Should we turn a deaf ear or take responsibility? The bystander effect in helping behavior of young children

Abstract

The bystander effect is well-documented in adults, but its developmental origins and underlying mechanisms in young children remain unclear. This study examined how bystander characteristics influence 5-year-olds’ prosocial decisions through three experiments with 247 young children (M = 5.00 years, SD = 0.58; 121 girls). Using a helping task paradigm in which young children chose between personal gain and helping others, we systematically manipulated three variables: the physical presence of bystanders (Experiment 1), their awareness of the dilemma (Experiment 2), and their perceived capability (Experiment 3). Results showed that the mere physical presence of bystanders did not significantly affect young children’s helping rates or response times. However, when bystanders were aware of the dilemma, young children’s helping decreased significantly compared to when bystanders were unaware. Critically, this effect was moderated by bystander capability: when high-capability bystanders were aware of the dilemma, young children’s helping rates were lowest and response times longest. These findings suggest that bystander effects in 5-year-olds are not driven by mere presence but by a dynamic assessment of responsibility distribution, contingent on perceptions of others’ awareness and capability. Young children appear to prioritize responsibility attribution over reputation concerns when deciding whether to help.

Keywords

Bystander capability helping behavior bystander effect responsibility attribution young children

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aiello

J. R.

Douthitt

E. A.

(2001). Social facilitation from Triplett to electronic performance monitoring. Group Dynamics Theory Research & Practice, 5(3), 163–180. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089–2699.5.3.163

Barbora

Michael

Malinda

(2018). Communicative eye contact signals a commitment to cooperate for young children. Cognition, 179, 192–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.010

Barron

Yechiam

(2002). Private e-mail requests and the diffusion of responsibility. Computers in Human Behavior, 18(5), 507–520. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0747–5632(02)00007–9

Bar-Tal

Raviv

Bar-Tal

(1982). Consistency of pupils’ attributions regarding success and failure. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74(1), 104–110. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.74.1.104

Bateson

Nettle

Roberts

(2006). Cues of being watched enhance cooperation in a real-world setting. Biology Letters, 2(3), 412–414. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2006.0509

Benabou

Tirole

(2006). Incentives and prosocial behavior. American Economic Review, 96(5), 1652–1678. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.96.5.1652

Bickman

(1971). The effect of another bystander’s ability to help on bystander intervention in an emergency. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 7(3), 367–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(71)90035–7

Bryan

C. J.

Master

Walton

G. M.

(2014). “Helping” versus “being a helper”: Invoking the self to increase helping in young children. Child Development, 85(5), 1836–1842. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12244

Buckley

Siegel

Ness

(1979). Egocentrism, empathy, and altruistic behavior in young children. Developmental Psychology, 15, 329–330. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012–1649.15.3.329

10.

Cañigueral

Hamilton

A. F. de C.

(2019). Effects of being watched on self-referential processing, self-awareness and prosocial behaviour. Consciousness and Cognition, 76, 102830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2019.102830

11.

Clark

R. D.

Word

L. E.

(1972). Why don’t bystanders help? Because of ambiguity? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24(3), 392–400. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0033717

12.

Cramer

R. E.

Mcmaster

M. R.

Bartell

P. A.

Dragna

(1988). Subject competence and minimization of the bystander effect. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 18(13), 1133–1148. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1988.tb01198.x

13.

Critelli

J. W.

Keith

K. W.

(2003). The bystander effect and the passive confederate: On the interaction between theory and method. Journal of Mind and Behavior, 24(3–4), 255–264. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2004-11787-001

14.

Darley

J. M.

Latané

(1968). Bystander intervention in emergencies: Diffusion of responsibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8(4), 377–383. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0025589

15.

Dunfield

K. A.

(2014). A construct divided: Prosocial behavior as helping, sharing, and comforting subtypes. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, Article 958. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00958

16.

Engelmann

J. M.

Herrmann

Tomasello

(2012). Five-year-olds, but not chimpanzees, attempt to manage their reputations. PLOS ONE, 7(10), Article e48433. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0048433

17.

Engelmann

J. M.

Herrmann

Tomasello

(2018). Concern for group reputation increases prosociality in young children. Psychological Science, 29(2), 181–190. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617733830

18.

Farroni

Csibra

Simion

Johnson

M. H.

(2002). Eye contact detection in humans from birth. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 99(14), 9602–9605. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.152159999

19.

Faul

Erdfelder

Lang

A.-G.

Buchner

(2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146

20.

Fischer

Krueger

J. I.

Greitemeyer

Vogrincic

Kastenmüller

Frey

. . . Kainbacher

(2011). The bystander-effect: A meta-analytic review on bystander intervention in dangerous and non-dangerous emergencies. Psychological Bulletin, 137(4), 517. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023304

21.

Ganti

Baek

(2021). Why people stand by: A comprehensive study about the bystander effect. Journal of Student Research, 10(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.47611/jsrhs.v10i1.1390

22.

Garcia

S. M.

Weaver

Moskowitz

G. B.

Darley

J. M.

(2002). Crowded minds: The implicit bystander effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 843–853. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022–3514.83.4.843

23.

Grueneisen

Warneken

(2022). The development of prosocial behavior—from sympathy to strategy. Current Opinion in Psychology, 43, 323–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.08.005

24.

Hamilton

A. F. D. C.

Lind

(2016). Audience effects: What can they tell us about social neuroscience, theory of mind and autism? Culture and Brain, 4(2), 159–177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40167–016–0044–5

25.

Harris

P. L.

Johnson

C. N.

Hutton

Andrews

Cooke

(1989). Young children’s theory of mind and emotion. Cognition & Emotion, 3(4), 379–400. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699938908412713

26.

Havlik

J. L.

Sugano

Y. Y. V.

Jacobi

M. C.

Kukreja

R. R.

Jacobi

J. H. C.

Mason

(2020). The bystander effect in rats. Science Advances, 6(28), 4205. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abb4205

27.

Hay

D. F.

Paine

A. L.

Perra

Cook

K. V.

Fyfield

(2021). Prosocial and aggressive behavior: A longitudinal study. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 86(2), 7–103. https://doi.org/10.1111/mono.12427

28.

D. Y. F.

(1996). Filial piety and its psychological consequences. In Bond

M. H.

(Ed.), The handbook of Chinese psychology (pp. 155–165). Oxford University Press. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1996-98234-011

29.

Hortensius

De Gelder

(2014). The neural basis of the bystander effect — The influence of group size on neural activity when witnessing an emergency. Neuroimage, 93, 53–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.02.025

30.

Hortensius

De Gelder

(2018). From empathy to apathy: The bystander effect revisited. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27(4), 249–256. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417749653

31.

Huang

L. L.

(2016). Interpersonal harmony and conflict for Chinese people: A yin-yang perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, Article 847. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00847

32.

Jung

E. H.

Bhojwani

N. S.

(2024). From observers to interveners: Examining bystander intentions in Facebook Live videos. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 41(14), 8655–8665. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2024.2413292

33.

Kachel

Tomasello

(2018). 3- and 5-year-old children’s adherence to explicit and implicit joint commitments. Developmental Psychology, 55(1), 80–88. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000632

34.

Kirschenbaum

A. A.

Rapaport

(2020). Helping behavior by bystanders: Contrasting individual vs social contextual factors. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 50, Article 101816. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101816

35.

Latane

Darley

J. M.

(1968). Group inhibition of bystander intervention in emergencies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 10(3), 215–221. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0026570

36.

Latané

Nida

(1981). Ten years of research on group size and helping. Psychological Bulletin, 89, 308–324. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033–2909.89.2.308

37.

Leary

M. R.

Kowalski

R. M.

(1990). Impression management: A literature review and two-component model. Psychological Bulletin, 107(1), 34–47. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.1.34

38.

Leimgruber

K. L.

Shaw

Santos

L. R.

Olson

K. R.

(2012). Young children are more generous when others are aware of their actions. PLOS ONE, 7(10), Article e48292. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0048292

39.

Levine

Prosser

Evans

Reicher

(2005). Identity and emergency intervention: How social group membership and inclusiveness of group boundaries shape helping behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(4), 443. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204271651

40.

Liebst

L. S.

Philpot

Bernasco

Dausel

K. L.

Ejbye-Ernst

Nicolaisen

M. H.

Lindegaard

M. R.

(2019). Social relations and presence of others predict bystander intervention: Evidence from violent incidents captured on CCTV. Aggressive Behavior, 45(6), 598–609. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21853

41.

Lutz

D. J.

Keil

F. C.

(2002). Early understanding of the division of cognitive labor. Child Development, 73(4),1073–1084. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00458

42.

Levine

Crowther

(2008). The responsive bystander: How social group membership and group size can encourage as well as inhibit bystander intervention. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(6), 1429–1439. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012634

43.

National Bureau of Statistics of China. (2022). China statistical yearbook 2022. China Statistics Press. https://www.stats.gov.cn/

44.

Nobre

G. C.

Valentini

N. C.

(2019). Self-perception of competence: Concept, changes in childhood, and gender and age-group differences. Journal of Physical Education, 30(1), Article e3008. https://doi.org/10.4025/jphyseduc.v30i1.3008

45.

Pasquini

E. S.

Corriveau

K. H.

Koenig

Harris

P. L.

(2007). Preschoolers monitor the relative accuracy of informants. Developmental Psychology, 43(5), 1216–1226. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.43.5.1216

46.

Philpot

Liebst

L. S.

Levine

Bernasco

Lindegaard

M. R.

(2020). Would I be helped? Cross-National CCTV footage shows that intervention is the norm in public conflicts. American Psychologist, 75(1), 66–75. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000469

47.

Plötner

Over

Carpenter

Tomasello

(2015). The effects of collaboration and minimal-group membership on children’s prosocial behavior, liking, affiliation, and trust. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 139, 161–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2015.05.008

48.

Senju

Johnson

M. H.

(2009). The eye contact effect: Mechanisms and development. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13(3), 127–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2008.11.009

49.

Shaw

Montinari

Piovesan

Olson

K. R.

Gino

Norton

M. I.

(2014). Children develop a veil of fairness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 363–375. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031247

50.

Sierksma

Shutts

(2021). Competence-based helping: Children’s consideration of need when providing others with help. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 210, 105206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2021.105206

51.

Siposova

Grueneisen

Helming

Tomasello

Carpenter

(2021). Common knowledge that help is needed increases helping behavior in children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 201, 104973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2020.104973

52.

Sprafkin

J. N.

Liebert

R. M.

Poulos

R. W.

(1975). Effects of a prosocial televised example on children’s helping. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 20(1), 119–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0965(75)90031–4

53.

Staub

(1970). A child in distress: The influence of age and number of witnesses on children’s attempts to help. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 14(2), 130–140. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0028752

54.

Tobin

Hsueh

Karasawa

(2009). Preschool in three cultures revisited: China, Japan, and the United States. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226805054.001.0001

55.

Vaish

Carpenter

Tomasello

(2010). Young children selectively avoid helping people with harmful intentions. Child Development, 81(6), 1661–1669. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01500.x

56.

Van Cleemput

Vandebosch

Pabian

. (2014). Personal characteristics and contextual factors that determine “helping,” “joining in,” and “doing nothing” when witnessing cyberbullying. Aggressive Behavior, 40(5), 383–396. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21534

57.

VanderBorght

Jaswal

V. K.

(2009). Who knows best? Preschoolers sometimes prefer child informants over adult informants. Infant and Child Development, 18(1), 61–71. https://doi.org/10.1002/icd.591

58.

Warneken

Tomasello

(2006). Altruistic helping in human infants and young chimpanzees. Science, 311(5765), 1301–1303. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1121448

59.

Warneken

Tomasello

(2013). The emergence of contingent reciprocity in young children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 116(2), 338–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2013.06.002

60.

Watanabe

Yuzawa

(2013). Perception of one’s own and others’ ability by preschool Japanese children. Japanese Psychological Research, 55(4), 303–314. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpr.12022