This article examines structured resources such as ontologies, reference models, and vocabularies in the domain of archival records management. We report on a systematic mapping study to identify resources with potential reusability for constructing a comprehensive ontology or ontology network for this domain. The Conducting Literature Search for Artefact Reuse (CLeAR) approach is adopted, offering a systematic methodology for identifying reusable structured resources. Through this approach, 19 resources are identified from 40 publications spanning 2002 to 2021, within a subset of 904 publications from Scopus and Web of Science. These resources primarily manifest as ontologies, while some serve as conceptual reference models, data models, or vocabularies. The analysis encompasses attributes like application domains, representation languages, and coverage of archival records aspects.
UNESCO. UNESCO archives: preserving our heritage for future generations, 2023.
3.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation Development (OECD). Digital government strategies for transforming public services in the welfare areas. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2016.
4.
FarinelliFAlmeidaMBMeloS. The role of ontologies in the interoperability of information systems: reflections in the governmental sphere (in Portuguese). In: 14th National Research Meeting in Information Science. Florianópolis, SC, https://brapci.inf.br/index.php/res/v/185252
5.
BastolaRCampusP.Developing domain ontology for issuing certificate of citizenship of Nepal. J Inform Tech2020; 2(02): 73–90.
6.
TsheringYAnutariyaC.Enabling Semantic Interoperability in Bhutan’s E-Government: an ontology-based framework. In: 2022 19th International Joint Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering (JCSSE), pp. 1–6. DOI: 10.1109/JCSSE54890.2022.9836286
7.
LiyanageHKrausePDe LusignanS.Using ontologies to improve semantic interoperability in health data. J Innovat Health Inform2015; 22(2): 309–315. DOI: 10.14236/jhi.v22i2.159
8.
KitchenhamBChartersS.Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering. Technical Report, School of Computer Science and Mathematics, Keele University, 2007.
9.
CamposPMCReginatoCCAlmeidaJPA, et al. Finding reusable structured resources for the integration of environmental research data. Environ Model Softw2020; 133: 104813.
10.
ISO. 15489-1 – information and documentation – records management – part 1: concepts and principles. Technical Report, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, 2016, https://www.iso.org/standard/62542.html
LohmannSHaagFNegruS. Towards a visual notation for OWL: a brief summary of VOWL. In: Proceedings of the 12th OWL: experiences and directions workshop. New York: Springer, pp. 143–153. DOI:10.1007/ 978-3-319-33245-1_15
18.
TennisJTRogersC. Authenticity metadata and the Ipam: progress toward the interpares application profile. In: International conference on Dublin core and metadata applications, pp. 38–45.
19.
LiCSugimotoS. Provenance description of metadata using PROV with PREMIS for long-term use of metadata. In: International conference on Dublin Core and metadata applications, pp. 147–156.
20.
LagosNVion-DuryJY.Digital preservation based on contextualized dependencies. In: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM symposium on document engineering, pp. 35–44.
21.
LagosNWaddingtonSVion-DuryJY. On the preservation of evolving digital content–the continuum approach and relevant metadata models. In: Research conference on metadata and semantics research. Springer, Springer International Publishing, pp. 15–26.
22.
IsaWMWZinNAMRosdiF, et al. Digital preservation of cultural heritage: Terengganu Brassware Craft Knowledge Base. Int J Adv Comput Sci Appl2019; 10(6).
23.
GoyACollaDMagroD, et al. Building semantic metadata for historical archives through an ontology-driven user interface. J Comput Cult Herit2020; 13(3): 1–36.
24.
MarketakisYTzitzikasY.Dependency management for digital preservation using semantic web technologies. Int J Digital Libr2009; 10(4): 159–177.
25.
PramarthaCDavisJKuanK. Digital preservation of cultural heritage: an ontology-based approach. In: ACIS 2017 Proceedings, p. 55.
26.
CorteseCMantegariG. Extending the digital archives of Italian psychology with semantic data. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Semantic Digital Archives (SDA 2011), CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 801. CEUR-WS.org, pp. 60–71, https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-801/paper5.pdf
27.
MatousekKKoubaZ. Knowledge exploration in historical artefact record keeping. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications, IEEE, pp. 555–558.
28.
RousseauJYCoutureC.Os fundamentos da disciplina arquivística. Lisboa: Publicações Dom Quixote, 2004.
29.
VsesviatskaOTietzTHoppeF, et al. ArDO: an ontology to describe the dynamics of multimedia archival records. In: Proceedings of the 36th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, pp. 1855–1863.
30.
MandalS. Item Relationships using Dublin Core, BIBO, FOAF, and FRBR for managing resources of cultural heritage: designing a prototype integrated framework. Libr Philos Pract2021: 1–16.
BiagettiMT.A comparative analysis and evaluation of bibliographic ontologies. In: Challenges and opportunities for knowledge organization in the digital age. Ergon Verlag, 2018, pp. 499–510. DOI: 10.5771/9783956504211-499
WangZSongZYuG, et al. An ontology for Chinese government archives knowledge representation and reasoning. IEEE Access2021; 9: 130199–130211. DOI:10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3112001.
35.
BaldoAGoyAMagroD.A pipeline supporting a smart access to historical documents based on a rich semantic representation of their content: a case study on time expressions, 2018, https://doi.org/10.5220/0006929601990206
36.
GoyAMagroDBaldoA.A semantic web approach to enable a smart route to historical archives. J Web Eng2019; 18(4–6): 287–318. DOI: 10.13052/jwe1540-9589.18462.
37.
DaranyiSMcNeillJKompatsiarisI, et al. Pericles – digital preservation through management of change in evolving ecosystems. pp. 51–74. DOI: 10.5220/0006163600510074
38.
MayerRAntunesGCaetanoA, et al. Using ontologies to capture the semantics of a (business) process for digital preservation. Int J Digital Libr2015; 15(2): 129–152. DOI: 10.1007/s00799-015-0141-7
ICOM/CIDOC Documentation Standards Group. CIDOC CRM Short Intro: concept and history of the CIDOC Conceptual Reference Model, https://cidoc-crm.org/node/202 (accessed 17 August 2025).
Llanes-PadrónDPastor-SánchezJA.Records in contexts: the road of archives to semantic interoperability. Program2017; 51: 387–405. DOI: 10.1108/PROG-03-2017-0021.
50.
BountouriLDamigosMDrakiouM, et al. The semantic mapping of RiC-CM to CIDOC-CRM. In: GohDHChenSJTuarobS (eds) Leveraging Generative Intelligence in Digital Libraries: Towards Human-Machine Collaboration. ICADL, 2023. Singapore: Springer, pp. 90–99. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-99-8088-8_8.
51.
OliveiraCCLöwMMBarrosTHB. Knowledge organization possibilities for archives: comparative semantic analysis between CIDOC-CRM and RiC-CM. KO2024; 51(5): 362–370. DOI: 10.5771/0943-7444-2024-5-362
de MelloBHRigoSJda CostaCA, et al. Semantic interoperability in health records standards: a systematic literature review. Health Technol2022: 1–18. DOI: 10.1007/s12553-022-00639-w.
55.
KitchenhamBBreretonP.A systematic review of systematic review process research in software engineering. Inf Softw Technol2013; 55(12): 2049–2075. DOI:10.1016/j.infsof.2013.07.010
56.
AdelEEl-SappaghSBarakatSI, et al. Distributed electronic health record based on semantic interoperability using fuzzy ontology: a survey. Int J Comput Appl2017; 40: 223–241.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
