This paper explores the internal components (semantics) of financial electronic records. The authors adopt a view of records as representations of perceptions about a specific domain that belong to classes of representations at the centre of which are archetypal ‘good’ records (records that most faithfully represent their domains). The paper proposes a static modelling language that illustrates how the ontological concepts of Bunge and Searle can be integrated to achieve a richer grammatical explanatory tool for use in modelling the internal structure of archetypal records in the context of domains of financial crisis and contagion such as the failure of Lehman Brothers.
G. Yeo , Concepts of record (1): evidence, information, and persistent representations, American Archivist70(2) (2007) 315-343.
2.
G. Yeo , Concepts of record (2): prototypes and boundary objects, American Archivist71(1) (2008) 118-143.
3.
Y. Wand and R. Weber, On the deep structure of information systems, Information Systems Journal5(3) (1995) 203-223.
4.
J.R. Searle , Social ontology: some basic principles, Anthropological Theory6(1) (2006) 12-29.
5.
S.L. Star and J.R. Griesemer, Institutional ecology, ‘translations’ and boundary objects: amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39, Social Studies of Science19(3) ( 1989) 387-420.
6.
E. Rosch and B. Lloyd (eds), Cognition and Categorization ( Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, 1978).
7.
E. Rosch, F. Varela and E.F. Thompson, The Embodied Mind (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1991).
8.
M. Bunge, Treatise on Basic Philosophy: Vol. 3: Ontology I: The Furniture of the World (Reidel, Boston, 1977).
9.
M. Bunge, Treatise on Basic Philosophy: Vol. 4: Ontology II: A World of Systems ( Reidel, Boston, 1979).
10.
J.R. Searle, The Construction of Social Reality (Allen Lane, London, 1995).
11.
Y. Wand and R. Weber, An ontological evaluation of systems analysis and design methods. In: E.D. Falkenberg and P. Lindgreen (eds), Information System Concepts: An In-depth Analysis: Proceedings of the IFIP TC 8/WG 8.1 Working Conference on Information System Concepts (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1989).
12.
Y. Wand and R. Weber, An ontological model of an information system, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering16(11) (1990) 1282-1292.
13.
Y. Wand and R. Weber, Mario Bunge’s ontology as a formal foundation for information systems concepts. In: P. Weingartner and G.J.W. Dorn (eds), Studies on Mario Bunge’s Treatise (Rodopi, Atlanta, 1990).
14.
Y. Wand and R. Weber, On the ontological expressiveness of information systems analysis and design grammars, Information Systems Journal3(4) (1993) 217-237.
15.
P. Checkland , Systems Thinking, Systems Practice ( Wiley, New York, 1999).
16.
P. Checkland and J. Scholes, Soft Systems Methodology in Action ( Wiley, New York, 1999).
17.
M. Rosemann and P. Green, Developing a meta model for the Bunge-Wand-Weber ontological constructs, Information Systems27(2) (2002) 75-91.
18.
P. Bera, A. Burton-Jones and Y. Wand, The Effect of Domain Familiarity on Modelling Roles: an Empirical Study. Available at: http://aisel.aisnet.org/pacis2009/110/ (accessed 11 November 2010).
