Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Social scientists are generally in agreement that spanking is not an especially effective method of discipline and is associated with a variety of behavioral and mental health problems in children. Interventions that have focused on disseminating this empirical research have met with some success in changing pro-spanking attitudes. However, given the strong connection between conservative Christian religious orientation and pro-spanking attitudes and behaviors, many conservative Christians may not be compelled by the empirical research. The current study examined the effectiveness of two interventions: an empirical research intervention that focused on the empirical evidence of the ineffectiveness and potential harm of spanking, and a religion intervention that provided a progressive interpretation of biblical passages that are sometimes used by Christians to justify spanking. A sample of 121 college students (87% female; 34% male; Mage = 20) attending a private, Christian, liberal arts university were randomly assigned to one of three intervention conditions: 1) Research Only, 2) Research and Religion, and 3) Control. Four weeks prior to the intervention sessions, students completed a demographic form and the Attitudes Toward Spanking (ATS) scale. Following the intervention, students completed the ATS scale a second time. Repeated measures ANOVA indicated a significant Time × Condition interaction for ATS scores, indicating that ATS scores decreased in both the Research Only condition (Mpre = 40.56, Mpost = 37.03) and the Research and Religion condition (Mpre = 41.23; Mpost = 33.29) but not the Control condition (Mpre = 40.17; Mpost = 40.78), F(2, 78) = 10.03, p = .001. Subsequent analyses indicated that ATS scores in both intervention conditions decreased compared to the control condition and that a greater decrease in favorable attitudes toward spanking was observed for the Research and Religion condition compared to the Research Only condition.

Keywords

spanking corporal punishment intervention Bible

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abelow

B. J.

(2011). The shaping of New Testament narrative and salvation teachings by painful childhood experience. Archive for the Psychology of Religion, 33(1), 1–54.

Bruce

(2002). God is dead. Secularization in the West. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

Ellison

C. G.

Bartkowski

J. P.

Segal

M. L.

(1996). Conservative Protestantism and the parental use of corporal punishment. Social Forces, 74(3), 1003–1028.

Chavis

Hudnut-Beumler

Webb

M. W.

Neely

J. A.

Bickman

Dietrich

M. S.

Scholer

S. J.

(2013). A brief intervention affects parents’ attitudes toward using less physical punishment. Child Abuse & Neglect, 37, 1192–1201.

Colon

P. A.

(2001). A history of children: A socio-cultural survey across millennia. Santa Barbara, CA: Greenwood Press.

Combs

(2009, 6 12). Parents’ Rights Constitutional Amendment vs. U.N.’s Convention of “Rights” of the Child. Retrieved from http://www.cc.org/commentary/parents039_rights_constitutional_amendment_vs_un039s_convention_quotrightsquot_child

CWALAC Staff. (2010, 6 3). U.N. treaty threatens parental rights. Retrieved from http://concernedwomen.org/u-n-treaty-threatens-parental-rights/

Deater-Deckard

Lansford

J. E.

Dodge

K. A.

Pettit

G. S.

Bates

J. E.

(2003). The development of attitudes about physical punishment: An 8-year longitudinal study. Journal of Family Psychology, 17(3), 351–360.

Dobson

(1970). Dare to discipline. Wheaton, IL: Living Books/Tyndale House.

10.

Dobson

(1976). The strong willed child: Birth through adolescence. Wheaton, IL: Living Books/Tyndale House.

11.

Ellison

C. G.

Sherkat

D. E.

(1993). Conservative Protestantism and support for corporal punishment. American Sociological Review, 58(1), 131–144.

12.

Eveleth

(2014, 2 19). Nineteen states allow teacher to spank children. Smithsonian.com. Retrieved from http://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/nineteen-states-allow-teachers-spank-children-180949810/

13.

Fagan

P. F.

Saunders

W. L.

Fragoso

M. A.

(2009). How U.N. conventions on women’s and children’s rights undermine family, religion, and sovereignty. Retrieved from http://downloads.frc.org/EF/EF09E38.pdf

14.

Ferguson

C. J.

(2013). Spanking, corporal punishment and negative long-term outcomes: A meta-analytic review of longitudinal studies. Clinical Psychology Review, 33(1), 196–208.

15.

Gershoff

E. T.

(2010). More harm than good: A summary of scientific research on the intended and unintended effects of corporal punishment on children. Law & Contemporary Problems, 73, 31–56.

16.

Gershoff

E. T.

(2013). Spanking and child development: We know enough now to stop hitting our children. Child Development Perspectives, 7(3), 133–137.

17.

Gershoff

E. T.

Grogan-Kaylor

(2016). Spanking and child outcomes: Old controversies and new meta-analyses. Journal of Family Psychology, 30(4), 453–469.

18.

Gershoff

E. T.

Lansford

J. E.

Sexton

H. R.

Davis-Kean

Sameroff

A. J.

(2012). Longitudinal links between spanking and children’s externalizing behaviors in a national sample of White, Black, Hispanic, and Asian American families. Child Development, 83(3), 838–843.

19.

Gershoff

E. T.

Purtell

K. M.

Holas

(2015). Corporal Punishment in US Public Schools. New York: Springer International Publishing.

20.

Holden

G. W.

Brown

A. S.

Baldwin

A. S.

Caderao

K. C.

(2014). Research findings can change attitudes about corporal punishment. Child Abuse & Neglect, 38(5), 902–908.

21.

Holden

G. W.

Coleman

S. M.

Schmidt

K. L.

(1995). Why 3-year-old children get spanked: Parent and child determinants as reported by college-educated mothers. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 41, 431–452.

22.

Holland

G. W.

Holden

G. W.

(2016). Changing orientations to corporal punishment: A randomized, control trial of the efficacy of a motivational approach to psycho-education. Psychology of Violence, 6(2), 233–242.

23.

Human Rights Watch. (2014). 25th Anniversary of the Convention on the Rights of the Child (17 November). Retrieved from http://www.hrw.org/news/2014/11/17/25th-anniversary-convention-rights-child

24.

Ingram

(n.d.). The Biblical approach to spanking. Focus on the Family. Retrieved from http://www.focusonthefamily.com/parenting/effective-biblical-discipline/effective-childdiscipline/biblical-approach-to-spanking

25.

Larzelere

R. E.

Baumrind

(2010). Are spanking injunctions scientifically supported? Law & Contemporary Problems, 73, 57–87.

26.

Nolan

(2011, 2 27). Corporal punishment at St. Augustine is morally troubling, New Orleans archbishop says. The Times-Picayune. Retrieved from http://www.nola.com/education/index.ssf/2011/02/corporal_punishment_at_st_aug.html

27.

Reich

S. M.

Penner

E. K.

Duncan

G. J.

Auger

(2012). Using baby books to change new mothers’ attitudes about corporal punishment. Child Abuse & Neglect, 36(2), 108–117.

28.

Robinson

D. H.

Funk

D. C.

Beth

Bush

A. M.

(2005). Changing beliefs about corporal punishment: Increasing knowledge about ineffectiveness to build more consistent moral and informational beliefs. Journal of Behavioral Education, 14(2), 117–139.

29.

Romano

Bell

Norian

(2013). Corporal punishment: Examining attitudes toward the law and factors influencing attitude change. Journal of Family Violence, 28(3), 265–275.

30.

Scholer

S. J.

Hamilton

E. C.

Johnson

M. C.

Scott

T. A.

(2010). A brief intervention may affect parents’ attitudes toward using less physical punishment. Family & Community Health, 33(2), 106–116.

31.

Simons

D. A.

Wurtele

S. K.

(2010). Relationships between parents’ use of corporal punishment and their children’s endorsement of spanking and hitting other children. Child Abuse & Neglect, 34(9), 639–646.

32.

Smith

T. W.

Hout

Marsden

P. V.

Kim

(2015). General Social Survey, 1972-2014. Storrs, CT: Roper Center for Public Opinion Research, University of Connecticut/Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributors]. http://www3.norc.org/GSS+Website/

33.

Straus

M. A.

Douglas

E. M.

Medeiros

R. A.

(2013). The primordial violence: Spanking children, psychological development, violence, and crime. New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.

34.

Taylor

C. A.

Hamvas

Paris

(2011). Perceived instrumentality and normativeness of corporal punishment use among black mothers. Family Relations, 60(1), 60–72.

35.

UN News Center (5 4, 2015). UN lauds South Sudan as country ratifies landmark children’s rights treaty. Retrieved from https://childrenandarmedconflict.un.org/un-lauds-south-sudan-as-country-ratifies-landmark-child-rights-treaty/

36.

UNICEF. (2014). Hidden in plain sight: A statistical analysis of violence against children. New York: UNICEF.

37.

United Nations General Assembly. (1989). Convention on the rights of the child. Retrieved from http://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/CRC.aspx

38.

United Nations, Committee on the Rights of the Child (CRC). (2007, 3 2). CRC General Comment No. 8 (2006): The Right of the Child to Protection from Corporal Punishment and Other Cruel or Degrading forms of Punishment (U.N. CRC/C/GC/8). Retrieved from: http://www.refworld.org/docid/460bc7772.html

39.

Vieth

V. I.

(2014). From sticks to flowers: Guidelines for child protection professionals working with parents using scripture to justify corporal punishment. William Mitchell Law Review, 40(3), 907–942.

40.

Vittrup

Holden

G. W.

Buck

(2006). Attitudes predict the use of physical punishment: A prospective study of the emergence of disciplinary practices. Pediatrics, 117(6), 2055–2064.

41.

Webb

W. J.

(2011). Corporal punishment in the Bible: A redemptive movement hermeneutic for troubling texts. Downers Grove, IL: Intervarsity Press.

Changing attitudes about spanking using alternative biblical interpretations

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References