The transition from financial dependence on one’s parents to financial self-sufficiency is one of the most relevant transitions during emerging adulthood. It is important to have an instrument able to assess emerging adults’ financial capabilities and to detect its change over time. The current article aims to collect international evidence of the Financial Identity Scale (FIS) validity and reliability. Cross-sectional data collected from 2,501 emerging adults aged 18–25 and belonging to three different countries—U.S. (n = 1,535), Italy (n = 485), and Lithuania (n = 481)—were adopted to test score structure validity, generalizability, sensitivity to difference, criterion-related validity, and internal consistency. Instead, four-wave longitudinal data, available for the American sample only (n = 1,900), were adopted to test FIS structural stability and sensitivity to change. As recommended by the contemporary view of validity, different structural equation models were performed. Findings suggest that FIS scores are valid and reliable. The implications for researchers and practitioners are discussed.
ArnettJ. J. (1998). Learning to stand alone: The contemporary American transition to adulthood in cultural and historical context. Human Development, 41, 295–315. https://doi.org/10.1159/000022591
2.
ArnettJ. J. (2014). Emerging adulthood: The winding road from the late teens through the twenties (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
3.
ArundelR.RonaldR. (2016). Parental co-residence, shared living and emerging adulthood in Europe: Semi-dependent housing across welfare regime and housing system contexts. Journal of Youth Studies, 19, 885–905. https://doi.org/13676261.2015.1112884
BarberB. L.CardN. A.SeridoJ.ShimS. (2011, November). Financial identity of United States and Australian college students[Paper presentation]. National Council of Family Relations Conference, Orlando, FL.
6.
BoschL. A.SeridoJ.CardN. A.ShimS.BarberB. (2016). Predictors of financial identity development in emerging adulthood. Emerging Adulthood, 4, 417–426. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167696816631845
7.
BrownT. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research (2nd ed.). The Guilford Press.
8.
ChenF. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14, 464–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834
9.
ClaesL.LuyckxK.VogelB.VerschuerenM.MüllerA. (2018). Identity processes and clusters in individuals with and without pathological buying. Psychiatry Research, 267, 467–472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2018.06.003
10.
ClaesL.MüllerA.LuyckxK. (2016). Compulsive buying and hoarding as identity substitutes: The role of materialistic value endorsement and depression. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 68, 65–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2016.04.005
11.
CohenP. A. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Erlbaum.
12.
DreverA. I.Odders-WhiteE.KalishC. W.Else-QuestN. M.HoaglandE.NelmsE. N. (2015). Foundations of financial well-being: Insights into the role of executive function, financial socialization, and experience-based learning in childhood and youth. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 49(1), 13–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/joca.12068
13.
DrukerJ.LernerL. S. (2018). Annali d’Italianistica: The New Italy and the Jews: From Massimo D’Azeglio to Primo Levi. Arizona State University.
14.
EriksonE. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. W. W. Norton.
FanX.SivoS. A. (2007). Sensitivity of fit indices to model misspecification and model types. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42(3), 509–529. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273170701382864
20.
FingermanK. L.ChengY. P.KimK.FungH. H.HanG.LangF. R.LeeW.WagnerJ. (2016). Parental involvement with college students in Germany, Hong Kong, Korea, and the United States. Journal of Family Issues, 37(10), 1384–1411. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X14541444
21.
GalliherR. V.McLeanK. C.SyedM. (2017). An integrated developmental model for studying identity content in context. Developmental Psychology, 53, 2011–2022. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000299
22.
GoossensL. (2001). Global versus domain-specific statuses in identity research: A comparison of two self-report measures. Journal of Adolescence, 24, 681–699. https://doi.org/10.1006/jado.2001.0438
HawsK. L.BeardenW. O.NenkovG. Y. (2012). Consumer spending self-control effectiveness and outcome elaboration prompts. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40, 695–710. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-011-0249-2
25.
JohnsonE.SherradenM. (2007). From financial literacy to financial capability among youth. The Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare, 34, 119–145. https://bit.ly/2UEx9GH
26.
KraniauskienėS. (2013). Normatyvinis ir funkcinis kartų solidarumas Lietuvoje [Normative and functional intergenerational solidarity in Lithuania]. Sociologija. Mintis Ir Veiksmas, 32, 89–121. https://doi.org/10.15388/SocMintVei.2013.1.1848
27.
KrogerJ.MarciaJ. E. (2011). The identity statuses: Origins, meanings, and interpretations. In SchwartzS. J.LuyckxK.VignolesV. L. (Eds.), Handbook of identity theory and research (pp. 31–53). Springer.
28.
KunnenS.MetzM. (2015). Commitment and exploration. In McLeanK. C.SeydM. (Eds.), The oxford handbook of identity development. Oxford University Press.
29.
LittleT. D. (2013). Longitudinal structural equation modeling. Guilford.
30.
LuyckxK.Seiffge-KrenkeI.SchwartzS. J.CrocettiE.KlimstraT. A. (2014). Identity configurations across love and work in emerging adults in romantic relationships. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 35, 192–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2014.03.007
31.
MarciaJ. E. (1966). Development and validation of ego-identity status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3, 551–558. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0023281
32.
MarshH. W.HauK. T.WenZ. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler’s (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling, 11(3), 320–341. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1103_2
33.
MecaA.RitchieR. A.BeyersW.SchwartzS. J.PicarielloS.ZamboangaB. L.HardyS. A.LuyckxK.KimS. Y.WhitbourneS. K.CrocettiE.BrownE. J.BenitezC. G. (2015). Identity centrality and psychosocial functioning: A person-centered approach. Emerging Adulthood, 3, 327–339. https://doi.org//10.1177/2167696815593183
NelsonL. J.Padilla-WalkerL. M.CarrollJ. S.MadsenS. D.BarryC.BadgerS. (2007). “If you want me to treat you like an adult start acting like one!” Comparing the criteria for adulthood among emerging adults and their parents. Journal of Family Psychology, 21, 665–674. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.21.4.665
36.
NunnallyJ. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. McGraw-Hill.
37.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2019). OECD Employment Outlook 2019: The Future of Work. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. htpps://dot.org/10.1787/9ee00155-en
38.
RantaM.Salmela-AroK. (2017). Subjective financial situation and financial capability of young adults in Finland. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 42, 525–534. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025417745382
39.
RaykovT. (1997). Estimation of composite reliability for congeneric measures. Applied Psychological Measurement, 21, 173–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/01466216970212006
40.
RiegelB.MoserD. K.GlaserD.CarlsonB.DeatonC.ArmolaR.SetharesK.ShivelyM.EvangelistaL.AlbertN. (2002). The Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire: Sensitivity to differences and responsiveness to intervention intensity in a clinical population. Nursing Research, 51, 209–218. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-200207000-00001
41.
RookD. W.FisherR. J. (1995). Normative influences on impulsive buying behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 22, 305–313. https://doi.org/10.1086/209452
42.
SarisW. E.SatorraA.Van der VeldW. M. (2009). Testing structural equation models or detection of misspecifications?Structural Equation Modeling, 16, 561–582. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510903203433
43.
ScalesP. C.BensonP. LOesterleS.HillK.HawkinsJ. D.PashakT. (2016). The dimensions of successful young adult development: A conceptual and measurement framework. Applied Developmental Science, 20, 150–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2015.1082429
44.
SchneiderD.HarknettK.StimpsonM. (2018). What explains the decline in first marriage in the United States? Evidence from the panel study of income dynamics, 1969 to 2013. Journal of Marriage and Family. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12481
45.
SchwartzS. J. (2001). The evolution of Eriksonian and, neo-Eriksonian identity theory and research: A review and integration. Identity, 1, 7–58. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532706XSCHWARTZ
46.
SeridoJ.ShimS.TangC. (2013). A developmental model of financial capability: A framework for promoting a successful transition to adulthood. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 37, 287–297. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025413479476
47.
SetterstenR. A. (2012). The contemporary context of young adulthood in the USA: From demography to development, from private troubles to public issues. In BoothA.BrownS. L.LandaleN. S.ManningW. D.McHaleS. M. (Eds.), Early adulthood in a family context (pp. 3–26). Springer.
48.
ShimS.SeridoJ.BoschL.TangC. (2013). Financial identity-processing styles among young adults: A longitudinal study of socialization factors and consequences for financial capabilities. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 47, 128–152. https://doi.org/10.1111/joca.12002
49.
ShimS.SeridoJ.TangC. (2012). The ant and the grasshopper revisited: The present psychological benefits of saving and future oriented financial behaviors. Journal of Economic Psychology, 33, 155–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2011.08.005
50.
SorgenteA.LanzM. (2019). The multidimensional subjective financial well-being scale for emerging adults: Development and validation studies. International Journal of Behavioral Development. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/0165025419851859
51.
SorgenteA.LanzM.SeridoJ.ShimS. (2018, May). Financial Identity Scale: Collecting validity evidence for the Italian version of the scale[Poster presentation]. SSEA Thematic Conference on Self and Identity, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. https://bit.ly/2KyNrKD
52.
SorgenteA.TagliabueS.LanzM. (2019). Brief Inventory of Thriving: Testing Italian version’s reliability using SEM. Psicologia della Salute, 2019, 97–117. https://doi.org/10.3280/pds2019-001006
53.
VosylisR.ErentaitėR. (2019). Linking family financial socialization with financial capabilities: Which dimensions matter most for financial identity, behaviors, and anxiety? Emerging Adulthood. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167696819856763
54.
VosylisR.SorgenteA. (2019, May). A dual-cycle approach to financial identity: Can the three-dimensional model be used to study the processes of identity formation in the domain of personal finances?[Poster presentation]. International Society of Research on Identity (ISRI) Conference, Naples, Italy.
55.
WidamanK. F.ThompsonJ. S. (2003). On specifying the null model for incremental fit indices in structural equation modeling. Psychological Methods, 8, 16–37. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.8.1.16
56.
XiaoJ. J.TangC.SeridoJ.ShimS. (2011). Antecedents and consequences of risky credit behavior among college students: Application and extension of the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 30, 239–245. https://doi.org/10.1509/jppm.30.2.239
57.
ZumboB. D. (2005). Structural equation modeling and test validation. In EverittB.HowellD. C. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of statistics in behavioral science (pp. 1951–1958). John Wiley & Sons.
58.
ZumboB. D.ChanE. K. (2014). Validity and validation in social, behavioral, and health sciences (Vol. 54). Springer International Publishing.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
