It’s not uncommon for the work-from-home (WFH) trend to persist after the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic. Various factors contribute to this continuation, including technological advancements and the benefits of it. The results of this study suggest suitable leadership styles for WFH.
OBJECTIVE
This research investigates transformational and transactional leadership on organizational performance through work-from-home outcomes during the COVID-19 crisis in Thailand.
METHODS
The data was collected by questionnaire from 444 employees who work for companies registered on the Stock Exchange of Thailand and the Market for Alternative Investment. These employees may work full-time or part-time from home or in a hybrid work arrangement. Data analysis employed the Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) method.
RESULTS
The main findings of this study indicate that during the COVID-19 crisis, transformational leadership did not directly influence employees’ work-for-home outcomes and had no direct or indirect effect on organizational performance. Conversely, transactional leadership is positively direct on organizational performance and indirectly through work-from-home outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS
The appropriate leadership style for the WFH environment during the COVID-19 pandemic is transactional leadership. This type of leader rewards employees for meeting expectations and imposes punishments for work that falls below the predetermined standard.
StokerJIGarretsenHLammersJ. Leading and working from home in times of COVID-19 On the perceived changes in leadership behaviors. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies. 2021;29(2):208–18. doi:10.1177/15480518211007452
2.
LeeH. Changes in workplace practices during the COVID-19 pandemic: The roles of emotion, psychological safety and organization support. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance. 2021;8(1):97–128. doi:10.1108/joepp-06-2020-0104
3.
AndersonDKelliherC. Enforced remote working and the work-life interface during lockdown. Gender in Management: An International Journal. 2020;35(7/8):677–83. doi:10.1108/gm-07-2020-0224
4.
FengZSavaniK. Covid-19 created a gender gap in perceived work productivity and job satisfaction: Implications for dual-career parents working from home. Gender in Management: An International Journal. 2020;35(7/8):719–36. doi:10.1108/gm-07-2020-0202
5.
AllenTDGoldenTDShockleyKM. How effective is telecommuting? Assessing the status of our scientific findings. Psychological Science in the Public Interest. 2015;16(2):40–68. doi:10.1177/1529100615593273
6.
SridharVBhattacharyaS. Significant household factors that influence an IT employees’ job effectiveness while on work from home. International Journal of Innovation Science. 2021;13(1):105–17. doi:10.1108/ijis-09-2020-0171
7.
Van der LippeTLippényiZ. Co-workers working from home and individual and team performance. New Technology, Work and Employment. 2019;35(1):60–79. doi:10.1111/ntwe.12153
8.
NakrošienėABučiūnienėIGoštautaitėB. Working from home: Characteristics and outcomes of telework. International Journal of Manpower. 2019;40(1):87–101. doi:10.1108/ijm-07-2017-0172
9.
MathewJOgbonnaEHarrisLC. Culture, employee work outcomes and performance: An empirical analysis of Indian software firms. Journal of World Business. 2012;47(2):194–203. doi:10.1016/j.jwb.2011.04.006
10.
YavasUBabakusE. Relationships between organizational support, customer orientation, and work outcomes. International Journal of Bank Marketing. 2010;28(3):222–38. doi:10.1108/02652321011036477
11.
NevesPCaetanoA. Commitment to change: Contributions to trust in the supervisor and work outcomes. Group & Organization Management. 2009;34(6):623–44. doi:10.1177/1059601109350980
12.
LimVKGTeoTSH. To work or not to work at home-an empirical investigation of factors affecting attitudes towards teleworking. Journal of Managerial Psychology. 2000;15(6):560–86. doi:10.1108/02683940010373392
13.
SheafferZBoglerRSarfatyS. Leadership attributes, masculinity and risk taking as predictors of crisis proneness. Gender in Management: An International Journal. 2011;26(2):163–87. doi:10.1108/17542411111116563
14.
BoehmAEnoshmGMichalS. Expectations of grassroots community leadership in times of normality and crisis. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management. 2010;18(4):184–94. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5973.2010.00617.x
15.
LaohavichienTFredendallLDStephen CantrellR. Leadership and quality management practices in Thailand. International Journal of Operations & Production Management. 2011;31(10):1048–1070.
16.
HofstedeG. Management scientists are human. Management Science. 1994;40(1):4–13.
17.
KhanKEBhattiOKKashifS. Eyeing at eastern philosophy for business leadership model. International Journal of Organizational Leadership. 2021;10, 278–298.
18.
CredeMJongJHarmsP. The generalizability of transformational leadership across cultures: A meta-analysis. Journal of Managerial Psychology. 2019;34(3):139–155. doi:10.1108/jmp-11-2018-0506
19.
ErezMEarleyPC. Culture, self-identity, and work. New York: Oxford University Press; 1993.
20.
GibsonCB. An investigation of gender differences in leadership across four countries. Journal of International Business Studies. 1995;26(2):255–79. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490847
21.
HaslamSASteffensNKReicherSDBentleySV. Identity leadership in a crisis: A 5R framework for learning from responses to Covid-19. Social Issues and Policy Review. 2021;15(1):35–83. doi:10.1111/sipr.12075
22.
FernandezAAShawGP. Academic leadership in a time of crisis: The Coronavirus and Covid-19. Journal of Leadership Studies. 2020;14(1):39–45. doi:10.1002/jls.21684
23.
DiraniKMAbadiMAlizadehABarhateBGarzaRCGunasekaraNIbrahimGMajzunZ. Leadership competencies and the essential role of Human Resource Development in times of crisis: A response to COVID-19 pandemic. Human Resource Development International. 2020;23(4):380–94. doi:10.1080/13678868.2020.1780078
24.
BartschSWeberEBüttgenMHuberA. Leadership matters in crisis-induced digital transformation: How to lead service employees effectively during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Service Management. 2021;32(1):71–85. doi:10.1108/josm-05-2020-0160
25.
HolgersenHJiaZSvenkerudS. Who and how many can work from home? evidence from task descriptions. Journal for Labour Market Research. 2021;55(4):1–13. doi:10.1186/s12651-021-00287-z
26.
van der LippeTLippényiZ. Co-workers working from home and individual and team performance. New Technology, Work and Employment. 2019;35(1):60–79. doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12153
27.
WaizeneggerLMcKennaBCaiWBendzT. An affordance perspective of team collaboration and enforced working from home during COVID-19. European Journal of Information Systems. 2020;29(4):429–42. doi:10.1080/0960085x.2020.1800417
28.
GreenNTappinDBentleyT. Working from Home Before, During and after the Covid-19 pandemic: Implications for workers and organizations. New Zealand Journal of Employment Relations. 2020;45(2):5–16.
29.
BickABlandinAMertensK. Work from home before and after the COVID-19 outbreak. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics. 2023;15(4):1–39.
30.
MatliW. The changing work landscape as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic: Insights from remote workers life situations in South Africa. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy. 2020;40(9/10):1237–56. doi:10.1108/ijssp-08-2020-038
31.
RožmanMČančerV. Appropriately organized work and employees’ concerns related to work from home during the COVID-19 pandemic: The case in Slovenia. Employee Relations: The International Journal. 2022;44(7):63–80. doi:10.1108/er-09-2021-0402
32.
ConleySWoosleySA. Teacher role stress, higher order needs and work outcomes. Journal of Educational Administration. 2000;38(2):179–201. doi:10.1108/09578230010320163
33.
ProdanovaJKocarevL. Employees’ dedication to working from home in times of COVID-19 crisis. Management Decision. 2021;60(3):509–30. doi:10.1108/md-09-2020-1256
34.
ErkutluH. The impact of transformational leadership on organizational and leadership effectiveness. Journal of Management Development. 2008;27(7):708–26. doi:10.1108/02621710810883616
35.
PawirosumartoSSarjanaPKGunawanR. The effect of work environment, leadership style, and organizational culture towards job satisfaction and its implication towards employee performance in Parador Hotels and Resorts, Indonesia. International Journal of Law and Management. 2017;59(6):1337–58. doi:10.1108/ijlma-10-2016-0085
36.
ChangSLeeM. A study on relationship among leadership, organizational culture, the operation of learning organization and employees’ job satisfaction. The Learning Organization. 2007;14(2):155–85. doi:10.1108/09696470710727014
37.
ManutiAGiancasproMLMolinoMIngusciERussoVSignoreFZitoMCorteseCG. “Everything will be fine”: A study on the relationship between employees’ perception of sustainable HRM practices and positive organizational behavior during covid19. Sustainability. 2020;12(23):10216.10.3390/su122310216
38.
ElenkovDS. Effects of leadership on organizational performance in Russian companies. Journal of Business Research. 2002;55(6):467–80. doi:10.1016/s0148-2963(00)00174-0
39.
AlrowwadAAbualoushSHMasa’dehR. Innovation and intellectual capital as intermediary variables among transformational leadership, transactional leadership, and organizational performance. Journal of Management Development. 2020;39(2):196–222. doi:10.1108/jmd-02-2019-0062
40.
KatouAA. Transformational leadership and Organisational Performance. Employee Relations. 2015;37(3):329–53. doi:10.1108/er-05-2014-0056
41.
KrishnanVR. Transformational leadership and personal outcomes: Empowerment as mediator. Leadership & Organization Development Journal. 2012;33(6):550–63. doi:10.1108/01437731211253019
42.
de VriesRERoeRATaillieuTCB. Need for leadership as a moderator of the relationships between leadership and individual outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly. 2002;13(2):121–37. doi:10.1016/s1048-9843(02)00097-8
43.
GemedaHKLeeJ. Leadership styles, work engagement and outcomes among information and communications technology professionals: A cross-national study. Heliyon. 2020;6(4):1–10. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03699
44.
de PoelFMStokerJIvan der ZeeKI. Climate control? The relationship between leadership, climate for change, and work outcomes. The International Journal of Human Resource Management. 2012;23(4):694–713. doi:10.1080/09585192.2011.561228
45.
ChanATChanEH. Impact of perceived leadership styles on work outcomes: Case of building professionals. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. 2005;131(4):413–22. doi:10.1061/(asce)0733-9364(2005)131:4(413)
46.
ZhangBMorrisJL. High-performance work systems and organizational performance: Testing the mediation role of employee outcomes using evidence from PR China. The International Journal of Human Resource Management. 2014;25(1):68–90. doi:10.1080/09585192.2013.781524
47.
AtanJ binMahmoodNH. The role of transformational leadership style in enhancing employees’ competency for organization performance. Management Science Letters. 2019; 2191–200. doi:10.5267/j.msl.2019.7.033
48.
MutereraJHemsworthDBareghehAGarcia-RiveraBR. The leader-follower dyad: The link between leader and follower perceptions of transformational leadership and its impact on job satisfaction and organizational performance. International Public Management Journal. 2018;21(1):131–62. doi:10.1080/10967494.2015.1106993
49.
García-MoralesVJJiménez-BarrionuevoMMGutiérrez-GutiérrezL. Transformational leadership influence on organizational performance through organizational learning and innovation. Journal of Business Research. 2012;65(7):1040–50. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.03.005
50.
BirasnavM. Knowledge management and organizational performance in the Service Industry: The role of transformational leadership beyond the effects of transactional leadership. Journal of Business Research. 2014;67(8):1622–9. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.09.006
51.
NoruzyADalfardVMAzhdariBNazari-ShirkouhiSRezazadehA. Relations between transformational leadership, organizational learning, knowledge management, organizational innovation, and organizational performance: An empirical investigation of manufacturing firms. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. 2013;64(5-8):1073–85. doi:10.1007/s00170-012-4038-y
52.
NguyenT-T-NLuuT-M-N. Linking transformational leadership and organizational performance: An empirical investigation of manufacturing firms in Vietnam. Economics & Sociology. 2019;12(2):170–91. doi:10.14254/2071-789x.2019/12-2/10
53.
AzizahYNRijalMKRumainurRohmahUNPranajayaSANgiuZMufidAPurwantoAMa‘uDH. Transformational or transactional leadership style: Which affects work satisfaction and performance of Islamic university lecturers during COVID-19 pandemic?Systematic Reviews in Pharmacy2020;11(7):577–88.
54.
WaheedAShehzadFArifFAbbasAAMehmoodZUsmanM. Role of CSR in achieving customers’ satisfaction and retention during COVID-19 and post-pandemic period: Empirical evidence from emerging nations. Human Systems Management. 2022;41(6):731–743. doi:10.3233/hsm-211564
55.
KlineRB. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. 3rd ed. United States of America: The Guilford Press; 2011.
56.
IacobucciD. Structural equations modeling: Fit indices, sample size, and advanced topics. Journal of Consumer Psychology. 2009;20(1):90–98. doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2009.09.003
57.
BarrettP. Structural equation modelling: Adjudging model fit. Personality and Individual Differences. 2007;42(5):815–824. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2006.09.018
58.
WestlandJC. Lower bounds on sample size in structural equation modeling. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications. 2010;9(6):476–487. doi:10.1016/j.elera2010.07.003
59.
GerdprasertSPruksachevaTPanijpanBRuenwongsaP. An interactive web-based learning unit to facilitate and improve intrapartum nursing care of nursing students. Nurse Education Today. 2011;31(5):531–5. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2010.10.008
60.
ParishTBaghurstTTurnerR. Becoming competitive amateur bodybuilders: Identification of contributors. Psychology of Men & Masculinity. 2010;11(2):152–9. doi:10.1037/a0018091
61.
ChoudharyAIAkhtarSAZaheerA. Impact of transformational and servant leadership on Organizational Performance: A Comparative Analysis. Journal of Business Ethics. 2013;116(2):433–40. doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1470-8
62.
CarmeliAMeitarRWeisbergJ. Self-leadership skills and innovative behavior at work. International Journal of Manpower. 2006;27(1):75–90. doi:10.1108/01437720610652853
63.
PodsakoffPMMacKenzieSBMoormanRHFetterR. Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers’ trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors. The Leadership Quarterly. 1990;1(2):107–42. doi:10.1016/1048-9843(90)90009-7
64.
LaohavichienT. Leadership and Quality Management: A Comparison Between The U.S. and Thailand [dissertation]. Clemson: Clemson University; 2004.
65.
MacKenzieSBPodsakoffPMRichGA. Transformational and transactional leadership and salesperson performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. 2001;29(2):115–34. doi:10.1177/03079459994506
66.
JyothibabuCFarooqABhusan PradhanB. An integrated scale for measuring an organizational learning system. The Learning Organization. 2010;17(4):303–27. doi:10.1108/09696471011043081
67.
LeeHChoiB. Knowledge management enablers, processes, and organizational performance: An integrative view and empirical examination. Journal of Management Information Systems. 2003;20(1):179–228. doi:10.1080/07421222.2003.11045756
68.
RingleCMWendeSBeckerJ-M. SmartPLS 4[Internet]. Oststeinbek: SmartPLS GmbH. [updated 2023; cited 2023 Feb 23]. Available from: http://www.smartpls.com
69.
WestSGFinchJFCurranPJ. Structural Equation Models with Nonnormal Variables: Problems and Remedies. In: Rick H, Hoyle, editor. Structural equation modeling: concepts, issues and applications. United States of America: Sage. 1995. p. 56–75.
70.
JooB (Brian)Jun YoonHJeungC. The effects of core self-evaluations and transformational leadership on organizational commitment. Leadership & Organization Development Journal. 2012;33(6):564–82. doi:10.1108/01437731211253028
71.
VianelloMGallianiEMHaidtJ. Elevation at work: The effects of leaders’ moral excellence. The Journal of Positive Psychology. 2010;5(5):390–411. doi:10.1080/17439760.2010.516764
72.
HairJFRisherJJSarstedtMRingleCM. When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review. 2019;31(1):2–24. doi:10.1108/ebr-11-2018-0203
73.
AliZSunHAliM. The impact of managerial and adaptive capabilities to stimulate organizational innovation in SMEs: A complementary PLS-SEM approach. Sustainability. 2017;9(12):2157.10.3390/su9122157
74.
HairJFRingleCMSarstedtM. PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice. 2011;19(2):139–51. doi:10.2753/mtp1069-6679190202
75.
HairJFSarstedtMHopkinsLKuppelwieserVG. Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). European Business Review. 2014;26(2):106–21. doi:10.1108/ebr-10-2013-0128
