Collaboration patterns among scientists are becoming more and more complicated. Even sophisticated methods for taking the number of co-authors into account do not solve all problems related to the calculation of citation measures such as the h -index. In this article we introduce role-based h-indices and in particular the major contribution h-index, denoted as h-maj, which takes only those articles into account in which the scientist plays a major or core role. As an example we provide major contribution indices for scientists in the health sciences in China. Differences between the h-index and h-maj are shown for data based on the Web of Science (WoS), and separately, based on the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) database. It is suggested to use the major contribution h-index as a supplementary index, especially in those fields where multiple ‘first authors’ and/or corresponding authors are common.
J.E. Hirsch, An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America102(46) ( 2005) 16569-16572.
2.
P. Ball, Achievement index climbs the ranks, Nature448(7155) (2007) 737.
3.
M.G. Banks, An extension of the Hirsch index: indexing scientific topics and compounds , Scientometrics69(1) (2006)161-168.
4.
L. Bornmann and H.D. Daniel, What do we know about the h-index? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology58(9) (2007) 1381-1385.
5.
T. Braun, W. Glänzel and A. Schubert, A Hirsch-type index for journals, Scientometrics69(1) (2006) 169-173.
6.
L. Egghe, The Hirsch-index and related impact measures, Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (in press, 2010).
7.
Y.X. Liu and R. Rousseau, Hirsch-type indices and library management: the case of Tongji University Library. In: D. Torres-Salinas and H.F. Moed (eds), Proceedings of ISSI 2007 (Madrid: CINDOC-CSIC, 2007) 514-522.
8.
A. Schubert and W. Glänzel, A systematic analysis of Hirsch-type indices for journals, Journal of Informetrics1(4) (2007) 179-184.
9.
L. Egghe, L.M. Liang and R. Rousseau, A relation between h-index and impact factor in the power law model, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (in press, 2009).
10.
P. Vinkler , Eminence of scientists in the light of the h-index and other scientometric indicators, Journal of Information Science33(4) (2007) 481-491.
11.
L. Egghe , An improvement of the h-index: the g-index, ISSI Newsletter2(1) (2006) 8-9.
12.
B.H. Jin , H-index: an evaluation indicator proposed by scientist, Science Focus1(3) (2006) 8-9 (in Chinese).
13.
B.H. Jin , The AR-index: complementing the h-index, ISSI Newsletter3(1) (2007) 6.
14.
B.H. Jin , L.M. Liang, R. Rousseau and L. Egghe, The R- and AR-indices: complementing the h-index, Chinese Science Bulletin52(6) (2007) 855-863.
15.
R. Rousseau, Simple models and the corresponding h- and g-index, Available at: E-LIS: ID 6153 (2006).
16.
F.P. Ruane and R.S.J. Tol , Rational (successive) h-indices: an application to economics in the Republic of Ireland, Scientometrics75(8) (2008) 395-405.
17.
R. Guns and R. Rousseau, Real and rational variants of the h-index and the g-index, Journal of Informetrics3(1) (2009) 64-71.
18.
M. Kosmulski , ‘I’ - a bibliometric index, Forum Akademickie (11) (2006) 31 (in Polish).
19.
G. Prathap , Hirsch-type indices for ranking institutions’ scientific research output, Current Science91 (2006) 1439.
20.
A. Schubert , Successive h-indices, Scientometrics70(1) ( 2007) 201-205.
21.
R. Rousseau , Reflections on recent developments of the h-index and h-type indices, COLLNET Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management2(1) (2008) 1-8.
22.
M. Schreiber , Self-citation corrections for the Hirsch index , European Physics Letters78(3) (2007).
23.
M. Schreiber , To share the fame in a fair way, hm modifies h for multi-authored manuscripts, New Journal of Physics10(4) (2008) 211-216.
24.
J.K. Wan , P.H. Hua and R. Rousseau, The pure h-index: calculating an author’s h-index by taking co-authors into account, COLLNET Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management1(2) (2007) 1-5.
25.
J.C. Chai, P.H. Hua, R. Rousseau and J.K. Wan, The adapted pure h-index. In: H. Kretschmer and F. Havemann (eds), Proceedings of WIS 2008, Berlin. Fourth International Conference on Webometrics, Informetrics and Scientometrics and Ninth COLLNET Meeting . Open access. Available at: www.collnet.de/Berlin-2008/ChaiWIS2008aph.pdf (accessed 25 March 2009).
26.
L. Bornmann , R. Mutz and H.D. Daniel, Are there better indices for evaluation purposes than the h-index? A comparison of nine different variants of the h index using data from biomedicine, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology59(5) (2008) 830-837.
27.
X.J. Hu , Loads of special authorship functions: linear growth in the percentage of ‘equal first authors’ and corresponding authors, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (in press, 2009).
28.
M. Smith , The trend toward multiple authorship in psychology , The American Psychologist13(10) (1958) 596-599.
29.
D.J. de SollaPrice, Little Science, Big Science ( Columbia University Press, New York, 1963).
30.
B. Cronin, Hyperauthorship: a postmodern perversion or evidence of a structural shift in scholarly communication practices? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology52(4) (2001) 558-569.
31.
H. Kretschmer and R. Rousseau, Author inflation leads to a breakdown of Lotka’s law, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology52(5) (2001) 610-614.
32.
L. Egghe, R. Rousseau and G. Van Hooydonk, Methods for accrediting publications to authors or countries: consequences for evaluation studies, Journal of the American Society for Information Science51(2) (2000) 145-157.
33.
J.P. Birnholtz , What does it mean to be an author? The intersection of credit, contribution, and collaboration in science, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology57(13) (2006) 1758-1770.
34.
P.D. Batista , M.G. Campiteli, O. .Kinouchi and A.S. Martinez, Is it possible to compare researchers with different scientific interests? Scientometrics68(1) (2006) 179-189.
35.
L. Egghe , Mathematical theory of the h-index and g-index in case of fractional counting of authorship, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology59(12) (2008) 1608-1616.
36.
M. Schreiber , A modification of the h-index: the hm-index accounts for multi-authored manuscripts, Journal of Informetrics2(3) ( 2008) 211-216.
37.
N.T. Hagen , Harmonic allocation of authorship credit: source-level correction of bibliometric bias assures accurate publication and citation analysis, PLoS ONE3 (12) (2008) e4021; doi:10.1371/journal.pone. 0004021.
38.
C.T. Zhang , A proposal for calculating weighted citations based on author rank, EMBO Reports10(5) (2009) 416-417.
39.
Q.L. Burrell , Should the h-index be discounted? In: W. Glänzel, A.Schubert and B. Schlemmer (eds). The Multidimensional World of Tibor Braun, (ISSI, Leuven, 2007) 65-68.
40.
D.W. Shapiro , N.S. Wenger and M.F. Shapiro, The contributions of authors to multiauthored biomedical research papers, Journal of American Medical Association271(6) ( 1994) 438-442.
41.
L. Butler , Modifying publication practices in response to funding formulas, Research Evaluation12(1) (2003) 39-46.
42.
P. Weingart , Impact of bibliometrics upon the science system: inadvertent consequences? Scientometrics62(1) (2005) 117-131.
43.
R. Costas and I. Iribarren-Maestro, Variations in content and format of ISI databases in their different versions: The case of the Science Citation Index in CD-ROM and the Web of Science, Scientometrics72(2) (2007) 167-183.
44.
R. Rousseau , R. Guns and Y.X. Liu , The h-index of a conglomerate, Cybermetrics12(1) (2008) paper 2. Available at: www.cindoc.csic.es/cybermetrics/articles/v1i1p1.html (accessed 6 June 2009).
45.
J.K. Wan , P.H. Hua , R. Rousseau and X.K. Sun , The journal download immediacy index (DII): Experiences using a Chinese full-text database, Scientometrics (in press, 2010).
46.
B. Rousseau and R. Rousseau, LOTKA: a program to fit a power law distribution to observed frequency data, Cybermetrics4(1) (2000). Available at: www.cindoc.csic.es/cybermetrics/articles/v4i1p4.html (accessed 6 June 2009)
47.
L. Egghe, Distributions of the h-index and the g-index. In: D. Torres-Salinas and H.F. Moed (eds), Proceedings of ISSI 2007 (CINDOC-CSIC, Madrid, Spain, 2007) 245-253.
48.
P. Zhou and L. Leydesdorff, China ranks second in scientific publications since 2006, ISSI Newsletter4(1) (2008) 7-9.
