The development of intent-based moral judgment and moral behavior in the context of indirect reciprocity: A cross-cultural study

Abstract

The current study aimed to investigate the cultural differences in the developmental origins of children’s intent-based moral judgment and moral behavior in the context of indirect reciprocity. To this end, we compared how German and Chinese children interpret and react to antisocial and prosocial interactions between puppets. An actor puppet performed either a positive or negative act toward a prosocial or antisocial target puppet with the intention to cause harm or not; 197 three and five-year-old children participated as a third party and were asked to judge the actor puppet’s behavior and to distribute stickers. Results showed that 3-year-old Chinese children were able to take intention and context into account when making moral judgments and distributing resources, whereas German children did not show sensitivity to intention until the age of 5. These findings suggest that culture may mediate children’s intent-based moral judgment and moral behavior in the context of indirect reciprocity.

Keywords

Intention indirect reciprocity moral judgment distribution cultural differences relation-oriented

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Beilmann

Mayer

Kasearu

Realo

(2014). The relationship between adolescents’ social capital and individualism-collectivism in Estonia, Germany, and Russia. Child Indicators Research, 7(3), 589–611. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-014-9232-z

Blake

P. R.

(2018). Giving what one should: Explanations for the knowledge-behavior gap for altruistic giving. Current Opinion in Psychology, 20, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.07.041

Blake

P. R.

McAuliffe

Warneken

(2014). The developmental origins of fairness: The knowledge-behavior gap. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(11), 559–561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2014.08.003

Buon

Jacob

Margules

Brunet

Dutat

Cabrol

Dupoux

(2014). Friend or foe? Early social evaluation of human interactions. PLoS One, 9(2), e88612. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088612

Cowell

J. M.

Lee

Malcolm-Smith

Selcuk

Zhou

Decety

(2017). The development of generosity and moral cognition across five cultures. Developmental Science, 20(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12403

Cushman

Sheketoff

Wharton

Carey

(2013). The development of intent-based moral judgment. Cognition, 127(1), 6–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.11.008

Fang

Faure

G. O.

(2011). Chinese communication characteristics: A Yin Yang perspective. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 35(3), 320–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2010.06.005

Fehr

Fischbacher

(2004). Social norms and human cooperation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(4), 185–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2004.02.007

Gao

Tingtoomey

(1998). Communicating effectively with the Chinese. Sage.

10.

Gibbs

J. C.

Basinger

K. S.

Grime

R. L.

Snarey

J. R.

(2007). Moral judgment development across cultures: Revisiting Kohlberg’s universality claims. Developmental Review, 27(4), 443–500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2007.04.001

11.

Gintis

Henrich

Bowles

Boyd

Fehr

(2008). Strong reciprocity and the roots of human morality. Social Justice Research, 21(2), 241–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-008-0067-y

12.

Guan

Park

H. S.

Lee

H. E.

(2009). Cross-cultural differences in apology. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 33(1), 32–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2008.10.001

13.

Gudykunst

W. B.

Nishida

(1986). Attributional confidence in low- and high-context cultures. Human Communication Research, 12(4), 525–549.

14.

Gummerum

Keller

(2012). East German children’s and adolescents’ friendship and moral reasoning before and after German reunification. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 173(4), 440–462.

15.

Hall

E. T.

(1976). Beyond culture. Doubleday.

16.

Hall

E. T.

(1998). The power of hidden culture. In Bennett

M. J.

(Ed.), Basic concepts of intercultural communication: Selected readings (pp. 53–68). Intercultural Press.

17.

Hamlin

J. K.

Wynn

(2011). Young infants prefer prosocial to antisocial others. Cognitive Development, 26(1), 30–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2010.09.001

18.

Hamlin

J. K.

Wynn

Bloom

(2007). Social evaluation by preverbal infants. Nature, 450(7169), 557–559. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06288

19.

Hamlin

J. K.

Wynn

Bloom

Mahajan

(2011). How infants and toddlers react to antisocial others. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(50), 19931–19936. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1110306108

20.

Kato-Shimizu

Onishi

Kanazawa

Hinobayashi

(2013). Preschool children’s behavioral tendency toward social indirect reciprocity. PLoS One, 8(8), e70915. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0070915

21.

Keller

Edelstein

Schmid

Fang

(1998). Reasoning about responsibilities and obligations in close relationships: A comparison across two cultures. Developmental Psychology, 34(4), 731–741.

22.

Kenward

Dahl

(2011). Preschoolers distribute scarce resources according to the moral valence of recipients’ previous actions. Developmental Psychology, 47(4), 1054–1064. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023869.supp

23.

Koenig

M. A.

Tiberius

Hamlin

J. K.

(2019). Children’s judgments of epistemic and moral agents: From situations to intentions. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(3), 344–360. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691618805452

24.

Tomasello

(2018). The development of intention-based sociomoral judgment and distribution behavior from a third-party stance. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 167, 78–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2017.09.021

25.

Margoni

Surian

(2016). Explaining the U-shaped development of intent-based moral judgments. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 219. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00219

26.

McNamara

R. A.

Willard

A. K.

Norenzayan

Henrich

(2018). Weighing outcome vs. intent across societies: How cultural models of mind shape moral reasoning. Cognition, 182, 95–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.09.008

27.

Nobes

Panagiotaki

Bartholomew

K. J.

(2016). The influence of intention outcome and question-wording on children’s and adults’ moral judgments. Cognition, 157, 190–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2016.08.019

28.

Nowak

M. A.

Sigmund

(2005). Evolution of indirect reciprocity. Nature, 437(7063), 1291–1298. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04131

29.

Olson

K. R.

Spelke

E. S.

(2008). Foundations of cooperation in young children. Cognition, 108(1), 222–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.12.003

30.

Purzycki

B. G.

Pisor

A. C.

Apicella

Atkinson

Cohen

Henrich

McElreath

McNamara

A. R.

Norenzayan

Willard

A. K.

Xygalatas

(2018). The cognitive and cultural foundations of moral behavior. Evolution and Human Behavior, 39(5), 490–501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2018.04.004

31.

Rai

T. S.

Fiske

A. P.

(2011). Moral psychology is relationship regulation: moral motives for unity, hierarchy, equality, and proportionality. Psychological Review, 118(1), 57–75.

32.

Robbins

Shepard

Rochat

(2017). Variations in judgments of intentional action and moral evaluation across eight cultures. Cognition, 164, 22–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.02.012

33.

Sabbagh

M. A.

Carlson

S. M.

Moses

L. J.

Lee

(2006). The development of executive functioning and theory of mind: A comparison of Chinese and U.S. preschoolers. Psychological Science, 17(1), 74–81.

34.

Sachdeva

Singh

Medin

(2011). Culture and the quest for universal principles in moral reasoning. International Journal of Psychology, 46(3), 161–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207594.2011.568486

35.

Sasaki

Okada

Nakai

(2017). The evolution of conditional moral assessment in indirect reciprocity. Scientific Reports, 7, 41870. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep41870

36.

Smetana

J. G.

(2006). Social-cognitive domain theory: Consistencies and variations in children’s moral and social judgments. In Killen

Smetana

J. G.

(Eds.), Handbook of Moral Development (pp. 119–153). Lawrence Erlbaum.

37.

Smetana

J. G.

Jambon

Ball

(2014). The social domain approach to children’s moral and social judgments. In Killen

Smetana

J. G.

(Eds.), Handbook of moral development (2 ed., pp. 23–45). Taylor and Francis.

38.

Smith

C. E.

Blake

P. R.

Harris

P. L.

(2013). I should but I won’t: Why young children endorse norms of fair sharing but do not follow them. PLoS One, 8(3), e59510. https://doi.org/ 10.1371/journal.pone.0059510

39.

Van de Vondervoort

J. W.

Hamlin

J. K.

(2017). Preschoolers’ social and moral judgments of third-party helpers and hinderers align with infants’ social evaluations. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 164, 136–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2017.07.004

40.

Van de Vondervoort

J. W.

Hamlin

J. K.

(2018). Preschoolers focus on others’ intentions when forming sociomoral judgments. Frontiers in Psychology, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01851

41.

Wang

B. X.

Rowley

(2017). Business networks and the emergence of Guanxi capitalism in China: The role of the ‘invisible hand’ (pp. 93–118). https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-08-100639-9.00006-2

42.

Wang

(2018). Studying cognitive development in cultural context: A multi-level analysis approach. Developmental Review, 50, 54–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2018.03.002

43.

Wang

Z. L.

Devine

R. T.

Wong

K. K.

Hughes

(2016). Theory of mind and executive function during middle childhood across cultures. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 149, 6–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2015.09.028

44.

Zhang

Hong

S. J.

(2017). Guanxi culture: How it affects the business model of Chinese firms. The China Business Model, 19–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-08-100750-1.00002-4

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.07 MB