Post-adoption service use and unmet service needs were examined longitudinally in three matched groups of children: children adopted from Romanian orphanages following a minimum of eight months' institutional experience (RO: n = 36); children from Romania who were destined for orphanages but were adopted early in infancy (EA: n = 25); and Canadian born non-adopted children (CB: n = 42). Data were collected when the adoptees had been in their adoptive homes for 11 months, at age 4.5 years and 10.5 years. Results indicated higher rates of service use and unmet service needs across time in the RO group. Unmet service needs in the RO group may be due in part to the unique challenges faced by post-institutionalized adoptees. Service use in the EA group jumped significantly at Phase 3, suggesting that the impact of their lesser degree of early deprivation was seen later in development under the additional challenge and stress of the demands of school. Findings, particularly from the EA group, supported the suggestion that adoptive parents have a lower threshold for referring their children for clinical services than do non-adoptive parents. Service needs of adoptees changed over time and those with unmet needs experienced greater challenges than those whose service needs were met.
Achenbach, T.M. (1991). Manual for the Child Behavior Checklist/4—18 and 1991 Profile. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry.
2.
Ames, E.W. (1990). Spitz revisited: A trip to Romanian orphanages . Canadian Psychological Association Developmental Psychology Newsletter, 9(2), 8—11.
3.
Ames, E.W. (1997). The development of Romanian orphanage children adopted to Canada. Ottawa: National Welfare Grants.
4.
Beckett, C., Maughan, B., Rutter, M., Castle, J., Colvert, E., Groothues, C., Kreppner, J., Stevens, S., O'Connor, G., & Sonuga-Barke, E.J.S. (2006). Do the effects of early severe deprivation on cognition persist into early adolescence? Findings from the English and Romanian adoptees study. Child Development , 77(3), 696—711.
5.
Brooks, D., Allen, J., & Barth, R. (2002). Adoption services use, helpfulness, and need: A comparison of public and private agency and independent adoptive families . Children and Youth Ser vices Review, 24(4), 213—238.
6.
Chilshom, K. (1998). A three year follow-up of attachment and indiscriminate friendliness in children adopted from Romanian orphanages. Child Development, 69, 1092—1106.
7.
Fernyhough, L. (2003). The quality and stability of attachment and its relation to indiscriminate friendliness in children adopted to Canada from Romanian orphanages — eight years later. Unpublished M.A. thesis. Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada.
8.
Fernyhough, L., Audet, K., & Le Mare, L. (2002, August). Attachment in Romanian orphans 10 years after adoption to Canada. Poster presented at the International Society of the Study of Behavioral Development (ISSBD)Ottawa, Canada.
9.
Fisher, L., Ames, E., Chisholm, K., & Savoie, L. (1997). Problems reported by parents of Romanian orphans adopted to British Columbia. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 20(1), 67—81.
10.
Grotevant, H.D. (2003). Counseling psychology meets the complex world of adoption. The Counseling Psychologist, 31(6), 753—762.
11.
Groze, V., & Ileana, D. (1996). A follow-up study of adopted children from Romania. Child AdolescentSocial Work Journal, 13(6), 541—565.
12.
Hilborn, R. (2004). Canadian Guide to Inter-country Adoption. Retrieved August 12, 2005, from www.familyhelper.net/ad/adguide.html
13.
Ingersoll, Barbara D. (1997). Psychiatric disorders among adopted children: A review and commentary. Adoption Quarterly, 1, 57—73.
14.
Johnson, D. (2000). Medical and developmental sequelae of early childhood institutionalization in Eastern European adoptees. In Charles A. Nelson (Ed.), Minnesota symposia on child psychology,Vol. 31:The effects of early adversity on neurobehavioral development (pp. 113—162). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
15.
Johnson, D. (2002). Adoption and the effects on children's development . Early Human Development, 68, 39—54.
16.
Kurytnik, K. (2003). A longitudinal study of the intellectual and academic performance of children adopted from Romanian orphanages. Unpublished M.A. thesis, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada.
17.
Le Mare, L., & Audet, K. (2002, August). Attentional abilities of Romanian orphans 10 years after adoption. Poster presented at the International Society of the Study of Behavioral Development (ISSBD)Ottawa, Canada.
18.
Le Mare, L., & Audet, K. (2006). A longitudinal study of the physical growth and health of post-industrialized Romanian adoptees. Paediatrics and Child Health, 11, 85—91.
19.
Le Mare, L., & Kurytnik, K. (2002, August). Parenting stress and marital breakdown in families of children adopted from Romanian orphanages. Poster presented at the International Society of the Study of Behavioral Development (ISSBD)Ottawa, Canada.
20.
Le Mare, L., Warford, L., & Fernyhough, L. (2001, April). Peer relationships of Romanian orphans 10 years after being adopted to Canada. Poster presented at the Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
21.
Leung, P., & Erich, S. (2002). Family functioning of adoptive children with special needs: Implications of familiar supports and child characteristics. Children and Youth Ser vices Review, 24(11), 799—816.
22.
MacLean, K. (2003). The impact of institutionalization on child development . Development and Psychopathology, 15, 853—884.
23.
Marcenko, M., & Smith, L. (1991). Post-adoption needs of families adopting children with developmental disabilities. Children and Youth Ser vices Review, 13, 413—424.
24.
Miller, B., Fan, X., Grotevant, H., Christensen, M., Coyl, D., & Van Dulmen, M. (2000). Adopted adolescents' overrepresentation in mental health counseling: Adoptees' problems or parents' lower threshold for referral?Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 39(12), 1504—1511.
25.
O'Connor, T., Rutter, M., Beckett, C., Keaveey, L., Kreppner, J., & the English and Romanian Adoptees Study Team (2000). The effects of global severe privation on cognitive competence: Extension and longitudinal follow-up. Child Development, 71, 376—390.
26.
Reilly, T., & Platz, L. (2004). Post-adoption service needs of families with special needs children: Use, helpfulness, and unmet needs. Journal of Social Service Research, 30, 51—67.
27.
Rosenthal, J., Groze, V., & Morgan, J. (1996). Services for families adopting children via public child welfare agencies: Use, helpfulness, and need. Children and Youth Ser vices Review, 18, 163—182.
28.
Roy, P., Rutter, M., & Pickles, A. (2004). Institutional care: Associations between overactivity and lack of selectivity in social relationships. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45, 866—873.
29.
Sobol, M. (1998) Adoption trends and a political agenda for Ontario . Adoption Roundup: Journal of the Adoption Council of Ontario , Winter, 1—5.
30.
Warford, L. (2002). Peer relationships of Romanian orphans 10 years after adoption to Canada: A longitudinal study. Unpublished M.A. thesis, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada.
31.
Warren, Sarah B. (1992). Lower threshold for referral for psychiatric treatment for adopted adolescents. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 31, 512—517.
32.
Wierzbicki, M. (1993). Psychological adjustment of adoptees: A meta-analysis . Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 22, 447—454.
33.
Wormeli, C.T., & Carter, D.E. (1990). Manual for the Canada Quick Individual Educational Test. White Rock, BC: Canadian Edumetrics Ltd.
