The emergence of research on various aspects of `information behaviour' is explored and its growth as a subject of academic research is documented. The origin of the field as a potential aid to the development of library and information services is noted, as is the transition from this status to that of a subject for research at PhD level and beyond. The development of the field has thus led to a division between the needs of academia for theoretically grounded work, and the needs of the field of practice for guidance for service development. There is, today, a disconnection between research and practice, to a significant extent: early research was undertaken by practitioners but today academic research dominates the scene. Suggestions are made as to how this disconnection can be repaired.
S. Shoham, Library Classification and Browsing: the Conjunction of Readers and Documents (Sussex Academic Press, Brighton , UK, 2000).
2.
C.A. Cutter, Rules for a Dictionary Catalog (4th edn) (Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, 1904).
3.
A. Black, The Public Library in Britain, 1914-2000 (British Library , London, UK, 2000).
4.
J. Kaiser, Systematic Indexing (Pitman, London, UK, 1911).
5.
J.P. Wood , Leaders in marketing: George H. Gallup, Journal of Marketing26(4) (1962) 78-80.
6.
J.D. Bernal, Preliminary analysis of pilot questionnaire on the use of scientific literature . In: The Royal Society 1948 Scientific Information Conference: Report and Papers Submitted (Royal Society, London, 1948) 589-637.
7.
I.H. Hogg and J.R. Smith, Information and literature use in a research and development organization . In: Proceedings of the 1958 International Conference on Scientific Information (National Academy of Sciences - National Research Council, Washington, DC, 1959) 131-162.
8.
S. Herner and M. Herner, Determining requirements for atomic energy information from reference questions . In: Proceedings of the 1958 International Conference on Scientific Information (National Academy of Sciences - National Research Council, Washington, DC, 1959) 181-188.
9.
M.B. Line, The information uses and needs of social scientists: an overview of INFROSS , Aslib Proceedings23(8) (1971) 412-434.
10.
J. Martyn, Report of an Investigation on Literature Searching by Research Scientists (Aslib Research Department, London , UK, 1964).
11.
M. Slater, Social scientists' information needs in the 1980s, Journal of Documentation44(3) (1988) 226-237.
12.
H. Menzel, Information needs and uses in science and technology, Annual Review of Information Science and Technology1 (1966) 41-69.
13.
W.J. Paisley , Information needs and uses, Annual Review of Information Science and Technology3 (1968) 1-30.
14.
C. Corkill and M. Mann, Information Needs in the Humanities: Two Postal Surveys ( Postgraduate School of Librarianship and Information Science, CRUS, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK, 1978 ).
15.
C. Harris and C. Harrop, Metals Information Needs in Industry: a Pilot Study in South Yorkshire (Postgraduate School of Librarianship and Information Science, CRUS, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK, 1984).
16.
N. Roberts and B. Clifford, Regional Variations in the Demand and Supply of Business Information: a Study of Manufacturing Firms (Postgraduate School of Librarianship and Information Science, CRUS, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK, 1986).
17.
D.R. Streatfield and T.D. Wilson, Information services in English local authority social services departments: implications of Project INISS, Behavioural and Social Sciences Librarian1 (1980) 189-199.
18.
T.D. Wilson , On user studies and information needs, Journal of Documentation37(1) (1981) 3-15.
19.
Hild occupational survey, A.L.A. Bulletin32 (1938) 525. Cited by: E.W. McDiarmid, The Library Survey: Problems and Methods (American Library Association , Chicago, IL, 1940).
20.
M.C. Quigley and W.E. Marcus, Portrait of a Library ( Appleton-Century, New York, NY, 1936). Cited by: E.W. McDiarmid, The Library Survey: Problems and Methods (American Library Association, Chicago, IL, 1940).
21.
C.C. Kuhlthau , Seeking Meaning: a Process Approach to Library and Information Services (2nd edn) ( Libraries Unlimited, Westport, CT, 2004).
22.
L. Limberg , Experiencing information seeking and learning: a study of the interaction between two phenomena, Information Research5(1) (1999). Available at: http://InformationR.net/ir/5-1/paper68.html (accessed 10 December, 2007).
23.
T.D. Wilson, Recent trends in user studies: action research and qualitative methods (1980), (Projekt Methodeninstrumentarium zur Benutzerforschung in Information und Dokumentation, MIB P1 11/80, Freie Universität, Institut für Publizistik und Dokumentationswissenschaft, Berlin, Germany, 1980). Available at: http://InformationR.net/ir/paper76.html (accessed 10 December, 2007).
24.
K.E. Fisher, S. Erdelez and L.E.F. McKechnie (eds), Theories of Information Behavior (Information Today, Medford, NJ, 2005).
25.
D.O. Case, Looking for Information: a Survey of Research and Information Seeking, Needs and Behavior (2nd edn) (Academic Press, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2007).
26.
T.D. Wilson , On user studies and information needs, Journal of Documentation37(1) (1981) 3-15.
27.
T.D. Wilson and C. Walsh, Information Behaviour: an Inter-Disciplinary Perspective ( British Library Board, London, UK, 1996). Available at: http://informationr.net/tdw/publ/infbehav/index.html (accessed 10 December, 2007).
28.
C.C. Kuhlthau , Seeking Meaning: a Process Approach to Library and Information Services (2nd edn) ( Libraries Unlimited, Westport, CT, 2004).
29.
B. Dervin, L. Foreman-Wernet and E. Lauterbach (eds), Sense-making Methodology Reader: Selected Writings of Brenda Dervin (Hampton Press, Creskill, NJ, 2003).
30.
T.D. Wilson , A re-examination of information seeking behaviour in the context of activity theory, Information Research11(4) (2006). Available at: http://InformationR.net/ir/11-4/paper260.html (accessed 10 December, 2007).
31.
T.D. Wilson , Activity theory and information seeking behavior , Annual Review of Information Science and Technology42 (2008) 119-161.
