Research to date has shown longitudinal changes in conscientiousness during early and middle adolescence, but most studies have been conducted in Western countries. The present study aimed to examine the pattern of mean-level conscientiousness change at the transition into early adolescence among a Chinese sample using curve of factors (CUFFS) models. Four waves of data from 661 Chinese children aged 8 years old at baseline in the China Family Panel Studies were used. Parents were asked to rate their children’s level of conscientiousness every 2 years. On average, mean-level conscientiousness showed a decelerating increase. Girls had higher average conscientiousness levels than boys, but they did not differ in change patterns. The inconsistency between the current study and previous research indicates that conscientiousness development may depend, in part, on cultural factors.
BarbaranelliC.CapraraG. V.RabascaA.PastorelliC. (2003). A questionnaire for measuring the Big Five in late childhood. Personality and Individual Differences, 34(4), 645–664. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00051-X
2.
BrandesC. M.KushnerS. C.HerzhoffK.TackettJ. L. (2021). Facet-level personality development in the transition to adolescence: Maturity, disruption, and gender differences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 121(5), 1095–1111. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000367
3.
BranjeS. J. T.van LieshoutC. F. M.GerrisJ. R. M. (2007). Big Five personality development in adolescence and adulthood. European Journal of Personality, 21(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.596
4.
BrownT. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research (2nd ed.). The Guilford Press.
ChanD. W.ChanL.-K. (1999). Implicit theories of creativity: Teachers’ perception of student characteristics in Hong Kong. Creativity Research Journal, 12(3), 185–195. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1203_3
7.
ChangL.MakM. C. K.LiT.WuB. P.ChenB. B.LuH. J. (2011). Cultural adaptations to environmental variability: An evolutionary account of East–West differences. Educational Psychology Review, 23(1), 99–129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9149-0
8.
ChenB.-B. (2020). Socialization values of Chinese parents: Does parents’ educational level matter?Current Psychology, 39, 511–517. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-017-9772-8
9.
ChenE. S. L.RaoN. (2011). Gender socialization in Chinese kindergartens: Teachers’ contributions. Sex Roles, 64(1), 103–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-010-9873-4
10.
ChenX.RubinK. H.LiuM.ChenH.WangL.LiD.GaoX.CenG.GuH.LiB. (2003). Compliance in Chinese and Canadian toddlers: A cross-cultural study. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 27(5), 428–436. https://doi.org/10.1080/01650250344000046
11.
CheungG. W.RensvoldR. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9(2), 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
12.
ChopikW. J.KitayamaS. (2018). Personality change across the life span: Insights from a cross-cultural, longitudinal study. Journal of Personality, 86(3), 508–521. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12332
13.
CostaP. T.Jr.McCraeR. R. (1994). Set like plaster: Evidence for the stability of adult personality. In HeathertonT. F.WeinbergerJ. L. (Eds.), Can personality change? (pp. 21–40). American Psychological Association.
14.
DealJ. E.HalversonC. F.HavillV.MartinR. (2005). Temperament factors as longitudinal predictors of young adult personality. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 51(3), 315–334. https://doi.org/10.1353/mpq.2005.0015
15.
De BolleM.De FruytF.McCraeR. R.LöckenhoffC. E.CostaP. T.Jr.Aguilar-VafaieM. E.. . . TerraccianoA. (2015). The emergence of sex differences in personality traits in early adolescence: A cross-sectional, cross-cultural study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108(1), 171–185. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038497
16.
De FruytF.BartelsM.Van LeeuwenK. G.De ClercqB.DecuyperM.MervieldeI. (2006). Five types of personality continuity in childhood and adolescence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(3), 538–552. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.91.3.538
17.
de HaanA.de PauwS.van den AkkerA.DekovićM.PrinzieP. (2017). Long-term developmental changes in children’s lower-order big five personality facets. Journal of Personality, 85(5), 616–631. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12265
18.
de HaanA. D.DekovićM.van den AkkerA. L.StoltzS. E. M. J.PrinzieP. (2013). Developmental personality types from childhood to adolescence: Associations with parenting and adjustment. Child Development, 84(6), 2015–2030. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12092
19.
DurbinC. E.HicksB. M.BlonigenD. M.JohnsonW.IaconoW. G.McGueM. (2016). Personality trait change across late childhood to young adulthood: Evidence for nonlinearity and sex differences in change. European Journal of Personality, 30(1), 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2013
GartsteinM. A.GonzalezC.CarranzaJ. A.AhadiS. A.YeR.RothbartM. K.YangS. W. (2006). Studying cross-cultural differences in the development of infant temperament: People’s Republic of China, the United States of America, and Spain. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 37(2), 145–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-006-0025-6
HancockG.KuoW.-L.LawrenceF. (2001). An illustration of second-order latent growth models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 8(3), 470–489. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0803_7
25.
HelwigC. C.ToS.WangQ.LiuC.YangS. (2014). Judgments and reasoning about parental discipline involving induction and psychological control in China and Canada. Child Development, 85(3), 1150–1167. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12183
26.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
27.
IsiordiaM.FerrerE. (2018). Curve of factors model: A latent growth modeling approach for educational research. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 78(2), 203–231. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164416677143
28.
JacksonJ. J.BoggT.WaltonK. E.WoodD.HarmsP. D.Lodi-SmithJ.EdmondsG. W.RobertsB. W. (2009). Not all conscientiousness scales change alike: A multimethod, multisample study of age differences in the facets of conscientiousness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(2), 446–459. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014156
29.
JacksonJ. J.HillP. L. (2018). Lifespan development of conscientiousness. In McAdamsD. P.ShinerR. L.TackettJ. L. (Eds.), Handbook of personality development (pp. 153–170). The Guilford Press.
30.
KlimstraT. A.HaleW. W.RaaijmakersQ. A. W.BranjeS. J. T.MeeusW. H. J. (2009). Maturation of personality in adolescence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(4), 898–912. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014746
31.
KlineR. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). The Guilford Press.
LittleR. J. A. (1988). A test of missing completely at random for multivariate data with missing values. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83, 1198–1202. https://doi.org/10.2307/2290157
34.
LuanZ.HuttemanR.DenissenJ. J. A.AsendorpfJ. B.van AkenM. A. G. (2017). Do you see my growth? Two longitudinal studies on personality development from childhood to young adulthood from multiple perspectives. Journal of Research in Personality, 67, 44–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2016.03.004
35.
LucasR. E.DonnellanM. B. (2011). Personality development across the life span: Longitudinal analyses with a national sample from Germany. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(4), 847–861. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024298
36.
LüdtkeO.RobertsB. W.TrautweinU.NagyG. (2011). A random walk down university avenue: Life paths, life events, and personality trait change at the transition to university life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(3), 620–637. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023743
37.
McArdleJ. J. (1988). Dynamic but structural equation modeling of repeated measures data. In NesselroadeJ. R.CattellR. B. (Eds.), Handbook of multivariate experimental psychology (pp. 561–614). Plenum Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0893-5_17
38.
ParkerP. D.LüdtkeO.TrautweinU.RobertsB. W. (2012). Personality and relationship quality during the transition from high school to early adulthood: Personality and relationship quality. Journal of Personality, 80(4), 1061–1089. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2012.00766.x
39.
QuY.PomerantzE. M. (2015). Divergent school trajectories in early adolescence in the United States and China: An examination of underlying mechanisms. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 44, 2095–2109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-014-0201-0
40.
QuY.PomerantzE. M.WangM.CheungC.CimpianA. (2016). Conceptions of adolescence: Implications for differences in engagement in school over early adolescence in the United States and China. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 45(7), 1512–1526. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-016-0492-4
41.
RobertsB. W.RobinsR. W. (2000). Broad dispositions, broad aspirations: The intersection of personality traits and major life goals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(10), 1284–1296. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167200262009
42.
RobertsB. W.WaltonK. E.ViechtbauerW. (2006). Patterns of mean-level change in personality traits across the life course: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 132(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.1.1
43.
RobertsB. W.WoodD.SmithJ. L. (2005). Evaluating Five Factor Theory and social investment perspectives on personality trait development. Journal of Research in Personality, 39(1), 166–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2004.08.002
44.
RobertsB. W.JacksonJ. J.FayardJ. V.EdmondsG.MeintsJ. (2009). Conscientiousness. In LearyM.HoyleR. (Eds.), Handbook of individual differences in social behavior (pp. 369–381). The Guilford Press.
45.
RosseelY. (2012). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
46.
RothbartM. K.SheeseB. E.PosnerM. I. (2007). Executive attention and effortful control: Linking temperament, brain networks, and genes. Child Development Perspectives, 1(1), 2–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-8606.2007.00002.x
47.
ShodaY.MischelW.PeakeP. K. (1990). Predicting adolescent cognitive and self-regulatory competencies from preschool delay of gratification: Identifying diagnostic conditions. Developmental Psychology, 26, 978–986. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.26.6.978
48.
SlobodskayaH. R.AkhmetovaO. A. (2010). Personality development and problem behavior in Russian children and adolescents. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 34(5), 441–451. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025409352825
49.
SotoC. J. (2016). The Little Six personality dimensions from early childhood to early adulthood: Mean-level age and gender differences in parents’ reports: Mean-Level Development of the Little Six. Journal of Personality, 84(4), 409–422. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12168
50.
SotoC. J.JohnO. P.GoslingS. D.PotterJ. (2011). Age differences in personality traits from 10 to 65: Big Five domains and facets in a large cross-sectional sample. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(2), 330–348. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021717
51.
SotoC. J.TackettJ. L. (2015). Personality traits in childhood and adolescence: Structure, development, and outcomes. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24(5), 358–362. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721415589345
52.
SpenglerM.BrunnerM.DamianR. I.LüdtkeO.MartinR.RobertsB. W. (2015). Student characteristics and behaviors at age 12 predict occupational success 40 years later over and above childhood IQ and parental socioeconomic status. Developmental Psychology, 51(9), 1329–1340. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000025
53.
SpenglerM.RobertsB. W.LüdtkeO.MartinR.BrunnerM.LüdtkeO. (2016). The kind of student you were in elementary school predicts mortality. Journal of Personality, 84(4), 547–553. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12180
54.
TackmanA. M.SrivastavaS.PfeiferJ. H.DaprettoM. (2017). Development of conscientiousness in childhood and adolescence: Typical trajectories and associations with academic, health, and relationship changes. Journal of Research in Personality, 67, 85–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2016.05.002
55.
TrautweinU.LüdtkeO.RobertsB. W.SchnyderI.NiggliA. (2009). Different forces, same consequence: Conscientiousness and competence beliefs are independent predictors of academic effort and achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(6), 1115–1128. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017048
56.
Van den AkkerA. L.DekovićM.AsscherJ.PrinzieP. (2014). Mean-level personality development across childhood and adolescence: A temporary defiance of the maturity principle and bidirectional associations with parenting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107(4), 736–750. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037248
57.
WagnerJ.LüdtkeO.RobitzschA. (2019). Does personality become more stable with age? Disentangling state and trait effects for the big five across the life span using local structural equation modeling. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 116(4), 666–680. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000203
58.
WanlessS. B.McClellandM. M.LanX.SonS. H.CameronC. E.MorrisonF. J.ChenF. M.ChenJ. L.LiS.LeeK.SungM. (2013). Gender differences in behavioral regulation in four societies: The United States, Taiwan, South Korea, and China. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 28(3), 621–633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2013.04.002
59.
WuY. (2015). The examination system in China: The case of Zhongkao mathematics. In ChoS. J. (Ed.), Selected Regular Lectures from the 12th International Congress on Mathematical Education (pp. 897–914). Springer.
60.
XieY.ZhangX.TuP.RenQ.SunY.LvP.DingH.HuJ.WuQ. (2017). China Family Panel Studies user’s manual (3rd ed.). Institute of Social Science Survey.
61.
YangY.LuoY.ZhangQ. (2021). A cautionary note on identification and scaling issues in second-order latent growth models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 28, 302–313. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2020.1747938
62.
ZhangY.KohnstammG.SlotboomA.-M.ElphickE.CheungP. C. (2002). Chinese and Dutch parents’ perceptions of their children’s personality. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 163(2), 165–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221320209598675
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
