A mathematical analysis of the h-index and study of its correlation with some improved metrics: A conceptual approach

Abstract

This article aims to establish the h-index in different mathematical aspects and measure the correlation of the h-index with other metrics using the bibliographic data of selected journals in the Library and Information Science (LIS) domain. Using the concept of relation and function, the h-index is expressed. Data collected from authors in three major LIS journals, including h-index, g-index, m-index, total citations and total publications, are analysed using correlation and regression analyses. The findings indicate a high level of relationship between h-index and g-index scores and m-index at starting year of publication. Conversely, a lower level of relationship between the h-index, g-index, starting year of publication, the total number of publications and the number of citations. This is an original study and will be of interest to the researchers of LIS who wants to know this performance indicator in different aspects, the dependency/independency of the h-index with other metrics, and the impact/performance of the three journals over time in terms of h-index, m-index, total citations and the number of publications. The study is limited to analysis of performance-and-citation-related measurements h-index, g-index, m-index, total citations, and the number of publications.

Keywords

Citation metrics citations correlation g-index h-index information science m-index performance indicators regression

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Poirrier

Moreno

Huerta

CG.

Robust h-index. Scientometrics 2021; 126(3): 1969–1981.

Hirsch

JE.

An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005; 102: 16569–16572.

Bornmann

Daniel

HD.

Does the h-index for ranking of scientists really work?

Scientometrics 2005; 65(3): 391–392.

Braun

Glanzel

Schubert

A Hirsch-type index for journals. Scientists 2005; 19(22): 8–10.

Glänzel

On the opportunities and limitations of the H-index. Sci Focus 2006; 1(1): 10–11.

Prathap

Evaluating journal performance metrics. Scientometrics 2012; 92(2): 403–408.

Prathap

Quasity, when quantity has a quality of its own – toward a theory of performance. Scientometrics 2011; 88: 555–562.

Egghe

Rousseau

Introduction to informetrics. Quantitative methods in library, documentation and information science. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1990.

Egghe

Power laws in the information production process: lotkaian informetrics. Oxford: Elsevier, 2005.

10.

Egghe

Dynamic h-Index: the Hirsch index in function of time. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol 2007; 58(3): 452–454.

11.

Glanzel

On the h-index – a mathematical approach to a new measure of publication activity and citation impact. Scientometrics 2006; 67(2): 315–321.

12.

Schubert

Glanzel

A systematic analysis of Hirsch-type indices for journals. J Informetr 2007; 1(3): 179–184.

13.

Hirsch

JE.

Does the h-index have predictive power?

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2007; 104(49): 19193–19198.

14.

Egghe

The mathematical relation between the impact factor and the uncitedness factor. Scientometrics 2008; 76(1): 117–123.

15.

Molinari

JF.

Mathematical aspects of a new criterion for ranking scientific institutions based on the h-index. Scientometrics 2008; 75(2): 339–356.

16.

Bornmann

Leydesdorff

Count highly-cited papers instead of papers with h citations: use normalized citation counts and compare ‘like with like’!

Scientometrics 2018; 115(2): 1119–1123.

17.

Leydesdorff

Bornmann

Mapping (USPTO) patent data using overlays to Google maps. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol 2012; 63(7): 1442–1458.

18.

Lund

Examination of correlates of H-index as a measure of research productivity for Library and Information Science faculty in the United States and Canada. Scientometrics 2019; 120(3): 897–915.

19.

Silva

Grácio

MC.

Dispersion measures for h-index: a study of the Brazilian researchers in the field of mathematics. Scientometrics 2021; 126(3): 1983–2011.

20.

Brito

Navarro

AR.

The inconsistency of h-index: a mathematical analysis. J Informetr 2021; 15(1): 101–106.

21.

Bertoli-Barsotti

Lando

TA.

A theoretical model of the relationship between the h-index and other simple citation indicators. Scientometrics 2017; 111: 1415–1448.

22.

Malesios

Some variations on the standard theoretical models for the h-index: a comparative analysis. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol 2015; 66: 2384–2388.

23.

Ashcroft

McIvor

Library and information science journal articles, higher education and language, 2005, https://archive.ifla.org/IV/ifla71/papers/001e-Ashcroft_McIvor.pdf

24.

Chen

Wang

Yang

Characterizing award-winning papers in Library and Information Science (LIS): a case study of LIS journals published by Emerald Publishing. In: Diversity, divergence, dialogue, vol. 12646 (ed Toeppe

Yan

Chu

SKW

), Beijing, China, 17–31 March 2021, pp. 413–428. Cham: Springer.

25.

Okagbue

Teixeira da Silva

JA.

Correlation between the CiteScore and Journal Impact Factor of top-ranked library and information science journals. Scientometrics 2020; 124(1): 797–801.

26.

Fernandez-Llimos

Differences and similarities between Journal Impact Factor and CiteScore. Pharm Pract 2018; 16(2): 1282–1282.

27.

Teixeira da Silva

Memon

AR.

Cite Score: a cite for sore eyes, or a valuable, transparent metric?

Scientometrics 2017; 111(1): 553–556.

28.

Prathap

The quality-quantity-quasity and energy-exergy-entropy exegesis of expected value calculation of citation performance. Scientometrics 2012; 91(1): 269–275.

29.

Russ

SB.

A translation of Bolanzo’s paper on the intermediate value theorem. Hist Math 1980; 7(2): 156–185.

30.

Egghe

Theory and practice of the g-index. Scientometrics 2006; 69(1): 131–152.