To clarify long-standing conceptual and empirical inconsistencies in models describing the relation between frontal brain asymmetry and emotion, we tested a theory of biological sensitivity to context. We examined whether asymmetry of alpha activation in frontal brain regions, as measured by resting electroencephalography, is sensitive to early developmental contexts. Specifically, we investigated whether frontal asymmetry moderates the association between birth weight and adult outcomes. Adults with left frontal asymmetry (LFA) who were born at extremely low birth weight exhibited high levels of attention problems and withdrawn behaviors in their 30s, whereas normal-birth-weight adults with LFA had low levels of these problem behaviors. Adults with right frontal asymmetry (RFA) displayed a relatively moderate amount of problem behavior regardless of birth weight. Our findings suggest that LFA is associated with sensitivity to developmental context and may help explain why LFA is associated with both positive and negative outcomes, whereas RFA seems to be associated with a more canalized process in some contexts.
AchenbachT. M. (1991). Manual for the Adult Self-Report and 1991 Profile. Burlington: University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry.
2.
AnokhinA. P.HeathA. C.MyersE. (2006). Genetic and environmental influences on frontal EEG asymmetry: A twin study. Biological Psychology, 71, 289–295.
3.
Bakermans-KranenburgM. J.van IJzendoornM. H. (2006). Gene-environment interaction of the dopamine D4 receptor (DRD4) and observed maternal insensitivity predicting externalizing behavior in preschoolers. Developmental Psychobiology, 48, 406–409.
4.
BelskyJ.Bakermans-KranenburgM. J.Van IJzendoornM. H. (2007). For better and for worse: Differential susceptibility to environmental influences. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 300–304.
BottingN.PowlsA.CookeR. W.MarlowN. (1997). Attention deficit hyperactivity disorders and other psychiatric outcomes in very low birth weight children at 12 years. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 38, 931–941.
7.
BoyceW. T.EllisB. J. (2005). Biological sensitivity to context: I. An evolutionary-developmental theory of the origins and functions of stress reactivity. Development and Psychopathology, 17, 271–301.
8.
BoyleM. H.MiskovicV.Van LieshoutR. J.DuncanL.SchmidtL. A.HoultL.. . . SaigalS. (2011). Psychopathology in young adults born at extremely low birth weight. Psychological Medicine, 41, 1763–1774.
9.
CoanJ. A.AllenJ. J. B. (2004). Frontal EEG asymmetry as a moderator and mediator of emotion. Biological Psychology, 67, 7–50.
10.
DavidsonR. J. (2000). Affective style, psychopathology, and resilience: Brain mechanisms and plasticity. American Psychologist, 55, 1196–1214.
11.
EllisB. J.BoyceW. T. (2008). Biological sensitivity to context. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17, 183–187.
12.
EllisB. J.BoyceW. T.BelskyJ.Bakermans-KranenburgM. J.Van IJzendoornM. H. (2011). Differential susceptibility to the environment: An evolutionary-neurodevelopmental theory. Development and Psychopathology, 23, 7–28.
13.
FoxN. A. (1991). If it’s not left, it’s right: Electroencephalograph asymmetry and the development of emotion. American Psychologist, 46, 863–872.
14.
GeschwindN.GalaburdaA. M. (1985). Biological mechanisms, associations, and pathology: III. A hypothesis and a program for research. Archives of Neurology, 42, 428–459.
15.
Harmon-JonesE.AllenJ. J. (1998). Anger and frontal brain activity: EEG asymmetry consistent with approach motivation despite negative affective valence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1310–1316.
16.
Harmon-JonesE.GableP. A.PetersonC. K. (2010). The role of asymmetric frontal cortical activity in emotion-related phenomena: A review and update. Biological Psychology, 84, 451–462.
17.
Harmon-JonesE.SigelmanJ. (2001). State anger and prefrontal brain activity: Evidence that insult-related left-prefrontal activation is associated with experienced anger and aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 797–803.
18.
HepperP. G. (2013). The developmental origins of laterality: Fetal handedness. Developmental Psychobiology, 55, 588–595.
19.
JethaM. K.SchmidtL. A.GoldbergJ. O. (2009). Long-term stability of resting frontal EEG alpha asymmetry and power in a sample of stable community outpatients with schizophrenia. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 72, 228–233.
20.
JonesN. A.FieldT.DavalosM.PickensJ. (1997). EEG stability in infants/children of depressed mothers. Child Psychiatry & Human Development, 28, 59–70.
21.
JonesN. A.FieldT.FoxN. A.LundyB.DavalosM. (1997). EEG activation in 1-month-old infants of depressed mothers. Development and Psychopathology, 9, 491–505.
22.
LevinM. (2005). Left–right asymmetry in embryonic development: A comprehensive review. Mechanisms of Development, 122, 3–25.
23.
MiskovicV.SchmidtL. A.GeorgiadesK.BoyleM.MacMillanH. L. (2009). Stability of resting frontal electroencephalogram (EEG) asymmetry and cardiac vagal tone in adolescent females exposed to child maltreatment. Developmental Psychobiology, 51, 474–487.
24.
PluessM.BelskyJ. (2013). Vantage sensitivity: Differences in response to positive experiences. Psychological Bulletin, 139, 901–916.
25.
SaigalS.StoskopfB.StreinerD.BoyleM.PinelliJ.PanethN.GoddeerisJ. (2006). Transition of extremely low-birth-weight infants from adolescence to young adulthood. Journal of the American Medical Association, 295, 667–675.
SchmidtL. A. (1999). Frontal brain electrical activity in shyness and sociability. Psychological Science, 10, 316–320.
28.
SchmidtL. A.CoteK. A.SantessoD. L.MilnerC. E. (2003). Frontal electroencephalogram alpha asymmetry during sleep: Stability and its relation to affective style. Emotion, 3, 401–407.
29.
SchmidtL. A.FoxN. A.PerezK.HamerD. H. (2009). Linking gene, brain, and behavior: DRD4, frontal asymmetry, and temperament. Psychological Science, 20, 831–837.
30.
SchmidtL. A.MiskovicV. (2013). A new perspective on temperamental shyness: Differential susceptibility to endoenvironmental influences. Social & Personality Psychology Compass, 7, 141–157.
31.
SchmidtL. A.SantessoD. L.MiskovicV.MathewsonK. J.McCabeR. E.AntonyM. M.MoscovitchD. A. (2012). Test-retest reliability of regional electroencephalogram (EEG) and cardiovascular measures in social anxiety disorder (SAD). International Journal of Psychophysiology, 84, 65–73.
32.
SchmidtL. A.ShahinfarA.FoxN. A. (1996). Regional brain electrical activity (EEG) in toddlers’ externalizing problems. Infant Behavior & Development, 19, 75.
33.
SchmidtL. A.TrainorL. J. (2001). Frontal brain electrical activity (EEG) distinguishes valence and intensity of musical emotions. Cognition & Emotion, 15, 487–500.
34.
TomarkenA. J.DavidsonR. J.WheelerR. E.KinneyL. (1992). Psychometric properties of resting anterior EEG asymmetry: Temporal stability and internal consistency. Psychophysiology, 29, 576–592.
35.
van HonkJ.SchutterD. J. L. G. (2006). From affective valence to motivational direction: The frontal asymmetry of emotion revised. Psychological Science, 17, 963–965.
36.
WaddingtonC. H. (1942). Canalization of development and the inheritance of acquired characters. Nature, 50, 563–565.
37.
WhitmanD. W.AgrawalA. A. (2009). What is phenotypic plasticity and why is it important? In WhitmanD. W.AnanthrakrishnanT. N. (Eds.), Phenotypic plasticity of insects: Mechanisms and consequences (pp. 1–63). Enfield, NH: Science Publishers.
