Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2025
Role of agency and structure impacting community ownership in school education (SDG 4): Evidences from India’s national education program in Karnataka state
Indian policies and programs like the Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan and the Right to Education Act emphasized community participation in school governance through School Development and Monitoring Committees (SDMCs). Despite significant investments in school infrastructure, access, and teacher training, learning outcomes in government schools especially in Mathematics, Science, and life skills, remain poor.
Objectives
The study undertook a quasi-experimental action research to understand the School Management Outcomes in terms of Community Ownership and Social accountability. The larger objective is to find ways to foster community participation in the governance of schools; develop capacities on both the supply and demand sides at the last mile; promote evidence-based and data driven research to build insights.
Methods
The study used a mixed-methods approach, employing tools like Citizen Report Cards (CRC) and Community Score Cards (CSC). These tools assessed public service adequacy to facilitate dialogue between service users and providers.
Results
Community agency, ownership and willingness emerged as important influencers for school management. They also proved to be crucial for effective participation and improved school outcomes.
Conclusions
Key insights from the findings of this study highlight the need to strengthen SDMCs through improved social accountability, structural reforms, and community empowerment.
JhaSK. From legislation to the classroom: effects of the right to education act on school education in India. RESEARCH REVIEW International Journal of Multidisciplinary2025; 10(3): 63–80.
PrakashCChandraS. School stakeholder’s views on corporate social responsibility in schools. Int J Sustain Soc2024; 16(3): 245–257.
5.
de BarrosAFajardo-GonzalezJPaulG, et al.The limitations of activity-based instruction to improve the productivity of schooling. Econ J2024; 134(659): 959–984.
6.
Pradeep RamavathJ. Interaction of micropolitics and education quality in rural Karnataka. Local Government Quarterly2017; 17(2): 45–67.
7.
RaoMBVPrasadSRSaumyaJ, et al.Does child-friendly Gram panchayats mean good governance? An analysis of 10 Gram panchayats in Karnataka. Journal of Development Policy and Practice2023; 9(1): 107–132.
8.
FattoreMVittadiniG. Subsidiarity principle and adaptive governance. In: MagginoF (ed) Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research. Springer, 2023, pp. 6995–6998.
9.
SSA. Basic features of Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan. SSA Karnataka, 2018.
10.
HarrissJ. The ‘wall’: reflections on youth aspiration, education and social mobility in India. South Asian History and Culture2024; 15(2): 142–155.
11.
JandhyalaBGT. What matters for outcomes in elementary education in India?Indian Journal of Human Development2011; 5(1): 1–25.
12.
Akshara Foundation. Analysing the quality of SDMC meetings in Hoskote, Kushtagi and Mundargi, Karnataka, 2015.
13.
GreeneJCCaracelliVJGrahamWF. Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educ Eval Pol Anal1989; 11(3): 255–274.
14.
WangXChenB. Investing in sons or daughters? The educational aspirations of rural parents in China. Br J Sociol Educ2025; 45(1): 101–118.
ForresterGHudsonRRowleyJ, et al.Mind the aspiration gap: how primary school pupils perceive their future adult selves and the perspectives and expectations of parents and teachers. Educ Rev2024; 76(4): 732–752.
SekharSNairMPrabhakarK, et al.Study of Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan initiatives on universalisation of elementary education in Karnataka with special reference to concerns of quality and equity. PAC, 2009.
WahlströmN. School and democratic hope: the school as a space for civic literacy. Eur Educ Res J2022; 21(6): 994–1008.
28.
DrezeJSenA. India: development and participation. Oxford University Press, 2002.
29.
JainNMakkarS. An inter-district analysis of infrastructural disparities in Karnataka. Indian J Ind Relat2024; 60(1): 48.
30.
YıldızDGUsluNA. Investigating the effect of digital storytelling on multicultural competencies and social justice: a mixed method study in psychological counseling education. Int J Intercult Relat2024; 103(4): 123–145.
31.
GierusBDuTMaduforoAN, et al.Prevalence and quality of mixed methods research in educational subdisciplines: a systematic review. Sage Open2025; 15(2): 21582440251335171.
32.
SandilosLERimm-KaufmanSESolandJ, et al.A mixed methods study examining how classroom experiences cultivate respect in Middle school students. Appl Dev Sci2025; 1–22. doi:10.1080/10888691.2025.2491399.
33.
ManouilidouEPapadopoulouEAChatzikiriakouI. Teacher evaluation: a triangulation study of data sources. European Journal of Contemporary Education and E-Learning2024; 2(3): 54–73.
ChukwukaJEIgwehK. Strategic role of feasibility study in entrepreneurial profitability and project management. Int J Bus Econ Res2024; 14(11): 1–18.
36.
KhujaevPBokievBKholmurotovT, et al.Innovative approaches to the feasibility study of options for calculation schemes of water supply. E3S Web. Conf2024; 538(03019): 1–7.
37.
EdwardKSylevereN. Reframing service delivery through people centred governance. International Journal of Public Policy and Administration, CARI Journals Limited2025; 7(1): 84–105.
38.
Public Affairs Centre. Study of SSA initiatives on universalisation of elementary education in Karnataka with special reference to concerns of quality and equity. UNICEF, 2009.
