This study presents a new approach to estimation of a nonlinear growth curve component with fixed and random effects in multilevel modeling. This approach can be used to estimate change in longitudinal data, such as day-of-the-week fluctuation. The motivation of the new approach is to avoid spurious estimates in a random coefficient regression model due to the synchronized periodical effect (e.g., day-of-the-week fluctuation) appearing both in independent and dependent variables. First, the new approach is introduced. Second, a Monte Carlo simulation study is carried out to examine the functioning of the proposed new approach in the case of small sample sizes. Third, the use of the approach is illustrated by using an empirical example.
Barrett, F.L., & Barrett, D.J. ( 2001). An introduction to computerized experience sampling in psychology. Social Science Computer Review, 19, 175-185.
2.
Biesanz, J.C., Deeb-Sossa, N., Papadakis, A.A., Bollen, K.A., & Curran, P.J. ( 2004). The role of coding time in estimating and interpreting growth curve models. Psychological Methods, 9, 30-52.
3.
Bolger, N., Davis, A., & Rafaeli, E. ( 2003). Diary methods: Capturing life as it is lived. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 579-616.
Donnet S., Foulley, J.-L., & Samson A. ( 2010). Bayesian analysis of growth curves using mixed models defined by stochastic differential equations. Biometrics, 66, 733-741.
6.
Heck, R.H., & Thomas, S.L. ( 2009). An introduction to multilevel modeling techniques. New York, NY: Routledge.
7.
Hektner, J., Schmidt, J.A., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2007). Experience sampling method: Measuring the quality of everyday life. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8.
Herzog, W., & Boomsma, A. ( 2009). Small-sample robust estimators of noncentrality-based and incremental model fit. Structural Equation Modeling, 16, 1-27.
9.
Hoogland, J.J., & Boomsma, A. ( 1998). Robustness studies in covariance structure modeling, Sociological Methods and Research, 26, 329-367.
10.
Hox, J. ( 2002). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Marsh, H.W., Hau, K.-T., Balla, J.R., & Crayson, D. ( 1998). Is more ever too much? The number of indicators per factor in confirmatory factor analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research , 33, 191-220.
Muukkonen, H., Hakkarainen, K., Inkinen, M., Lonka, K., & Salmela-Aro, K. (2008). CASS-methods and tools for investigating higher education knowledge practices. In G. Kanselaar, V. Jonker, P. Kirschner & F. Prins (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2008 International Conference for the Learning Sciences (ICLS) (Vol. 2, pp. 107-115). Utrecht, the Netherlands: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
15.
Raudenbush, S.W., & Bryk, A.S. ( 2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
16.
Rönkä, A., Malinen, K., Kinnunen, U., Tolvanen, A., & Lämsä, T. (2010). Capturing daily family dynamics via text messages: Development of a mobile diary. Community, Work & Family, 13(1), 5-21.
17.
Stoel, R.D., van Den Wittenboer, G., & Hox, J. ( 2003). Analyzing longitudinal data using multilevel regression and latent growth curve anal ysis. Metodología de las Ciencias del Comportamiento, 5, 21-42.
18.
Watson, D., Clark, L.A., & Tellegen, A. ( 1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063-1070.
19.
Westland, J.C. ( 2010). Lower bounds on sample size in structural equation modeling . Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 9, 476-487.
