Young generations are often identified as key actors in promoting sustainability. However, some studies suggest that adolescents may engage in pro-environmental behaviors to a lesser extent than other age groups. The literature on socialization provides useful insights into the factors that may facilitate or hinder these practices, examining how young people develop environmental attitudes and values within their social contexts. This systematic review explores the role of parents and peers in relation to adolescents’ pro-environmental behaviors. Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, 23 studies were analyzed, mostly conducted in Western contexts, investigating family dynamics, parental values, social norms, and observational learning processes. The findings highlight the involvement of parents and peers in environmental socialization processes, suggesting that both groups may play a role in adolescents’ sustainable practices. The review also identifies some limitations in existing research and suggests possible directions for future studies.
AbbassK.QasimM. Z.SongH.MurshedM.MahmoodH.YounisI. (2022). A review of the global climate change impacts, adaptation, and sustainable mitigation measures. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29, 42539–42559. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-19718-6
2.
AndoK.YorifujiK.OhnumaS.MatthiesE.KanbaraA. (2014). Transmitting pro-environmental behaviours to the next generation: A comparison between Germany and Japan. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 18(2), 134–144. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12078
ArutaJ. J. B. R. (2025). Intergenerational transmission of environmental knowledge predicts green purchase intention among Filipino adolescents: Is role modelling important?Educational and Developmental Psychologist, 42, 127–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/20590776.2024.2440459
5.
BalundėA.PerlaviciuteG. (2023). Are we on the same page? Exploring the relationships between environmental values, self-identity, personal norms and behavior in parent-adolescent dyads. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 92, 102157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2023.102157
BanduraA.CherryL. (2020). Enlisting the power of youth for climate change. American Psychologist, 75(7), 945–951. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000512
8.
BurkeK.DittmanC. K.ForbesE. J.EgginsE. (2021). PROTOCOL: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials evaluating the impact of parenting programmes for parents of adolescents (10–18 years) on adolescent mental health outcomes, positive development and the parent–adolescent relationship. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 17(1), Article e1146. https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1146
9.
BurkeS. E.SansonA. V.Van HoornJ. (2018). The psychological effects of climate change on children. Current Psychiatry Reports, 20(5), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-018-0896-9
10.
ChawlaL. (2009). Growing up green: Becoming an agent of care for the natural world. The Journal of Developmental Processes, 4, 6–23.
11.
ChwialkowskaA.BhattiW. A.GlowikM. (2020). The influence of cultural values on pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Cleaner Production, 268, 122305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122305
ColladoS.StaatsH.SanchoP. (2019). Normative influences on adolescents’ self-reported pro-environmental behaviors: The role of parents and friends. Environment and Behavior, 51(3), 288–314. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916517744591
14.
CostelloA.AbbasM.AllenA.BallS.BellS.BellamyR.FrielS.GroceN.JohnsonA.KettM. (2009). Managing the health effects of climate change: Lancet and University College London Institute for Global Health Commission. The Lancet, 373, 1693–1733. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60935-1
15.
DingM.LiuX.LiuP. (2024). Parent-child environmental interaction promotes pro-environmental behaviors through family well-being: An actor-partner interdependence mediation model. Current Psychology, 43(18), 16476–16488. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-05495-z
16.
DuarteR.EscarioJ. J.SanagustínM. V. (2015). The influence of the family, the school, and the group on the environmental attitudes of European students. Environmental Education Research, 23(1), 23–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2015.1074660
17.
DunlapR. E.Van LiereK. D.MertigA. G.JonesR. E. (2000). New trends in measuring environmental attitudes: Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: A revised NEP scale. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 425–442. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00176
18.
ErbasA. K.Tuncer TeksozG.TekkayaC. (2012). An evaluation of environmental responsibility and its associated factors: Reflections from PISA 2006. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 46, 41–62.
19.
FishbeinM.AjzenI. (2011). Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach. Psychology Press. (Original work published 2010).
20.
GenoveseM.ManganoM. C.PapaF.RomeoT.GrecoS. (2023). Local businesses’ consumption and perception of Single-Use Plastics: A preliminary assessment for conservation and mitigation plans in the Egadi Islands Marine Protected Area. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 194, 115252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2023.115252
21.
GislasonM. K.KennedyA. M.WithamS. M. (2021). The interplay between social and ecological determinants of mental health for children and youth in the climate crisis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(9), 4573. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18094573
22.
GongY.LiJ.XieJ.ZhangL.LouQ. (2021). Will “Green” parents have “Green” children? The relationship between parents’ and early adolescents’ green consumption values. Journal of Business Ethics, 179(2), 369–385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04835-y
23.
GrønhøjA.ThøgersenJ. (2009). Like father, like son? Intergenerational transmission of values, attitudes, and behaviours in the environmental domain. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(4), 414–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.05.002
24.
GrønhøjA.ThøgersenJ. (2012). Action speaks louder than words: The effect of personal attitudes and family norms on adolescents’ pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of Economic Psychology, 33(1), 292–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2011.10.001
25.
GrønhøjA.ThøgersenJ. (2017). Why young people do things for the environment: The role of parenting for adolescents’ motivation to engage in pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 54, 11–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.09.005
26.
HigginsJ. P. T.ThomasJ.ChandlerJ.CumpstonM.LiT.PageM. J.WelchV. A. (Eds.). (2022). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (version 6.3). The Cochrane Collaboration. www.training.cochrane.org/handbook
27.
HongQ. N.PluyeP.FàbreguesS.BartlettG.BoardmanF.CargoM.DagenaisP.GagnonM.-P.GriffithsF.NicolauB.O’CathainA.RousseauM.-C.VedelI. (2018). Mixed methods appraisal tool (MMAT), version 2018 (#1148552). Canadian Intellectual Property Office, Industry Canada.
28.
JančiusR.GavenauskasA.ŪsasA. (2021). The influence of values and the social environment on the environmental attitudes of students: The case of Lithuania. Sustainability, 13(20), 11436. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132011436
29.
KaiserF. G.WilsonM. (2000). Assessing people’s general ecological behavior: A cross-cultural measure. Journal of applied social psychology, 30(5), 952–978. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2000.tb02505.x
30.
KaplanH.MadjarN. (2015). Autonomous motivation and pro-environmental behaviours among Bedouin students in Israel: A self-determination theory perspective. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 31(2), 223–247. https://doi.org/10.1017/aee.2015.33
31.
Katz-GerroT.GreenspanI.HandyF.VeredY. (2019). Environmental behavior in three countries: The role of intergenerational transmission and domains of socialization. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 71, 101343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.101343
32.
KoesslerA. K.VorlauferT.FiebelkornF. (2022). Social norms and climate-friendly behavior of adolescents. PLOS ONE, 17(4), Article e0266847. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0266847
33.
KormosC.GiffordR. (2014). The validity of self-report measures of proenvironmental behavior: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 40, 359–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.09.003
34.
LakewY. (2020). The elusiveness of communicative influence: How key socializers influence adolescents’ proenvironmental engagement. International Journal of Communication, 14, 20.
35.
LangeF. (2023). Behavioral paradigms for studying pro-environmental behavior: A systematic review. Behavior Research Methods, 55(2), 600–622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.06.004
36.
LangeF.DewitteS. (2019). Measuring pro-environmental behavior: Review and recommendations. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 63, 92–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.04.009
37.
LawsonD. F.StevensonK. T.PetersonM. N.CarrierS. J.SeekampE.StrnadR. (2019). Evaluating climate change behaviors and concern in the family context. Environmental Education Research, 25(5), 678–690. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2018.1564248
38.
LeeK. (2010). The green purchase behavior of Hong Kong young consumers: The role of peer influence, local environmental involvement, and concrete environmental knowledge. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 23(1), 21–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/08961530.2011.524575
39.
LeppänenJ. M.HaahlaA. E.LensuA. M.KuitunenM. T. (2012). Parent-child similarity in environmental attitudes: A pairwise comparison. The Journal of Environmental Education, 43(3), 162–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2011.634449
40.
LiD.ZhaoL.MaS.ShaoS.ZhangL. (2019). What influences an individual’s pro-environmental behavior? A literature review. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 146, 28–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.03.024
41.
LiJ.LiuC. (2016). Intergenerational influence on adolescents’ proenvironmental behavior. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 44(4), 589–601. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2016.44.4.589
42.
LiuS.XuB.ZhangD.TianY.WuX. (2022). Core symptoms and symptom relationships of problematic internet use across early, middle, and late adolescence: A network analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 128, 107090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.107090
43.
MartinG.ReillyK.EverittH.GillilandJ. A. (2021). The impact of climate change awareness on children's mental well-being and negative emotions–a scoping review. Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 27(1), 59–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/camh.12525
44.
MattioliG.ScheinerJ. (2024). A panel analysis of change in personal air travel behaviour in England between 2012 and 2019. Transportation, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-024-10571-9
45.
OjalaM. (2015). Hope in the face of climate change: Associations with environmental engagement and student perceptions of teachers’ emotion communication style and future orientation. The Journal of Environmental Education, 46(3), 133–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2015.1021662
46.
OjalaM.BengtssonH. (2019). Young people’s coping strategies concerning climate change: Relations to perceived communication with parents and friends and proenvironmental behavior. Environment and Behavior, 51(8), 907–935. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916518763894
47.
OuzzaniM.HammadyH.FedorowiczZ.ElmagarmidA. (2016). Rayyan—A web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews, 5, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4
Perez-FelknerL. (2013). Socialization in childhood and adolescence. In DeLamaterJ.WardA. (Eds), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 119–149). Springer.
52.
PirasS.RighiS.BanchelliF.GiordanoC.SettiM. (2023). Food waste between environmental education, peers, and family influence. Insights from primary school students in Northern Italy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 383, 135461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135461
53.
PrattM. W.NorrisJ. E.AlisatS.BissonE. (2013). Earth mothers (and fathers): Examining generativity and environmental concerns in adolescents and their parents. Journal of Moral Education, 42(1), 12–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2012.714751
54.
RubinK. H.BukowskiW. M.LaursenB. (2009). Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups. Guilford Press.
55.
RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Press.
56.
SaracevicS.SchlegelmilchB. B.WuT. (2022). How normative appeals influence pro-environmental behavior: The role of individualism and collectivism. Journal of Cleaner Production, 344, 131086. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131086
57.
SharmaV.ColemanS.NixonJ.SharplesL.Hamilton-ShieldJ.RutterH.BryantM. (2019). A systematic review and meta-analysis estimating the population prevalence of comorbidities in children and adolescents aged 5 to 18 years. Obesity Reviews, 20(10), 1341–1349. https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.12904
58.
SmetanaJ. G.RobinsonJ.RoteW. M. (2015). Socialization in adolescence. Handbook of Socialization: Theory and Research, 2, 66–84.
59.
SteinbergL.IcenogleG.ShulmanE. P.BreinerK.CheinJ.BacchiniD.ChangL.ChaudharyN.Di GiuntaL.DodgeK. A.FantiK. A.LansfordJ. L.MaloneP. S.OburuP.PastorelliC.SkinnerA. T.SorbringE.TapanyaS.TiradoL. M. U.. . .TakashH. M. (2018). Around the world, adolescence is a time of heightened sensation seeking and immature self-regulation. Developmental Science, 21(2), Article e12532. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12532
60.
StevensonK. T.PetersonM. N.BondellH. D. (2019). The influence of personal beliefs, friends, and family in building climate change concern among adolescents. Environmental Education Research, 25(6), 832–845. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2016.1177712
61.
ThomaesS.GrapsasS.van de WeteringJ.SpitzerJ.PoorthuisA. (2023). Green teens: Understanding and promoting adolescents’ sustainable engagement. One Earth, 6(4), 352–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2023.02.006
62.
TianH.LiuX. (2022). Pro-environmental behavior research: Theoretical progress and future directions. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(11), 6721. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19116721
63.
TrottC. D. (2021). Youth-led climate change action: Multi-level effects on children, families, and communities. Sustainability, 13(22), 12355. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212355
WallisH.KlöcknerC. (2020). The transmission of energy-saving behaviors in the family: A multilevel approach to the assessment of aggregated and single energy-saving actions of parents and adolescents. Environment and Behavior, 52(3), 275–304. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916518802342
66.
WuZ. (2020). “Do Big Hands Guide Small Hands?” or “do Small Hands Guide Big Hands”: The intergenerational interactions in environmental behaviors and family influencing factors. Chinese Journal of Population, Resources and Environment, 18(3), 222–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjpre.2019.12.001
67.
XiaW.LiL. M. W. (2022). Multilevel evidence for the parent-adolescent dyadic effect of familiarity with climate change on pro-environmental behaviors in 14 societies: Moderating effects of societal power distance and individualism. Environment and Behavior, 54(7–8), 1097–1132. https://doi.org/10.1177/00139165221129550
68.
ŽukauskienėR.Truskauskaitė-KunevičienėI.GabėV.KaniušonytėG. (2021). “My words matter”: The role of adolescents in changing pro-environmental habits in the family. Environment and Behavior, 53(10), 1140–1162. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916520953150
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
