Introduction to the Special Section entitled “Environmental effects on development: Concordance and discrepancies between genetically-controlled and non genetically-controlled studies.”
AndrieuN.GoldsteinA. M. (1998). Epidemiologic and genetic approaches in the study of gene–environment interaction: An overview of available methods. Epidemiologic Reviews, 20, 137–147.
2.
BarnesJ. C.BeaverK. M.ConnollyE. J.SchwartzJ. A. (2016). Identifying the “Truly Disadvantaged”: A Comprehensive Biosocial Approach. International Journal of Behavioral Development. Advanced online publication. DOI: 10.1177/0165025415626517
3.
BrendgenM.BoivinM. (2015). Gene-environment transactions in childhood and adolescence: Problematic peer relationships. In NeiderhiserJ. M.HorwitzB. N. (Eds.), Behavioral Genetics of Interpersonal Relationships across the Lifespan (pp. 97–130). New York, NY: Springer.
4.
ChenJ.YuJ.ZhangJ. (2016). Investigating Unique Environmental Influences of Parenting Practices on Youth Anxiety: A Monozygotic Twin Differences Study. International Journal of Behavioral Development. Advanced online publication. DOI: 10.1177/0165025415611261
5.
Deater-DeckardK. (2016). Is Self-Regulation “All in the family”? Testing Environmental Effects using Within-Family Quasi-Experiments. International Journal of Behavioral Development. Advanced online publication. DOI: 10.1177/0165025415621971
6.
GuimondF. A.BrendgenM.VitaroF.Forget-DuboisN.DionneG.BoivinM. (2015). Peer victimization and anxiety in genetically vulnerable youth: The protective roles of teachers’ self-efficacy and anti-bullying classroom rules. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 43, 1095–1106. doi:10.1007/s10802-015-0001-3
7.
GuimondF. A.LaursenB.VitaroF.BrendgenM.DionneG.BoivinM. (2016). Associations Between Mother–Child Relationship Quality and Adolescent Adjustment: Using a Genetically Controlled Design to Determine the Direction and Magnitude of Effects. International Journal of Behavioral Development. Advanced online publication. DOI: 10.1177/0165025415620059
8.
JaffeeS. R.CaspiA.MoffittT. E.DodgeK. A.RutterM.TaylorA.TullyL. A. (2005). Nature × nurture: Genetic vulnerabilities interact with physical maltreatment to promote conduct problems. Development and Psychopathology, 17(1), 67–84.
9.
PikeA.OliverB. R. (2015). Parenting in childhood. In NeiderhiserJ. M.HorwitzB. N. (Eds.), Behavioral Genetics of Interpersonal Relationships across the Lifespan (pp. 57–81). New York, NY: Springer.
10.
PlominR.DeFriesJ. C.LoehlinJ. C. (1977). Genotype–environment interaction and correlation in the analysis of human behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 309–322.
11.
ScarrS.McCartneyK. (1983). How people make their own environments: A theory of genotype-environment effects. Child Development, 54(2), 424–435.
12.
VitaroF.BrendgenM.ArseneaultL. (2009). The discordant MZ-twin method: One step closer to the holy grail of causality. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 33(4), 376–382.
13.
VitaroF.BrendgenM.GirardA.DionneG.TremblayR. E.BoivinM. (2016). Links between friends’ physical aggression and adolescents’ physical aggression: What happens if gene-environment correlations are controlled? International Journal of Behavioral Development. Advanced online publication. DOI: 10.1177/0165025415618277
14.
WichersM.SchrijversD.GeschwindN.JacobsN.Myin-GermeysI.ThieryE. … van OsJ. (2009). Mechanisms of gene-environment interactions in depression: Evidence that genes potentiate multiple sources of adversity. Psychological Medicine, 39(7), 1077–1086. doi:10.1017/S0033291708004388
