This article defines information inequality as multifaceted disparity between individuals, communities or nations in mobilizing society’s information resources for the benefit of their lives and development. It then examines related research from a wide range of disciplines that focuses either on information inequality in general or on its specific forms, e.g. information poverty, information divide, knowledge gap and digital divide. It shows that it is possible to identify a number of clusters of information inequality research according to their theoretical perspectives, and that these perspectives have inherited to a great extent the traditional divisions of social sciences between structure vs agency, society vs individuals and objectivism vs subjectivism. Following earlier calls for greater dialogue between divisions of related research, this article goes further to call for integrative theorizing of information inequality in the way exemplified by Bourdieu’s research on social inequality.
BourdieuP. Social space and symbolic power. Sociological Theory1989; 7: 14–25.
2.
Knorr-CetinaK. Introduction. In: Knorr-CetinaKCicourelAV (eds) Advances in social theory and methodology: toward an integration of micro- and macro-sociologies, 1st edn.London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1981, pp. 1–47.
3.
RitzerG. Contemporary sociological theory and its classical roots: the basics, 1st edn.Beijing: Peking University Press, 2003, pp. 178–202.
4.
BourdieuP. Distinction: a social critique of the judgement of taste, 1st edn, trans. NiceR. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1984, pp. 99–259.
5.
BourdieuP. The social space and the genesis of groups. Theory and Society1985; 14: 723–744.
6.
BourdieuP. The field of cultural production, or: The economic world reversed. Poetics1983; 12: 311–356.
7.
SavolainenR. Everyday life information seeking: approaching information seeking in the context of ‘Way of Life’. Library and Information Science Research1995; 17: 259–294.
8.
RosenbaumH. Information use environments and structuration: towards an integration of Taylor and Giddens. In: Proceedings of the ASIS annual meeting1993; 30: 235–245.
9.
BurnettGJaegerPT. Small worlds, lifeworlds, and information: the ramifications of the information behaviour of social groups in public policy and the public sphere. Information Research13(2), http://InformationR.net/ir/13-2/paper346.htmlhttp://InformationR.net/ir/13-2/paper346.html">http://InformationR.net/ir/13-2/paper346.html (2008, accessed December 2010).
10.
JaegerPTBurnettG. Information worlds: social context, technology, and information behavior in the age of the internet, 1st edn.New York: Routledge, 2010, pp. 1–164.
11.
BuschmanJ. The integrity and obstinacy of intellectual creations: Jurgen Habermas and librarianship’s theoretical literature. The Library Quarterly2006; 76: 270–299.
12.
KvasnyL. A conceptual framework for examining digital inequality. In: Proceedings of the eighth Americas conference on information systems (AMCIS), Dallas, Texas, 9–11 August 2002, http://ist.psu.edu/faculty_pages/lkvasny/AMCIS2002.pdfhttp://ist.psu.edu/faculty_pages/lkvasny/AMCIS2002.pdf">http://ist.psu.edu/faculty_pages/lkvasny/AMCIS2002.pdf (2002, accessed December 2010).
13.
KvasnyLKeilM. The challenges of redressing the digital divide: a tale of two cities. In: Proceedings of international conference on information systems (ICIS) 2002, paper 84, http://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2002/84 (2002, accessed December 2010).
14.
van DijkJAGM. The deepening divide: inequality in the information society, 1st edn.London: Sage Publications, 2005, pp. 1–26.
15.
KimMCKimJK. Digital divide: conceptual discussions and prospect. In: Proceedings of conference on human society and the internet, 2001; 2105: 78–91.
16.
LievrouwLAFarbSE. Information and equity. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology2003; 37: 499–540.
17.
YuL. Understanding information inequality: making sense of the literature of the information and digital divides. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science2006; 38: 229–252.
18.
TichenorPDonohueGOlienC. Mass media flow and differential growth in knowledge. Public Opinion Quarterly1970; 34: 159–160.
19.
ChatmanEA. Life in a small world: applicability of gratification theory to information-seeking behaviour. Journal of the American Society for Information Science1991; 42: 438–449.
20.
ChatmanEA. The impoverished life-world of outsiders. Journal of the American Society for Information Science1996; 47: 193–206.
21.
ChildersTPostJA. The information poor in America, 1st edn.Metuchen, NJ: Scarecrow Press, 1975, pp. 32–89.
22.
DervinBGreenbergBS. The communication environment of the urban poor. In: KlineFGTichenorP (eds) Current perspectives in mass communication research, 1st edn.Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1972, pp. 195–235.
23.
DervinB. The U.S. low-income urban village: an information vacuum?Literacy Discussion1973; 4: 237–250.
24.
GreenbergBSDervinB. Mass communication among the urban poor. The Public Opinion Quarterly1970; 34: 224–235.
25.
CouldryN. Digital divide or discursive design? on the emerging ethics of information space. Ethics and Information Technology2003; 5: 89–97.
26.
CartierCCastellsMQiuJL. The information have-less: inequality, mobility, and translocal networks in Chinese cities. Studies in Comparative International Development2005; 40: 9–34.
27.
MoscoV. The political economy of communication: rethinking and renewal, 1st edn.London: Sage Publications, 1996, pp. 17–69.
28.
MansellR. From digital divides to digital entitlements in knowledge societies. Current Sociology2002; 50: 407–426.
29.
SchillerD. Ambush on the I-way: information commoditization on the electronic frontier. Paper presented at the BCLA information policy conference, Vancouver, 27–28 October 1995, www.vcn.bc.ca/bcla-ip/committee/dschill2.html (1995, accessed 20 October 2010).
30.
SchillerD. World communications in today’s age of capital. Emergences2001; 11: 51–68.
31.
SchillerHI. Information inequality: the deepening social crisis in America, 1st edn.New York: Routledge, 1996, pp. xi–xvi, pp. 1–42.
32.
SchillerHISchillerA. Libraries, public access to information and commerce. In: MoscoVWaskoJ (eds) The political economy of information, 1st edn.Madison, Wisconsin: The University of Wisconsin Press, 1988, pp. 146–166.
33.
MurdockGGoldingP. Common markets: corporate ambitions and communication trends in the UK and Europe. Journal of Media Economics1999; 12: 117–132.
34.
GoldingPMurdockG. Digital divide: communications policy and its contradictions. New Economy2001; 8: 110–115.
35.
MoscoV. Introduction: information in the pay-per society. In: MoscoVWaskoJ (eds) The political economy of information, 1st edn.Madison, WI: The University of Wisconsin Press, 1988, pp. 3–26.
36.
StevensonS. Digital divide: a discursive move away from the real inequities. The Information Society2009; 25: 1–22.
37.
ZhaoY. Universal service and China’s telecommunications miracle: discourses, practices, and post-WTO accession challenges. Info2007; 9: 108–121.
38.
SchillerHI. Introduction to who knows: information in the age of Fortune 500. In: CaoJZhaoY (eds) The political economy of communication: a reader, 1st edn.Shanghai: Fudan University Press, 2007, pp. 59–64.
39.
GoldingP. The communication paradox: inequality at national and international level and the communications media. In: International conference on communication and development in a postmodern era: re-evaluating the Freirean legacy. University Sains Malaysia, Penang, 6–10 December 1993.
40.
MurdockGGoldingP. Information poverty and political inequality: citizenship in the age of privatized communications. Journal of Communication1989; 39: 180–195.
41.
MurdockGGoldingP. Dismantling the digital divide: rethinking the dynamics of participation and exclusion. In: CalabreseASparksC (eds) Toward a political economy of culture: capitalism and communication in the twenty-first century, 1st edn.Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2004, pp. 244–260.
42.
MasmoudiM. The new world information order. Journal of Communications1979; 29: 172–185.
43.
SchillerHI. Communication and cultural domination, 1st edn.New York: International Arts and Sciences Press, 1976, pp. 1–127.
44.
SchillerHI. Decolonization of information: efforts toward a new international order. Latin American Perspectives1978; 5: 35–48.
45.
SmithA. The geopolitics of information: how western culture dominates the world, 1st edn.New York: Oxford University Press, 1980, pp. 1–192.
46.
Bhuiyan AJMSA. Peripheral view: conceptualizing the information society as a postcolonial subject. The International Communication Gazette2008; 70: 99–116.
47.
HaywoodT. Info-rich – info-poor: access and exchange in the global information society, 1st edn.London: Bowker Saur, 1995, pp. 77–127.
48.
BuchananEA. An overview of information ethics issues in a world-wide context. Ethics and Information Technology1999; 1: 193–201.
49.
MainL. The global information infrastructure: empowerment or imperialism?Third World Quarterly2001; 22: 83–97.
50.
CochraneGAthertonP. The cultural appraisal of efforts to alleviate information inequity. Journal of the American Society for Information Science1980; 31: 282–292.
51.
LuckmannB. The small life-worlds of modern man. Social Research1970; 37: 580–596.
52.
ChatmanEA. A theory of life in the round. Journal of the American Society for Information Science1999; 50: 207–217.
53.
ChatmanEA. Diffusion theory: a review and test of a conceptual model in information diffusion. Journal of the American Society for Information Science1986; 37: 377–386.
54.
ChatmanEA. The information world of low-skilled workers. Library and Information Science Research1987; 9: 265–283.
55.
ChatmanEA. Opinion leadership, poverty, and information sharing. RQ1987; 26: 341–353.
56.
ChatmanEA. Alienation theory: application of a conceptual framework to a study of information among janitors. RQ1990; 29: 355–368.
57.
ChatmanEA. The information world of retired women, 1st edn.New York: Greenwood Publishing Group, 1992, pp. 23–140.
58.
PendletonVEMChatmanEA. Small world lives: implications for the public library. Library Trends1998; 46: 732–751.
59.
AgadaJ. Inner-city gatekeepers: an exploratory survey of their information use environment. Journal of the American Society for Information Science1999; 50: 74–85.
60.
HersbergerJ. Are the economically poor information poor? Does the digital divide affect the homeless and access to information?The Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science2002; 27: 45–63.
61.
SpinkAColeC. Information and poverty: information-seeking channels used by African American low-income households. Library and Information Science Research2001; 23: 45–65.
62.
SligoFXJamesonAM. The knowledge-behavior gap in use of health information. Journal of the American Society for Information Science2000; 51: 858–869.
63.
GazianoC. The knowledge gap: an analytical review of media effects. Communication Research1983; 10: 447–486.
64.
GazianoC. A twenty-five-year review of knowledge gap research. In: 50th annual conference of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, Fort Lauderdale, FL, 21 May 1995, http://eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED383009.pdf (1995, accessed October 2010).
65.
GazianoC. Social stratification and the knowledge gap: some influences on knowledge disparities. In: 69th annual meeting of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Corvallis, OR, 6–9 August 1983, http://eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED237990.pdf (1983, accessed October 2010).
66.
GazianoCO’LearyJ. Childbirth and infant development knowledge gaps in interpersonal settings. Journal of Health Communication1998; 3: 29–51.
67.
EttemaJSKlineFG. Deficits, differences and ceilings: contingent conditions for understanding the knowledge gap. Communication Research1977; 4: 179–202.
68.
GazianoEGazianoC. Social control, social change and the knowledge gap hypothesis. In: DemersDViswanathK (eds) Mass media, social control, and social change: a macrosocial perspective, 1st edn.Ames: Iowa State University Press, 1998, pp. 117–136.
69.
DervinB. Communication gaps and inequalities: moving toward a reconceptualization. In: DervinBForeman-WernetLLauterbachE (eds) Sense-making methodology reader: selected writings of Brenda Dervin, 1st edn.Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press, 2003, pp. 17–46.
DervinB. From the mind’s eye of the user: the sense-making qualitative-quantitative methodology. In: DervinBForeman-WernetLLauterbachE (eds) Sense-making methodology reader: selected writings of Brenda Dervin, 1st edn.Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press, 2003, pp. 269–292.
72.
DervinB. On studying information seeking methodologically: the implications of connecting metatheory to method. Information Processing & Management1999; 35: 727–750.
73.
SavolainenR. The sense-making theory: reviewing the interests of a user-centered approach to information seeking and use. Information Processing & Management1993; 29: 13–28.
74.
DervinB. Users as research inventions: how research categories perpetuate inequities. Journal of Communication1989; 39: 216–232.
75.
FreedmanJBHendersonJC. Digital usage behavior: a sense making perspective. In: Proceedings of the 41st Hawaii international conference on system sciences, Big Island, Hawaii, January 2008, http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=4438828&tag=1 (2008, accessed 10 December 2010).
76.
McIverWJJr.ProkoschAP. Towards a critical approach to examining the digital divide. In: Proceedings of 2002 international symposium on technology and society (ISTAS’02), social implications of information and communication technology. Raleigh, NC, 6–8 June 2002, http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=1013832&tag=1 (2002, accessed December 2010).
77.
HaythornthwaiteC. Social network analysis: an approach and technique for the study of information exchange. Library and Information Science Research1996; 18: 323–342.
78.
GranovetterM. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology1973; 78: 1360–1380.
79.
GranovetterM. The strength of weak ties: a network theory revisited. Sociological Theory1983; 1: 201–233.
80.
PettigrewKE. The role of community health nurses in providing information and referral to the elderly: a study based on social network theory. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Western Ontario, 1997.
81.
HersbergerJ. A qualitative approach to examining information transfer via social networks among homeless populations. The New Review of Information Behaviour Research2003; 4: 95–108.
82.
JohnsonCA. Social capital and the search for information: examining the role of social capital in information seeking behavior in Mongolia. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology2006; 58: 883–894.
83.
BishopAPShoemakerSTidlineTJSalelaP. Information exchange networks in low-income neighborhoods: implications for community networking. In: Proceedings of the annual meeting of the American Society for Information Science1999; 62: 443–449.
84.
SilverH. Understanding social inclusion and its meaning for Australia. Australian Journal of Social Issues2010; 45: 184–211.
85.
BarryB. Social exclusion, social isolation and the distribution of income. In: Hills J Le GrandJPiachaudD (eds) Understanding social exclusion, 1st edn.Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002, pp. 13–29.
86.
QuarkAA. Social exclusion in the new economy: beyond the digital divide. Currents: Scholarship in the Human Services2008; 7: 1–20.
87.
CaidiNAllardD. Social inclusion of newcomers to Canada: an information problem. Library and Information Science Research2005; 27: 302–324.
88.
SelwynNFacerK. Beyond digital divide: towards an agenda for change. In: FerroEDwivediYKGil-GarciaJRWilliamsMD. Handbook of research on overcoming digital divides: constructing an equitable and competitive information society, 1st edn.Hershey: IGI Global, 2009, pp. 1–20.
89.
LloydALipuSKennanMA. On becoming citizens: examining social inclusion from an information perspective. Australian Academic and Research Libraries2010; 41: 42–53.
90.
PatemanJ. Social exclusion: an international perspective on the role of the state, communities and public libraries in tackling social exclusion. Journal of Information Science1999; 25: 445–463.
91.
WongYCLawCKFungJYCLamJCY. Perpetuating old exclusions and producing new ones: digital exclusion in an information society. Journal of Technology in Human Services2009; 27: 57–78.
92.
WarschauerM. Technology and social inclusion: rethinking the digital divide, 1st edn.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2003, pp. 200–215.
93.
ValentineGHollowaySBinghamN. The digital generation? children, ICT and the everyday nature of social exclusion. Antipode2002; 34: 296–315.
94.
VicenteMRLópezAJ. A multidimensional analysis of the disability digital divide: some evidence for Internet use. The Information Society2010; 26: 48–64.
95.
MossbergerKKaplanDGilbertMA. How concentrated poverty matters for the ‘digital divide’: motivation, social networks, and resources. In: 2006 annual meeting of the American Political Science Association. Philadelphia, PA, 30 August–3 September 2006, http://tigger.uic.edu/orgs/stresearch/Documents/APSAneorc06.pdf (2006, accessed October 2010).
96.
JapzonACGongH. A neighborhood analysis of public library use in New York City. Library Quarterly2005; 75: 446–463.
97.
CaidiNAllardDLukC. Locating public libraries in a multicultural city: a spatial mismatch?Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology2007; 44: 1–5.
98.
HaddonL. Social exclusion and information and communication technologies: lessons from studies of single parents and the young elderly. New Media Society2000; 2: 387–406.
99.
KarabanowJNaylorT. Street youth and information technology: an exploration of social inclusion and exclusion. International Journal of Humanities2007; 5: 253–259.
100.
DavidM. The politics of communication information technology, local knowledge and social exclusion. Telematics and Informatics2003; 20: 235–253.
101.
HullB. ICT and social exclusion: the role of libraries. Telematics and Informatics2003; 20: 131–142.
102.
DutchMMuddimanD. The public library, social exclusion and the information society in the United Kingdom. Libri2001; 51: 183–194.
103.
RogersEM. Diffusion of innovations, 1st edn.New York: Free Press of Glencoe, 1962, pp. 39–101.
104.
BillonMLera-LopezFMarcoR. Differences in digitalization levels: a multivariate analysis studying the global digital divide. Review of the World Economy2010; 146: 39–73.
105.
PickJBAzariR. Global digital divide: influence of socioeconomic, governmental, and accessibility factors on information technology. Information Technology for Development2008; 14: 91–115.
106.
RobisonKKCrenshawEM. Reevaluating the global digital divide: socio-demographic and conflict barriers to the Internet revolution. Sociological Inquiry2010; 80: 34–62.
107.
GoldfarbAPrinceJ. Internet adoption and usage patterns are different: implications for the digital divide. Information Economics and Policy2008; 20: 2–15.
108.
MartinSPRobinsonJP. The Income digital divide trends and predictions for levels of Internet use. Social Problems2007; 54: 1–22.
McIverWJr.A community informatics for the information society. In: GirardBO’SiochrúS (eds) Communicating in the information society, 1st edn.Geneva: United Nations Research Institute for Social Development, 2003, pp. 33–64.
112.
BishopAPBruceBC. Community informatics: integrating action, research and learning. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology2005; 31: 6–10.
113.
WilliamsKDurranceJC. Social networks and social capital: rethinking theory in community informatics. Journal of Community Informatics4(3), http://ci-journal.net/index.php/ciej/article/view/465 (2008, accessed 10 December 2010).
WilliamsJSligoFWallaceC. Free Internet as an agent of community transformation. The Journal of Community Informatics2005; 2: 53–67.
116.
DurranceJCFisherKE. Determining how libraries and librarians help. Library Trends2003; 51: 305–334.
117.
SmytheD. On the political economy of communications. Journalism Quarterly1960; 37: 563–572.
118.
NorrisP. Digital divide: civic engagement, information poverty and the Internet worldwide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001, pp. 3–38
119.
SelwynN. Reconsidering political and popular understandings of the digital divide. New Media & Society, 2004; 6: 341–362.
120.
DoctorRD. Seeking equity in the national information infrastructure. Internet Research1994; 4: 9–22.
121.
DoctorRD. Information technologies and social equity: confronting the revolution. Journal of the American Society for Information Science1991; 42: 216–228.
122.
BirdsallWF. ‘New Deal’ for libraries in the digital age?Library Trends1997; 46: 52–67.
HarrisMHHannahSAHarrisPC. Into the future: the foundations of library and information services in the post-industrial era, 1st edn.Greenwich, CT: Ablex Publishing, 1998, pp. 44–49.
125.
BuddJM. Knowledge and knowing in library and information science: a philosophical framework, 1st edn.Lanham Scarecrow Press, 2001, pp. 291–329.
126.
HjørlandB. Empiricism, rationalism and positivism in library and information science. Journal of Documentation2005; 61: 130–155.
127.
CroninC. Bourdieu and Foucault on power and modernity. Philosophy & Social Criticism1996; 22: 55–85.
128.
JaegerPT. Education, adoption, and development: building a culture of social theory in LIS. The Library Quarterly2010; 80: 203–209.
129.
AdamsM. Hybridizing habitus and reflexivity: towards an understanding of contemporary identity?Sociology2006; 40: 511–528.
