We outline the dominant, positivist approach to conceptualizing and researching organizations through multi-level research that views levels as independently existing, hierarchically nested entities, and problematize this view by offering an alternative approach based on embodied realism. We operationalize this approach through a study of three organization development workshops where organizational actors constructed artifacts we label embodied metaphors. We propose that analysis of embodied metaphors can enable access to actors' first-order conceptions of organizational levels and related organizational dimensions and reveals alternative qualities and interrelations among them; can support a clinical approach to organizations; provides a window to organizational, divisional or task identities; and poses substantial challenges to established conceptions of ontology and method in organization theory.
Albert S., and D. Whetten1985 `Organizational identity'. Research in organizational behavior. 7: 263—295.
2.
American Psychological Association1994Publication manual of the American Psychological Association, 4th edn. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Barrett, F.J., and D.L. Cooperrider1990 `Generative metaphor intervention: A new behavioral approach for working with systems divided by conflict and caught in defensive perception'. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science26: 219—239.
5.
Barry, D.1994 `Making the invisible visible: Using analogically-based methods to surface unconscious organizational processes'. Organization Development Journal12/4: 37—47.
6.
Berger P., and T. Luckmann1966The social construction of reality. London: Penguin.
7.
Black, M.1993 `More about metaphor' in Metaphor and thought , 2nd edn. A. Ortony (ed.), 19—41. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8.
Broussine, M., and R. Vince1996 `Working with metaphor towards organizational change' in Organisation development: Metaphorical explorations. C. Oswick and D. Grant (eds). 57—70. London: Pitman.
9.
Buergi, P.T., and J. Roos2003 `Images of strategy'. European Management Journal21/1: 69—78.
10.
Buergi, P., C. Jacobs, and J. Roos2005 `From metaphor to practice in the crafting of strategy '. Journal of Management Inquiry14/1: 78—94.
11.
Burke, W.W.1992 `Metaphors to consult by'. Group and Organization Management17: 255—259.
12.
Castro, S.L.2002 `Data analytic methods for the analysis of multilevel questions '. Leadership Quarterly13: 69—93.
13.
Cornelissen, J.2004 `What are we playing at? Theatre, organization and the use of metaphor'. Organization Studies25: 705—726.
14.
Cornelissen, J.2005 `Beyond compare: Metaphor in organization theory'. Academy of Management Review30: 751—764.
15.
Cornelissen, J.2006 `Organization theory: A case study of the organizational identity metaphor'. Journal of Management Studies43: 683—709.
16.
Dansereau, F., and F. Yammarino2002 `Introduction to the many faces of multi-level issues' in The Many Faces of Multi-level Issues, Research in Multilevel Issues 1: 13—19. Amsterdam: JAI Press.
17.
Dansereau, F., J. Alutto, and F. Yammarino1984Theory testing in organizational behavior: The varient approach. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
18.
Dilthey, W.1989Introduction to the human sciences. R. A. Makkreel and F. Rodi (eds). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
19.
Donaldson, L.1985In defense of organization theory: A reply to the critics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Doyle, J.R., and D. Sims2002 ` Enabling strategic metaphor in conversation: A technique of cognitive sculpting for explicating knowledge' in Mapping strategic knowledge. A. S. Huff and M. Jenkins (eds), 63—85. London: Sage.
22.
Drazin, R., M.A. Glynn, and R.K. Kazanjian1999 `Multilevel theorizing about creativity in organizations: A sensemaking perspective'. Academy of Management Review24: 286—307.
23.
Dukerich, J., B. Golden, and S. Shortell2002 `Beauty is in the eye of the beholder: The impact of organizational identification, identity, and image on the cooperative behaviors of physicians '. Administrative Science Quarterly47: 507—533.
24.
Eysenck. M.W.1993Principles of cognitive psychology. Hove: Erlbaum.
25.
Fiol, C.M.2001 `Revisiting an identity-based view of sustainable competitive advantage'. Journal of Management27: 691—700.
26.
Forceville, Charles2006 `Non-verbal and multimodal metaphor in a cognitivist framework: Agendas for research' in Cognitive linguistics: Current applications and future perspectives. G. Kristiansen, M. Achard, R. Dirven and F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza, (eds), 379—402. Berlin/ New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
27.
Foreman, P., and D. Whetten2002 `Members' identification with multiple-identity organizations '. Organization Science13: 618—635.
28.
Gergen, K.1999An invitation to social construction. Beverly Hills: Sage.
29.
Gibbs, R.W.1999 `Researching metaphor'. in Researching and applying metaphorCameron, L. and Low, G. (eds): 28—47. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
30.
Gibbs, R.W.2003 `Embodied experience and linguistic meaning'. Brain andLanguage84: 1—15.
31.
Gioia, D., M. Schultz, and K. Corley2000 `Organizational identity, image and adaptive instability '. Academy of Management Review25: 63—81.
32.
Heath, C., and J. Hindmarsh2002 `Analysing interaction: Video, ethnography and situated conduct'. In Qualitative Research in Action. May, T. (ed) 99—121. London: Sage.
33.
Heritage, J.1984Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge : Polity.
34.
Hoffman, D.A.1997 `An overview of the logic and rationale of hierarchical linear models'. Journal of Management23: 723—744.
Jacobs, C., and L. Heracleous2006 `Constructing shared understanding: The role of embodied metaphor in organization development'. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science42/2: 207—226.
37.
Johnson, M.1987The body in the mind: the bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
38.
Johnson, M., and G. Lakoff2002 `Why cognitive linguistics requires embodied realism'. Cognitive Linguistics13/3: 245—263.
39.
Klein, K.J., and S.W.J. Kozlowski2000 `From micro to meso: Critical steps in conceptualizing and conducting multilevel research'. Organizational Research Methods3: 211—236.
40.
Klein, K.J., H. Tosi, and A. Cannella, 1999 `Multilevel theory building: Benefits, barriers,and new developments'. Academy of Management Review24: 243—248.
41.
Kline, R.B.1998Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York/London: Guilford Press .
42.
Lakoff, G.1990 `The invariance hypothesis: Is abstract reason based on image schemas?' Cognitive Linguistics1: 39—74.
43.
Lakoff, G.1993 ` The contemporary theory of metaphor' in Metaphor and thought . A. Ortonty (ed.), 202—251. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
44.
Lakoff, G., and M. Johnson1980Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
45.
Lakoff, G., and M. Johnson1999Philosophy in the Flesh. New York: Basic Books.
46.
Marshak, R.1993 `Managing the metaphors of change'. Organizational Dynamics22/1: 44—56.
47.
Merleau-Ponty, M.1962Phenomenology of perception. New York : Routledge.
48.
Miles, M., and A. Huberman1994Qualitative data analysis, 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
49.
Morgan, G.1980 `Paradigms, metaphor and puzzle solving in organization theory'. Administrative Science Quarterly25: 660—671.
50.
Morgan, G.1983. `More on metaphor: Why we cannot control tropes in administrative science'. Administrative Science Quarterly28: 601—607.
51.
Morgan, G.1986Images of organization. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
52.
Morgan, G.1996 `An afterword: Is there anything more to be said about metaphor?' in Metaphor and organization. D. Grant and C. Oswick (eds), 227—240. London: Sage.
53.
Morgeson, F.P., and D.A. Hofmann1999 `The structure and function of collective constructs: Implications for multilevel research and theory development'. Academy of Management Review24: 249—265.
54.
Mossholder, K.W., and A.G. Bedeian1983 `Cross-level inference and organizational research: Perspectives on interpretation and application'. Academy of Management Review8: 547—558.
55.
Oswick, C., T. Keenoy, and D. Grant2002 `Metaphorical and analogical reasoning in organization theory: Beyond orthodoxy'. Academy of Management Review27: 294—303.
56.
Oswick, C., L. Putnam, and T. Keenoy2004 `Tropes, discourse and organizing' in Sage handbook of organizational discourse. D. Grant, C. Hardy, C. Oswick and L. Putnam (eds), 105—127. London: Sage.
57.
Palmer, I., and R. Dunford1996 `Conflicting uses of metaphors: Reconceptualizing their use in the field of organizational change'. Academy of Management Review21: 691—717.
58.
Pfeffer, J.1993 `Barriers to the advance of organizational science: Paradigm development as independent variable'. Academy of Management Review18: 599—620.
59.
Pinder, C.C., and V.W. Bourgeois1982 `Controlling tropes in administrative science'. Administrative Science Quarterly27: 641—652.
60.
Pratt, M., and A. Rafaeli1997 `Organizational dress as a symbol of multilayered social identities'. Academy of Management Journal40: 862—898.
61.
Rakova, M.2002 `The philosophy of embodied realism: A high price to pay? ' Cognitive Linguistics13: 215—244.
62.
Rohrer, T.2007 `The body in space: Embodiment, experientialism and linguistic conceptualization' in Body, language and mind, Vol. 1. T. Ziemke, J. Zlatev and R. Frank (eds). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter .
63.
Roos, J., B. Victor, and M.Statler2004 `Playing seriously with strategy'. Long Range Planning37/6: 549—568.
64.
Rousseau, D.M.1985 `Issues of level in organizational research: Multi-level and cross-level perspectives'. Research in Organizational Behavior7: 1—37.
65.
Rousseau, D.M., and R.J. House1994 `Meso organizational behavior: Avoiding three fundamental biases'. Journal of Organizational Behavior1: 13—30.
66.
Rousseau, D.M., S.B. Sitkin, R.S. Burt, and C. Camerer1998 `Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust'. Academy of Management Review23: 393—404.
67.
Schon, D.1993 ` Generative metaphor: A perspective on problem-setting in social policy' in Metaphor and thought, 2nd edn. A. Ortony (ed.), 137—163. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
68.
Stake, R.E.1995The art of case research. London: Sage.
69.
Staw, B.M., L.E. Sandelands, and J.E. Dutton1981 `Threat-rigidity effects in organizational behavior: A multilevel analysis'. Administrative Science Quarterly26: 501—524.
70.
Tsoukas, H.1991 `The missing link: A transformational view of metaphors in organizational science'. Academy of Management Review16: 566—585.
71.
Tsoukas, H.1993 `Analogical reasoning and knowledge generation in organization theory'. Organization Studies14: 323—346.
72.
Waldman, D.A., and F.J. Yammarino1999 `CEO charismatic leadership: Levels-of-management and levels-of-analysis effects'. Academy of Management Review24: 266—285.
73.
Weber, M.1991 `The nature of social action' in Weber: Selections in translation. W. G. Runciman (ed.), 7—32. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
74.
Wittgenstein, L.1955Tractatus logico-philosophicus. London : Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Yammarino, F.J.1998 `Multivariate aspects of the varient/WABA approach: Leadership illustrations'. Leadership Quarterly9: 203—227.
77.
Yammarino, F.J., and F. Dansereau2004Multi-level issues in organizational behavior and processes . Amsterdam; London: ElsevierJAI.
78.
Yammarino, F.J., A.J. Dubinsky, L.B.Comer, and M.A. Jolson1997 `Women and leadership: A multiple levels of analysis perspective '. Academy of Management Journal40: 205—222.
79.
Yin, R.1994Case study research: Design and methods, 2nd edn. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
