The aim of this study was to identify the variables that can potentially affect information-seeking behaviour in mental health service providers using a quasi-experimental research design. The sample included 30 mental health professionals (with minimum 2 years of experience) to each of whom a scenario was presented in which signs and symptoms of three patients were presented, simulating an actual diagnostic interview. Stress response evaluation (SRE), questionnaires, behavioural observation by the Morae software, and semi-structured interviews were used as means of data collection. Our findings showed that variables such as demographic (e.g. field of study, level of education, work experience and age), psychological (e.g. state and trait anxiety, and therapist’s self-assessment) and skill level (e.g. information literacy and expert knowledge) had significant effects on information-seeking behaviour. These results can hopefully provide insights to designers and librarians who seek to create novel or optimise the existing physician-assisted systems.
MehoLITibboRH. Modeling the information-seeking behavior of social scientists: Ellis’s study revisited. J Am Soc Inform Sci Technol2003; 54(6): 570–587.
2.
KuhlthauCC. Inside the search process: information seeking from the user’s perspective. J Am Soc Inform Sci1991; 42(5): 361–371.
3.
AndersonJGAbrahamsonK. Your health care may kill you: medical errors. Stud Health Technol Inform2017; 234: 13–17.
4.
CamererCLoewensteinGPrelecD. Neuroeconomics: how neuroscience can inform economics. J Econ Lit2005; 43(1): 9–64.
5.
ArielyDBernsGS. Neuromarketing: the hope and hype of neuroimaging in business. Nat Rev Neurosci2010; 11(4): 284–292.
6.
RiedlRLégerP-M. Fundamentals of NeuroIS. Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer, 2016.
7.
EllisDCoxDHallK. A comparison of the information seeking patterns of researchers in the physical and social sciences. J Document1993; 49(4): 356–369.
8.
VakkariP. A theory of the task-based information retrieval process: a summary and generalization of a longitudinal study. J Document2001; 57(1): 44–60.
9.
WilsonT. Human information behavior. Inform Sci2000; 3(2): 49–55.
10.
Noroozi ChakoliA. The main and effective factors in information seeking behavior. Libr Inform Sci2006; 9(1): 144–173 (in Persian).
11.
KuhlthauCC. A principle of uncertainty for information seeking. J Document1993; 49(4): 339–355.
12.
ClarkeMABeldenJLKoopmanRJet al. Information needs and information-seeking behaviour analysis of primary care physicians and nurses: a literature review. Health Info Libr J2013; 30(3): 178–190.
13.
DemergazziSPastoreLBassaniGet al. Information needs and information-seeking behavior of Italian neurologists: exploratory mixed methods study. J Med Internet Res2020; 22(4): e14979.
14.
DasguptaNAkhileshKSDasguptaS. Information-seeking behavior of medical professionals in the digital age in Kolkata, India. J Electr Res Med Libr2017; 14(1): 1–16.
15.
HyldegardJ. Collaborative information behavior: exploring Kuhlthau’s information search process model in a group-based educational setting. Inform Process Manag2006; 42(1): 276–298.
16.
PintoMSalesD. A research case study for user-centered information literacy instruction: information behaviour of translation trainees. J Inform Sci2007; 33(5): 531–550.
17.
Al-SamarraieHEldenfriaADawoudH. The impact of personality traits on users’ information-seeking behavior. Inform Process Manag2017; 53(1): 237–247.
18.
LopatovskaI. Emotional aspects of the online information retrieval process. PhD Thesis, School of Communication, Information and Library Studies, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, 2009.
19.
KrampenGFellCSchuiG. Psychologists’ research activities and professional information-seeking behaviour: empirical analyses with reference to the theory of the intellectual and social organization of the sciences. J Inform Sci2011; 37(4): 439–450.
20.
WuL. Help-seeking behaviors within the context of computer task accomplishment: an exploratory study. Doctoral Dissertation, The University of Tennesse, Knoxville, TN, 2011.
21.
González-ibáñezaRI. Study of positive and negative affective states in collaborative information seeking. PhD Thesis, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, 2013.
22.
SavolainenR. Cognitive barriers to information seeking: a conceptual analysis. J Inform Sci2015; 41(5): 613–623.
23.
GwizdkaJMostafaJ. NeuroIIR 2017: Challenges in bringing neuroscience to research in human information interaction. In: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on a conference on human information interaction and retrieval, Oslo, 7–11 March 2017. New York: ACM.
24.
GwizdkaJMoshfeghiYPollickFEet al. Applications of neuroimaging in information science: challenges and opportunities. In: Proceedings of the 76th ASIS&T annual meeting: beyond the cloud – rethinking information boundaries, Montreal, QC, Canada, 2013, 1–5November2013, pp. 67:1–67:4, http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2655780.2655847
25.
O’BrienHLGwizdkaJLopatovskaIet al. Psychophysiological methods in information science: fit or fad? In: iConference 2015 proceedings: presented at the iConference 2015, https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/handle/2142/73773 (accessed 21 February 2018).
26.
MostafaJGwizdkaJ. Deepening the role of the user: neurophysiological evidence as a basis for studying and improving search. In: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM on conference on human information interaction and retrieval, Carrboro, NC, 13–17 March 2016, pp. 63–70. New York: ACM.
27.
MoshfeghiYPollickF. Neuropsychological model of the realization of information need. J Assoc Inform Sci Technol2019; 70: 954–967.
28.
SarrafN. Mapping the neurophysiological and the affective dimensions of the information search process model. PhD Thesis, San Jose, CA: San Jose State University, 2019.
29.
PicardRWVyzasEHealeyJ. Toward machine emotional intelligence: analysis of affective physiological state. IEEE T Pattern Anal Mach Intel2001; 23(10): 1175–1191.
30.
HendahewaC. Strategy in action: analyzing online search behavior by mining search strategies. In: Proceedings of the 7th ACM international conference on Web search and data mining, New York, 24–28 February 2014, pp. 649–654. New York: ACM.
31.
SoltaniDMitsuiMShahC. Coagmen to v3. 0: rapid prototyping of web search experiments. In: Proceedings of the 2019 conference on human information interaction and retrieval, 2019, pp. 367–371, https://par.nsf.gov/servlets/purl/10099029
32.
JiangJHeDAllanJ. Searching, browsing, and clicking in a search session: changes in user behavior by task and over time. In: Proceedings of the 37th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research & development in information retrieval, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia, 6–11 June 2014, pp. 607–616. New York: ACM.
33.
DimokaAPavlouPADavisF. NeuroIS: the potential of cognitive neuroscience for information systems research. Inform Syst Res2010; 22: 687–702.
34.
RiedlRBankerRBenbasatRDet al. On the foundations of NeuroIS: reflections on the Gmunden retreat 2009. Commun Assoc Inform Syst2010; 27(1): 02715.
WuYLiuYTsaiYHRet al. Investigating the role of eye movements and physiological signals in search satisfaction prediction using geometric analysis. J Assoc Inform Sci Technol2019; 70(9): 981–999.
38.
ZerehsazM. An investigation into the relationship among users’ psychological capabilities / skills and their help seeking behavior in digital library based on Marchionini’s adapted model. PhD Thesis, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, 2015 (in Persian).
39.
ShovonMHINandagopalDDuJTet al. Cognitive activity during web search. In: Proceedings of the 38th international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval, Santiago, Chile, 9–13 August 2015, pp. 967–970. New York: ACM.
GwizdkaJ. Inferring web page relevance using pupillometry and single channel EEG. In: RandolphABDavisFDvom BrockeJ, et al. (eds) Information Systems and Neuroscience. Cham: Springer, 2018, pp. 175–183.
42.
LiuJShahC. Interactive IR user study design, evaluation, and reporting: synthesis lectures on information concepts. Retr Serv2019; 11(2): i–93.
43.
BurdickT. Gender in information search process: an exploratory study of students experience. PhD Thesis, State of Florida University, Tallahassee, FL, 1995.
44.
AzimiMAminiSSadatmoosaviAet al. Evaluation and analysis of uncertainty in the information seeking behavior of medical post-graduate students. J Res Med Dent Sci2018; 6(3): 24–32.
45.
BirksJ. The influence of emotions on interviewers’ information search behaviors: a test of an information processing model. PhD Thesis, The University of Akron, Akron, OH, 2009.
46.
NahlD. Affective load theory (ALT). In: FisherKEErdelezSEMcKechnieEG (eds) Theories of Information Behavior. Medford, NJ: Information Today, 2005, pp. 39–43.
47.
NahlD. Measuring the affective information environment of web searchers. Proc Am Soc Inform Sci Technol2004; 41(1): 191–197.
ArapakisIJoseJMGrayPD. Affective feedback: an investigation into the role of emotions in the information seeking process. In: Proceedings of the 31st annual international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information, 2008, http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/4825/ (accessed 21 January 2017).
50.
HoseiniM. The influence of interactivity features of databases on scientific behavior: a user perspective survey based on the flow theory. PhD Thesis, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, 2012 (in Persian).
