The abilities comprising social intelligence are critical to children’s development and interpersonal functioning, and there is a need for reliable and valid tools for measuring them. This paper describes the Children’s Social Comprehension Scale (CSCS), which is a performance-based test of the cognitive component of social intelligence for young schoolchildren. The CSCS was developed as an easy-to-use and rapid screening tool for diagnosing deficits in social information processing, such as understanding and evaluation of social situations. The final version of the instrument exhibits satisfactory score reliability as measured by Cronbach’s alpha and acceptable factorial validity of results as determined by confirmatory factor analysis for each of the studied age groups (6–7, 8–9, and 10–11 years; N = 358). The validity of the CSCS results is also corroborated by its positive correlations with other measures of social intelligence (stronger), intellectual potential (weaker), and an indicator of effective social functioning. The scores on the test show age differences in the expected direction. All these findings suggest that the CSCS is valid and reliable measure of cognitive social intelligence in children.
BarnesM. L.SternbergR. J. (1989). Social intelligence and decoding of nonverbal cues. Intelligence, 13, 263–287.
2.
Bar-OnR. (2000). Emotional and social intelligence: Insights from the Emotional Quotient Inventory. In Bar-OnR.ParkerJ. D. A. (Eds.), The Handbook of Emotional Intelligence (pp. 363–388). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
3.
Bar-OnR.ParkerJ. D. A. (2000). The Bar-On EQ-i: YV: Technical Manual. Toronto, Canada: Multi-Health Systems.
4.
BeebeD. W.PfiffnerL. J.McBurnettK. (2000). Evaluation of the validity of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children Third Edition Comprehension and Picture Arrangement Subtests as measures of social intelligence. Psychological Assessment, 12, 97–101. doi:10.1031//104U-35O0.12.1.97.
5.
BoltM. D.JohnsonT. R. (2009). Addressing score bias and differential item functioning due to individual differences in response style. Applied Psychological Measurement, 33, 335–352. doi:10.1177/0146621608329891.
6.
CarrerasM. R.BrazaP.MunozJ. M.BrazaF.AzurmendiA.Pascual-SagastizabalE.CardasJ.Sanchez-MartinJ. R. (2014). Aggression and prosocial behaviors in social conflicts mediating the influence of cold social intelligence and affective empathy on children’s social preference. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 55, 371–379. doi:10.1111/sjop.12126.
7.
CarrollJ. B. (1993). Human Cognitive Abilities: A Survey of Factor-Analytic Studies. New York: Cambridge University Press.
8.
ChenF. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 464–504. doi:10.1080/10705510701301834.
9.
CieciuchJ.DavidovE.SchmidtP.AlgesheimerR. (2016). Assessment of cross-cultural comparability. In WolfC.JoyeD.SmithT. W. (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Survey Methodology (pp. 628–646). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
10.
CusmanF.YoungL. (2011). Patterns of moral judgment derive from non-moral psychological representations. Cognitive Science, 35, 1052–1075.
11.
DarleyJ. M.ShultzT. R. (1990). Moral rules—their content and acquisition. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 525–556.
12.
DowswellE.ChessorD. (2014). Socially skilled successful students: Improving children’s social intelligence through social education programs. e-Journal of Social & Behavioural Research in Business, 5, 23–60.
13.
DunnT. J.BaguleyT.BrunsdenV. (2014). From alpha to omega: A practical solution to the pervasive problem of internal consistency estimation. British Journal of Psychology, 105, 399–412. doi:10.1111/bjop.12046.
14.
FordM. E.TisakM. S. (1983). A further search for social intelligence. Behavioural Research in Business, 75, 196–206.
15.
FurnhamA.Chamorro-PremuzicT. (2004). Estimating one’s own personality and intelligence scores. British Journal of Psychology, 95, 149–160.
16.
GoldenbergI.MathesonK.MantlerJ. (2006). The assessment of emotional intelligence: A comparison of performance-based and self-report methodologies. Journal of Personality Assessment, 86, 33–45.
17.
GreshamF. M.ElliottS. N. (1987). The relationship between adaptive behavior and social skills: Issues in definition and assessment. The Journal of Special Education, 21, 167–181. doi:10.1177/002246698702100115.
18.
GreshamF. M.ElliottS. N. (2008). Social Skills Improvement System: Rating Scales. Bloomington, MN: Pearson Assessments.
19.
GrobA.MeyerC. S.Hagmann-von ArxP. (2009). Intelligence and Development Scales (IDS). Intelligenz und Entwicklungsskalen für Kinder von 5–10 Jahren. Bern, Switzerland: Hans Huber.
20.
GuilfordJ. P. (1967). The Nature of Human Intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.
21.
HedlundJ.SternbergR. J. (2000). Too many intelligences? Integrating social, emotional, and practical intelligence. In Bar-OnR.ParkerJ. D. A. (Eds.), The Handbook of Emotional Intelligence: Theory, Development, Assessment, and Application at Home, School, and in the Workplace (pp. 136–167). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
22.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118.
23.
JaworowskaA.MatczakA.FecenecD. (2009). Scale of Intelligence and Development for Children Aged 5–10 IDS. In GrobA.MeyerC. S.Hagmann-von ArxP. (Eds.), Manual. [Skale inteligencji i rozwoju dla dzieci w wieku 5–10 lat IDS. W A. Grob, C. S. Meyer, & P. Hagmann-von Arx (Reds.), Podręcznik]. Warszawa, Poland: Pracownia Testów Psychologicznych PTP.
24.
JohnsonJ.IronsmithM. (1994). Assessing children’s sociometric status: Issues and the application of social network analysis. Journal Of Group Psychotherapy, Psychodrama & Sociometry, 47, 36.
25.
KaukiainenA.BjörkqvistK.ÖstermanK.LagerspetzK. M.ForsblomS. (1995). Peer-Estimated Social Intelligence (PESI). Turku, Finland: University of Turku.
26.
KeatingD. P. (1978). A search for social intelligence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 218–223.
27.
MabeP. A.WestS. G. (1982). Validity of self-evaluation of ability: A review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 280–296.
28.
MarloweH. (1986). Social intelligence: Evidence for multidimensionality and construct independence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 52–58.
29.
MarshH. W.HauK. T.WenZ. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler’s (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling, 11, 320–341. doi:10.1207/s15328007sem1103_2.
McDonaldR. P. (1999). Test Theory: A Unified Treatment. Hillsdale, MI: Erlbaum.
32.
O’SullivanM.GuilfordJ. P. (1966). Six Factor Tests of Social Intelligence: Manual of Instructions and Interpretations. Beverly Hills, CA: Sheridan Psychological Services.
33.
OttS. L.SpinelliS.RockD.RobertsS.AmmingerG. P.Erlenmeyer-KimlingL. (1998). The New York High Risk Project: Social and general intelligence in children at risk for schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research, 31, 1–11.
34.
PaulhusD. L.LysyD. C.YikM. S. (1998). Self-report measures of intelligence: Are they useful as proxy IQ tests?Journal of Personality, 66, 525–553.
35.
PiagetJ. (1972). The Psychology of Intelligence. Totowa, NJ: Littlefield, Adams.
36.
ReynoldsC. R.KamphausR. W. (1992). Behavior Assessment System for Children (BASC) Manual. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
37.
RhemtullaM.Brosseau-LiardP. E.SavaleiV. (2012). When can categorical variables be treated as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods under suboptimal conditions. Psychological Methods, 17, 354–373. doi:10.1037/a0029315.
38.
RiggioR. E.MessamerJ.ThrockmortonB. (1991). Social and academic intelligence: Conceptually distinct but overlapping constructs. Personality and Individual Differences, 12, 695–702.
39.
SijtsmaK. (2009). On the use, the misuse, and the very limited use fullness of Cronbach’s alpha. Psychometrika, 74, 107–120. doi:10.1007/s11336-008-9101-0.
40.
SilveraD. H.MartinussenM.DahlT. I. (2001). The Tromso Social Intelligence Scale, a self-report measure of social intelligence. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 42, 313–19.
41.
SippsG. J.BerryG. W.LynchE. M. (1987). WAIS-R and social intelligence: A test of established assumptions that uses the CPI. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 43, 499–504.
42.
SotoC. J.JohnO. P.GoslingS. D.PotterJ. (2008). The developmental psychometrics of Big Five self-reports: Acquiescence, factor structure, coherence, and differentiation from ages 10 to 20. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 718–737.
43.
ThorndikeE. L. (1920). Intelligence and its use. Harper’s Magazine, 140, 227–235.
44.
UttichK. T. (2012). The Relationship between Social Cognition and Moral Reasoning. Berkeley, CA: UC Berkeley Electronic Theses and Dissertations.
45.
WalkerR. E.FoleyJ. M. (1973). Social intelligence: Its history and measurement. Psychological Reports, 33, 451–495.
46.
WechslerD. (1958). The Measurement and Appraisal of Adult Intelligence (4th ed.). Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins.
47.
WigelsworthM.HumphreyN.KalamboukaA.LendrumA. (2010). A review of key issues in the measurement of children’s social and emotional skills. Educational Psychology in Practice, 26, 173–186. doi:10.1080/02667361003768526.
48.
WongC.DayJ.MaxwellS.MearaN. (1995). A multitrait-multimethod study of academic and social intelligence in college students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 117–133.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
