The industrial revolutions have significantly impacted the labour workforce due to technological changes. Consequently, these changes have reshaped the job search landscape, necessitating a deeper understanding of job search behaviour.
Objective
This study explores the determinants influencing new-collar job seekers’ use of online job search platforms through an integrated model combining the technology acceptance model (TAM) and decomposed theory of planned behaviour (DTPB).
Method
Three hundred thirty responses from new-collar job seekers in the East Coast region of Malaysia were analysed using partial least squares-structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM 4).
Results
Eight of the nine hypotheses developed from the TAM and DTPB variables had a significant impact. The study highlights that sociodemographic factors, digital skills, experience, and platform usability contributed to the insignificance of perceived ease of use in influencing the attitude of new-collar job seekers. Although actual behavioural control failed to moderate the relationship between intention and behaviour, this finding provides valuable insights into the role of this variable in the context of online job search platforms.
Conclusion
The findings of this study enhance the understanding of new-collar workers’ behaviours in Malaysia. By gaining insights into these behaviours, the study underscores the importance of various stakeholders in the labour market being better prepared for future conditions, ultimately supporting Malaysia’s efforts to achieve developed country status.
GeorgeASGeorgeAH. Industrial revolution 5.0: the transformation of the modern manufacturing process to enable man and machine to work hand in hand. Journal of Seybold Report ISSN NO2020; 1533: 9211.
FullerJBLangerCNitschkeJ, et al.The emerging degree reset: how the shift to skills-based hiring holds the keys to growing the US workforce at a time of talent shortage. Burning Glass Institute, 2022. [White Paper]. https://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Pages/item.aspx?num=62030
ChowdhuryMSKangDS. Person–organisation fit and occupation selection in Bangladesh: a study on Bangladesh Civil Service applicants. South Asian Journal of Human Resources Management2022; 9(2): 225–249.
10.
van HooftEAKammeyer-MuellerJDWanbergCR, et al.Job search and employment success: a quantitative review and future research agenda. J Appl Psychol2021; 106(5): 674–713.
11.
ChowdhuryMSKangDS. Modeling corporate environmental responsibility perceptions and job-seeking intentions: examining the underlying mechanism. Sustainability2021; 13(11): 6270.
12.
ZainalNZHairuddinHKassimES. Psychological determinants of job search intention among fresh graduates for the supply of labour force in the digital ERA. Asia Pr soc sci2020; 6(3): 204–210.
13.
LinHF. Applicability of the extended theory of planned behaviour in predicting job seeker intentions to use job‐search websites. Int J Sel Assess2010; 18(1): 64–74.
14.
Lucero‐RomeroGArias‐BolzmannLG. Millennials’ use of online social networks for job search: the Ecuadorian case. Psychol Mark2020; 37(3): 359–368.
15.
NadlifatinRPersadaSFClarindaM, et al.Social media-based online entrepreneurship approach on millennials: a measurement of job pursuit intention on multi-level marketing. Procedia Comput Sci2021; 197: 110–117. DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2021.12.124.
16.
ChowdhuryMS. Modelling intention to use online recruitment websites: insights from the theory of planned behavior. Barishal Univ J Bus Stud2022; 7(1): 33–47.
17.
ParikhAPatelJDJaiswalAK. Managing job applications online: integrating website informativeness and compatibility in theory of planned behaviour and technology acceptance model. Decis2021; 48: 97–113.
18.
MokhlisSHussinNSNNizamNZ, et al.Predicting Malaysian university students’ intent to pursue retailing career: applicability of theory of planned behaviour. Int J2022; 7(1): e0277.
19.
AjzenI. The theory of planned behavior: frequently asked questions. Hum Behav Emerg Technol2020; 2(4): 314–324.
20.
GrimaldoJRUyC. Factors affecting recruitment officers' intention to use online tools. Rev Integr Bus Econ Res2020; 9: 194–208.
21.
WanbergCRAliAACsillagB. Job seeking: the process and experience of looking for a job. Annu Rev Organ Psychol Organ Behav2020; 7(1): 315–337.
22.
FabermanRJMuellerAIŞahinA, et al.Job search behavior among the employed and non‐employed. Econometrica2022; 90(4): 1743–1779.
23.
MegeirhiHARibeiroMAWoosnamKM. Job search behavior explained through perceived tolerance for workplace incivility, cynicism and income level: a moderated mediation model. J Hospit Tourism Manag2020; 44: 88–97.
24.
KaoKYHsuHHRogersA, et al.I see my future!: linking mentoring, future work selves, achievement orientation to job search behaviors. J Career Dev2022; 49(1): 232–245.
25.
UrquidiMOrtegaG. Artificial intelligence for job seeking: how to enhance labor intermediation in public employment services. 2020.
26.
KarácsonyPIzsákTVasaL. Attitudes of Z generation to job searching through social media. Econ Sociol2020; 13(4): 227–240.
27.
CoffeyJFarivarFCameronR. The job seeking experiences of international graduates in the host country: Australia’s lost opportunity?Int J Hum Resour Manag2021; 32(4): 846–870.
28.
DuongMTHNguyenDVNguyenPT. Using fuzzy approach to model skill shortage in Vietnam’s labor market in the context of Industry 4.0. Eng Technol Appl Sci Res2020; 10(3): 5864–5868.
29.
DaveCVOnline job portal-A better way for finding jobs in the COVID-19 pandemic.
30.
Van HoyeG. Job-search behavior as construct: a review of different job-search behaviors and sources. The Oxford handbook of job loss and job search. New York: Oxford Handbook of Job Loss and Job Search Oxford University Press, 2018, pp. 259–274.
31.
DillahuntTRIsraniALuAJ,et al.Examining the use of online platforms for employment: a survey of US job seekers. In: Proceedings of the 2021 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, Yokohama JapanMay 8 - 132021, pp. 1–23.
32.
Al-AdwanASLiNAl-AdwanA, et al.Extending the technology acceptance model (TAM) to predict university students’ intentions to use metaverse-based learning platforms. Educ Inf Technol2023; 28(11): 15381–15413.
33.
SarmahRDhimanNKanojiaH. Understanding intentions and actual use of mobile wallets by millennials: an extended TAM model perspective. J Indian Bus Res2021; 13(3): 361–381.
34.
TaoDWangTWangT, et al.A systematic review and meta-analysis of user acceptance of consumer-oriented health information technologies. Comput Human Behav2020; 104: 106147.
35.
LinYYuZ. Extending technology acceptance model to higher-education students’ use of digital academic reading tools on computers. Int J Educ Technol High Educ2023; 20: 34. DOI: 10.1186/s41239-023-00403-8.
36.
DavisF. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q1989; 13: 319–339.
37.
KaurDKaurR. Elucidating the role of gender differences via TAM in e-recruitment adoption in India: a multi-group analysis using MICOM. The Bottom Line2022; 35(2/3): 115–136.
38.
GoudaSKPatroYSSMishraS. A Study of E-recruitment technology adoption in India. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice2004; 30(5): 11804–11812.
39.
PanjaitanOWOAndenTRetawatiA. Gen Z job seekers' intention towards e-recruitment in Central Kalimantan: technology acceptance model (TAM) approach. International Journal of Accounting, Management, Economics and Social Sciences (IJAMESC)2023; 1(6): 745–754.
40.
MathiesonKPeacockEChinWW. Extending the technology acceptance model: the influence of perceived user resources. SIGMIS Database2001; 32(3): 86–112.
41.
Burton-JonesAHubonaGS. The mediation of external variables in the technology acceptance model. Inf Manag2006; 43(6): 706–717.
42.
BagozziRP. The legacy of the technology acceptance model and a proposal for a paradigm shift. J Assoc Inf Syst2007; 8(4): 3–254.
43.
AjzenI. The theory of planned behaviour. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process1991; 50(2): 179–211.
44.
ZaineldeenSHongboLKoffiAL, et al.Technology acceptance model’ concepts, contribution, limitation, and adoption in education. ujer2020; 8(11): 5061–5071.
45.
Fernández-ValeraMM. Psychological capital and job search: a systematic literature review and agenda for Future Research. Int J Res Vocat Educ Train2023; 10(1): 68–89. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01698.
46.
LiuJLinSFengY. Understanding why Chinese contractors are not willing to purchase construction insurance. Eng Construct Architect Manag2018; 25(2): 257–272.
47.
YizhongXLinZBaranchenkoY, et al.Employability and job search behavior: a six-wave longitudinal study of Chinese university graduates. Empl Relat2017; 39(2): 223–239.
48.
ZhangLHuQZhangS, et al.Understanding Chinese residents’ waste classification from a perspective of intention–behavior gap. Sustainability2020; 12(10): 4135.
49.
IslamMRahmanMMTaherMA, et al.Using artificial intelligence for hiring talents in a moderated mechanism. Futur Bus J2024; 10(1): 13.
50.
CandraSCahyonoHWibowoRA, et al.Acceptance of the use of social media: case of linkedin in Indonesian netizen. Int J Sci Technol Res2020; 9(1): 1451–1461.
51.
Van HooftEADe JongM. Predicting job seeking for temporary employment using the theory of planned behaviour: the moderating role of individualism and collectivism. J Occup Organ Psychol2009; 82(2): 295–316.
52.
CamilleriMA. The online users’ perceptions toward electronic government services. J Inf Commun Ethics Soc2020; 18(2): 221–235. DOI: 10.1108/JICES-09-2019-0102.
53.
RosenthalS. Procedural information and behavioral control: longitudinal analysis of the intention-behavior gap in the context of recycling. Recycling2018; 3(1): 5.
54.
LeongLYHewTSOoiKB, et al.Extending the theory of planned behavior in the social commerce context: a meta-analytic SEM (MASEM) approach. Inf Syst Front2023; 25(5): 1847–1879.
55.
TaylorSToddPA. Understanding information technology usage: a test of competing models. Inf Syst Res1995; 6(2): 144–176. DOI: 10.1287/isre.6.2.144.
56.
RofiqoAZamarkasiABin Abd RazakA. The important role of the DTPB in the development of Islamic P2P lending in Indonesia. Asian J Islam Manag2023; 5(1): 36–53.
57.
FerreiraAIRodriguesRCarvalhoH, et al.Social interaction matters to job search over the long haul. Curr Psychol2023; 42(36): 32398–32416.
58.
BorenJP. The relationships between co-rumination, social support, stress, and burnout among working adults. Manag Commun Q2014; 28(1): 3–25. DOI: 10.1177/0893318913509283.
59.
KulkarniMNithyanandS. Social influence and job choice decisions. Empl Relat2012; 35(2): 139–156. DOI: 10.1108/01425451311287844.
60.
GiantariIGAKZainDRahayuM, et al.The role of perceived behavioral control and trust as mediator of experience on online purchasing intentions relationship a study on youths in denpasar city (Indonesia). International Journal of Business and Management Invention2013; 2(1): 30–38.
61.
TsengTHWangYMLinHH, et al.Relationships between locus of control, theory of planned behavior, and cyber entrepreneurial intention: the moderating role of cyber entrepreneurship education. Int J Manag Educ2022; 20(3): 100682.
62.
KhatimahH. Consumer’s intention to use e-money mobile using the decomposed theory of planned behavior. Doctoral Thesis. Changlun: University Utara Malaysia, 2016.
63.
KidwellBJewellRD. An examination of perceived behavioral control: internal and external influences on intention. Psychol Mark2003; 20(7): 625–642.
64.
JaidiYVan HooftEAArendsLR. Recruiting highly educated graduates: a study on the relationship between recruitment information sources, the theory of planned behavior, and actual job pursuit. Hum Perform2011; 24(2): 135–157.
65.
MorrisonEW. Longitudinal study of the effects of information seeking on newcomer socialization. J Appl Psychol1993; 78(2): 173–183.
66.
MoghaddamHARezaeiSAminM. Examining job seekers' perception and behavioral intention toward online recruitment: a PLS path modelling approach. J Glob Bus Adv2015; 8(3): 305–325.
67.
MacKinnonDP. Integrating mediators and moderators in research design. Res Soc Work Pract2011; 21(6): 675–681.
68.
CarmackHJHeissSN. Using the theory of planned behavior to predict college students’ intent to use LinkedIn for job searches and professional networking. Commun Stud2018; 69(2): 145–160.
69.
SekaranU. Research methods for business: a skill building approach. 4th ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2003.
70.
FamSFSooJHWahjonoSI. Online job search among millennial students in Malaysia. JDM (Jurnal Dinamika Manajemen)2017; 8(1): 1–10.
71.
AzmiENRahmanNA. The Malaysian job market: exploring social networking sites (SNSS) as an alternative communication method between employers and job seekers. International Journal of Modern Trends in Social Science2022; 5(22): 12–21.
72.
AshimkhanovaSSarwarASengVO. A synthesized framework explaining job application among IT graduates in Malaysia. Journal of System and Management Sciences2023; 13(6): 298–321.
73.
Ch’ngCKPhangZW. Analysing the determinants of job selection preferences among quantitative science students in Malaysia using multi-criteria decision making (mcdm). ASM Science Journal2024.
AhmadWIIsmailZRahmanAH. Aging and economic participation of older population in rural Malaysia. Int J Humanit Soc Sci2011; 9(1): 128–133.
77.
MasudRMutalibAAIsmailI. Gender inequality: a comparative study of participation in technical courses. J Couns Educ Technol2018; 1(1): 10–13. DOI: 10.32698/0121.
78.
HairJFJrMatthewsLMMatthewsRL, et al.PLS-SEM or CB-SEM: updated guidelines on which method to use. Int J Multivar Data Anal2017; 1(2): 107–123.
79.
HairJHultGRingleC, et al.A primer on partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM). 3rd ed.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2022.
80.
HenselerJRingleCMSarstedtM. A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modelling. J Acad Mark Sci2015; 43: 115–135.
81.
FrankeGSarstedtM. Heuristics versus statistics in discriminant validity testing: a comparison of four procedures. Internet Res2019; 29(3): 430–447.
82.
PodsakoffPMMacKenzieSBLeeJY, et al.Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol2003; 88(5): 879–903.
83.
EichhornBR. Common method variance techniques. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc, 2014.
84.
CohenJ. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Milton Park: Routledge, 2013.
85.
DawsonJF. Moderation in management research: what, why, when, and how. J Bus Psychol2014; 29(1): 1–9.
86.
KennyDAJuddCM. The unappreciated heterogeneity of effect sizes: implications for power, precision, planning of research, and replication. Psychol Methods2019; 24(5): 578–589.
87.
IndarsinTAliH. Attitude toward Using m-commerce: the analysis of perceived usefulness perceived ease of use, and perceived trust: case study in Ikens Wholesale Trade, Jakarta–Indonesia. Saudi Journal of Business and Management Studies2017; 2(11): 995–1007.
88.
LaiP. The literature review of technology adoption models and theories for the novelty technology. J Inf Syst Technol Manag2017; 14(1): 21–38. DOI: 10.4301/S1807-17752017000100002.
89.
RafdinalWSenalasariW. Predicting the adoption of mobile payment applications during the COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Bank Mark2021; 39(6): 984–1002. DOI: 10.1108/IJBM-10-2020-0532.
90.
KamaruddinMIHAhmadAHusainMA, et al.Employment trends of COVID-19 graduates: the case of a Malaysian public university. 2023.
91.
SeyediSSDarroudiAHaghighinasabM. Developing a model and questionnaire for predicting intention to use job boards: a jobseeker-oriented research on the e-recruitment adoption in Iran. Foundations of Management2022; 14(1): 67–88. DOI: 10.2478/fman-2022-0005.
92.
MmMSarwarA. Social networking sites for e-recruitment: a perspective of Malaysian employers. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business2021; 8(8): 613–624.
