Text message content as a window into college student drinking: Development and initial validation of a dictionary of “alcohol-talk”

Abstract

The ubiquity of digital communication within the high-risk drinking environment of college students raises exciting new directions for prevention research. However, we are lacking relevant constructs and tools to analyze digital platforms that serve to facilitate, discuss, and rehash alcohol use. In the current study, we introduce the construct of alcohol-talk (or the extent to which college students use alcohol-related words in text messaging exchanges) as well as introduce and validate a novel tool for measuring this construct. We describe a closed-vocabulary, dictionary-based method for assessing alcohol-talk. Analyses of 569,172 text messages from 267 college students indicate that this method produces a reliable and valid measure that correlates as expected with self-reported alcohol and related risk constructs. We discuss the potential utility of this method for prevention studies.

Keywords

Youth/adolescence alcohol technology text analysis drinking

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Borsari

Carey

K. B.

(2001). Peer influences on college drinking: A review of the research. Journal of Substance Abuse, 13, 391–424. doi:10.1016/S0899-3289(01)00098-0

Chen

E. E.

Wojcik

S. P.

(2016). A practical guide to big data research in psychology. Psychological Methods, 21, 458–474. doi:10.1037/met0000111

Fournier

A. K.

Clarke

S. W.

(2011). Do college students use Facebook to communicate about alcohol? An analysis of student profile pages. Cyberpsychology, 5, 1–12.

Hebden

Lyons

A. C.

Goodwin

McCreanor

(2015). “When you add alcohol, it gets that much better”: University students, alcohol consumption, and online drinking cultures. Journal of Drug Issues, 45, 214–226. doi:10.1177/0022042615575375

Jensen

Hussong

A. M.

Baik

(2018). Text messaging and social network site use to facilitate alcohol involvement: Comparison of US and Korean college students. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 21, 311–317. doi:10.1089/cyber.2017.0616

Johnston

L. D.

O’Malley

P. M.

Bachman

J. G.

Schulenberg

J. E.

(2011a). Monitoring the future national survey results on drug use, 1975-2010. Volume II, College students & adults ages 19-50. Institute for Social Research (Vol. I). Ann Arbor, MI: ERIC.

Johnston

L. D.

O’Malley

P. M.

Bachman

J. G.

Schulenberg

J. E.

(2011b). Monitoring the future national survey results on drug use, 1975-2010: Volume II, College students and adults ages 19-50. Institute For Social Research, I. Ann Arbor, MI: ERIC.

Kern

M. L.

Park

Eichstaedt

J. C.

Schwartz

H. A.

Sap

Smith

L. K.

Ungar

L. H.

(2016). Gaining insights from social media language: Methodologies and challenges. Psychological Methods, 21, 507. doi:10.1037/met0000091

Kosinski

Wang

Lakkaraju

Leskovec

(2016). Mining big data to extract patterns and predict real-life outcomes. Psychological Methods, 21, 493–506. doi:10.1037/met0000105

10.

LaBrie

J. W.

Hummer

J. F.

Neighbors

Larimer

M. E.

(2010). Whose opinion matters? The relationship between injunctive norms and alcohol consequences in college students. Addictive Behaviors, 35, 343–349.

11.

Levitt

Sher

K. J.

Bartholow

B. D.

(2009). The language of intoxication: Preliminary investigations. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 33, 448–454. doi:10.1111/j.1530-0277.2008.00855.x

12.

Mehl

M. R.

(2006). Quantitative text analysis. In Eid

Diener

(Eds.), Handbook of multimethod measurement in psychology (pp. 141–156). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/11383-000

13.

Moreno

M. A.

Whitehill

J. M.

(2014). Influence of social media on alcohol use in adolescents and young adults. Alcohol Research: Current Reviews, 36, 91.

14.

Pennebaker

J. W.

Boyd

R. L.

Jordan

Blackburn

(2015). The development and psychometric properties of LIWC2015. UT faculty/researcher works. Austin, TX: The University of Texas at Austin. doi:10.15781/T29G6Z

15.

Pew Research Center. (2018a). Mobile fact sheet. Washington, D.C.: Pew Research Center. Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/fact-sheet/mobile/

16.

Pew Research Center. (2018b). Internet/Broadband fact sheet. Washington, D.C.: Pew Research Center. Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/fact-sheet/internet-broadband/

17.

Sobell

L. C.

Sobell

M. B.

(1992). Timeline followback: A technique for assessing self reported ethanol consumption (Vol. 17). Totowa, NJ: Humana Press.

18.

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2012). Results from the 2011 national survey on drug use and health: Summary of national findings (Vol. Series H-4). Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.

19.

Varvil-Weld

Crowley

D. M.

Turrisi

Greenberg

M. T.

Mallett

K. A.

(2014). Hurting, helping, or neutral? The effects of parental permissiveness toward adolescent drinking on college student alcohol use and problems. Prevention Science, 15, 716–724. doi:10.1007/s11121-013-0430-6

20.

Westgate

E. C.

Neighbors

Heppner

Jahn

Lindgren

K. P.

(2014). “I will take a shot for every ‘like’ I get on this status”: Posting alcohol-related Facebook content is linked to drinking outcomes. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 75, 390–398. doi:10.15288/jsad.2014.75.390

21.

White

Hingson

(2013). The burden of alcohol use: Excessive alcohol consumption and related consequences among college students. Alcohol Research: Current Reviews, 35, 201–218. doi:10.1136/emermed-2015-205295