The advance of internet technology has stimulated the rise of professional virtual communities (PVCs). The objective of PVCs is to encourage people to exploit or explore knowledge through websites. However, many virtual communities have failed due to the reluctance of members to continue their participation in these PVCs. Motivated by such concerns, this study formulates and tests a theoretical model to explain the factors influencing individuals' intention to continue participating in PVCs' knowledge activities. Drawing from the information system and knowledge management literatures, two academic perspectives related to PVC continuance are incorporated in the integrated model. This model posits that an individual's intention to stay in a professional virtual community is influenced by a contextual factor and technological factors. Specifically, the antecedents of PVC members' intention to continue sharing knowledge include social interaction ties capital and satisfaction at post-usage stage. These variables, in turn, are adjusted based on the confirmation of pre-usage expectations. A longitudinal study is conducted with 360 members of a professional virtual community. Results indicate that the contextual factor and technological factors both exert significant impacts on PVC participants' continuance intentions.
F.S. Lee, D. Vogel and M. Limayem, Virtual community informatics: a review and research agenda, Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application5(1) (2003) 47—61.
2.
P. Gongla and C.R. Rizzuto, Evolving communities of practice: IBM global services experience, IBMSystems Journal40(4) (2001) 842—62.
3.
W.H. DeLone and E.R. McLean, The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update , Journal of Management Information Systems19(4) (2003) 9—30.
4.
S. Sangwan, Virtual community success: a uses and gratifications perspective. In: Proceedings of the 38th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 3—6 January 2005 ( Computer Society Press, 2005) 193c.
5.
Y. Malhotra and D.F. Galletta, Building systems that users want to use, Communications of theACM47(12) (2004) 89—94.
6.
A.K. Gupta and V. Govindarajan, Knowledge flows within multinational corporations, Strategic Management Journal21(4) (2000) 473—96.
7.
M.M. Wasko and S. Faraj, It is what one does: why people participate and help others in electronic communities of practice, Journal of Strategic InformationSystems9(2—3) (2000) 155—73.
8.
M.M. Wasko and S. Faraj, Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice, MIS Quarterly29(1) (2005) 35—57.
9.
A. Kankanhalli , B.C.Y. Tan and K.K. Wei, Contributing knowledge to electronic knowledge repositories: an empirical investigation, MIS Quarterly29(1) (2005) 113—43.
10.
J. Nahapiet and S. Ghoshal, Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage, Academy of Management Review23(2) ( 1998) 242—66.
11.
C. Gillam and C. Oppenheim, Review article: reviewing the impact of virtual teams in the information age, Journal of Information Science32(2) (2006) 160—75.
12.
W. Tsai and S. Ghoshal, Social capital and value creation: the role of intrafirm networks, Academy of Management Journal41(4) (1998) 464—76.
13.
A. Bhattacherjee and G. Premkumar, Understanding changes in belief and attitude toward information technology usage: a theoretical model and longitudinal test, MIS Quarterly28(2) (2004) 229—54.
14.
M. Bieber , D. Engelbart, R. Furuta, S.R. Heltz, J. Noll, J. Preece, E.A. Stohr, M. Turoff and B. van de Valle, Toward virtual community knowledge evolution, Journal of Management Information Systems18(4) (2002) 11—35.
15.
J. Hagel and A. Armstrong, Net Gain: Expanding Markets Through Virtual Communities (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA,1997).
16.
G. Burnett and M.H. Dickey, Inscription and interpretation of text: a cultural hermeneutic examination of virtual community, Information Research9(1) (2003). Available at: http://informationr.net/ir/9-1/infres91.html (accessed 27 July 2006).
17.
J. Preece , Sociability and usability: twenty years of chatting online, Behavior and Information Technology Journal20(5) (2001) 347—56.
18.
B. Wellman , J. Salaff, D. Dimitrova, L. Garton, M. Gulia and C. Haythornthwaite, Computer networks as social networks: collaborative work, telework, and virtual community, Annual Review of Sociology22 (1996) 213—38.
19.
J. Koh and Y.G. Kim, Knowledge sharing in virtual communities: an e-business perspective, Expert Systems with Applications26(2) (2004) 155—66.
20.
A. Ardichvili , V. Page and T. Wentling, Motivation and barriers to participation in virtual knowledge-sharing communities of practice, Journal of Knowledge Management7(1) (2003) 64—77.
21.
G. Burnett , Information exchange in virtual communities: a typology, Information Research5(4) (2000). Available at: http://informationr.net/ir/5-4/paper82.html (accessed 11 May 2006).
22.
B. Daniel , R.A. Schwier and G. McCalla, Social capital in virtual learning communities and distributed communities of practice, Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology29(3) (2003) 113—39.
23.
C. Haythornthwaite , A social network study of the growth of community among distance learners, Information Research4(1) (1998). Available at: http://informationr.net/ir/4-1/infres41.html (accessed 27 July 2006).
24.
J.N. Cummings , B. Butler and R. Kraut, The quality of online social relationships, Communications of theACM45(7) (2002) 103—8.
25.
M. Markland , Embedding online information resources in virtual learning environments: some implications for lecturers and librarians of the move towards delivering teaching in the online environment, Information Research8(4) (2003). Available at: http://informationr.net/ir/8-4/infres84.html (accessed 27 July 2006).
26.
F.J. Lin and C.M. Hsueh, Knowledge map creation and maintenance for virtual communities of practice, Information Processing and Management42(2) (2006) 551—68.
27.
D. Cohen and L. Prusak, In Good Company: How Social Capital Makes Organizations Work ( Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA,2001).
28.
A.H. Gold, A. Malhotra and A.H. Segars, Knowledge management: an organizational capabilities perspective, Journal of Management Information Systems18(1) (2001) 185—214.
29.
H. Lee and B. Choi, Knowledge management enablers, processes, and organizational performance: an integrative view and empirical examination, Journal of Management Information Systems20(1) (2003) 179—228.
30.
H. Yli-Renko , E. Autio and H.J. Sapienza, Social capital, knowledge acquisition, and knowledge exploitation in young technology-based firms, Strategic Management Journal22(6—7) (2001) 587—613.
31.
J.J. Hoffman , M.L. Hoelscher and K. Sherif, Social capital, knowledge management, and sustained superior performance, Journal of Knowledge Management9(3) ( 2005) 93—100.
32.
R.S. Burt, Structural holes: the social structure of competition ( Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1992).
33.
R.D. Putnam , Bowling alone: America's declining social capital , Journal of Democracy6(1) (1995) 65—78.
34.
C.A. Johnson , Choosing people: the role of social capital in information seeking behavior, Information Research10(1) (2004). Available at: http://informationr.net/ir/10-1/infres101.html (accessed 27 July 2006).
35.
A. Jashapara , The emerging discourse of knowledge management: a new dawn for information science research?Journal of Information Science31(2) (2005) 136—48.
36.
H. Weigand, A. Moor and W.J. Heuvel, Supporting the evolution of workflow patterns for virtual communities. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 4—7 January 2000 ( Computer Society Press, 2000) 6009.
37.
C.R. McInerney and N.J. Bird, Assessing website quality in context: retrieving information about genetically modified food on the Web, Information Research10(2) (2005). Available at: http://informationr.net/ir/10-2/infres102.html (accessed 27 July 2006).
38.
A.J. Flanagin and M.J. Metzger, Internet use in the contemporary media environment, Human Communication Research27(1) (2001) 153—81.
39.
T.J. Johnson and B.K. Kaye, Webelievability: a path model examining how convenience and reliance predict online credibility, Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly79(3) (2002) 619—42.
40.
W.H. DeLone and E.R. McLean, Information systems success: the quest for the dependent variable, Information Systems Research3(1) (1992) 60—95.
41.
W.H. DeLone and E.R. McLean, Measuring e-commerce success: applying the DeLone and McLean information systems success model, International Journal of Electronic Commerce9(1) (2004) 31—47.
42.
P.B. Seddon , A respecification and extension of the DeLone and McLean model of IS success, Information Systems Research8(3) ( 1997) 240—53.
43.
E.W. Anderson andM.W. Sullivan, The antecedents and consequences of customer satisfaction for firms, Marketing Science12(2) (1993) 125—43.
44.
R.L. Oliver , Cognitive, affective, and attribute bases of the satisfaction response, Journal of Consumer Research20(3) (1993) 418—30.
45.
V. McKinney , K. Yoon and F.M. Zahedi, The measurement of web-customer satisfaction: an expectation and disconfirmation approach, Information Systems Research13(3) (2002) 296—315.
46.
R.L. Oliver and W.S. Desarbo, Response determinants in satisfaction judgments, Journal of Consumer Research14(4) (1988) 495—507.
47.
R.L. Oliver , A cognitive model for the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions, Journal of Marketing Research17(4) (1980) 460—69.
48.
P. Kale, H. Singh and H. Perlmutter, Learning and protection of proprietary assets in strategic alliances: building relational capital, Strategic Management Journal21(3) (2000) 217—37.
49.
A. Bhattacherjee , Understanding information systems continuance: an expectation—confirmation model, MIS Quarterly25(3) (2001) 351—70.
50.
S.M. Choi and M.C. Park, A study on determinants of repurchase intention in mobile internet services . In: R. Cooper and G.Madden (eds), Conference Proceedings — M-Business, E-Commerce and the Impact of Broadband on Regional Development and Business Prospects, Perth ( ITS Communication Economics & Electronic Markets Research Centre, Perth, Australia, 2003) 22—4.
51.
S. Pavlin , Community of practice in a small research institute, Journal of KnowledgeManagement10(4) (2006) 136—44.
52.
A.T. Coughlan , E. Anderson, L. Stern and A. El-Ansary, Marketing Channel ( Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2001).
53.
P.F. Clay, A.R. Dennis and D.G. Ko, Factors affecting the loyal use of knowledge management systems. In: Proceedings of the 38th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 3—6 January 2005 ( Computer Society Press, 2005) 251c.
54.
D. Gefen, E-commerce: the role of familiarity and trust, Omega28(6) (2000) 725—37.
55.
C. Fornell and D.F. Larcker, Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error, Journal of Marketing Research18(1) (1981) 39—50.
56.
P. Bentler and D. Bonett, Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures , Psychological Bulletin88(3) (1980) 588—606.
57.
A. Bhattacherjee , An empirical analysis of the antecedents of electronic commerce service continuance, Decision SupportSystems32(2) (2001) 201—14.
