Evidence suggests an impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health, particularly among emerging adults. However, theories on altruism born of suffering or adversarial growth suggest that we might also see prosocial behavior as a function of the pandemic, which may protect against mental health challenges. Because cultural values are central in determining prosocial behavior, the current study explored how cultural values were differentially associated with adaptive prosocial behaviors that might protect against mental health challenges. Participants for the current study included 5,682 young people aged 18–25 years from 14 different countries around the world (68% female, 62% college students). Path analyses suggested that there were few differences in patterns as a function of culture, but revealed that horizontal individualism and horizontal and vertical collectivism were indirectly associated with lower levels of depression via prosocial behavior toward family members. Discussion focuses on the importance of coping by strengthening family relationships via prosocial behavior during the pandemic.
ArmentaB. E.KnightG. P.CarloG.JacobsonR. P. (2011). The relation between ethnic group attachment and prosocial tendencies: The mediating role of cultural values. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41(1), 107–115.
2.
ArnettJ. J. (2015). Emerging Adulthood: The winding road from the late teens through the twenties (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.
3.
ArnettJ. J.ŽukauskienėR.SugimuraK. (2014). The new life stage of emerging adulthood at ages 18–29 years: Implications for mental health. The Lancet Psychiatry, 1(7), 569–576.
4.
BarrettD. W.WosinskaW.ButnerJ.PetrovaP.Gornik-DuroseM.CialdiniR. B. (2004). Individual differences in the motivation to comply across cultures: The impact of social obligation. Personality and Individual Differences, 37(1), 19–31.
5.
CarloG.Padilla-WalkerL. (2020). Adolescents’ prosocial behaviors through a multidimensional and multicultural lens. Child Development Perspectives, 14(4), 265–272.
6.
DavisA. N.Martin-CuellarA.LuceH. (2019). Life events and prosocial behaviors among young adults: Considering the roles of perspective taking and empathic concern. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 180(4–5), 205–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221325.2019.1632785
7.
EisenbergN.SpinradT. L.Knafo-NoamA. (2015). Prosocial development. In LambM. E.LernerR. M. (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science: Socioemotional processes (Vol. 3, 7th ed., pp. 610–656). John Wiley & Sons.
8.
EvansS.AlkanE.BhangooJ. K.TenenbaumH.Ng-KnightT. (2021). Effects of the COVID-19 lockdown on mental health, wellbeing, sleep, and alcohol use in a UK student sample. Psychiatry Research, 298, Article 113819.
9.
FeyginaI.HenryP. J. (2015). Culture and prosocial behavior. In SchroederD. A.GrazianoW. G. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of prosocial behavior (pp. 188–208). Oxford University Press.
10.
GoldbergD.WilliamsP. (1988). A user’s guide to the GHQ. NFER-Nelson.
11.
HaidtJ.KollerS. H.DiasM. G. (1993). Affect, culture, and morality, or is it wrong to eat your dog?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 613–628.
12.
HalliburtonA. E.HillM. B.DawsonB. L.HightowerJ. M.RuedenH. (2021). Increased stress, declining mental health: Emerging adults’ experiences in college during COVID-19. Emerging Adulthood, 9, 433–448.
13.
HayD. F.PawlbyS. (2003). Prosocial development in relation to children’s and mothers’ psychological problems. Child Development, 74, 1314–1327. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00609
14.
HudsonS. K. T. J.CikaraM.SidaniusJ. (2019). Preference for hierarchy is associated with reduced empathy and increased counter-empathy towards others, especially out-group targets. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 85, Article 103871.
15.
JensenL. A. (2008). Through two lenses: A cultural–developmental approach to moral psychology. Developmental Review, 28(3), 289–315.
16.
JensenL. A. (2011). Bridging universal and cultural perspectives: A vision for developmental psychology in a global world. Child Development Perspectives, 6(1), 98–104.
17.
KemmelmeierM.JamborE. E.LetnerJ. (2006). Individualism and good works: Cultural variation in giving and volunteering across the United States. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 37(3), 327–344.
18.
KnightG. P.CarloG.BasilioC. D.JacobsonR. P. (2015). Familism values, perspective taking, and prosocial moral reasoning: Predicting prosocial tendencies among Mexican American Adolescents. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 25(4), 717–727.
19.
KnightG. P.MazzaG. L.CarloG. (2018). Trajectories of familism values and the prosocial tendencies of Mexican American adolescents. Developmental Psychology, 54(2), 378–384.
20.
KwongA. S.PearsonR. M.AdamsM. J.NorthstoneK.TillingK.SmithD.. . .TimpsonN. J. (2020). Mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic in two longitudinal UK population cohorts. medRxiv.
21.
LampridisE.PapastylianouD. (2017). Prosocial behavioral tendencies and orientation towards individualism-collectivism of Greek young adults. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 22(3), 268–282.
22.
LannuttiP. J.BevanJ. L. (2021). Conclusion to the special issue: Relationships in the time of COVID-19: Examining the effects of the global pandemic on personal relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 39, 80–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075211063536
23.
LanzettaJ. T.EnglisB. G. (1989). Expectations of cooperation and competition and their effects on observers’ vicarious emotional responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(4), 543–554.
24.
LittleT. D. (2013). Longitudinal structural equation modeling. Guilford Press.
25.
MastenA. S.CutuliJ.HerbersJ. E.ReedM. G. J. (2002). Resilience in development. In SnyderC. R.LopezS. J. (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 74–88). Oxford University Press.
26.
MastenA.ReedM.-G. J. (2002). Resilience in development. In SnyderC. R.LopezS. J. (Eds.), Handbook of Positive Psychology (pp. 74–88 ). Oxford University Press.
27.
McArthurB. A.RacineN.McDonaldS.ToughS.MadiganS. (2021). Child and family factors associated with child mental health and well-being during COVID-19. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-021-01849-9
28.
Memmott-ElisonM. K.HolmgrenH. G.Padilla-WalkerL. M.HawkinsA. J. (2020). Associations between prosocial behavior, externalizing behaviors, and internalizing symptoms during adolescence: A meta-analysis. Journal of Adolescence, 80, 98–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2020.01.012
29.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (1998–2017). Mplus user’s guide (8th ed.).
30.
NelsonL. J.Padilla-WalkerL. M. (2013). Flourishing and floundering in emerging adult college students. Emerging Adulthood, 1, 67–78.
31.
Padilla-WalkerL.CarloG.Memmott-ElisonM. K. (2018). Longitudinal change in adolescents’ prosocial behavior toward strangers, friends, and family. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 28(3), 698–710.
32.
Padilla-WalkerL. M.CarloG. (2014). The study of prosocial behavior: Past, present, and future. In Padilla-WalkerL. M.CarloG. (Eds.), Prosocial development: A multidimensional approach (pp. 3–16). Oxford University Press.
33.
Padilla-WalkerL. M.CarloG.NielsonM. G. (2015). Does helping keep teens protected? Longitudinal bidirectional relations between prosocial behavior and problem behavior. Child Development, 86(6), 1759–1772. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12411
34.
Padilla-WalkerL. M.MillettM. A.Memmott-ElisonM. A. (2020). Can helping others strengthen teens? Character strengths as mediators between prosocial behavior and adolescents’ internalizing symptoms. Journal of Adolescence, 79, 70–80.
35.
ParolaA.RossiA.TessitoreF.TroisiG.MannariniS. (2020). Mental health through the COVID-19 quarantine: A growth curve analysis on Italian young adults. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article 567484.
36.
QinY.ZhouY.FanF.ChenS.HuangR.CaiR.PengT. (2016). Developmental trajectories and predictors of prosocial behavior among adolescents exposed to the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 29, 80–87.
37.
RogersA. A.HaT.OckeyS. (2021). Adolescents’ perceived socio-emotional impact of COVID-19 and implications for mental health: Results from a US-based mixed-methods study. Journal of Adolescent Health, 68(1), 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.09.039
38.
RossiR.SocciV.TaleviD.MensiS.NioluC.PacittiF.Di LorenzoG. (2020). COVID-19 pandemic and lockdown measures impact on mental health among the general population in Italy. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 11, Article 790.
39.
SabatoH.AbrahamY.KogutT. (2021). Too lonely to help: Early adolescents’ social connections and willingness to help during COVID-19 lockdown. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 31(3), 764–779.
40.
SchacterH. L.MargolinG. (2019). When it feels good to give: Depressive symptoms, daily prosocial behavior, and adolescent mood. Emotion, 19(5), 923–927. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000494
41.
SingelisT. M.TriandisH. C.BhawukD. P.GelfandM. J. (1995). Horizontal and vertical dimensions of individualism and collectivism: A theoretical and measurement refinement. Cross-Cultural Research, 29(3), 240–275.
42.
SolomouI.ConstantinidouF. (2020). Prevalence and predictors of anxiety and depression symptoms during the COVID-19 pandemic and compliance with precautionary measures: Age and sex matter. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(14), Article 4924.
43.
ThakurV.JainA. (2020). COVID 2019- suicides: A global psychological pandemic. Brain, Behavior, and Immunity, 88, 952–953.
44.
TriandisH. C.GelflandM. J. (1998). Converging measurement of horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 118–128.
45.
VollhardtJ. (2009). Altruism born of suffering and prosocial behavior following adverse life events: A review and conceptualization. Social Justice Research, 22, 53–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-009-0088-1
46.
WinsorE. R.SkovdalM. (2011). Agency, resilience and Coping: Exploring the psychosocial effects of Goat ownership on orphaned and vulnerable children in western Kenya. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 21, 433–450. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.1086
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
