The rapid pace of digital transformation and globalization has compelled organizations to adapt urgently.
Objectives
This study examines the role of digital leadership (DL), information technology support (ITS), and knowledge sharing (KS) in enhancing organizational learning capability (OLC), which subsequently impacts organizational performance (OP).
Methods
The research was conducted in South Korea’s Daegu Industrial Area, focusing on the automobile industry. 359 participants were surveyed to assess their understanding of IT support, digital leadership, and knowledge sharing within their organizations. The data collected were analyzed using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM).
Results
Based on the resource-based view (RBV) theory, the study found that DL and ITS positively influence KS, subsequently boosting OLC. OLC significantly impacts OP, with KS fully mediating the relationships between DL–OLC and ITS–OLC. These findings highlight KS as a key driver of OLC and performance, offering managers valuable guidance on aligning KS with strategic objectives.
Conclusion
By examining the relationships among DL, ITS, KS, OLC, and OP, this study builds on existing research and offers practical strategies for developing OLC in digitally driven business environments.
CarbonaraNBasileLJ. Organization performance in smart working settings: the mediating role of digital leadership. Int J Organ Anal2025. DOI: 10.1108/IJOA-10-2024-4883, In press.
2.
EberlJKDrewsP. Digital leadership-mountain or molehill? A literature review. In AhlemannF.SchütteR.StieglitzS. (Eds.), Innovation Through Information Systems. WI 2021. Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation. Springer, Cham, 2021, 48, pp. 223–237.
3.
GuiLLeiHLePB. Fostering product and process innovation through transformational leadership and knowledge management capability: the moderating role of innovation culture. Eur J Innovat Manag2024; 27: 214–232.
4.
ElkjaerB. Taking stock of “organizational learning”: looking back and moving forward. Manag Learn2022; 53: 582–604.
5.
HalimEHMustikaGSariRN, et al.Corporate governance practices and financial performance: the mediating effect of risk management committee at manufacturing firms. Journal of International Studies2017; 10: 272–289.
6.
ZhangJJehangirFNYangL, et al.Competitive advantage and firm performance: the role of organizational culture, organizational innovation, and knowledge sharing. J Knowl Econ2025; 16: 3081–3107.
7.
ArarKSaitiAGuajardoM. Redesigning and recomputing the future of education: the role of technology, the learning process, personality traits, and diversity in learning systems. Power Educ2023; 15: 243–258.
8.
CuradoCMuñoz-PascualLGalendeJ. Antecedents to innovation performance in SMEs: a mixed methods approach. J Bus Res2018; 89: 206–215.
9.
WangSAlamGMSkrbinjekV, et al.Managing digital bridges: how online social capital translates digital literacy into higher education access. Hum Syst Manag2025. DOI :10.1177/01672533251359152.
10.
de AraujoLMPriadanaSParamartaV, et al.Digital leadership in business organizations. IJEAMaL2021; 2(1): 45–56.
11.
KazimFA. Digital transformation and leadership style: a multiple case study. The ISM journal of international business2019; 3: 24–33.
12.
AlamGMRahmanMMSkrbinjekV, et al.Does the digitalised era adjust the mismatch as match? A comparison of graduates from different streams to align HE and industry in Bangladesh. Int J Innovat Learn2025; 38(1): 92–115.
FatimaTMasoodA. Impact of digital leadership on open innovation: a moderating serial mediation model. J Knowl Manag2024; 28: 161–180.
15.
ShinJMollahMAChoiJ. Sustainability and organizational performance in South Korea: the effect of digital leadership on digital culture and employees’ digital capabilities. Sustainability2023; 15: 2027.
16.
NaimMFShehzadNAl NahyanMT, et al.The impact of knowledge sharing on employee engagement through the mediating role of competency development and moderating role of social climate. J Knowl Manag2024; 28: 1889–1916.
17.
CortellazzoLBruniEZampieriR. The role of leadership in a digitalized world: a review. Front Psychol2019; 10: 1938.
18.
AzeemANaseemMAAliR, et al.How does environmental performance contribute to firm financial performance in a multi-country study? Mediating role of competitive advantage and moderating role of voluntary environmental initiatives. J Knowl Econ2024; 16: 1–34.
BarneyJBClarkDN. Resource-based theory: creating and sustaining competitive advantage. Oup, 2007.
21.
CamisónCVillar-LópezA. Organizational innovation as an enabler of technological innovation capabilities and firm performance. J Bus Res2014; 67: 2891–2902.
22.
Ruiz-MercaderJMeroño-CerdanALSabater-SánchezR. Information technology and learning: their relationship and impact on organisational performance in small businesses. Int J Inf Manag2006; 26: 16–29.
23.
KumarMMamgainPPasumartiSS, et al.Organizational IT support and knowledge sharing behaviour affecting service innovation performance: empirical evidence from the hospitality industry. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems2024; 54: 256–279.
MokhchyJChenGAhmadS, et al.Dynamic impact of leadership style, knowledge-sharing, and organizational culture on organizational performance. Curr Psychol2025; 44: 4097–4112.
26.
SaeedIKhanJZadaM, et al.Linking ethical leadership to followers’ knowledge sharing: mediating role of psychological ownership and moderating role of professional commitment. Front Psychol2022; 13: 841590.
LiuYLiYShiLH, et al.Knowledge transfer in buyer-supplier relationships: the role of transactional and relational governance mechanisms. J Bus Res2017; 78: 285–293.
29.
AkhavanPHosseiniSMAbbasiM, et al.Knowledge-sharing determinants, behaviors, and innovative work behaviors: an integrated theoretical view and empirical examination. Aslib J Inf Manag2015; 67: 562–591.
30.
YangZNguyenVTLePB. Knowledge sharing serves as a mediator between collaborative culture and innovation capability: an empirical research. J Bus Ind Market2018; 33: 958–969.
31.
Jerez-GomezPCéspedes-LorenteJValle-CabreraR. Organizational learning capability: a proposal of measurement. J Bus Res2005; 58: 715–725.
32.
JyothibabuCFarooqABhusan PradhanB. An integrated scale for measuring an organizational learning system. Learn Organ2010; 17: 303–327.
33.
SaundersMLewisPThornhillA. Research methods for business students. Pearson Education, 2009.
34.
SekaranUBougieR. Research methods for business: a skill building approach. John Wiley & Sons, 2016.
35.
LeeHChoiB. Knowledge management enablers, processes, and organizational performance: an integrative view and empirical examination. J Manag Inf Syst2003; 20: 179–228.
36.
ChenY-HLinT-PYenDC. How to facilitate inter-organizational knowledge sharing: the impact of trust. Inf Manag2014; 51: 568–578.
37.
EspositoVVChinWWHenselerJ, et al.Handbook of partial least squares: concepts, methods and applications. 2010.
