In Ecuador, the recent introduction of mineral mining led to a conflictive debate on mining and development, particularly the concept of Buen Vivir (good living). This article examines the discourses on the mining–development nexus articulated in the conflict around the first large-scale mine of Ecuador, El Mirador. The findings indicate that although the conflict concerns tangible territorial transformations, it is also a struggle over meanings. In this struggle, Buen Vivir has become subject to strategic framing processes and eventually turned into an empty signifier. The case of El Mirador illustrates the challenges of advancing Buen Vivir from concept to practice in the context of a search for a post-neoliberal development framework.
AcostaA. (2012). El Buen Vivir en el camino del post-desarrollo: Una lectura desde la Constitución de Montecristi(The good living (together), an utopia to (re)construct: scope of the Constitution of Montecristi) (Working Paper No. 9.). Friedrich Ebertheim Stiftung, Quito. Retrieved November12, 2012, from http://cadtm.org/IMG/pdf/El_Buen_Vivir_en_el_camino_del_post-desarrollo-_Una_lectura_desde_la_Constitucion_de_Montecristi.pdf
2.
AcostaA. (2011). El Buen (con) Vivir, una utopía por (re) construir: Alcances de la Constitución de Montecristi. (The good living towards post-development: a view from the Constitution of Montecristi.)Otra Economía, 4(6), 8–31.
3.
Arias BenavidesH. (2004). Zamora de Ayer y de Hoy (Zamora’s past and present.) (2nd ed.). Zamora: Consejo Provincial de Zamora Chinchipe.
4.
ArselM. (2012). Between “Marx and markets”? The state, the “left turn”and nature in Ecuador. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, 103(2), 150–163.
5.
BáezM., & SacherW. (2014). Los discursos del Buen Vivir y el sumak kawsay, y la minería metálica a gran escala en Ecuador: Rupturas y continuidades con el modelo de desarrollo. (The discourses of Buen Vivir, Sumak Kawsay and large-scale metal mining in Ecuador: ruptures and continuities) In RamosG. C. Delgado (Ed.), Buena Vida, Buen Vivir: Imaginarios Alternativos Para El Bien Común de La Humanidad, (pp. 233–276). México DF: UNAM, Centro de Investigaciones Interdisciplinarias en Ciencias y Humanidades.
6.
BebbingtonA. (2009a). Latin America: Contesting extraction, producing geographies. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, 30(1), 7–12.
7.
BebbingtonA. (2009b). The new extraction: Rewriting the political ecology of the Andes. NACLA Report on the Americas, 42(5), 12–20.
8.
BebbingtonA. (2014). Governing natural resources for inclusive development. In HickeyS., SenK., & BukenyaB. (Eds.), The politics of inclusive development: Interrogating the evidence (pp. 86–115). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9.
BebbingtonA., & BuryJ. (2013). Political ecologies of the subsoil. In BebbingtonA. & BuryJ. T. (Eds.), Subterranean struggles: New dynamics of mining, oil, and gas in Latin America (pp. 1–26). Austin, Texas: University of Texas Press.
10.
BebbingtonA., HinojosaL., HumphreysBebbington, D., BurneoM. L., & WarnaarsX. (2008). Contention and ambiguity: Mining and the possibilities of development. Development and Change, 39(6), 887–914.
11.
BebbingtonA., HumphreysBebbington, D. H., HinojosaL., BurneoM. L., & BuryJ. (2013). Anatomies of conflict: Social mobilizations and new political ecologies of the Andes. In BebbingtonA. & BuryJ. T. (Eds.), Subterranean struggles: New dynamics of mining, oil, and gas in Latin America (pp. 241–266). Austin, Texas: University of Texas Press.
12.
BeckerM. (2013). The stormy relations between Rafael Correa and social movements in Ecuador. Latin American Perspectives, 40(3), 43–62.
13.
BenfordR. D., & SnowD. A. (2000). Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 611–639.
14.
BoelensR. (2008). The rules of the game and the game of the rules: Normalization and resistance in Andean water control. Wageningen: Wageningen University and Research.
15.
BöhmS., & BreiV. (2008). Marketing the hegemony of development: Of pulp fictions and green deserts. Marketing Theory, 8(4), 339–366.
16.
BrétonV. (2013). Etnicidad, desarrollo y’Buen Vivir’: Reflexiones críticas en perspectiva histórica. (Ethnicity, Development and the ‘Good Life’: Critical Reflections within a Historical Perspective)European Review of Latin American and Caribbean Studies/Revista Europea De Estudios Latinoamericanos Y Del Caribe, 95, 71–95.
17.
BretónV., CortezD., & GarcíaF. (2014). En busca del sumak kawsay: Presentación del dossier (In search of sumak kawsay : introduction to the dossier). Iconos, 48, 9–24.
18.
BryantR. L. (1997). Beyond the impasse: The power of political ecology in Third World environmental research. Area, 29(1), 5–19.
19.
BuchananK. S. (2013). Contested discourses, knowledge, and socio- environmental conflict in Ecuador. Environmental Science & Policy, 30, 19–25.
20.
BurchardtH.-J., & DietzK. (2014). (Neo-)extractivism—a new challenge for development theory from Latin America. Third World Quarterly, 35(3), 468–486.
21.
BuryJ., & BebbingtonA. (2013). New geographies of extractive industries in Latin America. In BebbingtonA. & BuryJ. (Eds.), Subterranean struggles: New dynamics of mining, oil, and gas in Latin America (pp. 27–66). Austin, Texas: University of Texas Press.
22.
CEDHU & FIDH. (2010). Intervención minera a gran escala en Ecuador y vulneración de derechos humanos: Caso Corriente Resources (Large-scale mining in Ecuador and human rights abuses. The Case of Corriente Resources Inc.). Quito: Comisión Ecuménica de Derechos Humanos and Federación Internacional de Derechos Humanos.
23.
ChicaizaG. (2009). Vigencia y garantía de los derechos colectivos y ambientales en el Ecuador 2009: Repercusiones de la aprobación de la Ley de Minería (Validity and guarantee of collective rights and rights of nature in Ecuador 2009: repercussions of the approval of the Mining Law.). In OrtizQ. (Ed.), Estado Constitucional de Derechos? Informe Sobre Derechos Humanos Ecuador, Programa Andino de Derechos Humanos (pp. 163–180). Quito: Abya Yala.
24.
ChicaizaG. (2014). Mineras Chinas en Ecuador: Nueva dependencia. (Chinese miners in Ecuador: a new dependency) Quito: Acción Ecológica.
25.
ConaghanC. M. (2011). Ecuador: Rafael Correa and the citizens’ revolution. In LevitskyS. & RobertsK. M. (Eds.), The resurgence of the Latin American left (pp. 260–283). Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
26.
CortezD. (2011). La construcción social del “Buen Vivir” (Sumak Kawsay) en Ecuador (The social construction of the Good Living (Sumak Kawsay) in Ecuador.). Aportes Andinos, 28, 1–23.
27.
de CastroF., HogenboomB., & BaudM. (2016). Introduction: Environment and society in contemporary Latin America. In de CastroF., HogenboomB., & BaudM. (Eds.), Environmental governance in Latin America (pp. 1–25). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
28.
Delgado RamosG. C. (Ed.). (2014). Buena vida, buen vivir: imaginarios alter- nativos para el bien común de la humanidad, Colección debate y reflexión (Good life, good living. Alternative imaginaries for humanity’s common wellbeing.). México DF: UNAM, Centro de Investigaciones Interdisciplinarias en Ciencias y Humanidades.
29.
DoshP., & KligermanN. (2009). Correa vs. social movements: Showdown in Ecuador. NACLA Report on the Americas, 42(5), 21–24.
30.
EguigurenM., & JimenezA. (2011). Los conflictos sociales en el Ecuador: Análisis del Caso “Mirador” Cantón del Pangui (Social conflicts in Ecuador: analysis of the Mirador case in El Pangui canton.). Cognitio Juris, 2(1), 114–127.
31.
EscobarA. (2010). Latin America at a crossroads: Alternative modernizations, post-liberalism, or post-development?Cultural Studies, 24(1), 1–65.
32.
EscobarA. (2011). Encountering development: The making and unmaking of the Third World. Princeton, NJ.: Princeton University Press.
33.
FernándezB. S., PardoL., & SalamancaK. (2014). El buen vivir en Ecuador: ¿marketing político o proyecto en disputa? Un diálogo con Alberto Acosta (The good living in Ecuador: political marketing or a disputed project? A dialogue with Alberto Acosta.). Iconos, 48, 101–117.
34.
GaleanoE. (1973). Open veins of Latin America: Five centuries of the pillage of a continent. New York: Monthly Review Press.
35.
GallagherK. P., KoleskiK., & IrwinA. (2012). The new banks in town: Chinese finance in Latin America. Washington, DC: Inter-American Dialogue.
36.
GudynasE. (2009). La dimensión ecológica del Buen Vivir: Entre el fantasma de la modernidad y el desafío biocéntrico (The ecological dimension of Living Well: between the spectre of modernism and the biocentric challenge.). OBETS, 4, 49–53.
GudynasE. (2011b). Alcances y contenidos de las transiciones al post-extractivismo (Scope and content of the transitions towards post-extractivism.). Ecuador Debate, 82, 60–79.
39.
GudynasE. (2011c). Buen Vivir: Germinando alternativas al desarrollo (Buen Vivir: germinating alternatives to development). América Latina en movimiento, 462(4), 1–20.
40.
HaarstadH., & FløysandA. (2007). Globalization and the power of rescaled narratives: A case of opposition to mining in Tambogrande, Peru. Political Geography, 26(3), 289–308.
41.
HajerM., & VersteegW. (2005). A decade of discourse analysis of environmental politics: Achievements, challenges, perspectives. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 7(3), 175–184.
42.
HarcourtW. (2011). Editorial: Making the non-business case for development. Development, 54(4), 429–432.
43.
HimleyM. (2008). Geographies of environmental governance: The nexus of nature and neoliberalism. Geography Compass, 2(2), 433–451.
44.
HogenboomB. (2012). Depoliticized and repoliticized minerals in Latin America. Journal of Developing Societies, 28(2), 133–158.
45.
HoutartF. (2011). El concepto del Sumak Kawsay (Buen Vivir) y su correspondencia con el bien común de la humanidad (The concept of Sumak Kawsay (the good living) and its correspondence with humanity’s common wellbeing.). Ecuador Debate, 84, 57–76.
46.
Hoy. (2012, March5). Hoy se firma el primer contrato a gran escala. Retrieved October18, 2015, from https://issuu.com/hoycomec/docs/dn_05_marzo_2012_
47.
Humphreys BebbingtonD., & BebbingtonA. (2012). Post-what? Extractive industries, narratives of development and socio-environmental disputes across the (ostensibly changing) Andean Region. In HaarstadH. (Ed.), New political spaces in Latin American natural resource governance (pp. 17–38). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
48.
LiT. M. (1996). Images of community: Discourse and strategy in property relations. Development and Change, 27(3), 501–527.
49.
LongN. (2007). Resistance, agency, and counterwork: A theoretical positioning. In WrightW. & MiddendorfG. (Eds.), The fight over food. producers, consumers and activists challenge the global food system (pp. 69–92). University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
50.
LópezA., & Cubillos CelisP. (2009). Análisis del Referéndum Constitucional 2008 en Ecuador (Analysis of the 2008 constitutional referendum in Ecuador.). Iconos, 33, 13–20.
51.
MaresD. (2011). Resource nationalism and energy security in Latin America: Implications for global supplies, Latin American energy dialogue. James A. Baker III Institute for Public Policy, Rice University, Albuquerque. Retrieved March13, 2013, from https://repository.unm.edu/handle/1928/20538
52.
Martinez-AlierJ. (2001). Mining conflicts, environmental justice, and valuation. Journal of Hazardous Materials, Risk and Governance, 86(1–3), 153–170.
53.
MelsT. (2009). Analysing environmental discourses and representations. In CastreeN., DemerittD., LivermanD., & RhoadsB. (Eds.), A companion to environmental geography (pp. 385–399). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
54.
Ministerio de Recursos Naturales No Renovables. (2011). Plan Nacional de Desarollo del Sector Minero 2011–2015 (National plan for the development of the mining sector, 2011-2015). Quito: Ministerio de Recursos Naturales No Renovables.
55.
MooreJ., & VelásquezT. (2012). Sovereignty negotiated: Anti-mining movements, the state and multinational mining companies under Correa’s “21st century socialism.” In BebbingtonA. (Ed.), Social conflict, economic development and extractive industry: Evidence from South America (pp. 112–133). Oxon, UK: Routledge.
56.
MooreJ., & VelásquezT. (2013). Water for gold: Confrontating state and corporation discourses in Azuay, Ecuador. In BebbingtonA. & BuryJ. T. (Eds.), Subterranean struggles: New dynamics of mining, oil, and gas in Latin America (pp. 119–148). Austin, Texas: University of Texas Press.
57.
MuradianR., Martinez-AlierJ., & CorreaH. (2003). International capital versus local population: The environmental conflict of the Tambogrande mining project, Peru. Society & Natural Resources, 16(9), 775–792.
58.
NeumannR. P. (2005). Making political ecology. New York: Routledge.
59.
PerreaultT. (2013). Nature and nation: Hydrocarbons, governance and the territorial logics of “resource nationalism.” In BebbingtonA. & BuryJ. T. (Eds.), Subterranean struggles: New dynamics of mining, oil, and gas in Latin America (pp. 67–90). Austin, Texas: University of Texas Press.
60.
RadcliffeS. A. (2012). Development for a postneoliberal era? Sumak kawsay, living well and the limits to decolonisation in Ecuador. Geoforum, 43(2), 240–249.
61.
RobbinsP. (2012). Political ecology: A critical introduction (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
62.
SawyerS. (2004). Crude chronicles: Indigenous politics, multinational oil, and neoliberalism in Ecuador. Durham, NC : Duke University Press.
63.
SENPLADES. (2013). Plan Nacional para el Buen Vivir 2013–2017 (National Plan for Good Living 2013–2017.). Quito: Secretaría Nacional de Planificación y Desarrollo.
64.
SENPLADES. (2009). Plan Nacional del Desarrollo: Plan Nacional para el Buen Vivir 2009–2013 (National Development Plan: National Plan for Good Living 2009–2013, Building a Plurinational and Intercultural State.). Quito: Secretaría Nacional de Planificación y Desarrollo.
65.
SvampaM. (2013). “Consenso de los Commodities” y lenguajes de valoración en América Latina (The commodity consensus and valuation languages in Latin America.). Nueva Sociedad, 244, 30–46.
UrkidiL. (2010). A glocal environmental movement against gold mining: Pascua–Lama in Chile. Ecological Economics, 70(2), 219–227.
68.
UrkidiL., & WalterM. (2011). Dimensions of environmental justice in anti-gold mining movements in Latin America. Geoforum, 42(6), 683–695.
69.
Van den HomberghH. (2004). No stone unturned: Building blocks of environmentalist power versus transnational industrial forestry in Costa Rica. Amsterdam: Dutch University Press.
70.
VanhulstJ. (2015). El laberinto de los discursos del Buen vivir: entre Sumak Kawsay y Socialismo del siglo XXI (The labyrinth of discourses about Buen Vivir: between Sumak Kawsayand Socialism of the XXI century.). Polis, 40, 1–20.
71.
VanhulstJ., & BelingA. E. (2013). Buen vivir: la irrupción de América Latina en el campo gravitacional del desarrollo sostenible (The good living: the irruption of Latin America in the gravitational field of sustainable development.). Revista Iberoamericana de Economía Ecológica, 21, 1–14.
72.
VillalbaU. (2013). Buen Vivir vs Development: A paradigm shift in the Andes?Third World Quarterly, 34(8), 1427–1442.
73.
WalshC. (2010). Development as Buen Vivir: Institutional arrangements and (de)colonial entanglements. Development, 53(1), 15–21.
74.
WarnaarsX. (2012). Why be poor when we can be rich? Constructing responsible mining in El Pangui, Ecuador. Resources Policy, 37, 223–232.
75.
WarnaarsX. (2013). Territorial transformation in El Pangui, Ecuador: Understanding how mining conflict affects territorial dynamics, social mobilization and daily life. In BebbingtonA. & BuryJ. T. (Eds.), Subterranean struggles: New dynamics of mining, oil, and gas in Latin America (pp. 149–171). Austin, Texas: University of Texas Press.
76.
WattsM., & PeetR. (1996). Liberating political ecology. In PeetR. & WattsM. (Eds.), Liberation ecologies: Environment, development, social movements (pp. 3–24). New York: Routledge.
77.
WhitmoreA. (2006). The emperor’s new clothes: Sustainable mining?Journal of Cleaner Production, 14(3–4), 309–314.
78.
WinkelG. (2012). Foucault in the forests—A review of the use of “Foucauldian”concepts in forest policy analysis. Forest Policy and Economics, 16, 81–92.
