The autonomous-relatedness model posits that companying with the socio-cultural shift from collectivistic to individualistic, parents from traditional collectivistic cultures increasingly emphasize autonomous goals for their children, in addition to traditional relatedness goals. This three-wave study digs deeper into this model by assessing the relative importance of autonomous and relatedness goals, individual differences among parents on endorsing both goals, and the potential bi-directional associations between these goals and preschoolers’ prosocial behaviors. A sample of 336 Chinese parents (Meanage = 31.73 ± 5.86 years, 172 mothers) with children aged 3–6 years (Meanage = 4.51 ± 0.95 years) were surveyed in November 2022 (Wave 1), March 2023 (Wave 2), and July 2023 (Wave 3). Parents reported on autonomous and relatedness goals using the Socialization Goals Questionnaire and on their children’s prosocial behaviors using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. Data were analyzed based on both variable- and person-centered approaches, and on both group and individual levels. Results showed that parents (1) prioritized autonomous over relatedness goals; (2) could be categorized into two groups, with approximately one-fourth to one-third exhibiting lower endorsement of both goals; and (3) positive, bidirectional associations between parental goals and children’s prosocial behaviors were observed at both group and individual levels. These findings enrich the understanding of the autonomous-relatedness model amid cultural change, emphasizing children’s prosocial development, and highlight the role of children’s active involvement in their socialization.
AbdelmoulaM.ChakrounW.AkroutF. (2015). The effect of sample size and the number of items on reliability coefficients: Alpha and rho: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Numerical Methods and Applications, 13(1), 1–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.17654/IJNMAMar2015_001_020
2.
AsparouhovT.MuthénB. (2014). Auxiliary variables in mixture modeling: Three-step approaches using Mplus. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 21(3), 329–341. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2014.915181
3.
BellR. Q. (1968). A reinterpretation of the direction of effects in studies of socialization. Psychological Review, 75(2), 81–95. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0025583
4.
CabreraN. J.VollingB. L.BarrR. (2018). Fathers are parents, too! Widening the lens on parenting for children's development. Child Development Perspectives, 12(3), 152–157. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12275
5.
CarloG.CrockettL. J.RandallB. A.RoeschS. C. (2007). A latent growth curve analysis of prosocial behavior among rural adolescents. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 17(2), 301–324. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2007.00524.x
ChenX.LiuJ.EllisW.ZarbatanyL. (2016). Social sensitivity and adjustment in Chinese and Canadian children. Child Development, 87(4), 1115–1129. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12514
8.
CohenR. J.SwerdlikM. E. (2005). Psychological testing and assessment: An introduction to tests and measurement (6th ed.). McGraw Hill.
9.
DinizE.BrandãoT.MonteiroL.VerissimoM. (2021). Father involvement during early childhood: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 13(1), 77–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12410
10.
DixT.StewartA. D.GershoffE. T.DayW. H. (2007). Autonomy and children’s reactions to being controlled: Evidence that both compliance and defiance may be positive markers in early development. Child Development, 78(4), 1204–1221. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01061.x
11.
DögeP.KellerH. (2014). Factorial structure of a socialization goal questionnaire across non-migrant and migrant mothers in Germany. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 11(4), 512–520. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2013.872026
12.
DongS.DubasJ. S.DekovićM.WangZ. (2022). Goodness of fit in the Chinese context of socialization in the first three years. Developmental Psychology, 58(10), 1875–1886. http://doi:10.1037/dev0001409
13.
FonsecaB. R.CavalcanteL. I. C.KärtnerJ.KosterM. (2018). Maternal socialization goals and the spontaneous prosocial behavior of children in rural contexts. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 31, Article 27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41155-018-0108-x
14.
GartsteinM. A.PutnamS. P. (Eds.) (2018). Toddlers, parents and culture: Findings from the joint effort toddler temperament consortium. Routledge.
15.
Giner TorrénsM.KärtnerJ. (2017). The influence of socialization on early helping from a cross-cultural perspective. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 48(3), 353–368. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022117690451
GouzeK. R.HopkinsJ.BryantF. B.LavigneJ. V. (2017). Parenting and anxiety: Bi-directional relations in young children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 45, 1169–1180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-016-0223-z
18.
HamakerE. L.KuiperR. M.GrasmanR. P. P. P. (2015). A critique of the cross-lagged panel model. Psychological Methods, 20(1), 102–116. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038889
19.
HaoY. F.WangZ. Y.DongS. Y.LiuS. M.WuM.LuS. (2019). The predictive effects of maternal life event stress in early childhood on 5-year-old child behavioral problems: A chained mediation model. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 51(1), 85–95. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2019.00085
20.
IBM Corp. (2015). IBM SPSS statistics for windows, version 23.0. IBM Corp.
21.
KağitçibaşiC. (1990). Family and socialization in cross-cultural perspective: A model of change. In BermanJ. (Ed.), Cross-cultural perspectives: Nebraska symposium on motivation (pp. 135–200). University of Nebraska Press.
22.
KağitçibaşiC. (2005). Autonomy and relatedness in cultural context: Implications for self and family. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 36(4), 403–422. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022105275959
23.
KağitçibaşiÇ. (2007). Family, self, and human development across cultures: Theories and applications (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
24.
KärtnerJ. (2018). Beyond dichotomies—(M)others’ structuring and the development of toddlers’ prosocial behavior across cultures. Current Opinion in Psychology, 20, 6–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.07.040
25.
KärtnerJ.BorkeJ.MaasmeierK.KellerH.KleisA. (2011). Sociocultural influences on the development of self-recognition and self-regulation in Costa Rican and Mexican toddlers. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 10, 112–196. https://doi.org/10.1891/1945–8959.10.1.96
26.
KärtnerJ.KellerH.ChaudharyN. (2010). Cognitive and social influences on early prosocial behavior in two sociocultural contexts. Developmental Psychology, 46(4), 905–914. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019718
27.
KellerH. (2022). Cultures of infancy. Erlbaum.
28.
KellerH.KärtnerJ. (2013). The cultural solution of universal developmental tasks. Advances in Culture and Psychology, 3, 63–116.
29.
KellerH.LammB.AbelsM.YovsiR.BorkeJ.JensenH.PapaligouraZ.HolubC.LoC.TomiyamaA. J.SuY.WangY.ChaudharyN. (2006). Cultural models, socialization goals, and parenting ethnotheories: A multicultural analysis. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 37(2), 155–172. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022105284494
30.
KellerH.PapaligouraZ.KunsemullerP.VoelkerS.PapaeliouC.LohausA.LammB.KokkinakiT.ChrysikouE.MousouliV. (2003). Concepts of mother-infant interaction in Greece and Germany. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 34(6), 677–689. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022103257035
31.
LaursenB.HoffE. (2006). Person-centered and variable-centered approaches to longitudinal data. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 52(3), 377–389. https://doi.org/10.1353/mpq.2006.0029
32.
LiX.LambM. E. (2015). Fathering in Chinese culture: Traditions and transitions. In RoopnarineJ. L. (Ed.), Fathers across cultures: The importance, roles, and diverse practices of dads (pp. 273–306). Praeger/ABC-CLIO.
33.
LinC. Y. C.FuV. R. (1990). A comparison of child-rearing practices among Chinese, immigrant Chinese, and Caucasian-American parents. Child Development, 61(2), 429–433. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1990.tb02789.x
34.
LowthianE.BedstonS.KristensenS. M.AkbariA.FryR.HuxleyK.JohnsonR.KimH. S.OwenR. K.TaylorC.GriffithsL. (2023). Maternal mental health and children’s problem behaviours: A Bi-directional Relationship?Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology, 51(11), 1611–1626. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-023-01086-5
35.
LuoY.ChenF.ZhangX.ZhangY.ZhangQ.LiY.ZhouQ.WangY. (2021). Profiles of maternal and paternal parenting styles in Chinese families: Relations to preschoolers’ psychological adjustment. Children and Youth Services Review, 121, Article 105787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105787
OberskiD. (2016). Mixture models: Latent profile and latent class analysis. In RobertsonJ.KapteinM. (Eds.), Modern statistical methods for HCI. Human–computer interaction series (pp. 1–14). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26633-6_1
38.
Olvera AstiviaO. L.KrocE.ZumboB. D. (2020). The role of item distributions on reliability estimation: The case of Cronbach’s coefficient alpha. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 80(5), 825–846. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164420903770
39.
PiedmontR. L.HylandM. E. (1993). Inter-item correlation frequency distribution analysis: A method for evaluating scale dimensionality. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53(2), 369–378. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164493053002006
RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
42.
RyanR. M.DeciE. L.GrolnickW. S. (1995). Autonomy, relatedness, and the self: Their relation to development and psychopathology. In CicchettiD.CohenD. J. (Eds.), Developmental psychopathology, Vol. 1. Theory and methods (pp. 618–655). John Wiley & Sons.
43.
SillettiF.IannelloN. M.IngogliaS.IngugliaC.CassibbaR.EisnerM.RibeaudD.MussoP. (2023). Do self-control and parental involvement promote prosociality and hinder internalizing problems? A four-wave longitudinal study from early to mid-to-late adolescence. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 44(9), 1154–1187. https://doi.org/10.1177/02724316231210250
44.
SongY.MalhotraS.BroekhuizenM.WangY.ChenB. B.DubasJ. S. (2021). Prosocial behavior in young preschoolers: A cross-cultural study across The Netherlands, India, and China. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 182(3), 129–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221325.2021.1891857
45.
StewartS. M.BondM. H.DeedsO.ChungS. F. (1999). Intergenerational patterns of values and autonomy expectations in cultures of relatedness and separateness. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 30, 575–593.
46.
SuH.WangH.ChangF. (2023). The rise of the middle class in contemporary china. Springer Nature.
VedstedP.SokolowskiI.HejeH. N. (2008). Data quality and confirmatory factor analysis of the Danish EUROPEP questionnaire on patient evaluation of general practice. Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care, 26(3), 174–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/02813430802294803
49.
WilliamsG. A.KibowskiF. (2016). Latent class analysis and latent profile analysis. In JasonL. A.GlenwickD. S. (Eds.), Handbook of methodological approached to community-based research. Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods (pp. 143–153). Oxford University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
