Research methodology knowledge helps postgraduate students to address societal issues skillfully. This study reviewed 338 PhD and master’s theses and dissertations in library and information science from the institutional repositories of two universities in Tanzania and South Africa. Through a bibliometric research design, the study identified the research methods employed by a cohort of postgraduate students from 2012 to 2022, aiming to understand the problems they addressed and the research methods they chose to investigate their research objectives. The findings revealed that students did not fully understand the philosophical assumptions that underpin the selected research approach. Postgraduate studies from South Africa were predominantly qualitative, whereas Tanzanian studies preferred a mixed methods approach. Case studies and surveys were the common research designs at both institutions. Training in research methodology, particularly in research paradigms, theoretical and conceptual frameworks, required further improvement. This would help students justify their research strategies more thoroughly. The study further recommends collaborative research methodology training for students and supervisors to strengthen library and information science research outputs in this region. These recommendations, if implemented, hold the potential to significantly enhance the quality and impact of future research in library and information science.
AdamsJ.KhanH. T. A.RaesideR. (2014). Research methods for business and social science students (2nd ed.). Sage.
2.
AniO. E.OkwuezeE. (2017). Bibliometric analysis of publications in Nigerian libraries: 2005–2014. International Journal of Management and Fuzzy Systems, 3(4), 52–56.
3.
BrymanA.BellE. (2019). Social research methods (5th Canadian ed.). Oxford University Press.
4.
ChuH. (2015). Research methods in library and information science: A content analysis. Library & Information Science Research, 37(1), 36–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2014.09.003
ClarkT. (2022). Methodological becoming: Doctoral students perceptions of their methodological journeys. Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education, 13(1), 36–53. https://doi.org/10.1108/sgpe-12-2020-0076
7.
ConnawayL. S.FanielI. M.NarayanB.Sayyed-AbdiE. (2019). There is a method to it: Making meaning in information research through a mix of paradigms and methods. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 56(1), 521–524. https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.80
8.
CreswellJ. W.CreswellD. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage.
9.
DanielB. (2022). The role of research methodology in enhancing postgraduate students research experience. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 20(1), 34–48. https://doi.org/10.34190/ejbrm.20.1.2253
10.
DanielE.KumarV.OmarN. (2018). Postgraduate conception of research methodology: Implications for learning and teaching. International Journal of Research and Method in Education, 41(2), 220–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727x.2017.1283397
11.
DoraM.KumarH. A. (2019). National and international trends in library and information science research: A comparative review of the literature. International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions, 46(4), 1–16.
12.
EliaE.Ndenje-SichalweE. (2022). Research trends and output among information studies postgraduate students in Tanzania, 2000-2017: A reflection of the university of dar es Salaam. Information Development, 40(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/02666669221115673
13.
EliaE. F.SifeA. (2018). Analysis of top cited papers in library and information science that have stood the test of time. University of Dar es Salaam Library Journal, 13(1), 54–68.
14.
JärvelinK.VakkariP. (2021). LIS research across 50 years: Content analysis of journal articles. Journal of Documentation, 78(7), 65–88.
15.
KeshavarzH.ShekariM. R. (2020). Factors affecting topic selection for theses and dissertations in library and information science: A national scale study. Library & Information Science Research, 42(4), 101052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2020.101052
16.
KivunjaC.KuyiniA. B. (2017). Understanding and applying research paradigms in educational contexts. International Journal of Higher Education, 6(5), 26–41. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v6n5p26
17.
LouW.SuZ.HeJ.LiK. (2021). A temporary dynamic examination of research method usage in the Chinese library and information science community. Information Processing & Management, 58(5).
18.
MaJ.LundB. (2020). The evolution of LIS research topics and methods from 2006 to 2018: A content analysis. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 57(1), e241. https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.241
19.
MaJ.LundB. (2021). The evolution and shift of research topics and methods in library and information science. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 72(8), 1059–1074. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24474
20.
MaddenA. D. (2021). A review of basic research tools without the confusing philosophy. Higher Education Research and Development, 41(5), 1633–1647. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2021.1920895
21.
MandaP. (2002). Review of the state of research methodol- ogy in African librarianship. University of Dar Es Salaam Library Journal, 4(1/2), 90–103. https://doi.org/10.4314/udslj.v4i1.26602
22.
MasukuM. (2023). Library and information science and the positivist paradigm: Some critical reflections. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 56(3), 698–711. (Original work published 2024) https://doi.org/10.1177/09610006231161324
23.
MatusiakK. K.OsińskaV.OrganisciakP.PittsR. T. (2024). Research methods and the use of visual representation in library and information science research. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 76(3), 527–544. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24945
24.
MavodzaJ. (2020). The evolving landscape of research methods in library and information science. In NgulubeP. (Ed.), Handbook of research on connecting research methods for information science research (pp. 1–17). IGI Global.
25.
MitthalR. (2011). Library and information science research trends in India. Annals of Library and Information Studies, 58, 319–325.
26.
MosweuO.MosweuT. (2020). Research methodologies used in library and information studies masters' degree dissertations at the university of Botswana. In NgulubeP. (Ed.), Handbook of research on connecting research methods for information science research (pp. 384–403). IGI Global.
27.
MutulaS. (2011). Challenges of postgraduate research: Case of developing countries. South African Journal of Library and Information Science, 77(1), 184–190. https://doi.org/10.7553/77-2-60
28.
MutulaS.MajingeR. (2018). Common flaws in library and information sciences (LIS) PhD theses submitted for examination in East, southern and west African universities: A critical experiential view. Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries (QQML), 7, 309–325.
29.
NagelD. A.BurnsV. F.TilleyC.AubinD. (2015). When novice researchers adopt constructivist grounded theory: Navigating less travelled paradigmatic and methodological paths in PhD dissertation work. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 10, 365–383. https://doi.org/10.28945/2300
30.
Ndenje-SichalweE.EliaE. (2020). Research methodology practices among postgraduate information studies students in Tanzania. IFLA Journal, 47(2), 129–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/0340035220965986
31.
Ndenje-SichalweE.EliaE. F. (2022). A seventeen-year research topic dispersion and methodological choices among LIS postgraduates in Tanzania. University of Dar Es Salaam Library Journal, 17(1), 129–150. https://doi.org/10.4314/udslj.v17i1.9
32.
NgulubeP. (2005). Research procedures used by master of information studies students at the university of natal in the period 1982–2002 with special reference to their sampling techniques and survey response rates: A methodological discourse. The International Information & Library Review, 37(2), 127–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572317.2005.10762673
33.
NgulubeP. (2013). Blending qualitative and quantitative research methods in library and information science in Sub-Saharan Africa. ESARBICA Journal, 32, 10–23.
34.
NgulubeP.MokwatloK.NdwandweS. (2009). Utilisation and prevalence of mixed methods research in library and information research in South Africa 2002-2008. South African Journal of Libraries and Information Science, 75(2), 105–116. https://doi.org/10.7553/75-2-91
35.
NgulubeP.UkwomaS. C. (2019). Cartographies of research designs in library information science research in Nigeria and South Africa, 2009–2015. Library & Information Science Research, 41(3), 100966. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2019.100966
36.
OchollaD. N. (2008). The current status and challenges of collaboration in library and information studies (LIS) education and training in Africa. New Library World, 109(9/10), 466–479. https://doi.org/10.1108/03074800810910496
37.
OchollaD. N.Le RouxJ. (2011). Conceptions and misconceptions of theoretical frameworks in library and information science research: A case study of selected theses and dissertations from eastern and southern african universities. Mousaion, 29(2), 61–74.
38.
PasipamireP. (2020). Integration in mixed methods research designs by graduate students at the University of Science and Technology. In NgulubeP. (Ed.), Handbook of research on connecting research methods for information science research (pp. 384–403). IGI Global.
PickardA. J. (2013). Research Methods in Information. London: UK Facet Publ.
41.
Plano ClarkV. L.CreswellJ. W. (2014). Understanding research: A consumer’s guide. Pearson.
42.
SamuelsP. (2023). Proposal writing for business research projects. Routledge.
43.
SaundersM. N. K.LewisP.ThornhillA. (2023). Research methods for business students (9th ed.). Pearson.
44.
UkwomaS. C.NgulubeP. (2020). Supervision practices in library and information science postgraduate research in Nigeria and South Africa. African Journal of Library, Archives and Information Science, 30(2), 127–142. https://doi.org/10.4314/54ryde52
45.
UllahA.AmeenK. (2018). Account of methodologies and methods applied in LIS research: A systematic review. Library & Information Science Research, 40(1), 53–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2018.03.002
46.
UllahA.AmeenK. (2022). Examining the use of methodological pluralism in library and information science empirical research produced by Pakistani authors. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 27(2), 97–113. https://doi.org/10.22452/mjlis.vol27no2.6
47.
VakkariP.ChangY.JärvelinK. (2022). Disciplinary contributions to research topics and methodology in library and information science leading to fragmentation?Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 73(12), 1706–1722. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24690
