This article presents a framework that detects potential ontology building errors to improve the ontology quality. These potential errors are called ontology pitfalls in the literature. This work extends the existing ontology pitfall set in the literature and suggests new solutions for ontology repair. We have also developed a Java implementation for detection of the proposed pitfalls. These pitfalls were evaluated with well-known ontologies using this implementation.
IyerVSanagavarapuLMRaghuReddy Y. A framework for syntactic and semantic quality evaluation of ontologies. In: International Conference on Secure Knowledge Management in the Artificial Intelligence Era, San Antonio, 8-9 October 2021, pp.73–93, Springer.
2.
GuarinoNWeltyC. Evaluating ontological decisions with OntoClean. Communications of the ACM2002; 45(2):61–65.
3.
TartirSArpinarIBShethAP. Ontological evaluation and validation. In: KameasAHealyMPoliR(eds) Theory and applications of ontology: computer applications. Springer, 2010, pp.115–130.
4.
GangemiACatenacciCCiaramitaMet al. A theoretical framework for ontology evaluation and validation. In: Workshop on Semantic Web Applications and Perspectives, Trento, 14–16December2005, http://www.ceur-ws.org/Vol-166/9.pdf
5.
Burton-JonesAStoreyVCSugumaranVet al. A semioticmetrics suite for assessing the quality of ontologies. Data and Knowledge Engineering2005; 55(1):84–102.
AlaniHBrewsterCShadboltN. Ranking ontologies with AktiveRank. In: International Semantic Web conference, Athens, 5–9 November 2006, pp.1–15, Springer.
8.
Poveda-VillalonMGomez-PerezASuarez-FigueroaMC. Oops!(ontologypitfallscanner!): An on-line tool for ontology evaluation. International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems2014; 10(2):7–34.
9.
McDanielMStoreyVCSugumaranV. Assessing the quality of domain ontologies: Metrics and an automated ranking system. Data and Knowledge Engineering2018; 115:32–47.
10.
LantowB. Ontometrics:Putting metrics into use for ontology evaluation. In: International joint conference on knowledge discovery, knowledge engineering and knowledge management, Porto, 9-11 November 2016, pp.186–191, Springer.
11.
AmardeilhFLaubletPMinelJL.Document annotation and ontology population from linguistic extractions. In: International conference on Knowledge capture, Banff, 2–5 October 2005, pp.161–168, ACM.
12.
WohlgenanntGSabouMHanikaF. Crowd-based ontology engineering with the uComp Protege Plugin. Semantic Web Journal2016; 7(4):379–398.
13.
KiptooCC. Ontology enhancement using crowd sourcing: A conceptual architecture. International Journal of Crowd Science2020; 4(3):231–243.
14.
PittetPBarthelemyJ. Exploiting users’ feedbacks: Towards a task-based evaluation of application ontologies throughout their lifecycle. In: International conference on knowledge engineering and ontology development, Lisbon, 12–14 November 2015, https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01459827/document
15.
ZhangYSaberiMChangE. Semantic-based lightweight ontology learning framework: A Case study of intrusion detection ontology. In: International conference on web intelligence, Leipzig, 23–26 August 2017, pp.1171–1177, ACM.
16.
DingLFininTJoshiAet al. Swoogle: A search and metadata engine for the semantic web. In: International conference on information and knowledge management, Washington, 8–13 November 2004, pp.652–659, ACM.
ChakrabortyJ. OntoConnect: Domain-agnostic ontology alignment using neural networks. PhDThesis, 2021, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ.
20.
CarrollJJDickinsonIDollinCet al. Jena: Implementing the semantic web recommendations. In: International World Wide Web conference on alternate track papers and posters, NewYork, 19–21 May 2004, pp.74–83, ACM.
TzitzikasYAlloccaCBekiariCet al. Integrating heterogeneous and distributed information about marine species through a top level ontology. In: Metadata and Semantics Research Conference, Thessaloniki, 19-22 November 2013, pp.289–301, Springer.
23.
HeppM. Goodrelations: An ontology for describing products and services offers on the web. In: International conference on knowledge engineering and knowledge management, Las Vegas, 14–17 July 2008, pp.329–346, Springer.
BornerKConlonMCorson-RikertJet al.Vivo: A semantic approach to scholarly networking and discovery. Synthesis Lectures on the Semantic Web Theory and Technology2012; 7(1):1–178.
RijgersbergHVan AssemMTopJ. Ontology of units of measure and related concepts. Semantic Web Journal2013; 4(1):3–13.
30.
JanowiczKHallerACoxSJet al. SOSA: A lightweight ontology for sensors, observations, samples and actuators. Journal of Web Semantics2019; 56:1–10.
31.
HorrocksIPatel-SchneiderPFBoleyHet al. SWRL: A semantic web rule language combining OWL and RuleML (W3C Member Submission), 2004, https://www.w3.org/Submission/SWRL/
