The aim of this paper is to provide a systematic and thematic review of the wide range of literature on the labour market participation of Generation Z.
Objective
To identify the key themes in the relevant literature, analyse and organize the results of the studies and then propose future research directions on Generation Z by developing an integrative framework.
Methods
The research involved an aggregative systematic review of the 250 papers published up to 08/04/2024 in the WoS and Scopus databases was performed. After reading the abstracts, relevant articles (n = 55) were filtered.
Results
The findings of the metasynthesis indicate that for Generation Z, money is not the primary factor when choosing a job. Career and professional development are priority. Not all social media platforms are accessible, but with their extensive network of contacts, referrals can be an effective recruitment channel. Employers are expected to provide autonomy, flexibility and a healthy work–life balance. Intrinsic motivators (inspiring work and positive working environment) are also highly effective.
Conclusions
Research findings suggest that there are overlaps between Generation Z’s expectations of work, their workplace motivators and the factors that enhance their engagement; however, organizations should consider that preferences may vary in different situations.
BrotheimH. Introducing Generation Z. American Jail Association2014; 28(5): 15–20.
2.
KlagesBWelzVKroegerS, et al.Towards the derivation of measures to improve the intrinsic motivation and the affective commitment of employees in manual line assembly. Proced CIRP2022; 120: 583–588.
3.
SakdiyakornMGolubovskayaMSolneD. Understanding Generation Z through collective consciousness: impacts for hospitality work and employment. Int J Hospit Manag2021; 94: 1–3. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102822.
4.
Benítez–MárquezMDSánches–TebaEMBermúdez–GonzálezGB, et al.Generation Z within the workforce and in the workplace: a bibliometric analysis. Front Psychol2022; 12: 736820.
5.
DenyerDTranfieldD. Producing a systematic review. In: BuchananDABrymanA (eds) The Sage handbook of organizational research methods. New York: Sage Publications Ltd, 2009, pp. 671–689.
6.
KatzROgilvieSShawJ, et al.Explained: the art of living in a digital age. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press, 2022, p. 274.
7.
Csiszárik–KocsírÁGarai–FodorM. Motivation analysing and preference system of choosing a workplace as segmentation criteria based on a country wide research result focus on generation of Z. On-line J Model N Eur2018; 27: 67–85.
8.
StaglKCBurkeCSSalasE, et al.Team adaptation: realizing team synergy. In: BurkeCSPierceLGSalasE (eds) Understanding adaptability: A prerequisite for effective performance within complex environments. Elsevier, 2006, pp. 117–141. DOI: 10.1016/S1479-3601(05)06004-2.
9.
de BoerPBordoloiP. Nationality differences in Gen Z work values: an exploratory study. J Int Educ Bus2022; 15(2): 373–392.
AndheskaHSuparnoSDawudD, et al.Writing motivation and the ability in writing a research proposal of generation Z students based on cognitive style. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists2020; 8(1): 87–104.
17.
MarieASKaurP. Digitizing the teaching process to best meet the needs of generation Z a study in understanding the importance of digitizing education to match gen Z needs. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research2020; 9(1): 3213–3216.
18.
DanyikóTKelenhegyiPMallászJ, et al.20 éves a magyarországi internet. Ahogy a szakemberek megélték, megélik. Internet Szolgáltatók Tanácsa2011. https://mek.oszk.hu/18700/18732/18732.pdf (accessed 18 October 2024).
19.
LazanyiKBilanY. Generetion Z on the labour market: do they trust others within their workplace?Polish Journal of Management Studies2017; 16(1): 78–93.
20.
McCrindleMFellA. Understanding generation Z: recruiting, training and learning the next generation. Australia: McCrindle Research Pty Ltd, 2019.
21.
Graczyk–KucharskaM. Knowledge management for human resources: profile of a generation Z employee. Proceedings of the European Conference on Knowledge Management, ECKM2019; 1: 434–442.
22.
ThumaO. Generációs különbségek a munka és az iskola világában. In: Korkép. XXI. századi kihívások. Budapest: Budapesti Gazdasági Egyetem, 2016, pp. 212–232. DOI: 10.29180/KORKEP.2016.10.
23.
TwengeJMCampbellSM. Generational differences in psychological traits and their impact on the workplace. J Manag Psychol2008; 23(8): 862–877.
24.
SladekSGrabingerAGenZ. The first generation of the 21st century has arrived. Richmond: XYZ University, 2014.
25.
Pataki–BittóFKapusyK. Work environment transformation in the post COVID-19 based on work values of the future workforce. J Corp R Estate2021; 23(3): 151–169.
26.
MaganoJSilvaCFigueiredoC, et al.Generation Z: fitting project management soft skills competencies - a mixed-method approach. Educ Sci2020; 10(7): 187.
27.
CsepeliCAZ. Nemzedék lehetséges életpályái. Educatio2016; 25(4): 509–515.
28.
FryRParkerK. Early benchmarks show ‘post-millennials’ on track to be most diverse, best-educated generation. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center, 2018.
29.
PichlerSKohliCGranitzN. DITTO for Gen Z: a framework for leveraging the uniqueness of the new generation. Bus Horiz2021; 64(5): 599–610.
30.
SpitzerAB. The historical problem of generations. Am Hist Rev1973; 78: 1353–1385.
31.
LeslieBAndersonCBickhamC, et al.Generation Z perceptions of a positive workplace environment. Empl Responsib Rights J2021; 33: 171–187.
32.
RužićEBenazićD. Dimensions of attractiveness in employer branding and the value proposition framework for young employees. Ekonomski vjesnik/Econviews2023; 36(1): 89–100.
33.
AmeenNAnandA. Generation Z in the United Arab Emirates: a smart–tech–driven iGeneration. In: GentinaEParryE (eds) The new generation Z in Asia: Dynamics, differences, digitalisation (The changing context of managing people). Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited, 2020, pp. 181–192.
34.
JäckelKGarai-FodorM. Intergenerational cooperation and generational differences at work. In: 2022 IEEE 22nd international symposium on computational intelligence and informatics and 8th IEEE international conference on recent achievements in mechatronics, automation, computer science and robotics (CINTI-MACRo), Budapest, Hungary, 21–22 November 2022, pp. 171–176. DOI: 10.1109/CINTI-MACRo57952.2022.10029641.
35.
KőművesZSHoppASzabó-SzentgrótiG. Generational differences and motivation in the food industry. Studia Mundi – Economica2022; 9(2): 37–48.
36.
RachmatdiantoAIrvanNJPrasetyaningtyasSW. Managing talent in digital marketing industry: the case of Indonesia. In: 8th international conference on business and industrial research, ICBIR 2023 – proceedings, Bangkok, Thailand, 18–19 May 2023, pp. 341–346. DOI: 10.1109/ICBIR57571.2023.10147662.
37.
BerberNGašićDKatićI, et al.The mediating role of job satisfaction in the relationship between FWAs and turnover intentions. Sustainability2022; 14(8): 1–14.
38.
Ferreras–PerezJBurrellDNNemesekC, et al.Retaining generation z cybersecurity talent in government and beyond. In: Handbook of research on cybersecurity risk in contemporary business systems. IGI Global2023; 325–342. DOI: 10.4018/978-1-6684-7207-1.ch017.
39.
RazenERSulistiyaningsihR. The impact of job satisfaction on job performance of generation Z employees in DKI Jakarta after the COVID-19 pandemic. International Conference of Psychology, 2023. KnE Life Sciences2022; 1–18. DOI: 10.18502/kss.v8i19.14343.
40.
YunyiCSinghJSKKularajasingamJ. The influence of workforce diversity and job meaningfulness on employee engagement and organizational citizenship behaviors. Hum Syst Manag2024; 43(1): 1–15.
41.
HarzingAWAlakangasS. Google scholar, Scopus and the Web of science: a longitudinal and cross–disciplinary comparison. Scientometrics2016; 106(2): 787–804.
42.
MacháčekVSrholecMFerreiraMR, et al.Researchers’ institutional mobility: bibliometric evidence on academic inbreeding and internationalization. Sci Publ Pol2022; 49(1): 85–97.
43.
PaulJCriadoAR. The art of writing literature review: what do we know and what do we need to know?Int Bus Rev2020; 29: 101717.
44.
HalováDMüllerM. Innovative approaches to recruiting: using social media to become the employer of choice for generation Z. In: Proceedings of the European conference on innovation and entrepreneurship, ECIE, Portugal, 2021, pp. 1135–1143. DOI: 10.34190/EIE.21.093.
45.
AbouHJ.The role of digital media in the recruitment process in the middle east. In: AzouryNDaouL (eds) Business and social media in the middle east: Strategies, best practices and perspectives. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2020.
46.
MahmoudABFuxmanLMohrI, et al.“We aren’t your reincarnation!” workplace motivation across X, Y and Z generations. Int J Manpow2021; 42(1): 193–209.
47.
HamdanYAlheetAF. Examining employee recruitment success and retention with respect to the recruitment system: a case of generation Z employees. Acad Strat Manag J2021; 20(2): 1–12.
48.
ZhongYZhangLWeiW, et al.Attracting Gen Z workforce: the effects of organizational social media policy. Tour Rev2023; 79(1): 54–68.
49.
HalováDMüllerM. Being an employer of choice: attracting Generation Z to work by building brand via social media. Corp Reput Rev2023; 27(29): 283–298. DOI: 10.1057/s41299-023-00172-0.
50.
NovotnáMGottwaldD. Increasing the level of human capital through suitable recruitment communication with Generation Z. In: 8th Carpathian logistics congress on logistics, distribution, transport and management (CLC). Prague2019: 671–676.
51.
AcheampongNAA. Reward preferences of the youngest generation: attracting, recruiting, and retaining Generation Z into public sector organizations. Compensat Benefit Rev2020; 53(2): 75–97.
52.
ChillakuriB. Understanding Generation Z expectations for effective onboarding. J Organ Change Manag2020; 33(7): 1277–1296.
53.
Tato-JiménezJLBuenadicha-MateosMGonzález-LópezÓR. Evolution and sustainability of benefits offered to employees in on-line recruitment. Sustainability2019; 11(16): 1–17.
54.
SunJLeungXYZhangH, et al.Attracting Generation Z talents to the hospitality industry through COVID CSR practices. Int J Contemp Hospit Manag2022; 34(4): 1587–1606.
55.
ChillakuriBMahanandiaR. Generation Z entering the workforce: the need for sustainable strategies in maximizing their talent. Hum Resour Manag Int Dig2018; 26(4): 34–38.
56.
SatpathyILittDPatnaikBCM, et al.Challenges related to multi–generational workforce in manufacturing sector. Int J Mech Eng Technol2019; 10(1): 719–724.
57.
TrifanVAPanteaMF. The receptivity of younger generation Romanian employees to new technology implementation and its impact on the balance between work and life. J Bus Econ Manag2023; 24(3): 489–505.
58.
BeckerKL. We want connection and we do not mean wi–fi: examining the impacts of Covid–19 on Gen Z’s work and employment outcomes. Manag Res Rev2022; 45(5): 684–699.
59.
SidorcukaIChesnovickaA. Methods of attraction and retention of Generation Z staff. International Conference of Central–Bohemia–University (CBUIC) – Innovations in Science and Education2017; 5: 807–814.
60.
KaraivanovaMKleinK. The Generation Z in Bulgaria: challenging conservative organisations. In: ScholzCRennigAGenerationsZ (eds) Europe (The changing context of managing people). Leeds: Emerald Publishing Limited, 2019, pp. 217–251. DOI: 10.1108/978-1-78973-491-120191019.
61.
LasslebenHHofmannL. Attracting Gen Z talents: do expectations towards employers vary by gender?Gender in Management2023; 38(4): 545–560.
62.
PanditaD. Innovation in talent management practices: creating an innovative employer branding strategy to attract generation Z. Int J Innovat Sci2022; 20(14): 556–569.
63.
RoyKKCoelhoPSharmaP. Employer attractiveness: generation z employment expectations in India. Cardiometry2021; 23: 433–444.
64.
StecklMSimshäuserUNiederbergerM. Attraction of Generation Z – a quantitative study on the importance of health-related dimensions at work. Präv Gesundheitsf2019; 14: 212–217.
65.
GanguliRPadhySC. Moderating effect of demographic factors on the relationship between work motivation and employee retention of Gen Z. NMIMS Management Review2023; 31(2): 145–156.
66.
LeeCCLimHSSeoDJ, et al.Examining employee retention and motivation: the moderating effect of employee generation. Evidence-based HRM2022; 10(4): 385–402.
67.
SatpathyIPatnaikBCMPalaiD. Role of it among multi–generational workforce in banking sector. Int J Innovative Technol Explor Eng2019; 8(11): 1445–1450.
68.
Garai–FodorMJäckelK. Motivational tools and incentives: different generations, different needs at work. In: International symposium on computational intelligence and informatics, Budapest, Hungary, 21–22 November 2022. DOI: 10.1109/CINTI-MACRo57952.2022.10029558.
69.
HolzerBRamuzOMinderCE, et al.Motivation and personality factors of Generation Z high school students aspiring to study human medicine. BMC Med Educ2022; 22(1): 31.
70.
LašákováAVojtekováMProcházkováL. What (de)motivates GEN Z women and GEN Z men at work? Comparative study of gender differences in the young generation's motivation. Journal of Bunisess Economics and Management2023; 24(4): 771–796.
71.
ZehetnerAZehetnerDLepeykoT, et al.Generation Z’s expectations of their leaders: a cross-cultural, multi-dimensional investigation of leadership styles. European Conference on Management, Leadership and Governance, ECMLG2022; 18(1): 447–455.
72.
AchmadLINoermijatiNRofiatyR, et al.Job satisfaction and employee engagement as mediators of the relationship between talent development and intention to stay in generation Z workers. J Professional Business Review2023; 8(1): e0814.
73.
RohayatiTDestalaniAAArizkaHD, et al.Impact of job satisfaction, positive organizational culture and meaningful work on turnover intention in Gen Z. WSEAS Trans Syst2023; 22: 613–621.
74.
DwidienawatiDJatmikoLADewantiRN, et al.Organization culture and employee experience: do they affect job satisfaction and turnover intention?WSEAS Trans Bus Econ2024; 21(18): 202–211.
75.
BoezatEFoteaSFoteaI. Investigating the relationship between intention mindset among Romanian students as representatives of Generation Z. Journal of Esast European Management Studies2023; 28(4): 630–663.
76.
ZhongXMamunAAMasukujjamanM, et al.Modelling the significance of organizational conditions on quiet quitting intention among Gen Z workforce in an emerging economy. Sci Rep2023; 13(1): 1–18.
77.
JayathilakeHDDaudDEawHC, et al.Employee development and retention of Generation-Z employees in the post-COVID-19 workplace: a conceptual framework. Benchmark Int J2021; 28(7): 2343–2364.
78.
StumpfAMFieldingR. Fulfilling Gen Z’s needs and expectations in industry 4.0: attracting and retaining early career talent. In: Handbook of research on sustainable career ecosystems for university students and graduates. IGI Global2023: 258–277. DOI: 10.4018/978-1-6684-7442-6.ch014.
79.
PopaitoonP. Fostering work meaningfulness for sustainable human resources: a study of generation Z. Sustainability2022; 14(6): 3626.
80.
AliHLiMQiuX. Examination of HRM practices in relation to the retention of Chinese Gen Z employees. Humanit Soc Sci Commun2024; 11(1): 24.
81.
ChillakuriB. Examining the role of supervisor support on Generation Z’s intention to quit. Am Bus Rev2020a; 23(2): 408–430.
82.
RodriguezMBoyerSFlemingD, et al.Impact of grit on organizational turnover: empirical results of international vs. US Gen Z/Millennial cusp: an abstract. In: KreyNRossiP (eds) Back to the future: Using marketing basics to provide customer value. AMSAC 2017. Developments in Marketing Science: Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science. Cham: Springer, 2018. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-66023-3_161.
83.
AnhHTDVanHTTNaTTL. Affecting factors on employee engagement of generation Z. The Case of Labor Laws in Vietnam2023; 38(3): 247–274.
84.
BielenMKubiczekJ. Response of the labor market to the needs and expectations of Generation Z. E–MENTOR2020; 4: 87–94. DOI: 10.15219/em86.1486.
85.
MaloniMHiattMSCampbellS. Understanding the work values of Gen Z business students. Int J Manag Educ2019; 17(3): 100320.
86.
JungHSYoonHH. Generational effects of workplace flexibility on work engagement, satisfaction, and commitment in South Korean deluxe hotels. Sustainability2021; 13(16): 9143.
87.
AggarwalASadhnaPGuptaS, et al.Gen Z entering the workforce: restructuring HR policies and practices for fostering the task performance and organizational commitment. J Publ Aff2020; 22(3): 1–18.
88.
Bos–NehlesARenkemaMJanseenM. HRM and innovative work behaviour: a systematic literature review. Pers Rev2017; 46(7): 1228–1253.
