The knowledge gained from data mining is highly dependent on the experience of an expert for further analysis to increase effectiveness and wise decision-making. This mined knowledge requires actionability enhancement before it can be applied to real-world problems. The literature highlights the reasons that emerged the need to incorporate human wisdom in decision-making for complex problems. To solve this problem, a domain called ‘Wisdom Mining’ is recommended, proposing a set of algorithms parallel to the algorithms proposed by the data mining. In wisdom mining, a process to extract wisdom needs to be defined with less influence from an expert. This review proposed improvements to data mining techniques and their applications in the real world and emphasised the need to seek ways to harness wisdom from data. This study covers the diverse definitions and different perspectives of wisdom within philosophy, psychology, management and computer science. This comprehensive literature review served as a foundation for constructing a wise decision framework that aided in identifying the wisdom factors like context, utility, location and time. The inclusion of these wisdom factors in existing data mining algorithms makes the transition from data mining to wisdom mining possible. This research includes the relationship between these two mining process that facilitated further elucidation of the wisdom mining process. Potential research trends in the domain are also seen as a potential endeavour to improve the analysis and use of data.
IntezariAPauleenDJ. Conceptualizing wise management decision making: a grounded theory approach. Decis Sci2018; 49(2): 335–400.
7.
Big Data: Concepts Methodologies Tools Applications. Hershey, PA: IGI Global, 2016, p. 815.
8.
SternbergRJordanJ. A handbook of wisdom: Psychological perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
9.
BerneckerSPritchardD. The Routledge Companion to Epistemology. New York: Routledge, 2011.
10.
WilliamsPBNusbaumHC. Toward a neuroscience of wisdom. In: AbsherJRCloutierJ (eds) Neuroimaging Personality, Social Cognition, and Character. Cambridge: Academic Press, 2016, pp. 383–395.
11.
BachmannCSasseLHabischA. Applying the practical wisdom lenses in decision-making: an integrative approach to humanistic management. Human Manag J2018; 2(2): 125–150.
12.
Stangel-MesekeMBovenCBraunGet al. Practical Wisdom and Diversity: Aligning Insights, Virtues and Values. Wiesbaden: Springer Gabler, 2018.
13.
Sasse-WerhahnLFBachmannCHabischA. Managing tensions in corporate sustainability through a practical wisdom lens. J Bus Ethics2018; 163: 53–66.
14.
IntezariAPauleenD. Wisdom analytics wicked problems: integral decision making for the data age. London: Routledge, 2019.
AlammarFPauleenD. Exploring managers’ conceptions of wisdom as management practice. J Manag Org2016; 22(4): 550–565.
17.
PauleenDDalalNRooneyDet al. In bed with technology? Peril, promise, and prudence. Commun Assoc Inform Syst2015; 37(1): 38.
18.
DalalNPauleenDJ. The wisdom nexus: guiding information systems research, practice, and education. Inform Syst J2019; 29(1): 224–244.
19.
FormicaP. Portrait of path finders. In: FormicaP (ed.) The role of creative ignorance: portraits of path finders and path creators, pp. 57–62. New York: Palgrave Pivot, 2015.
20.
JonesWE. Wisdom as an aim of higher education. J Value Inquiry2015; 49(1–2): 1–15.
21.
SternbergRJ. Wisdom intelligence creativity synthesized. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
ThompsonVA. Dual-process theories: a meta-cognitive perspective. In: EvansJFrankishK (eds) In Two Minds: Dual Processes and Beyond. New York: Oxford University Press, 2009, pp. 171–196.
36.
KliegrTBahníkŠFürnkranzJ. A review of possible effects of cognitive biases on interpretation of rule-based machine learning models, arXiv, 2018, https://arxiv.org/abs/1804.02969
IntezariAPauleenDJTaskinN. The DIKW hierarchy and management decision-making. In: 2016 49th Hawaii international conference on system sciences (HICSS), Koloa, HI, 5–8 January 2016, pp. 4193–4201. New York: IEEE.
39.
ShaheenMShahbazMGuergachiA. Context based positive and negative spatio-temporal association rule mining. Knowl Based Syst2013; 37: 261–273.
SternbergRJ. Why schools should teach for wisdom: the balance theory of wisdom in educational settings. Educ Psychol2001; 36(4): 227–245.
42.
BaltesPBStaudingerUM. Wisdom: a metaheuristic (pragmatic) to orchestrate mind and virtue toward excellence. Am Psychol2000; 55(1): 122.
43.
GengLHamiltonHJ. Interestingness measures for data mining: a survey. ACM Comput Surv2006; 38(3): 1–32.
44.
QayyumMA. Modelling wisdom in learning and decision making. Int J Knowl Learn2018; 12(2): 146–166.
45.
GrossmannI. Wisdom in context. Perspect Psychol Sci2017; 12(2): 233–257.
46.
BrienzaJPKungFYHSantosHCet al. Wisdom, bias, and balance: toward a process-sensitive measurement of wisdom-related cognition. J Personal Social Psychol2018; 115(6): 1093.
47.
IsiKOYJonesMCSidorovaA. Business intelligence success: the roles of BI capabilities and decision environments. Inform Manag2013; 50(1): 13–23.
48.
AlalwanJAThomasMAWeistrofferHR. Decision support capabilities of enterprise content management systems: An empirical investigation. Decis Support Syst2014; 68: 39–48.
49.
DalalNPauleenDJennexMet al. Where is the wisdom we have lost in technology. In: 19th Americas conference on information systems, AMCIS 2013 – Hyperconnected World: Anything, Anywhere, Anytime, Chicago, IL, 15–17 August 2013, pp. 3994–3997. Red Hook, NY: Curran Associates.
50.
WalshR. What is wisdom? Cross-cultural and cross-disciplinary syntheses. Rev General Psychol2015; 19(3): 278.
51.
PassfieldLHopkerJG. A mine of information: can sports analytics provide wisdom from your data?Int J Sport Physiol Perform2017; 12(7): 851–855.
52.
RowleyJ. The wisdom hierarchy: representations of the DIKW hierarchy. J Inform Sci2007; 33(2): 163–180.
53.
HeyJ. The data, information, knowledge, wisdom chain: the metaphorical link. Intergovern Oceanograp Commis2004; 26: 1–18.
CooperP. Data, information, knowledge and wisdom. Anaesth Intens Care Med2014; 15(1): 44–45.
56.
BaskaradaSKoroniosA. Data, information, knowledge, wisdom (DIKW): a semiotic theoretical and empirical exploration of the hierarchy and its quality dimension. Australasia J Inform Syst2013; 18(1): 36–48.
57.
JennexME. Big Data, the Internet of Things, and the revised knowledge pyramid. ACM SIGMIS Database2017; 48(4): 69–79.
58.
SatoAHuangR. A generic formulated kid model for pragmatic processing of data, information, and knowledge. In: 2015 IEEE 12th international conference on ubiquitous intelligence and computing and 2015 IEEE 12th international conference on autonomic and trusted computing and 2015 IEEE 15th international conference on scalable computing and communications and its associated workshops (UIC-ATC-ScalCom), Beijing, China, 10–14 August 2015, pp. 609–616. New York: IEEE.
59.
YusofWSZakariaOZainolZet al. DIKW application on knowledge based framework with situational awareness. Int J Acad Res Busines Social Sci2013; 8(6): 1110–1120.
60.
LiewA. DIKIW: data, information, knowledge, intelligence, wisdom and their interrelationships. Business Manag Dynam2013; 2(10): 49.
61.
MingHChangCKYangJ. Dimensional situation analytics: from data to wisdom. In: 2015 IEEE 39th annual computer software and applications conference, Taichung, Taiwan, 1–5 July 2015, pp. 50–59. New York: IEEE.
62.
AllenGD. Hierarchy of knowledge – from data to wisdom. Int J Curr Res Multidiscip2004; 2: 15–23.
63.
NurnbergerAWenzelC. Wisdom – the blurry top of human cognition in the DIKW-model?Proc EUSFLAT Conf2011; 1: 584–591.
64.
CongerSProbstJ. Knowledge management in ITSM: Applying the DIKW model. In: MoraMGomezJMGarridoLet al. (eds) Engineering and management of IT-based service systems. New York: Springer, 2014, pp.1–18.
65.
SchumakerRP. From data to wisdom: The progression of computational learning in text mining. Commun IIMA2014; 11(1): 4.
66.
ShethAAnantharamPHensonC. Physical-cyber-social computing: an early 21st century approach. Intell Syst IEEE2013; 28(1): 78–82.
67.
MingHOyamaK. Dimensional situation analytics: an introduction and its application prospects. In: 2019 IEEE world congress on services (SERVICES), Milan, 8–13 July 2019, vol. 2642, pp. 133–134. New York: IEEE.
68.
OyamaKTakeuchiAFujimotoH. CAPIS model based software design method for sharing experts’ thought processes. In: 30th annual international computer software and applications conference (COMPSAC’06), Chicago, IL, 17–21 September 2006, vol. 1, pp. 307–316. New York: IEEE.
69.
OyamaKJaygarlHXiaJet al. A human-machine dimensional inference ontology that weaves human intentions and requirements of context awareness systems. In: 32nd annual IEEE international computer software and applications conference, Turku, 28 July–1 August 2008, pp. 287–294. New York: IEEE.
70.
YangJChangCKMingH. A situation-centric approach to identifying new user intentions using the MTL method. In: 2017 IEEE 41st annual computer software and applications conference (COMPSAC), Turin, 4–8 July 2017, vol. 1, pp. 347–356. New York: IEEE.
71.
LobovA. Smart manufacturing systems: climbing the DIKW pyramid. In: IECON 2018-44th annual conference of the IEEE industrial electronics society, Washington, DC, 21–23 October 2018, pp. 4730–4735. New York: IEEE.
72.
SathananthanS.Data valuation considering knowledge transformation, process models | data models. In: 2018 12th international conference on research challenges in information science (RCIS), Nantes, 29–31 May 2018, pp. 1–5. New York: IEEE.
73.
TuomiI. Data is more than knowledge: Implications of the reversed knowledge hierarchy for knowledge management and organizational memory. In: Proceedings of the 32nd annual Hawaii international conference on systems sciences. HICSS-32. Abstracts and CD-ROM of Full Papers, Maui, HI, 5–8 January 1999, p. 12. New York: IEEE.
74.
JennexME. Using a revised knowledge pyramid to redefine knowledge management strategy. In: JennexME (ed.) Effective knowledge management systems in modern society. Hershey, PA: IGI Global, 2019, pp. 1–18.
75.
WuXZhuXWuGQet al. Data mining with big data. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng2013; 26(1): 97–107.
76.
HolzingeA. Human–computer interaction and knowledge discovery (HCI-KDD): what is the benefit of bringing those two fields to work together. In: International conference on availability, reliability, and security, Regensburg, 2–6 September 2013, pp. 319–328. Berlin: Springer, Heidelberg.
77.
GoebelMGruenwaldL. A survey of data mining and knowledge discovery software tools. ACM SIGKDD Explor Newslett1999; 1(1): 20–33.
78.
HanJKamberMPeiJ. Data mining: concepts techniques. Burlington, MA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 2013.
79.
SrideviRRamarajE. A general survey on multidimensional and quantitative association rule mining algorithms. Int J Eng Res Appl2013; 3(4): 1442–1448.
80.
FreitasAA. Data mining knowledge discovery with evolutionary algorithms. Berlin: Springer, 2013.
81.
AndrejevicM. Big data, big questions the big data divide. Int J Commun2014; 8: 17.
82.
KumarATyagiAKTyagiSK. Data mining: various issues and challenges for future a short discussion on data mining issues for future work. Int J Emerg Tech Adv Eng2014; 4(1): 1–8.
83.
LiJZLiQLiuTYet al. Data mining: modeling, algorithms, applications and systems. Adv Mater Res2014; 926: 2786–2789.
84.
AggarwalCC. Data mining: The Textbook. New York: Springer, 2015.
85.
LauschASchmidtATischendorfL. Data mining and linked open data–New perspectives for data analysis in environmental research. Ecol Model2015; 295: 5–17.
86.
ShmueliGBrucePCYahavIet al. Data mining for business analytics: concepts, techniques, and applications in R. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2017.
87.
SimeoneO. A very brief introduction to machine learning with applications to communication systems. IEEE Trans Cognit Commun Network2018; 4(4): 648–664.
88.
DelenDZolbaninHM. The analytics paradigm in business research. J Busines Res2018; 90: 186–195.
89.
WilliamsG. Descriptive and predictive analytics. In: WilliamsG (ed.) Data Mining with Rattle and R. New York: Springer, 2011, pp. 245–268.
90.
AgyapongKBHayfron-AcquahJBAsanteM. An overview of data mining models (Descriptive and Predictive). Int J Softw Hardw Res Eng2016; 4: 53–60.
91.
ChenYHuDZhangG. Data mining and critical success factors in data mining projects. In: International conference on programming languages for manufacturing, Shanghai, China, 15–17 June 2006, pp. 281–287. Boston, MA: Springer.
ChenFDengPWanJet al. Data mining for the Internet of things: literature review and challenges. Int J Distrib Sens Netw2017; 11(8): 431047.
94.
YuXChuYJiangFet al. SVMs classification based two-side cross domain collaborative filtering by inferring intrinsic user and item features. Knowl Based Syst2018; 141: 80–91.
95.
YuXJiangFDuJet al. A cross-domain collaborative filtering algorithm with expanding user and item features via the latent factor space of auxiliary domains. Pattern Recogn2019; 94: 96–109.
96.
CuiZXuXFeiXUEet al. Personalized recommendation system based on collaborative filtering for IoT scenarios. IEEE Trans Serv Comput2020; 13(4): 685–695.
97.
HassanSISamadAAhmadOet al. Partitioning and hierarchical based clustering: a comparative empirical assessment on internal and external indices, accuracy, and time. Int J Inform Tech2020; 12(4): 1377–1384.
LuJZhuQ. An effective algorithm based on density clustering framework. IEEE Access2017; 5: 4991–5000.
100.
BhattacharjeePMitraP. A survey of density based clustering algorithms. Front Comput Sci2021; 15(1): 1–27.
101.
HirecheCDriasHMoulaiH. Grid based clustering for satisfiability solving. Appl Soft Comput2020; 88: 106069.
102.
KushwahaMYadavHAgrawalC. A review on enhancement to standard k-means clustering. In: ShuklaRKAgrawalJSharmaSet al. (eds) Social networking and computational intelligence. New York: Springer, 2020, pp. 313–326.
103.
CirrincioneGCiravegnaGBarbieroPet al. The GH-EXIN neural network for hierarchical clustering. Neural Netw2020; 121: 57–73.
104.
RenjithSSreekumarAJathavedanM. Performance evaluation of clustering algorithms for varying cardinality and dimensionality of data sets. Mater Today2020; 27: 627–633.
105.
WangSLiQZhaoCet al. Extreme clustering – a clustering method via density extreme points. Inform Sci2021; 542: 24–39.
106.
PandeySC. Data mining techniques for medical data: a review. In: International conference on signal processing, communication, power and embedded system (SCOPES), Paralakhemundi, India, 3–5 October 2016, pp. 972–982. New York: IEEE.
107.
TranPHTranKPHuongTTet al. Real time data-driven approaches for credit card fraud detection. In: Proceedings of the 2018 International conference on E-business and applications ICEBA, Da Nang, Vietnam, 23–25 February 2018, pp. 6–9. New York: ACM.
108.
PengJLiQLiHet al. Fraud detection of medical insurance employing outlier analysis. In: 2018 IEEE 22nd international conference on computer supported cooperative work in design (CSCWD), Nanjing, China, 9–11 May 2018, pp. 341–346. New York: IEEE.
109.
LiXWongKC. Evolutionary multiobjective clustering and its applications to patient stratification. IEEE Trans Cybernet2018; 49(5): 1680–1693.
110.
ShenB. Universal knowledge discovery from big data: towards a paradigm shift from ‘knowledge discovery’ to ‘wisdom discovery’, arXiv, 2014, https://arxiv.org/abs/1403.7570
111.
EsfandiariNBabavalianMRMoghadamAMEet al. Knowledge discovery in medicine: current issue and future trend. Expert Syst Appl2014; 41(9): 4434–4463.
112.
CaoL. Actionable knowledge discovery and delivery. In: CaoL (ed.) Metasynthetic Computing and Engineering of Complex Systems. London: Springer, 2015, pp. 287–312.
113.
ShiYZhangLTianYet al. Intelligent knowledge: a study beyond data mining. New York: Springer, 2015.
114.
LiXZhangHZhuZet al. An intelligent transformation knowledge mining method based on Extenics. J Intern Technol2013; 14(2): 315–325.
115.
FatimaFTalibRHanifMKet al. A paradigm-shifting from domain-driven data mining frameworks to process-based domain-driven data mining-actionable knowledge discovery framework. IEEE Access2020; 8: 210763–210774.
116.
SuPWangY. An empirical study of observation-weighting method for mining actionable behavioral rules. J Phys Conf Ser2020; 1550(3): 032169.
117.
SubramaniSWangHBalasubramaniamSet al. Mining actionable knowledge using reordering based diversified actionable decision trees. In: International conference on web information systems engineering, Shanghai, China, 7–10 November 2016, pp. 553–560. Cham: Springer.
118.
LuQCuiZChenYet al. Extracting optimal actionable plans from additive tree models. Front Comput Sci2017; 11(1): 160–173.
119.
SuPYangJLiZet al. Mining actionable behavioral rules based on decision tree classifier. In: 2017 13th international conference on semantics, knowledge and grids (SKG), Beijing, China, 13–14 August 2017, pp. 139–143. New York: IEEE.
120.
SuPWangLZengDet al. An observation-weighting method for mining actionable behavioral rules. In: Seventh international conference advanced computational intelligence (ICACI), Wuyi, China, 27–29 March 2015, pp. 120–125. New York: IEEE.
121.
SuPWangLZengDet al. Power-function-based observation-weighting method for mining actionable behavioral rules. In: 2015 seventh international conference on advanced computational intelligence (ICACI), Baltimore, MD, 27–29 May 2015, pp. 120–125. New York: IEEE.
122.
SuPYangJLiZ. Bayesian network-based approach for mining actionable behavioral rules. In: 12th international conference on semantics, knowledge and grids (SKG), Beijing, China, 15–17 August 2016, pp. 131–135. New York: IEEE.
123.
SuPZhuDZengD. A new approach for resolving conflicts in actionable behavioral rules. Sci World J2014; 2014: 530483.
124.
MenziesT. Beyond data mining. IEEE Softw2013; 30(3): 92–92.
125.
MenziesT. Beyond data mining; towards idea engineering. In: Proceedings of the 9th international conference on predictive models in software engineering, Baltimore, MD, 9 October 2013, pp. 1–6. New York: ACM.
126.
ZhangLLiJShiYet al. Foundations of intelligent knowledge management. Human Syst Manag2009; 28(4): 145–161.
127.
LiangWQianWWuYet al. Mining context-aware user requirements from crowd contributed mobile data. In: Proceedings of the 7th Asia-Pacific symposium on internetware, Wuhan, China, 6 November 2015, pp. 132–140.
128.
TangKChenYLHuHW. Context-based market basket analysis in a multiple-store environment. Decis Support Syst2008; 45(1): 150–163.
129.
ChenYLTangKShenRJet al. Market basket analysis in a multiple store environment. Decis Support Syst2005; 40(2): 339–354.
130.
GhorbaniMAbessiM. A new methodology for mining frequent itemsets on temporal data. IEEE Trans Eng Manag2017; 64(4): 566–573.
131.
HongTPLanGCSuJHet al. Discovery of temporal association rules with hierarchical granular framework. Appl Comput Inform2016; 12(2): 134–141.
132.
ChangCYChenMSLeeCH. Mining general temporal association rules for items with different exhibition periods. In: IEEE international conference data mining, Maebashi City, Japan, 9–12 December 2002, pp. 59–66. New York: IEEE.
133.
SalehBMassegliaF. Discovering frequent behaviors: time is an essential element of the context. Knowl Inform Syst2011; 28(2): 311–331.
134.
ForkanARMKhalilIIbaidaAet al. BDCaM: big data for context-aware monitoring – a personalized knowledge discovery framework for assisted healthcare. IEEE Trans Cloud Comput2015; 5(4): 628–641.
135.
ForkanAKhalilITariZ. CoCaMAAL: a cloud-oriented context-aware middleware in ambient assisted living. Future Gener Comput Syst2014; 35: 114–127.
136.
AborokbahMMAl-MutairiSSangaiahAKet al. Adaptive context aware decision computing paradigm for intensive health care delivery in smart cities – a case analysis. Sustain Cities Soc2018; 41: 919–924.
137.
JabbarMADeekshatuluBLChandraP. A novel algorithm for utility-frequent itemset mining in market basket analysis. In: Innovations in Bio-inspired Computing and Applications, Ostrava, 22–24 August 2016. Cham: Springer, pp. 337–345.
138.
MaiTVoBNguyenLTT. A lattice-based approach for mining high utility association rules. Inform Sci2017; 399: 81–97.
139.
BhattacharyaSDubeyD. High utility itemset mining. Int J Emerg Technol Adv Eng2012; 2(8): 476–481.
140.
SrivastavaNGuptaKBaliyanN. Improved market basket analysis with utility mining. In: Proceedings of 3rd international conference on Internet of things and connected technologies (ICIoTCT), Information Systems & Ebusiness Network, March 26–27, 2018, pp. 716–719. India.
141.
HosseiniMMooreJAlmalikiMet al. Wisdom of the crowd within enterprises: practices and challenges. Comput Netw2015; 90: 121–132.
142.
MarshSDibbenMDwyerN. The wisdom of being wise: A brief introduction to computational wisdom. In: IFIP international conference on trust management, Darmstadt, 18–22 July 2016, pp. 137–145. Cham: Springer.
143.
DalalN. Wisdom computing: toward a framework for wisdom research in information systems. In: The proceedings of the eighteenth Americas conference on information systems, Seattle, WA, August2012, http://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2012/proceedings/PerspectivesIS/14
144.
SiddikeMAKIwanoKHidakaKet al. Wisdom service systems: harmonious interactions between people machine. In: International conference on applied human factors and ergonomics, Los Angeles, CA, 17–21 July 2017, pp. 115–127. Cham: Springer.
145.
RugaiN. Computational Epistemology: From Reality to Wisdom, 2nd ed.Morrisville, NC: Lulu Press, 2012.
146.
Akila DeviTRAkilaRGeethaA. Framework for embedded intelligence-integrating IoT, WoT and W2T. In: 2017 2nd international conference on computing and communications technologies (ICCCT), Chennai, India, 23–24 February 2017, pp. 360–364. New York: IEEE.
147.
ShenB. Universal knowledge discovery from big data using combined dual-cycle. Int J Mach Learn Cybernet2018; 9(1): 133–144.
148.
KalanatNKhanshanAKhanjariE. Actionable knowledge discovery from social networks using causal structures of structural features. J Intel Fuzzy Syst2020; 39: 489–501.
