.Sahlin-AnderssonK. (Eds.), Transnational governance: Institutional dynamics of regulation (pp. 308–328). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
37.
JacobssonB.Sahlin-AnderssonK. (2006). Dynamics of soft regulations. In DjelicM.-L.Sahlin-AnderssonK. (Eds.), Transnational governance: Institutional dynamics of regulation (pp. 247–265). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
38.
KaghanW. N.LounsburyM. (2006). Artifacts, articulation work and institutional residue. In RafaeliA.PrattM. G. (Eds.), Artifacts and organizations: Beyond mere symbolism (pp. 279–289). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
39.
KerwerD. (2005). Rules that many use: Standards and global regulation. Governance, 18, 611–632.
40.
KurtzL. (2008). Socially responsible investment and shareholder activism. In CraneA.McWilliamsA.MattenD.MoonJ.SiegelD. S., The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility (pp. 249–267). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
41.
LangleyA. (1999). Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management Review, 24, 691–710.
42.
LawrenceT. B. (1999). Institutional strategy. Journal of Management, 25, 161–188.
43.
LawrenceT. B.SuddabyR. (2006). Institutions and institutional work. In CleggS. R.LawrenceT. B.NordW. R. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organization studies (pp. 215–254). London: SAGE.
44.
LawrenceT. B.SuddabyR.LecaB. (Eds.) (2009). Institutional work: Actors and agency in institutional studies of organizations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
45.
LawrenceT.SuddabyR.LecaB. (2011). Institutional work: Refocusing institutional studies of organization. Journal of Management Inquiry, 20, 52–58.
46.
LounsburyM.CrumleyE. T. (2007). New practice creation: An institutional perspective on innovation. Organization Studies, 28, 993–1012.
47.
MoonJ.CraneA.MattenD. (2011). Corporations and citizenship in new institutions of global governance. In CrouchC.MacLeanC. (Eds.), The responsible corporation in a global economy (pp. 203–224). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
48.
OlshanM. A. (1993). Standards-making organizations and the rationalization of American life. Sociological Quarterly, 34, 319–335.
49.
PatriottaG.GondJ-P.SchultzF. (2011). Maintaining legitimacy: Controversies, orders of worth and justifications. Journal of Management Studies48(8): 1804–1836.
50.
PerkmannM.SpicerA. (2007). ‘Healing the scars of history’: Projects, skills and field strategies in institutional entrepreneurship. Organization Studies, 28, 1101–1122.
51.
PerkmannM.SpicerA. (2008). How are management fashions institutionalized? The role of institutional work. Human Relations, 61, 811–844.
52.
PettigrewA. M.WoodmanR. W.CameronK. S. (2001). Studying organizational change and development: Challenges for future research. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 697–713.
53.
PorterT. M. (1995). Trust in numbers: The pursuit of objectivity in science and public life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
54.
PowerM. (1997). The audit society: Rituals of verification. New York: Oxford University Press.
55.
QuackS. (2007). Legal professionals and transnational law-making: A case of distributed agency. Organization, 14, 643–666.
56.
RivoliP. (2003). Making a difference or making a statement? Finance research and socially responsible investment. Business Ethics Quarterly, 13, 271–287.
57.
Sahlin-AnderssonK. (2000). Arenas as standardizers. In BrunssonN.JacobssonB. (Eds.), World of standards (pp. 100–113). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
58.
SauderM. (2008). Interlopers and field change: The entry of U.S. News into the field of legal education. Administrative Science Quarterly, 53, 209–234.
59.
SauderM.EspelandW. N. (2009). The discipline of rankings: Tight coupling and organizational change. American Sociological Review, 74, 62–82.
60.
SeidlD. (2007). Standard setting and following in corporate governance: An observation-theoretical study of the effectiveness of governance codes. Organization, 14, 705–727.
61.
SelznickP. (1949). TVA and the grassroots. New York: Harper and Row.
62.
SelznickP. (1957). Leadership in administration: A sociological interpretation. New York: Harper and Row.
Tamm HallströmK. (2000). Organizing the process of standardization. In BrunssonN.JacobssonB. (Eds.), World of standards (pp. 85–99). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
67.
TimmermansS.EpsteinS. (2010). A world of standards but not a standard world: Towards a sociology of standards and standardization. Annual Review of Sociology, 36, 69–89.
68.
TraceyP.PhillipsN.JarvisO. (2011). Bridging institutional entrepreneurship and the creation of new organizational forms: A multilevel model. Organization Science22(1): 60–80.
69.
VogelD. (2010). The private regulation of global corporate conduct: Achievements and limitations. Business and Society, 49, 68–87.
70.
WaddockS. (2008). Building a new institutional infrastructure for corporate responsibility. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 22(3), 87–108.
71.
ZilberT. B. (2006). The work of the symbolic in institutional processes: Translations of rational myths in Israeli high tech. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 281–303.
