Multidimensional scale of self-esteem (EMES-16): Psychometric evaluation of a domain-specific measure of self-esteem for French-speaking adolescents

Abstract

The EMES-16 is a very short multidimensional measure of domain-specific Self-Esteem designed for French-speaking adolescents. This study presents a psychometric evaluation of this measure among 2603 adolescents with a focus on its factor structure tested in CFA for alternative, theoretically grounded models. Results revealed the superiority of a domain-specific, and partly hierarchical structure, over unidimensional or fully hierarchical structures. This structure supports the derivation of five domain-specific scores (Emotional, Social, Physical, Academic and Creative Self-Esteem) as well as a superordinate composite index (Core Self-Evaluation) underlying the Emotional, Social and Physical Self-Esteem. Measurement invariance testing supported partial equivalence of the construct measured by the EMES-16 across gender and strict equivalence by age groups. Construct validity evaluation suggested strong evidence of EMES-16’s scores convergent and divergent validity with measures of unidimensional Self-Esteem, Self-Concept Clarity, Big Five Personality and Social Desirability. Internal consistency was also satisfactory given the concision of the EMES-16 scales. In conclusion, we discuss the promise of the EMES-16 as a psychometrically solid measure for screening and developmental research purposes among French-speaking adolescents.

Keywords

Adolescence multidimensional self-esteem structure of self-esteem measurement invariance psychometric evaluation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Barbot

(2008). Structures identitaires et expression créative à l’adolescence. L’orientation scolaire et professionnelle, 37, 483–507.

Barbot

(2011). Brief big five (BB5). Paris, France: Hogrefe France.

Barbot

(2018). Creativity and self-esteem in adolescence: A study of their domain-specific, multivariate relationships. The Journal of Creative Behavior. Epub ahead of print July 14, 2018. doi:10.1002/jocb.365

Barbot

Besançon

Lubart

(2016). The generality-specificity of creativity: Exploring the structure of creative potential with EPoC. Learning and Individual Differences, 52, 178–187.

Barbot

Hein

Luthar

S. S.

Grigorenko

E. L.

(2014). Capturing age-group differences and developmental change with the BASC parent rating scales. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 35, 294–303. doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2014.04.003

Barbot

Heuser

(2017). Creativity and identity formation in adolescence: A developmental perspective. In Karwowski

Kaufman

J. C.

(Eds.), The creative self: Effect of beliefs, self-efficacy, mindset, and identity (pp. 87–98). London, UK: Academic Press.

Barbot

Tinio

P. P.

(2015). Where is the “g” in creativity? A specialization–differentiation hypothesis. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 1041.

Bariaud

(2006). Le Self-perception profile for adolescents (SPPA) de S. Harter. Un questionnaire multidimensionnel d’évaluation de soi. L’orientation scolaire et professionnelle, 35/2, 282–295.

Baumeister

R. F.

Vohs

K. D.

(2018). Revisiting our reappraisal of the (surprisingly few) benefits of high self-esteem. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13, 137–140.

10.

Brunot

Valéau

Juhel

(2015). La clarté du concept de soi: Validation d’une échelle de mesure en langue française. Revue Européenne de Psychologie Appliquée/European Review of Applied Psychology, 65, 143–153.

11.

Byrne

B. M.

Shavelson

R. J.

(1987). Adolescent self-concept: Testing the assumption of equivalent structure across gender. American Educational Research Journal, 24, 365–385.

12.

Byrne

B. M.

Shavelson

R. J.

Muthén

(1989). Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures: The issue of partial measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 456.

13.

Byrne

B. M.

Stewart

S. M.

(2006). Teacher’s corner: The MACS approach to testing for multigroup invariance of a second-order structure: A walk through the process. Structural Equation Modeling, 13, 287–321.

14.

Campbell

J. D.

Trapnell

P. D.

Heine

S. J.

Katz

I. M.

Lavallee

L. F.

Lehman

D. R.

(1996). Self-concept clarity: Measurement, personality correlates, and cultural boundaries. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 141.

15.

Cheung

G. W.

Rensvold

R. B.

(2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233–255.

16.

Coopersmith

(1967). The antecedents of self-esteem. San Francisco, CA: Freeman.

17.

Gentile

Grabe

Dolan-Pascoe

Twenge

J. M.

Wells

B. E.

Maitino

(2009). Gender differences in domain-specific self-esteem: A meta-analysis. Review of General Psychology, 13, 34–45.

18.

Ghorpade

Hattrup

Lackritz

J. R.

(1999). The use of personality measures in cross-cultural research: A test of three personality scales across two countries. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 670–679.

19.

Gnambs

Scharl

Schroeders

(2018). The structure of the Rosenberg self-esteem scale: A cross-cultural meta-analysis. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 226, 14–29.

20.

Graziano

W. G.

Jensen-Campbell

L. A.

Finch

J. F.

(1997). The self as a mediator between personality and adjustment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 392.

21.

Graziano

W. G.

Ward

(1992). Probing the big five in adolescence: Personality and adjustment during a developmental transition. Journal of Personality, 60, 425–439.

22.

Guérin

Marsh

H. W.

Famose

J.-P.

(2003). Construct validation of the self-description questionnaire II with a French sample. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 19, 142.

23.

Harris

M. A.

Wetzel

Robins

R. W.

Donnellan

M. B.

Trzesniewski

K. H.

(2018). The development of global and domain self-esteem from ages 10 to 16 for Mexican-origin youth. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 42, 4–16.

24.

Harter

(1988). Self-perception profile for adolescents. Denver, CO: University of Denver.

25.

Harter

(1990). Self and identity development. In Feldman

S. S.

Elliott

G. R.

(Eds.), At the Threshold: The Developing Adolescent (pp. 352–387). Cambridge, MA, US: Harvard University Press.

26.

Harter

(2015). The construction of the self, 2nd Edition: Developmental and sociocultural foundations. New York, NY: Guilford Publications.

27.

Heine

S. J.

Lehman

D. R.

Markus

H. R.

Kitayama

(1999). Is there a universal need for positive self-regard? Psychological Review, 106, 766.

28.

Judge

T. A.

Erez

Bono

J. E.

Thoresen

C. J.

(2002). Are measures of self-esteem, neuroticism, locus of control, and generalized self-efficacy indicators of a common core construct? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 693–710.

29.

Karwowski

Barbot

(2016). Creative self-beliefs: Their nature, development, and correlates. In Kaufman

J. C.

Baer

(Eds.), The Cambridge companion to creativity and reason in cognitive development (pp. 302–326). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ Press.

30.

Kirkpatrick

L. A.

Ellis

B. J.

(2008). An evolutionary-psychological approach to self-esteem: Multiple domains and multiple functions. In Fletcher

G. J. O.

Clark

M. S.

(Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Interpersonal processes (pp. 409–436). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.

31.

Little

T. D.

(1997). Mean and Covariance Structures (MACS) analyses of cross-cultural data: Practical and theoretical issues. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 32, 53–76.

32.

Little

T. D.

(2013). Longitudinal structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

33.

Little

T. D.

Slegers

D. W.

Card

N. A.

(2006). A non-arbitrary method of identifying and scaling latent variables in SEM and MACS models. Structural Equation Modeling, 13, 59–72.

34.

Markus

H. R.

Kitayama

(1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–253.

35.

Marsh

H. W.

(1989). Age and sex effects in multiple dimensions of self-concept: Preadolescence to early adulthood. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 417.

36.

Marsh

H. W.

(1993). The multidimensional structure of academic self-concept: Invariance over gender and age. American Educational Research Journal, 30, 841–860.

37.

Marsh

H. W.

Ayotte

(2003). Do multiple dimensions of self-concept become more differentiated with age? The differential distinctiveness hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 687.

38.

Marsh

H. W.

O’Mara

(2008). Reciprocal effects between academic self-concept, self-esteem, achievement, and attainment over seven adolescent years: Unidimensional and multidimensional perspectives of self-concept. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 542–552.

39.

Marshall

S. L.

Parker

P. D.

Ciarrochi

Sahdra

Jackson

C. J.

Heaven

P. C. L.

(2015). Self-compassion protects against the negative effects of low self-esteem: A longitudinal study in a large adolescent sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 74, 116–121.

40.

McCain

J. L.

Jonason

P. K.

Foster

J. D.

Campbell

W. K.

(2015). The bifactor structure and the “dark nomological network” of the State Self-Esteem Scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 72, 1–6.

41.

McCrae

R. R.

Costa

P. T.

(1989). The structure of interpersonal traits: Wiggins’s circumplex and the five-factor model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 586.

42.

Meade

A. W.

Johnson

E. C.

Braddy

P. W.

(2008). Power and sensitivity of alternative fit indices in tests of measurement invariance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 568.

43.

Meredith

W. H.

Wang

Zheng

F. M.

(1993). Determining constructs of self-perception for children in Chinese cultures. School Psychology International, 14, 371–380.

44.

Nye

C. D.

Bradburn

Olenick

Bialko

Drasgow

(2018). How big are my effects? Examining the magnitude of effect sizes in studies of measurement equivalence. Organizational Research Methods. Epub ahead of print March 15, 2018. doi:10.1177/1094428118761122

45.

Nye

C. D.

Drasgow

(2011). Effect size indices for analyses of measurement equivalence: Understanding the practical importance of differences between groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 966.

46.

Oubrayrie

De Léonardis

Safont

(1994). Un outil pour l’évaluation de l’estime de soi chez l’adolescent: l’ETES. European Review of Applied Psychology, 44, 309–318.

47.

Ponterotto

J. G.

Charter

R. A.

(2009). Statistical Extensions of Ponterotto and Ruckdeschel’s (2007) reliability matrix for estimating the adequacy of internal consistency coefficients. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 108, 878–886.

48.

Rentzsch

Wenzler

M. P.

Schütz

(2016). The structure of multidimensional self-esteem across age and gender. Personality and Individual Differences, 88, 139–147.

49.

Robins

R. W.

Tracy

J. L.

Trzesniewski

Potter

Gosling

S. D.

(2001). Personality correlates of self-esteem. Journal of Research in Personality, 35, 463–482.

50.

Robins

R. W.

Trzesniewski

K. H.

Tracy

J. L.

Gosling

S. D.

Potter

(2002). Global self-esteem across the life span. Psychology and Aging, 17, 423–434.

51.

Rosenberg

(1965). Rosenberg self-esteem scale (RSE). Acceptance and Commitment Therapy. Measures Package, 61, 52.

52.

Shavelson

R. J.

Hubner

J. J.

Stanton

G. C.

(1976). Self-concept: Validation of construct interpretations. Review of Educational Research, 46, 407–441.

53.

Sordes-Ader

Lévêque

Oubrayrie

Safont-Mottay

(1998). Présentation de l’échelle toulousaine de l’estime de soi: L’ETES. In Bolognini

Prêteur

(Eds.), Estime de soi. Perspectives développementales (pp. 167–182). Lausanne: Delachaux et Niestlé.

54.

Tashakkori

(1993). Gender, ethnicity, and the structure of self-esteem: An attitude theory approach. The Journal of Social Psychology, 133, 479–488.

55.

Terriot

Vignoli

Lallemand

Bourcier

(2017). Validation du self-perception profile for adolescents de Harter auprès d’un échantillon d’adolescents français. Pratiques Psychologiques, 23, 359–376.

56.

Thomas

C. R.

Gadbois

S. A.

(2007). Academic self-handicapping: The role of self-concept clarity and students’ learning strategies. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 101–119.

57.

Tournois

Mesnil

Kop

J.-L.

(2000). Autoduperie et hétéroduperie: un instrument de mesure de la désirabilité sociale. Revue Européenne de Psychologie Appliquée, 50, 219–232.

58.

Vallieres

E. F.

Vallerand

R. J.

(1990). Traduction et validation Canadienne-Française de l’Echelle de l’Estime de Soi de Rosenberg. International Journal of Psychology, 25, 305–316.

59.

Vispoel

W. P.

(1995). Self-concept in artistic domains: An extension of the Shavelson, Hubner, and Stanton (1976) model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 134–153.

60.

von Soest

Wichstrøm

Kvalem

I. L.

(2016). The development of global and domain-specific self-esteem from age 13 to 31. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110, 592–608.

61.

Wagner

Gerstorf

(2018). Introduction to the special section on self-esteem and personality across the lifespan: Antecedents of development and change. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 42, 1–3.

62.

Wang

Ollendick

T. H.

(2001). A cross-cultural and developmental analysis of self-esteem in Chinese and Western Children. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 4, 253–271.

63.

Widaman

K. F.

Little

T. D.

Preacher

K. J.

Sawalani

G. M.

(2011). On creating and using short forms of scales in secondary research. In Trzesniewski

K. H.

Donnellan

M. B.

Lucas

R. E.

(Eds.), Secondary data analysis: An introduction for psychologists (pp. 39–61). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

64.

Wigfield

Eccles

J. S.

Mac Iver

Reuman

D. A.

Midgley

(1991). Transitions during early adolescence: Changes in children’s domain-specific self-perceptions and general self-esteem across the transition to junior high school. Developmental Psychology, 27, 552.

65.

Wilgenbusch

Merrell

K. W.

(1999). Gender differences in self-concept among children and adolescents: A meta-analysis of multidimensional studies. School Psychology Quarterly, 14, 101–120.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.23 MB