The current study aimed to investigate the cultural differences in the developmental origins of children’s intent-based moral judgment and moral behavior in the context of indirect reciprocity. To this end, we compared how German and Chinese children interpret and react to antisocial and prosocial interactions between puppets. An actor puppet performed either a positive or negative act toward a prosocial or antisocial target puppet with the intention to cause harm or not; 197 three and five-year-old children participated as a third party and were asked to judge the actor puppet’s behavior and to distribute stickers. Results showed that 3-year-old Chinese children were able to take intention and context into account when making moral judgments and distributing resources, whereas German children did not show sensitivity to intention until the age of 5. These findings suggest that culture may mediate children’s intent-based moral judgment and moral behavior in the context of indirect reciprocity.
BeilmannM.MayerB.KasearuK.RealoA. (2014). The relationship between adolescents’ social capital and individualism-collectivism in Estonia, Germany, and Russia. Child Indicators Research, 7(3), 589–611. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-014-9232-z
2.
BlakeP. R. (2018). Giving what one should: Explanations for the knowledge-behavior gap for altruistic giving. Current Opinion in Psychology, 20, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.07.041
3.
BlakeP. R.McAuliffeK.WarnekenF. (2014). The developmental origins of fairness: The knowledge-behavior gap. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(11), 559–561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2014.08.003
4.
BuonM.JacobP.MargulesS.BrunetI.DutatM.CabrolD.DupouxE. (2014). Friend or foe? Early social evaluation of human interactions. PLoS One, 9(2), e88612. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088612
5.
CowellJ. M.LeeK.Malcolm-SmithS.SelcukB.ZhouX.DecetyJ. (2017). The development of generosity and moral cognition across five cultures. Developmental Science, 20(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12403
FangT.FaureG. O. (2011). Chinese communication characteristics: A Yin Yang perspective. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 35(3), 320–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2010.06.005
GaoG.TingtoomeyS. (1998). Communicating effectively with the Chinese. Sage.
10.
GibbsJ. C.BasingerK. S.GrimeR. L.SnareyJ. R. (2007). Moral judgment development across cultures: Revisiting Kohlberg’s universality claims. Developmental Review, 27(4), 443–500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2007.04.001
11.
GintisH.HenrichJ.BowlesS.BoydR.FehrE. (2008). Strong reciprocity and the roots of human morality. Social Justice Research, 21(2), 241–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-008-0067-y
GudykunstW. B.NishidaT. (1986). Attributional confidence in low- and high-context cultures. Human Communication Research, 12(4), 525–549.
14.
GummerumM.KellerM. (2012). East German children’s and adolescents’ friendship and moral reasoning before and after German reunification. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 173(4), 440–462.
15.
HallE. T. (1976). Beyond culture. Doubleday.
16.
HallE. T. (1998). The power of hidden culture. In BennettM. J. (Ed.), Basic concepts of intercultural communication: Selected readings (pp. 53–68). Intercultural Press.
HamlinJ. K.WynnK.BloomP.MahajanN. (2011). How infants and toddlers react to antisocial others. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(50), 19931–19936. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1110306108
KellerM.EdelsteinW.SchmidC.FangF.FangG. (1998). Reasoning about responsibilities and obligations in close relationships: A comparison across two cultures. Developmental Psychology, 34(4), 731–741.
22.
KenwardB.DahlM. (2011). Preschoolers distribute scarce resources according to the moral valence of recipients’ previous actions. Developmental Psychology, 47(4), 1054–1064. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023869.supp
23.
KoenigM. A.TiberiusV.HamlinJ. K. (2019). Children’s judgments of epistemic and moral agents: From situations to intentions. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(3), 344–360. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691618805452
24.
LiJ.TomaselloM. (2018). The development of intention-based sociomoral judgment and distribution behavior from a third-party stance. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 167, 78–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2017.09.021
25.
MargoniF.SurianL. (2016). Explaining the U-shaped development of intent-based moral judgments. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 219. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00219
26.
McNamaraR. A.WillardA. K.NorenzayanA.HenrichJ. (2018). Weighing outcome vs. intent across societies: How cultural models of mind shape moral reasoning. Cognition, 182, 95–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.09.008
27.
NobesG.PanagiotakiG.BartholomewK. J. (2016). The influence of intention outcome and question-wording on children’s and adults’ moral judgments. Cognition, 157, 190–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2016.08.019
PurzyckiB. G.PisorA. C.ApicellaC.AtkinsonQ.CohenE.HenrichJ.McElreathR.McNamaraA. R.NorenzayanA.WillardA. K.XygalatasD. (2018). The cognitive and cultural foundations of moral behavior. Evolution and Human Behavior, 39(5), 490–501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2018.04.004
31.
RaiT. S.FiskeA. P. (2011). Moral psychology is relationship regulation: moral motives for unity, hierarchy, equality, and proportionality. Psychological Review, 118(1), 57–75.
32.
RobbinsE.ShepardJ.RochatP. (2017). Variations in judgments of intentional action and moral evaluation across eight cultures. Cognition, 164, 22–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.02.012
33.
SabbaghM. A.XuF.CarlsonS. M.MosesL. J.LeeK. (2006). The development of executive functioning and theory of mind: A comparison of Chinese and U.S. preschoolers. Psychological Science, 17(1), 74–81.
34.
SachdevaS.SinghP.MedinD. (2011). Culture and the quest for universal principles in moral reasoning. International Journal of Psychology, 46(3), 161–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207594.2011.568486
35.
SasakiT.OkadaI.NakaiY. (2017). The evolution of conditional moral assessment in indirect reciprocity. Scientific Reports, 7, 41870. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep41870
36.
SmetanaJ. G. (2006). Social-cognitive domain theory: Consistencies and variations in children’s moral and social judgments. In KillenM.SmetanaJ. G. (Eds.), Handbook of Moral Development (pp. 119–153). Lawrence Erlbaum.
37.
SmetanaJ. G.JambonM.BallC. (2014). The social domain approach to children’s moral and social judgments. In KillenM.SmetanaJ. G. (Eds.), Handbook of moral development (2 ed., pp. 23–45). Taylor and Francis.
38.
SmithC. E.BlakeP. R.HarrisP. L. (2013). I should but I won’t: Why young children endorse norms of fair sharing but do not follow them. PLoS One, 8(3), e59510. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059510
39.
Van de VondervoortJ. W.HamlinJ. K. (2017). Preschoolers’ social and moral judgments of third-party helpers and hinderers align with infants’ social evaluations. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 164, 136–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2017.07.004
40.
Van de VondervoortJ. W.HamlinJ. K. (2018). Preschoolers focus on others’ intentions when forming sociomoral judgments. Frontiers in Psychology, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01851
WangQ. (2018). Studying cognitive development in cultural context: A multi-level analysis approach. Developmental Review, 50, 54–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2018.03.002
43.
WangZ. L.DevineR. T.WongK. K.HughesC. (2016). Theory of mind and executive function during middle childhood across cultures. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 149, 6–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2015.09.028
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
