This theoretical paper explores the implications of adopting a practice approach in information science, proposing ‘information in social practice’ as an umbrella term in preference to ‘information behaviour’ or ‘information practice’. The paper explores one influential definition of practice and how four forms of personal photography would be understood within it. It shows that social practices often involve information activities such as seeking or managing information, although they are not the end of the practice. Information activities differ markedly between apparently similar practices; indeed conceptions of what information is are shaped by particular practices. This justifies examining information at the practice level. The focus in the practice approach on social convention and identity, materiality and embodiment, routine and change may also change how we look at information.
FeldmanMSOrlikowskiWJ. Theorizing practice and practicing theory. Organization Science2011; 22(5): 1240–1253.
4.
PostillJ. Introduction: Theorizing media and practice. In: BräuchlerBPostillJ (eds) Theorising media and practice. Oxford: Berghahn Books, 2010.
5.
SchatzkiT. The site of the social. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2002.
6.
CorradiGGherardiSVerzelloniL. Through the practice lens: Where is the bandwagon of practice-based studies heading?Management Learning2010; 41(3): 265–283.
7.
GherardiS. Knowing and learning in practice-based studies: An introduction. The Learning Organization2009; 16(5): 352–359.
8.
GherardiS. Practice? It’s a matter of taste. Management Learning2009; 40(5): 535–550.
9.
LloydA. Informing practice: Information experience of ambulance officers in training and on-road practice. Journal of Documentation: 2008; 65(3): 396–419.
10.
LloydA. Corporeality and practice theory: Exploring emerging research agendas for information literacy. Information Research15(3), http://informationr.net/ir/15-3/colis7/colis704.html (2010, accessed May 2012).
11.
HaiderJ. The environment on holidays or how a recycling bin informs us on the environment. Journal of Documentation2011; 67(5): 823–839.
12.
PrigodaEMcKenziePJ. A collectivist study of human information behaviour in a public library knitting group. Journal of Documentation2007; 63(1): 90–114.
13.
VeinotTC. The eyes of the power company. Library Quarterly; 2007; 77(2) 151–179.
14.
CoxAM. An exploration of the practice approach and its place in information science. Journal of Information Science2012; 38(3): 176–188.
15.
SavolainenR. Information behaviour and information practice: Reviewing the umbrella concepts of information seeking studies. Library Quarterly2007; 77(2): 109–132.
16.
SavolainenR. Everyday information practices: A social phenomenological perspective. Plymouth: Scarecrow Press, 2008.
17.
RoseG. Doing family photography. Farnham: Ashgate, 2010.
18.
SchwartzD. Camera clubs and fine art photography: The social construction of an elite code. Urban Life1986; 15(2): 165–195.
19.
GriffinM. Amateur photography and pictorial aesthetics: Influences of organization and industry on cultural production. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, 1986.
20.
PetersonSM. Common banality: The affective character of photo sharing, everyday life and produsage cultures. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Department of Innovative Communication, IT University of Copenhagen, 2008.
21.
CoxAMBlakeM. Information and food blogging as serious leisure. Aslib Proceedings2011; 63(2/3): 204–220.
22.
ChalfrenR. Snapshot versions of life. Bowling Green State University Popular Press: Bowling Green, 1987.
23.
SavolianenR. Everyday life information seeking. In: FisherKErdelezSMcKechnieL (eds) Theories of information behaviour. Medford, NJ: ASIST, 2005.
24.
HartelJ. Information activities and resources in an episode of gourmet cooking. Information Research12( 1), http://informationr.net/ir/12-1/paper282.html (2006, accessed May 2012).
25.
HartelJ. Managing documents at home for serious leisure: A case study of the hobby of gourmet cooking. Journal of Documentation2010: 66(6); 847–874.
26.
HartelJ. Time as a framework for information science: Insights from the hobby of gourmet cooking. Information Research15(4), http://informationr.net/ir/15-4/colis715.html (2010, accessed May 2012).
27.
LeeCPTraceCB. The role of information in a community of hobbyist collectors. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology2009; 60(3); 621–637.
28.
StebbinsRA. Amateurs, professionals and serious leisure. London: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 1992.
29.
BurgessJ. Vernacular creativity and new media. Unpublished PhD thesis, Queensland University of Technology, 2007.
30.
WatsonPMorganMHemmingtonN. Online communities and the sharing of extraordinary restaurant experiences. Journal of Foodservice2008; 19(6); 289–302.
31.
KirkDSSellenAJRotherCWoodKR. Understanding photowork. Proceedings of the CHI, 2006, pp. 761–770.
32.
HemmigWS. The information-seeking behavior of visual artists: A literature review. Journal of Documentation2008; 64(3): 343–362.
33.
HemmigWS. An empirical study of the information-seeking behavior of practicing visual artists. Journal of Documentation2009; 65(4): 682–703.
34.
CobbledickS. The information-seeking behaviour of artists: Exploratory interviews. Library Quarterly1996; 66(4): 343–372.
35.
SpurginKM. ‘Three backups is a minimum’: A first look at norms and practices in the digital photo collections of amateur photographers. In LeeCA (ed.) I digital: Personal collections in the digital era. Chicago, IL: Society of American Archivists, 2011.
36.
WhittakerSBergmanOCloughP. Easy on that trigger dad: A study of long term family photo retrieval. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing2010; 14(1): 31–43.
37.
SluisDRubinsteinK. A life more photographic: Mapping the networked image. Photographies2008; 1(1): 9–28.
38.
LuCParkJHuX. User tags versus expert-assigned subject terms: A comparison of LibraryThing tags and Library of Congress Subject Headings. Journal of Information Science2010; 36(6): 763–779.
39.
LambertRD. Descriptive, narrative, and experiential pathways to symbolic ancestors. Mortality2006; 11(4): 317–335.
40.
KindbergTSpasojevicMFleckRSellenA. The ubiquitous camera: An in-depth study of camera phone use. Pervasive Computing2005; 4(2): 42–50.
41.
WardeA. Consumption and theories of practice. Journal of Consumer Culture2005; 5(2): 131–153.
42.
WengerE. Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
43.
HodgesDC. Participation as dis-identification with/in a community of practice. Mind, Culture and Activity1998; 5(4): 272–290.
44.
McCarthyJWrightP. Technology as experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2004.
45.
WellsL. Photography: A critical introduction. London: Routledge, 2000.
46.
SchatzkiT. Social practices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
47.
SwidlerA. What anchors cultural practices. In: SchatzkiTKnorr CetinaKvon SavignyE (eds) The practice turn in contemporary theory. London: Routledge, 2001.
48.
DaviesJ. Display, identity and the everyday: Self-presentation through digital image sharing. Discourse, Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education2007; 28(4): 549–564.
49.
MurrayS. Digital images, photo-sharing, and our shifting notions of everyday aesthetics. Journal of Visual Culture2008; 7(2): 147–163.
50.
ShoveEWatsonMHandMIngramJ. The design of everyday life. Oxford: Berg, 2007.
