Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Educating children on a global level is a dynamic process where policy, procedure and guideline changes can leave teachers searching for new programs to resolve new challenges. This brief report shows a successful application of the Good Behavior Game in a school in the country of Belize following a significant change in policy regarding acceptable practices in addressing school-based behavioral challenges.

Keywords

Belize corporal punishment diverse classroom Good Behavior Game intervention

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Barrish

H. H.

Saunders

Wolf

M. M.

(1969) Good behavior game: Effects of individual contingencies for group consequences on disruptive behavior in a classroom. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 2: 119–124. doi:10.1901/jaba.1969.2-119.

Donaldson

J. M.

Vollmer

T. R.

Krous

Downs

Berard

(2011) An evaluation of the Good Behavior Game in Kindergarten classrooms. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 44: 605–609. doi:10.1901/jaba.2011.44-605.

Dupper

D. R.

Dingus

A. E. M.

(2008) Corporal punishment in US public schools: A continuing challenge for school social workers. Children and Schools 30: 243–250. doi:10.1093/cs/30.4.243.

Finn

C. A.

Sladeczek

I. E.

(2001) Assessing the social validity of behavioral interventions: A review of treatment acceptability measures. School Psychology Quarterly 16: 176–206. doi:10.1521/scpq.16.2.176.18703.

Government of Belize, Ministry of Education. (2010). Education and Training Act of 2010, Part VIII Teaching Services. Section 51, subsecion 1–4 pp. 164–165. Retrieved from http://planipolis.iiep.unesco.org/upload/Belize/Belize-education-and-training-act-2010.pdf.

Government of Belize, Ministry of Education. (2010). Education and Training Act of 2010, Part VIII Teaching Services. Section 52, subsection a–c pp. 165–166. Retrieved from http://planipolis.iiep.unesco.org/upload/Belize/Belize-education-and-training-act-2010.pdf.

Jimerson

S. R.

Skokut

Cardenas

Malone

Stewart

(2008) Where in the world is school psychology: Examining evidence of school psychology around the globe. School Psychology International 29: 131–144.

Kazdin

A. E.

(1981) Acceptability of child treatment techniques: The influence of treatment efficacy and adverse side effects. Behavior Therapy 12: 493–506. doi:10.1016/S0005-7894(81)80087-1.

Kazdin

A. E.

(2011) Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings, 2nd ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

10.

Low

L. L.

Yuan

Y. S.

(2011) Teachers’ perceptions and concerns on banning of corporal punishment and its alternative disciplines. Education and Urban Society 43: 137–164. doi:10.1177/0013124510380232.

11.

Martens

B. K.

Witt

J. C.

Elliott

S. N.

Darveaux

(1985) Teacher judgments concerning the acceptability of school-based interventions. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice 16: 191–198. doi:10.1037/0735-7028.16.2.191.

12.

Nolan, J. D., Houlihan, D., Wanzek, M., & Jenson, W. R. (2014). The Good Behavior Game: A classroom-behavior intervention effective across cultures. School Psychology International 35(2), 191–205.

13.

O’Neil

Killian

Hough

(2009) The socio-historical context of in-school corporal punishment in Kwa-Zulu Natal setting. Journal of Psychology in Africa 19: 123–126.

14.

Pérez

Rodríguez

De la Barra

Fernández

A. M.

(2005) Efectividad de una estrategia conductual para el manejo de la agresividad en escolares de enseñanza básica (Effectiveness of a behavioral strategy of aggression management in elementary school children). Psykhe 14: 55–62. doi:10.4067/S0718-22282005000200005.

15.

Saigh

P. A.

Umar

A. M.

(1983) The effects of a good behavior game on the disruptive behavior of Sudanese elementary school students. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 16: 339–344. doi:10.1901/jaba.1983.16-339.

16.

Turco

T. L.