The benefits and drawbacks of diversity inside organizations have been the focus of attention for researchers and practitioners for several decades. In our article, we investigate the business case for racial diversity across different hierarchical levels. More precisely, we ask: How does racial diversity within organizations and its asymmetry across hierarchical levels affect their financial performance? From a sample of 143 US law firms from 2008 to 2012, we provide strong support for the business case and show that greater racial diversity for the entire organization is positively associated with firm financial performance. However, contrary to our initial expectations, the benefits of diversity are not more pronounced at the top of the organization, where its effects should arguably be more clearly observable. Diversity seems to have a similar effect across the three levels in law firms: associates, mid-level and partners. Furthermore, we find that the most profitable firms actually have their racial diversity heavily concentrated at the associate level. We discuss alternative explanations for this surprising finding and why the top-performing law firms have both overall higher degree of racial diversity and more concentration of its diversity at the lower level.
AhernKRDittmarAK (2012) The changing of the boards: The impact on firm valuation of mandated female board representation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics127(1): 137–197.
2.
AldrichHEFiolCM (1994) Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation. Academy of Management Review19(4): 645–670.
3.
AnconaDGCaldwellDF (1992) Bridging the boundary: External activity and performance in organizational teams. Administrative Science Quarterly37(4): 634–665.
4.
AndrevskiGRichardOCShawJDFerrierWJ (2014) Racial diversity and firm performance: The mediating role of competitive intensity. Journal of Management40(3): 820–844.
5.
AshleyLEmpsonL (2013) Differentiation and discrimination: Understanding social class and social exclusion in leading law firms. Human Relations66(2): 219–244.
6.
BantelKAJacksonSE (1989) Top management and innovations in banking: Does the composition of the top team make a difference?Strategic Management Journal10(S1): 107–124.
7.
BarkerPMonksKBuckleyF (1999) The role of mentoring in the career progression of chartered accountants. The British Accounting Review31(3): 297–312.
8.
BarneyJ (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management17(1): 99–120.
9.
BartelCA (2001) Social comparisons in boundary-spanning work: Effects of community outreach on members’ organizational identity and identification. Administrative Science Quarterly46(3): 379–413.
10.
BerronePGelabertLMassa-SaluzzoFRousseauHE (2016) Understanding community dynamics in the study of grand challenges: How nonprofits, institutional actors, and the community fabric interact to influence income inequality. Academy of Management Journal59(6): 1940–1964.
11.
BlauPM (1977) Inequality and Heterogeneity: A Primitive Theory of Social Structure. New York: Free Press.
12.
BrewerMB (1979) In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. Psychological Bulletin86(2): 307–324.
13.
BrewerMBWeberJG (1994) Self-evaluation effects of interpersonal versus intergroup social comparison. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology66(2): 268–275.
14.
BrodbeckFCGuillaumeYRLeeNJ (2011) Ethnic diversity as a multilevel construct: The combined effects of dissimilarity, group diversity, and societal status on learning performance in work groups. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology42(7): 1198–1218.
15.
ByrneDE (1971) The Attraction Paradigm. New York: Academic Press.
16.
CertoSTLesterRHDaltonCMDaltonDR (2006) Top management teams, strategy and financial performance: A meta-analytic examination. Journal of Management Studies43(4): 813–839.
17.
CoxTHBlakeS (1991) Managing cultural diversity: Implications for organizational competitiveness. The Executive5(3): 45–56.
18.
De DreuCKWestMA (2001) Minority dissent and team innovation: The importance of participation in decision making. Journal of Applied Psychology86(6): 1191–1201.
19.
DickensL (1999) Beyond the business case: A three-pronged approach to equality action. Human Resource Management Journal9(1): 9–19.
20.
DickensL (2000) Still wasting resources? Equality in employment. Personnel Management3: 137–169.
21.
ElfenbeinHAO’ReillyCA (2007) Fitting in: The effects of relational demography and person-culture fit on group process and performance. Group & Organization Management32(1): 109–142.
22.
HarrisonDAKleinKJ (2007) What’s the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Academy of Management Review32(4): 1199–1228.
23.
HittMABiermanLShimizuKKochharR (2001) Direct and moderating effects of human capital on strategy and performance in professional service firms: A resource-based perspective. Academy of Management Journal44(1): 13–28.
24.
HittMABiermanLUhlenbruckKShimizuK (2006) The importance of resources in the internationalization of professional service firms: The good, the bad, and the ugly. Academy of Management Journal49(6): 1137–1157.
25.
HorwitzSKHorwitzIB (2007) The effects of team diversity on team outcomes: A meta-analytic review of team demography. Journal of Management33(6): 987–1015.
26.
JonsenKTatliAÖzbilginMFBellMP (2013) The tragedy of the uncommons: Reframing workforce diversity. Human Relations66(2): 271–294.
27.
JoshiARohH (2009) The role of context in work team diversity research: A meta-analytic review. Academy of Management Journal52(3): 599–627.
28.
JoshiALiaoHRohH (2011) Bridging domains in workplace demography research: A review and reconceptualization. Journal of Management37(2): 521–552.
29.
JulianSDOfori-DankwaJC (2017) Context matters: Diversity’s short- and long-term effects in fortune’s ‘best companies to work for’. Strategic Management Journal38(7): 1557–1565.
30.
KerrSPKerrWR (2011) Economic impacts of immigration: A survey. NBER Working Paper No. 16736. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
31.
KerrWR (2013) US high-skilled immigration, innovation, and entrepreneurship: Empirical approaches and evidence. NBER Working Paper No. 19377. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
32.
KochanTBezrukovaKElyR, et al. (2003) The effects of diversity on business performance: Report of the diversity research network. Human Resource Management42(1): 3–21.
33.
LevineSSApfelbaumEPBernardM, et al. (2014) Ethnic diversity deflates price bubbles. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences111(52): 18524–18529.
34.
McGinnKLMilkmanKL (2013) Looking up and looking out: Career mobility effects of demographic similarity among professionals. Organization Science24(4): 1041–1060.
35.
MaelFAshforthBE (1992) Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior13(2): 103–123.
36.
MayoM (1999) Capitalizing on a diverse workforce. Ivey Business Journal64(1): 20–26.
37.
MayoMKakarikaMMainemelisCDeuschelNT (2017) A metatheoretical framework of diversity in teams. Human Relations70(8): 911–939.
38.
MillerTdel Carmen TrianaM (2009) Demographic diversity in the boardroom: Mediators of the board diversity–firm performance relationship. Journal of Management Studies46(5): 755–786.
39.
NathanM (2014) The wider economic impacts of high-skilled migrants: A survey of the literature for receiving countries. IZA Journal of Migration3(1): 4. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-9039-3-4.
40.
NathanM (2015) After Florida: Towards an economics of diversity. European Urban and Regional Studies22(1): 3–19.
41.
NathanM (2016) Ethnic diversity, business performance and location: Which firms? Which cities?Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space48(2): 2462–2483.
42.
NoonM (2007) The fatal flaws of diversity and the business case for ethnic minorities. Work, Employment and Society21(4): 773–784.
43.
OmiMWinantH (2015) Racial Formation in the United States. New York and Abingdon: Routledge.
44.
PageS (2007) The Difference: How the Power of Diversity Creates Better Groups, Firms, Schools, and Societies. Princeton, NJ and Woodstock: Princeton University Press.
45.
PelledLH (1996) Demographic diversity, conflict, and work group outcomes: An intervening process theory. Organization Science7(6): 615–631.
46.
PeriGSparberC (2011) Highly educated immigrants and native occupational choice. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society50(3): 385–411.
47.
PolzerJTMiltonLPSwannWB (2002) Capitalizing on diversity: Interpersonal congruence in small work groups. Administrative Science Quarterly47(2): 296–324.
48.
RichardOMcMillanAChadwickKDwyerS (2003) Employing an innovation strategy in racially diverse workforces: Effects on firm performance. Group & Organization Management28(1): 107–126.
49.
RichardOC (2000) Racial diversity, business strategy, and firm performance: A resource-based view. Academy of Management Journal43(2): 164–177.
50.
RichardOCMurthiBPIsmailK (2007) The impact of racial diversity on intermediate and long-term performance: The moderating role of environmental context. Strategic Management Journal28(12): 1213–1233.
51.
RothKO’DonnellS (1996) Foreign subsidiary compensation strategy: An agency theory perspective. Academy of Management Journal39(3): 678–703.
52.
SchneiderBHallDTNygrenHT (1971) Self image and job characteristics as correlates of changing organizational identification. Human Relations24(5): 397–416.
53.
SemadeniMWithersMCCertoST (2014) The perils of endogeneity and instrumental variables in strategy research: Understanding through simulations. Strategic Management Journal35(7): 1070–1079.
54.
SrikanthKHarveySPetersonR (2016) A dynamic perspective on diverse teams: Moving from the dual-process model to a dynamic coordination-based model of diverse team performance. The Academy of Management Annals10(1): 453–493.
55.
TajfelHTurnerJC (2004) The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In: JostJTSidaniusJ (eds) Key Readings in Social Psychology: Political Psychology. New York and Hove: Psychology Press, 276–293.
56.
van DickRvan KnippenbergDHägeleS, et al. (2008) Group diversity and group identification: The moderating role of diversity beliefs. Human Relations61(10): 1463–1492.
57.
van KnippenbergDSchippersMC (2007) Work group diversity. Annual Review of Psychology58: 515–541.
58.
VinnicombeSDoldorESealyR (2018) The female FTSE board report: Busy going nowhere with the female executive pipeline. University of Cranfield, UK.
59.
WilkinsDB (2007) Your people. In: EmpsonL (ed.) Managing the Modern Law Firm: New Challenges, New Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 37–63.
60.
WooldridgeJM (2002) Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach. Mason, OH: South Western Educational Publishing.
