Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2020-4
The Transmission of Energy-Saving Behaviors in the Family: A Multilevel Approach to the Assessment of Aggregated and Single Energy-Saving Actions of Parents and Adolescents
The present article examines the transmission of energy-saving behaviors in the family on two levels. We investigated the extent to which energy-saving performance differed between adolescents in relation to parental behavior on an aggregated level but also across single behaviors within adolescents. Furthermore, we investigated whether social context (e.g., private areas in a household) interfered with one of the basic mechanisms assumed for this transmission (observation). Correlations between 13 self-reported single energy-saving behaviors from 264 adolescents and their respective parents (N = 554) were analyzed by combining a path analysis with a multilevel approach. There were strong significant correlations between parents’ and adolescents’ energy-saving behaviors, mediated by adolescents’ perceptions of their parents’ behavior. The congruence between parents’ self-reports and adolescents’ perceptions was lower in private contexts than in shared social contexts in the household. This indicates that differentiated investigations with single behaviors and a focus on the social context (e.g., observability) are needed in transmission research.
AbrahamseW.StegL. (2009). How do socio-demographic and psychological factors relate to households’ direct and indirect energy use and savings?Journal of Economic Psychology, 30, 711-720. doi:10.1016/j.joep.2009.05.006
2.
AjzenI. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
3.
AnsolabehereS.SchaffnerB. F. (2014). Does survey mode still matter? Findings from a 2010 multi-mode comparison. Political Analysis, 22, 285-303.
4.
BakerC. W.LittleT. D.BrownellK. D. (2003). Predicting adolescent eating and activity behaviors: The role of social norms and personal agency. Health Psychology, 22, 189-198. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.22.2.189
5.
BambergS. (2013). Changing environmentally harmful behaviors: A stage model of self-regulated behavioral change. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 34, 151-159. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.01.002
6.
BambergS.ReesJ.SeebauerS. (2015). Collective climate action: Determinants of participation intention in community-based pro-environmental initiatives. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 43, 155-165. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.06.006
7.
BanduraA. (1971). Social learning theory. Morristown, NY: General Learning Press.
8.
BanduraA. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
9.
BanduraA.CapraraG. V.BarbaranelliC.RegaliaC.ScabiniE. (2011). Impact of family efficacy beliefs on quality of family functioning and satisfaction with family life. Applied Psychology, 60, 421-448. doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.2010.00442.x
10.
BellB. T.TothN.LittleL.SmithM. A. (2015). Planning to save the planet: Using an online intervention based on implementation intentions to change adolescent self-reported energy-saving behavior. Environment and Behavior, 48, 1049-1072. doi:10.1177/0013916515583550
11.
BemD. J. (1967). Self-perception: An alternative interpretation of cognitive dissonance phenomena. Psychological Review, 74, 183-200. doi:10.1037/h0024835
12.
BemD. J. (1972). Self-perception theory. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 6, 1-62. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60024-6
13.
BrushA. B.InkpenK. M. (2007). Yours, mine and ours? Sharing and use of technology in domestic environments. In UbiComp 2007 Ubiquitous Computing–9th International Conference (pp.109-126). Berlin, Germany: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-74853-3_7
14.
ChristO.SchlüterE. (2012). Strukturgleichungsmodelle mit Mplus: eine praktische Einführung [Structural Equation Modeling with Mplus: A practical introduction]. München, Germany: Oldenbourg.
15.
CialdiniR. B. (2003). Crafting normative messages to protect the environment. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12, 105-109. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.01242
16.
CialdiniR. B.GoldsteinN. J. (2004). Social influence: Compliance and conformity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 591-621. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142015
17.
CialdiniR. B.RenoR. R.KallgrenC. A. (1990). A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 1015-1026. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.58.6.1015
18.
DietzT.GardnerG. T.GilliganJ.SternP. C.VandenberghM. P. (2009). Household actions can provide a behavioral wedge to rapidly reduce US carbon emissions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 18452-18456. doi:10.1073/pnas.0908738106
19.
DumontH.TrautweinU.LüdtkeO.NeumannM.NiggliA.SchnyderI. (2012). Does parental homework involvement mediate the relationship between family background and educational outcomes?Contemporary Educational Psychology, 37(1), 55-69. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.09.004
20.
DuncanO. D. (1975). Introduction to structural equation models. New York, NY: Academic Press.
21.
DuncanT. E.DuncanS. C.HopsH. (1994). The effects of family cohesiveness and peer encouragement on the development of adolescent alcohol use: A cohort-sequential approach to the analysis of longitudinal data. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 55, 588-599. doi:10.15288/jsa.1994.55.588
22.
EasterlingD.MillerS.WeinbergerN. (1995). Environmental consumerism: A process of children’s socialization and families’ resocialization. Psychology & Marketing, 12, 531-550. doi:10.1002/mar.4220120606
23.
EvansG. W.OttoS.KaiserF. G. (2018). Childhood origins of young adult environmental behavior. Psychological Science, 29, 679-687. doi:10.1177/0956797617741894
24.
FischerD.BarthM. (2014). Key competencies for and beyond sustainable consumption: An educational contribution to the debate. GAiA-Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 23, 193-200. doi:10.14512/gaia.23.S1.7
25.
German Advisory Council on Global Change. (2014). Human progress within planetary guard rails: A contribution to the SDG debate (Policy paper). Berlin, Germany: Author.
26.
German Advisory Council on Global Change. (2016). Development and justice through transformation: The four big “I”s (Special reports). Berlin, Germany: Author.
27.
GiffordR.NilssonA. (2014). Personal and social factors that influence pro-environmental concern and behaviour: A review. International Journal of Psychology, 49, 141-157. doi:10.1002/ijop.12034
28.
GoldsteinN. J.CialdiniR. B. (2007). Using social norms as a lever of social influence. In PratkanisA. R. (Ed.), The Science of social influence: Advances and future progress (pp. 167-192). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
29.
GossenM.SchollG.HolzhauerB.SchippergesM. (2015). Umweltbewusstsein in Deutschland 2014. Vertiefungsstudie: Umweltbewusstsein und Umweltverhalten junger Menschen [Environmental consciousness in germany 2014. In-depth report: Environmental consciousness and behavior of young people]. Dessau-Roßlau, Germany: Institut für ökologische Wirtschaftsforschung.
30.
GotschiE.VogelS.LindenthalT. (2007). High school students’ attitudes and behaviour towards organic products: Survey results from Vienna. Vienna: Department für Wirtschafts-und Sozialwiss., Inst. für Nachhaltige Wirtschaftsentwicklung, Univ. für Bodenkultur.
31.
GrønhøjA. (2006). Communication about consumption: A family process perspective on “green” consumer practices. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 5, 491-503. doi:10.1002/cb.198
32.
GrønhøjA.ThøgersenJ. (2009). Like father, like son? Intergenerational transmission of values, attitudes, and behaviours in the environmental domain. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29, 414-421. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.05.002
33.
GrønhøjA.ThøgersenJ. (2011). Feedback on household electricity consumption: Learning and social influence processes. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 35, 138-145. doi:10.1111/j.1470-6431.2010.00967.x
34.
GrønhøjA.ThøgersenJ. (2012). Action speaks louder than words: The effect of personal attitudes and family norms on adolescents’ pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of Economic Psychology, 33, 292-302. doi:10.1016/j.joep.2011.10.001
35.
Gram-HanssenK. (2007). Teenage consumption of cleanliness: How to make it sustainable. Sustainability: Science, Practice, and Policy, 3, 15-23. doi:10.1080/15487733.2007.11907998
36.
Gram-HanssenK. (2014). New needs for better understanding of household’s energy consumption-behaviour, lifestyle or practices?Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 10(1-2), 91-107. doi:10.1080/17452007.2013.837251
37.
GrusecJ. E.DavidovM. (2010). Integrating different perspectives on socialization theory and research: A domain-specific approach. Child Development, 81, 687-709. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01426.x
38.
GrusecJ. E.MaayanD. (2014). Socialization in the family. The roles of parents. In GrusecJ. E.HastingsP. D. (Ed.), Handbook of socialization: Theory and research (pp. 284-308). New York: Guilford Press.
39.
HausteinS.KlöcknerC. A.BlöbaumA. (2009). Car use of young adults: The role of travel socialization. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 12, 168-178. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2008.10.003
40.
HeckhausenH.GollwitzerP. M. (1987). Thought contents and cognitive functioning in motivational versus volitional states of mind. Motivation and Emotion, 11, 101-120. doi:10.1007/BF00992338
41.
HurrelmannK. (2007). Lebensphase Jugend: eine Einführung in die sozialwissenschaftliche Jugendforschung [Life phase adolescence: An introduction to social science youth research] (Vol. 9). Weinheim, Germany: Beltz Juventa.
42.
JohnD. R. (1999). Consumer socialization of children: A retrospective look at twenty-five years of research. Journal of Consumer Research, 26, 183-213. doi:10.1086/209559
43.
JonesE. E.NisbettR. E. (1972). The actor and the observer: Divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior. In JonesE. E.KanouseD. E.KelleyH. H.NisbettR. E.ValinsS.WeinerB. (Eds.), Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior (pp. 79-94). New York, NY: General Learning Press.
44.
KaiserF. G.OerkeB.BognerF. X. (2007). Behavior-based environmental attitude: Development of an instrument for adolescents. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27, 242-251. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.06.004
45.
KakiharaF.Tilton-WeaverL. (2009). Adolescents’ interpretations of parental control: Differentiated by domain and types of control. Child Development, 80, 1722-1738. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01364.x
46.
KallgrenC. A.RenoR. R.CialdiniR. B. (2000). A focus theory of normative conduct: When norms do and do not affect behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1002-1012. doi:10.1177/01461672002610009
47.
KerrD. C.CapaldiD. M.PearsK. C.OwenL. D. (2009). A prospective three generational study of fathers’ constructive parenting: Influences from family of origin, adolescent adjustment, and offspring temperament. Developmental Psychology, 45, 1257-1275. doi:10.1037/a0015863
48.
KlöcknerC. A.MatthiesE. (2009). Structural modeling of car use on the way to the university in different settings: Interplay of norms, habits, situational restraints, and perceived behavioral control. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 39, 1807-1834. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2009.00505.x
49.
KlöcknerC. A.MatthiesE. (2012). Two pieces of the same puzzle? Script-based car choice habits between the influence of socialization and past behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42, 793-821. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2011.00817.x
50.
KlöcknerC. A.OppedalI. O. (2011). General vs. domain specific recycling behaviour—Applying a multilevel comprehensive action determination model to recycling in Norwegian student homes. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 55, 463-471. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2010.12.009
51.
KuczynskiL.MarshallS.SchellK. (1997). Value socialization in a bidirectional context. In GrusecJ. E.KuczynskiL. (Eds.), Parenting and children’s internalization of values: A handbook of contemporary theory (pp. 23-50). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
52.
KuczynskiL.ParkinC. M. (2007). Agency and bidirectionality in socialization: Interactions, transactions, and relational dialectics. In GrusecJ. E.HastingsP. D. (Eds.), Handbook of socialization: Theory and research (pp. 259-283). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
53.
LapinskiM. K.RimalR. N.De VriesR.LeeE. L. (2007). The role of group orientation and descriptive norms on water conservation attitudes and behaviors. Health Communication, 22, 133-142. doi:10.1080/10410230701454049
54.
LarssonB.AnderssonM.OsbeckC. (2010). Bringing environmentalism home. Children’s influence on family consumption in the Nordic countries and beyond. Childhood, 17, 129-147. doi:10.1177/0907568209351554
55.
LittleT. D.CardN. A.BovairdJ. A.PreacherK. J.CrandallC. S. (2007). Structural equation modeling of mediation and moderation with contextual factors. In LittleT. D.BovairdJ. A.CardN. A. (Eds.), Modeling contextual effects in longitudinal studies (pp. 207-230). New York, NY: Routledge.
56.
LongJ.HarréN.AtkinsonQ. D. (2014). Understanding change in recycling and littering behavior across a school social network. American Journal of Community Psychology, 53, 462-474. doi:10.1007/s10464-013-9613-3
57.
MatthiesE.SelgeS.KlöcknerC. A. (2012). The role of parental behaviour for the development of behaviour specific environmental norms —The example of recycling and re-use behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32, 277-284. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.04.003
58.
MatthiesE.WallisH. (2015). Family socialization and sustainable consumption. In ReischL. A.ThøgersenJ. (Eds.), Handbook of research on sustainable consumption (pp. 268-284). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
59.
McNealJ. U. (1999). The kids market: Myths and realities. Ithaca, NY: Paramount Market Publishing.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (1998-2013). Mplus user’s guide [Computer software]. Los Angeles, CA: Author.
62.
MutzI. D.ScheerP. J. (1998). Pubertät und Adoleszenz.
63.
OttoS.KaiserF. G. (2014). Ecological behavior across the lifespan: Why environmentalism increases as people grow older. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 40, 331-338. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.08.004
64.
ReichardtC. S. (2002). The priority of just-identified, recursive models. Psychological Methods, 7, 307-315. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.7.3.307
65.
RenoR. R.CialdiniR. B.KallgrenC. A. (1993). The transsituational influence of social norms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(1), 104-112. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.64.1.104
66.
RogoffB.ParadiseR.ArauzR. M.Correa-ChávezM.AngelilloC. (2003). Firsthand learning through intent participation. Annual Review of Psychology, 54(1), 175-203. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145118
67.
SchubertK.KleinM. (2011). Das Politiklexikon [The encyclopedia of politics] (5th ed., Vol. 4.). Bonn: Dietz.
68.
SchwartzS. H. (1977). Normative influences on altruism. In BerkowitzL. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 10, pp. 221-279). New York, NY: Academic Press.
69.
SchwartzS. H.HowardJ. A. (1981). A normative decision-making model of altruism. In RushtonJ. P.SorrentinoR. M. (Eds.), Altruism and helping behavior (pp. 189-211). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
70.
SeebauerS.FleißJ.SchweighartM. (2017). A household is not a person: Consistency of pro-environmental behavior in adult couples and the accuracy of proxy-reports. Environment and Behavior, 49, 603-637. doi:10.1177/0013916516663796
71.
SternP. C. (2000). Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 407-424. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00175
72.
ThøgersenJ.GrønhøjA. (2010). Electricity saving in households—A social cognitive approach. Energy Policy, 38, 7732-7743. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2010.08.025
UrbanJ.ŠčasnýM. (2012). Exploring domestic energy-saving: The role of environmental concern and background variables. Energy Policy, 47, 69-80. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2012.04.018
75.
WallisH.NachreinerM.MatthiesE. (2016). Adolescents and electricity consumption; Investigating sociodemographic, economic, and behavioural influences on electricity consumption in households. Energy Policy, 94, 224-234. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2016.03.046
76.
WillsonA. E.ShueyK. M.ElderG. H.WickramaK. (2006). Ambivalence in mother-adult child relations: A dyadic analysis. Social Psychology Quarterly, 69, 235-252. doi:10.1177/019027250606900302
77.
WoodM. D.ReadJ. P.MitchellR. E.BrandN. H. (2004). Do parents still matter? Parent and peer influences on alcohol involvement among recent high school graduates. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 18(1), 19-30. doi:10.1037/0893-164X.18.1.19
78.
YanR.-N.XuH. (2010). Understanding green purchase behavior: College students and socialization agents. Journal of Family & Consumer Sciences, 102(2), 27-32.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
