The vast majority of the almost 2 million adopted children in the United States remain with their adoptive family throughout their life. For an estimated 1% to 25% of adopted children, adoption ends in dissolution or disruption. This article provides an overview of the A Step Further (ASF) program as experienced by two adoptive families that were at risk of dissolution. The ASF program is an intensive educational and supportive program that provides services to help adopted children and their families remain together through challenging times. A case study design is utilized and describes case characteristics; utilization of the ASF program; staff characteristics and training; and a summary of the interventions, support services, and materials provided for families enrolled in ASF services. Cases presented reported substantial progress on parent-identified personal goals and clinically significant improvements in child behavior problems at conclusion of the program. At 1-year post ASF services, parents reported that the child of focus remained with his adoptive family. Preliminary evidence suggests that ASF is targeting families at risk of dissolution and having a high level of success at keeping adoptive and guardianship families intact. Limitations and implications for clinicians and students are discussed.
AchenbachT. M.RescorlaL. A. (2001). Manual for the ASEBA school-age forms and profiles. Burlington: University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth, & Families.
2.
AtkinsonA. J.GonetP. A.FreundlichM.RileyD. B. (2013). Adoption competent clinical practice: Defining its meaning and development. Adoption Quarterly, 16, 156-174. doi:10.1080/10926755.2013.844215
3.
BarthR. P.BerryM.YoshikamiR.GoodfieldR. K. (1988). Predicting adoption disruption. Social Work, 33, 227-233.
4.
BerryM.BarthR. P. (1990). A study of disrupted adoptive placements of adolescents. Child Welfare: Journal of Policy, Practice, and Program, 69, 209-225.
5.
BrooksD.AllenJ.BarthR. P. (2002). Adoption services use, helpfulness, and need: A comparison of public and private agency and independent adoptive families. Children and Youth Services Review, 24, 213-238.
6.
Bundy-MyrowS.BoothP. B. (2009). Theraplay: Supporting attachment relationships. In O’ConnorK. J.BravermanL. D. (Eds.), Play therapy theory and practice: Comparing theories and techniques (2nd ed., pp. 315-366). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
7.
Casey Family Services. (2003). Strengthening families and communities: Promising practices in adoption-competent mental health services (White paper). New Haven, CT: Author.
8.
Center for Adoption Support and Education. (2014). Training for adoption competency (TAC): Evaluation highlights. Burtonsville, MD: Author.
Child Welfare Information Gateway. (2012). Adoption disruption and dissolution. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Children’s Bureau.
11.
CoakleyJ. F.BerrickJ. D. (2008). Research review: In a rush to permanency: Preventing adoption disruption. Child & Family Social Work, 13, 101-112.
DrotarD.La GrecaA. M.LemanekK.KazakA. (1995). Case reports in pediatric psychology: Uses and guidelines for authors and reviewers. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 20, 549-565.
16.
FestingerT. (2002). After adoption: Dissolution or permanence?Child Welfare: Journal of Policy, Practice, and Program, 81, 515-533.
17.
FestingerT. (2014). Adoption disruption. In MallonG. P.HessP. M. (Eds.), Child welfare for the 21st century: A handbook of practices, policies, and programs (2nd ed., pp. 437-454). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
18.
Friends National Resource Center for Community-Based Child Abuse Prevention. (2008). The Protective Factors Survey manual. Chapel Hill, NC: Author.
19.
Hornby Zeller Associates. (2012). Quarterly report: Nebraska family helpline, family navigator/family peer support and post adoption/post guardianship services. Troy, NY: Author.
20.
HoustonD. M.KramerL. (2008). Meeting the long-term needs of families who adopt children out of foster care: A three-year follow-up study. Child Welfare: Journal of Policy, Practice, and Program, 87, 145-170.
Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services. (2014). Nebraska Medicaid managed care and fee-for service care fee schedule for mental health and substance abuse services. Lincoln, NE: Author.
OrnelasL. A.SilversteinD. N.TanS. (2007). Effectively addressing mental health issues in permanency-focused child welfare practice. Child Welfare League of America, 86, 93-112.
25.
PerryB. D. (2009). Examining child maltreatment through a neurodevelopmental lens: Clinical applications of the neurosequential model of therapeutics. Journal of Loss and Trauma, 14, 240-255.
26.
ReillyT.PlatzL. (2003). Characteristics and challenges of families who adopt children with special needs: An empirical study. Children and Youth Services Review, 25, 781-803.
RushtonA.DanceC. (2006). The adoption of children from public care: A prospective study of outcome in adolescence. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 45, 877-883.
29.
Semanchin-JonesA.LaLiberteT. (2010). Adoption disruptions and dissolutions. St. Paul: Center for Advanced Studies in Child Welfare, University of Minnesota.
SmithS. L. (2010). Keeping the promise: The critical need for post-adoption services to enable children and families to succeed. New York, NY: Evan B. Donaldson Adoption Institute.
TanT.MarnT. (2013). Mental health service utilization in children adopted from US foster care, US private agencies, and foreign countries: Data from the 2007 National Survey of Adoption Parents (NSAP). Children and Youth Services, 35, 1050-1054.
34.
VandivereS.MalmK.RadelL. (2009). Adoption USA: A chartbook based on the 2007 National Survey of Adoptive Parents. Washington, DC: The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation.
35.
WulczynF. H.Brunner HislopK. (2009). Issue papers on foster care and adoption: Growth in the adoption population. Chicago, IL: Chapin Hall at the University of Chicago.
