We report the results of a longitudinal case study depicting the relationship between internal and external legitimacy at Orion, an emergent creative professional firm. We address the following questions: How do different types of legitimacy emerge, and how do they interact to shape organizational evolution? Introducing a staged process model, we demonstrate that organizational legitimacy is a product of action, which is continually reproduced and reconstructed by members of an organization in concert with external legitimation activities. Internal and external legitimacy evolve through a process of emergence, validation, diffusion and consensus, sometimes recursively repeating the cycle when imbalances result in conflict and friction.
AndersG. (2000). Bezos shares his ideas for time management. Wall Street Journal, 4February, p. 1.
5.
BarleyS.KundaG. (2004). Gurus, hired guns, and warm bodies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
6.
BartunekJ. M.LouisM. R. (1996). Insider/outsider team research, qualitative research methods (Vol. 40). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
7.
BaumJ. A. C.OliverC. (1991). Institutional linkages and organizational mortality. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 187–218.
8.
BitektineA. (2011). Toward a theory of social judgments of organizations: The case of legitimacy, reputation, and status. Academy of Management Review, 36, 151–179.
9.
CassidyJ. (2003). Dot.con: How America lost its mind and money in the internet era. New York: Perennial.
10.
CourpassonD. (2000). Managerial strategies of domination: Power in soft bureaucracies. Organization Studies, 21, 141–161.
11.
DeephouseD. L.SuchmanM. (2008). Legitimacy in organizational institutionalism. In GreenwoodR.OliverC.SuddabyR.Sahlin-AnderssonK. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism, (pp. 49–77). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
12.
DelmarF.ShaneS. (2006) Does experience matter? The effect of founding team experience on the survival and sales of newly founded ventures. Strategic Organization, 4, 215–247.
13.
DiMaggioP. (1997). Culture and cognition. Annual Reviews in Sociology, 23, 263–287.
14.
DiMaggioP. J.PowellW. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147–160.
15.
DroriI.HonigB.SheafferZ. (2009). The life cycle of an internet firm: Scripts, legitimacy, and identity. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33, 715–738.
16.
EdelmanL. B.UggenC.ErlangerH. S. (1999). The endogeneity of legal regulation. American Journal of Sociology, 102, 406–454.
17.
EisenhardtK. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14, 532–550.
18.
EisenhardtK. M.GraebnerM.E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 25–32.
19.
ElsbachK. D.SuttonR. I. (1992). Acquiring organizational legitimacy through illegitimate actions: A marriage of institutional and impression management theories. Academy of Management Journal, 35, 699–738.
20.
GarudR.HardyC.MaguireS. (2007). Institutional entrepreneurship as embedded agency: An introduction to the special issue. Organization Studies, 28, 957–969.
21.
GioaD. A.ChittipeddiK. (1991). Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategic change initiation. Strategic Management Journal, 12, 433–448.
22.
GlynnM. A.MarquisS. (2004). When good names go bad: Symbolic illegitimacy in organizations. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 22, 147–170.
23.
GolantB. D.SillinceJ. A. A. (2007). The constitution of organizational legitimacy: A narrative perspective. Organization Studies, 28, 1149–1167.
24.
GreenwoodR.SuddabyR. (2006). Institutional entrepreneurship in mature fields: The big five accounting firms. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 27–48.
25.
GreenwoodR.SuddabyR.HiningsC. (2002). Theorizing change: The role of professional associations in the transformation of institutionalized fields. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 58–80.
26.
HalletT. (2010). The myth incarnate: Recoupling processes, turmoil, and inhabited institutions in an urban elementary school. American Sociological Review, 75, 52–74.
27.
HannanM. T.FreemanJ. (1984). Structural inertia and organizational change. American Sociological Review, 49, 149–164.
28.
HargadonA. B.DouglasY. (2001). When innovations meet institutions: Edison and the design of the electric light. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46, 476–501.
29.
HymowitzC. (1999). How Amazon.com staffs a juggernaut, Wall Street Journal, 4May, p. B1.
30.
JohnsonC.DowdT. J.RidgewayC.L. (2006). Legitimacy as a social process. Annual Review of Sociology, 32, 53–78.
31.
JohnsonJ.HolubM. J. (2003). Questioning organizational legitimacy: The case of US expatriates. Journal of Business Ethics, 47, 269–293.
32.
KaghanW.LounsburyM. (2011). Institutions and work. Journal of Management Inquiry, 20, 73–81.
33.
KanterR. M. (2001) Evolve! Succeeding in the digital culture of tomorrow. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
34.
KarlssonT.HonigB. (2009). Judging a business by its cover: An institutional perspective on new ventures and the business plan. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(1), 27–45.
35.
KostovaT.RothK. (2002). Adoption of an organizational practice by subsidiaries of multinational corporations: Institutional and relational effects. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 215–233.
36.
KostovaT.ZaheerS. (1999). Organizational legitimacy under conditions of complexity: The case of the multinational enterprise. Academy of Management Review, 24, 64–81.
37.
LawrenceT. B.SuddabyR. (2006). Institutions and institutional work. In CleggS. R.HardyC.LawrenceT. B.NordW. R. (Eds.), Handbook of organization studies (2nd edn.), (pp. 215–254). London: SAGE Publications.
38.
LawrenceT. B.SuddabyR.LecaB. (2009). Introduction: Theorizing and studying institutional work. In LawrenceB.SuddabyR.LecaB. (Eds.), Institutional work: actors and agency in institutional studies of organizations (pp. 1–27). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
39.
LawrenceTSuddabyR.LecaB. (2011). Institutional work: Refocusing institutional studies of organization, Journal of Management Inquiry, 20, 52–58.
40.
LockeK. (2001). Grounded theory in management research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
41.
LounsburyM.CrumleyE. T. (2007). New practice creation: An institutional approach to innovation. Organization Studies, 28, 993–1012.
42.
LounsburyM.GlynnM. A. (2001). Cultural entrepreneurship: Stories, legitimacy, and the acquisition of resources. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 545–564.
43.
LuJ. W.XuD. (2006) Growth and survival of international joint ventures: An external-internal legitimacy perspective. Journal of Management, 32, 426–448.
44.
MaguireS.HardyC.LawrenceT. (2004). Institutional entrepreneurship in emerging fields: HIV/AIDS treatment advocacy in Canada. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 657–679.
45.
MartensM. L. (2004). IPO effects: Corporate restructuring when a firm goes public. Journal of Public Affairs, 4, 1479–1854.
46.
MeyerJ. W.RowanB. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340–363.
47.
MeyerJ. W.ScottW.R. (1983). Organizational environments: ritual and rationality. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE Publications.
48.
MilesM. B.HubermanM. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE Publications.
PacheA.SantosF. M. (2010). Inside the hybrid organization: An organizational level of responses to conflicting institutional demands. Working Paper. INSEAD, 2010/57/EFE/ISIC/ICE.
51.
PfefferJ. (1981). Management as symbolic action: The creation and maintenance of organizational paradigms. In CummingsL. L.StawB. M. (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior (pp. 1–52). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
52.
PorterM. E. (2001). Strategy and the internet. Harvard Business Review, 79(3), 63–78.
53.
PowellW.DiMaggioP. (1991). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
54.
PrattM. G. (2000). The good, the bad, and the ambivalent: Managing identification among Amway distributors. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, 456–493.
55.
RindovaV. P.PollockT. G.HaywardM. L. (2006). Celebrity firms: The social construction of market popularity. Academy of Management Review, 31, 50–71.
56.
RuefM.ScottW. R. (1998). A multidimensional model of organizational legitimacy: Hospital survival in changing institutional environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43, 877–904.
57.
ScheinE. (1983). The role of founder in creating organizational culture. Organizational Dynamics, 12, 13–28.
58.
SchneibergM.LounsburyM. (2008). Social movements and institutional analysis. In GreenwoodR.OliverC.SahlinsK.SuddabyR. (Eds.), Handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 648–670). London: SAGE Publications.
59.
ScottW. R. (1995). Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA. SAGE Publications.
60.
ScottW. R. (2001). Institutions and organizations (2nd edn.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
61.
ScottW. R. (2008). Approaching adulthood: The maturing of institutional theory. Theory and Society, 37, 427–442.
62.
SewellW. H. (2005). Logic of history: social theory and social transformation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
63.
ShaneS.StuartT. (2002). Organizational endowments and the performance of university start-ups. Management Science, 48, 154–170.
64.
SinghJ. V.TuckerD. J.HouseR. J. (1986). Organizational legitimacy and the liability of newness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31, 171–193.
65.
StewartA. (1998). The ethnographer’s method. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
66.
StinchcombeA. L. (1965) Social structure and organizations. In MarchJ. G. (Ed.), Handbook of organizations (pp. 142–193). Chicago, IL: Rand-McNally.
67.
StraussA.CorbinJ. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE Publications.
68.
StrykerR. (1994). Rules, resources, and legitimacy processes: Some implications for social conflict, order, and change. American Journal of Sociology, 99, 847–910.
69.
SuchmanM. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20, 571–610.
SwidlerA. (1986). Culture in action: Symbols and strategies. American Sociological Review, 51, 273–286.
72.
SwidlerA. (2001). Talk of love. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
73.
TostL. T. (2011). An integrative model of legitimacy judgments. Academy of Management Review, 36, 686–710.
74.
VaaraE.MoninP. (2010). A recursive perspective on discursive legitimation and organizational action in mergers and acquisitions. Organization Science, 21, 3–22.
75.
WeberM. (1978 [1924]). Economy and society (Vols. I and II), RothG.WittichC. (Eds.). Berkeley: University of California Press.
76.
ZelditchM. (2001). Processes of legitimation: Recent developments and new directions, Social Psychology Quarterly, 64 (1), 4–17.
77.
ZelditchM.WalkerH. A. (1984). Legitimacy and the stability of authority. Advances in Group Processes, 1, 1–25.
78.
ZiderB. (1998). How venture capital works. Harvard Business Review, 76(6), 131–139.
79.
ZietsmaC.LawrenceT. B. (2010). Institutional work in the transformation of an organizational field: The interplay of boundary work and practice work. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55, 189–221.
80.
ZimmermanM. A.ZeitzG. J. (2002). Beyond survival: Achieving new venture growth by building legitimacy. Academy of Management Review, 27, 414–431.
81.
ZookM. A. (2005). The geography of the internet industry: venture capital, dot-coms, and local knowledge. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
82.
ZottC.HuyQ. N. (2007). How entrepreneurs use symbolic management to acquire resources. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52, 70–105.
83.
ZuckerL. G. (1987). Institutional theories of organization. Annual Review of Sociology, 13, 443–464.
