While the societal salience of environmental issues appears to have risen substantially in recent years, relatively little is known regarding how environmental responsiveness has evolved over time within business in general, or within particular private sector organizations. In this study we seek to address this deficit by exploring the evolving pattern of environmental strategy within a large sample of US companies over the period 1997 to 2006. Based on evolutionary theories of selection and adaptation as well as Burgelman’s strategic change processes, we characterize the pattern of evolving responses to natural environmental issues, distinguish between changes in the overall attention paid to environmental issues that are attributable to the forces of adaptation and selection, and examine the distinctive characteristics of those organizations that have exhibited the most dramatic improvements in their environmental strategy. Our findings indicate that while there is widespread inertia in respect of environmental responsiveness within our sample of companies, those companies that have achieved significant improvements in their environmental strategies do so as a result of a combination of autonomous and induced change processes. Such companies have often recently appointed a new CEO, are relatively strongly engaged in research and development, and have strong prior achievements in environmental strategy.
Ambec, S., & Lanoie, P. ( 2008). Does it pay to be green? A systematic overview. Academy of Management Perspective, November, 45-62.
2.
Ambrosini, V., & Bowman, C. ( 2009). What are dynamic capabilities and are they a useful construct in strategic management? International Journal of Management Reviews, 111, 29-49.
3.
Apte, U., Karmakar, U., & Nath, H. ( 2008). Information services in the U.S. economy: Value, job, and management implications. California Management Review , 50 (3), 12-30.
4.
Aragón-Correa, J., Hurtado-Torres, N., Sharma, S., & Garcìa-Morales, V. (2008). Environmental strategy and performance in small firms: A resource-based perspective. Journal of Environmental Management, 86, 88-103.
5.
Armenakis, A., & Bedeian, A. ( 1999). Organisational change: A review of theory and research in the 1990s. Journal of Management, 25 (3), 293-315.
6.
Audia, P., Locke, E., & Smith, K. ( 2000). The paradox of success: An archival and a laboratory study of strategic persistence following radical environmental change. Academy of Management Journal, 43 (5), 837-853.
7.
Banerjee, S. ( 2003). Who sustains whose development? Sustainable development and the reinvention of nature. Organization Studies, 24 (1), 143-180.
8.
Bansal, P. ( 2005). Evolving sustainably: A longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development. Strategic Management Journal, 26, 197-218.
9.
Bansal, P., & Clelland, I. ( 2004). Talking trash: Legitimacy, impression management, and unsystematic risk in the context of the natural environment. Academy of Management Journal, 47 (1), 93-103.
10.
Bansal, P., & Roth, K. ( 2000). Why companies go green: A model of ecological responsiveness . Academy of Management Journal, 43 (4), 717-736.
11.
Barnett, W., & Burgelman, R. ( 1996). Evolutionary perspectives on strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 5-19.
Berry, M., & Rondinelli, D. (1998). Proactive corporate environmental management: A new industrial revolution. Academy of Management Executive, 12 (2), 38-50.
14.
Boeker, W. ( 1989). Strategic change: The effects of founding and history . Academy of Management Journal, 32 (3), 489-515.
15.
Brown, S., & Eisenhardt, K. (1997). The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 1-34.
16.
Burgelman, R. ( 1991). Intraorganizational ecology of strategy making and organizational adaptation: Theory and field research. Organization Science , 2 (3), 239-262.
17.
By, R. ( 2005). Organisational change management: A critical review. Journal of Change Management, 5 (4), 369-380.
18.
Cascio, W., Young, C., & Morris, J. ( 1997). Financial consequences of employment-change decisions in major U.S. corporations. Academy of Management Journal , 40 (5), 1175-1189.
19.
Carpenter, M. ( 2002). The implications of strategy and social context for the relationship between top management team heterogeneity and firm performance . Strategic Management Journal, 23 (3), 275-284.
20.
Ceres (2010). Investors achieve record results on climate change. CERES - Investors and environmentalists for a prosperous future. Published 7 July. Available from http://www.ceres.org/Page.aspx?pid=1260 (accessed 13 July 2010 ).
21.
Child, J. ( 1997). Strategic choice in the analysis of action, structure, organizations and environment: Retrospect and prospect. Organization Studies, 18 (1), 43-76.
22.
Child, J., Lu, Y., & Tsai, T. ( 2007). Institutional entrepreneurship in building an environmental protection system for the People’s Republic of China. Organization Studies, 28 (7), 1013-1034.
23.
Cho, C., and Patten, D. ( 2007). The role of environmental disclosures as tools of legitimacy: A research note. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32 (7-8), 639-647.
24.
Christmann, P., & Taylor, G. ( 2001). Globalisation and the environment: Determinants of firm self-regulation in China. Journal of International Business Studies, 32 (3), 439-458.
25.
Clemens, B., & Douglas, T. ( 2006). Does coercion drive firms to adopt ‘voluntary’ green initiatives? Relationships among coercion, superior firm resources, and voluntary green initiatives. Journal of Business Research , 59 (4), 483-491.
26.
Coleman, H. Jr. ( 1999). What enables self-organizing behavior in businesses? Emergence, 1 (1), 33-48.
27.
Cordano, M., & Frieze, I. ( 2000). Pollution reduction preferences of U.S. environmental managers: Applying Ajzen’s theory of planned behaviour. Academy of Management Journal, 43 (4), 627-641.
28.
Crane, A. ( 2000). Corporate greening as amoralization. Organization Studies, 21 (4), 673-696.
29.
Crotty, J. ( 2006). Reshaping the hourglass? The environmental movement and civil society development in the Russian Federation. Organization Studies, 27 (9), 1319-1338.
30.
Cyert, R., & March, J. ( 1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall Inc.
31.
David, P., Bloom, M. & Hillman, A. ( 2007). Investor activism, managerial responsiveness, and corporate social performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28, 91-100
32.
Delmas, M., Russo, M., & Montes-Sancho, M. (2007). Deregulation and environmental differentiation in the electric utility industry. Strategic Management Journal, 28, 189-209.
33.
Delmas, M.A., & Toffel, M.W. ( 2004). Stakeholders and environmental management practices: An institutional framework. Business Strategy and the Environment , 13 (4), 209-222.
34.
Doh, J. ( 2009). Offshore outsourcing: Implications for international business and strategic management theory and practice. Journal of Management Studies, 42 (3), 695-704.
35.
Egri, C., & Herman, S. ( 2000). Leadership in the North American environmental sector: Values, leadership styles, and contexts of environmental leaders and their organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 43 (4), 571-604.
36.
Etzion, D. ( 2007). Research on organizations and the natural environment, 1992-present: A review. Journal of Management, 33 (4), 637-664.
37.
Fineman, S. ( 1996). Emotional subtexts in corporate greening. Organization Studies, 17 (3), 479-500.
38.
Freese, J., & Long, S. ( 2006). Regression models for categorical dependent variables using Stata. College Station: Stata Press.
39.
Hannan, M., & Freeman, J. ( 1984). Structural inertia and organizational change. American Sociological Review, 49 (2), 149-164.
40.
Hart, S., & Milstein, M. ( 2003). Creating sustainable value. Academy of Management Executive, 17 (2), 56-69.
41.
Haveman, H. ( 1992). Between a rock and a hard place: Organizational change and performance under conditions of fundamental environmental transformation . Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 48-75.
42.
Helfat, C., Finkelstein, S., Mitchell, W., Peteraf, M., Singh, H., Teece, D., & Winter, S. ( 2006). Dynamic capabilities: Understanding strategic change in organizations. New York: Blackwell .
43.
Hillman, A., & Keim, G. ( 2001). Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: What’s the bottom line?Strategic Management Journal, 22, 125-139.
44.
Hoffman, A. ( 1999). Institutional evolution and change: Environmentalism and the US chemical industry. Academy of Management Journal , 42 (4), 351-371.
45.
Huff, J., Huff, A., & Thomas, H. ( 1992). Strategic renewal and the interaction of cumulative stress and inertia. Strategic Management Journal, 13, 55-75.
46.
Johnson, R., & Greening, D. ( 1999). The effects of corporate governance and institutional ownership types on corporate social performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 564-577.
47.
Kassinis, G., & Vafeas, N. ( 2002). Corporate boards and outside stakeholders as determinants of environmental litigation. Strategic Management Journal , 23 (5), 399-415.
48.
Kassinis, G., & Vafeas, N. ( 2006). Stakeholder pressures and environmental performance. Academy of Management Journal, 49 (1), 145-159.
49.
Kauffman, S. ( 1995). Escaping the red queen effect. The McKinsey Quarterly, 1, 118-129.
50.
Kelly, D., & Amburgey, T. ( 1991). Organizational inertia and momentum: A dynamic model of strategic change. Academy of Management Journal, 34 (3), 591-612.
51.
Khanna, M., & Anton, W. ( 2002). Corporate environmental management: Regulatory and market-based incentives. Land Economics, 78 (4), 539-558.
52.
King, A. ( 2007). Cooperation between corporations and environmental groups: A transaction cost perspective. Academy of Management Review , 32 (3), 889-900.
53.
King, A., & Lenox, M. ( 2002). Exploring the locus of profitable pollution reduction . Management Science, 48 (2), 289-299.
54.
Kjærgaard, A., & Kautz, K. ( 2008). A process model of establishing knowledge management: Insights from a longitudinal field study. Omega, 36 (2), 282-297.
55.
Kolk, A., & Pinkse, J. ( 2004). Market strategies for climate change. European Management Journal, 22 (3), 304-314.
56.
Kuratko, D., Ireland, D., Covin, J., & Hornsby, J. ( 2005). A model of middle-level manager’s entrepreneurial behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 296, 699-716.
57.
Lee, S., & Rhee, S. ( 2007). The change in corporate environmental strategies: A longitudinal empirical study. Management Decision, 45 (2), 196-216.
58.
Levinthal, D. ( 1991). Organizational adaptation and environmental selection: Interrelated processes of change. Organization Science, 2 (1), 140-145.
59.
Levinthal, D. ( 1997). Adaptation on rugged landscapes. Management Science, 43 (7), 934-950.
60.
Long, S. ( 1997). Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
61.
Lovas, B., & Ghoshal, S. ( 2000). Strategy as guided evolution. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 875-896.
62.
March, J. ( 1981). Footnotes to organizational change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26, 563-577.
63.
March, J. ( 1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning . Organization Science, 2 (1), 71-87.
64.
Mattingly, J., & Berman, S. ( 2006). Measurement of corporate social action: Discovering taxonomy in the Kinder, Lydenburg and Domini ratings data. Business and Society, 45 (1), 20-46.
65.
McKay, R. ( 2001). Organizational responses to an environmental Bill of Rights. Organization Studies, 22 (4), 625-659.
66.
Meyer, A., Brooks, G., & Goes, J. ( 1990). Environmental jolts and industry revolutions: Organizational responses to discontinuous change. Strategic Management Journal , 11, 93-110.
67.
Miketa, A. ( 2001). Analysis of energy intensity developments in manufacturing sectors in industrialized and developing countries. Energy Policy, 29 (10), 769-775.
68.
Miles, R., Snow, C., Meyer, A., & Coleman, H. ( 1978). Organizational strategy, structure, and process. Academy of Management Review, July, 546-562.
69.
Miller, D., & Chen, M.-J. ( 1994). Sources and consequences of competitive inertia: A study of the US airline industry. Administrative Science Quarterly , 39, 1-23.
70.
Miller, D., & Friesen, P. ( 1984). Organizations: A quantum view. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
71.
Murrillo-Luna, J., Garcés-Ayerbe, C., & Rivera-Torres, P. (2008). Why do patterns of environmental responses differ? A stakeholders’ pressure approach. Strategic Management Journal, 29, 1225-1240.
72.
Nehrt, C. ( 1998). Maintainability of firstmover advantages when environmental regulations differ between countries. Academy of Management Review, 23, 77-97.
73.
Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F., & Rynes, S. ( 2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis . Organization Studies, 24 (3), 403-441.
74.
O’Rourke, A. ( 2003). A new politics of engagement: Shareholder activism for corporate social responsibility. Business Strategy and the Environment, 12, 227-239.
75.
Orsato, R., Den Hond, F., & Clegg, S. ( 2002). The political ecology of automobile recycling in Europe . Organization Studies, 23 (4), 639-665.
76.
Péli, G. ( 2009). Fit by founding, fit by adaptation: Reconciling conflicting organization theories with logical formalization. Academy of Management Review, 34 (2), 343-360.
77.
Porter, M., & Van der Linde, C. (1995). Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9 (4), 97-118.
78.
Rehbein, K., Waddock, S., & Graves, S. ( 2004). Understanding shareholder activism: Which corporations are targeted? Business and Society, 43 (3), 239-267.
79.
Reid, E., & Toffel, M. ( 2009).Responding to public and private politics: Corporate disclosure of climate change strategies. Strategic Management Journal , 30, 1157-1178.
80.
Rivkin, J. ( 2000). Imitation of complex strategies. Management Science, 46 (6), 824-844.
81.
Roome, N. ( 1992). Developing environmental management strategies. Business Strategy and the Environment, 1 (1), 11-24.
82.
Roome, N., & Wijen, F. ( 2006). Stakeholder power and organizational learning in corporate environmental management. Organization Studies, 27 (2), 235-263.
83.
Rueda-Manzanares, A., Aragón-Correa, J., & Sharma, S. ( 2008). The influence of stakeholders on the environmental strategy of service firms: The moderating effects of complexity, uncertainty and munificence . British Journal of Management, 19, 185-203.
84.
Russo, M., & Fouts, P. ( 1997). A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Academy of Management Journal , 40 (3), 534-560.
85.
Sharfman, M., & Fernando, C. ( 2008). Environmental risk management and the cost of capital . Strategic Management Journal, 296, 569-592.
86.
Sharma, S. ( 2000). Managerial interpretations and organisational context as predictors of corporate choice of environmental strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 43 (4), 681-697.
87.
Sharma, S., & Vredenburg, H. (1998). Proactive corporate environmental strategy and the development of competitively valuable organisational capabilities . Strategic Management Journal, 19, 729-753.
Shropshire, C., & Hillman, A. ( 2007). A longitudinal study of significant change in stakeholder management. Business and Society, 46 (1), 63-87.
90.
Sparkes, R., & Cowton, C. ( 2004). The maturing of socially responsible investment: A review of the developing link with corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 52 (1), 45-57.
91.
Thornton, D., Kagan, R., & Gunningham, N. (2003). Sources of corporate environmental performance. California Management Review, 46 (1), 127-141.
92.
Tsoukas, H., & Chia, R. ( 2002). On organizational becoming: Rethinking organizational change. Organizational Science, 13 (5), 567-582.
93.
Van de Ven, A., & Poole, M. ( 1995). Explaining development and change in organisations. Academy of Management Review, 20 (3), 510-540.
94.
Van de Ven, A., & Poole, M. ( 2005). Alternative approaches for studying organizational change . Organization Studies, 26 (9), 1377-1404.
95.
Waddock, S. ( 2003). Myths and realities of social investing. Organization and Environment, 16 (3), 369-380.
96.
Waddock, S., & Graves, S. ( 1997). The corporate social performance - financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 18 (4), 303-319.
97.
Wezel, F., & Saka-Helmhout, A. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of organizational change: ‘Institutionalizing’ the behavioral theory of the firm. Organization Studies, 27 (2), 265-286.
98.
Winn, M., & Angell, L. ( 2000). Towards a model of corporate greening. Organization Studies, 21 (6), 1119-1147.
99.
Yang, Q., Mudambi, R., & Meyer, K. ( 2008). Conventional and reverse knowledge flows in multinational corporations. Journal of Management, 345, 882-902.
