Automated vehicles (AVs) have the potential to improve road safety and improve transportation access, particularly for older adults. As a cutting-edge technology where few have personal experience, individuals’ initial perceptions of the safety of AVs will likely stem from communications originating from various stakeholders. A survey instrument was developed to both implicitly and explicitly estimate how personal perceptions of AV safety are influenced by safety messages from different sources. The implicit measure revealed that younger adults were particularly influenced by positive safety-related information provided by average AV crash rates and official statements from AV companies. When measured explicitly, older adults reported a larger preference for safety-related messages from safety advocacy groups and a decreased preference for information from average crash rates and AV companies. Results are discussed in terms of how safety related messages from various stakeholders might be utilized to affect perceptions of AVs across adulthood.
AbrahamH.LeeC.BradyS.FitzgeraldC.MehlerB.ReimerB.CoughlinJ. F. (2017). Autonomous vehicles and alternatives to driving: Trust, preferences, and effects of age: Proceedings of the Transportation Research Board 96th Annual Meeting.
2.
American Geriatrics Society. (2016).PomidorA. (Ed.), Clinician’s guide to assessing and counseling older drivers (3rd ed.): National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.Report No. DOT HS 812 228.
3.
AminpourP.HelhesonJ. F.FerraroP. J. (2022). The choice of message and messenger to drive behavior change that averts the health impacts of wildfires: An online randomized controlled experiment. BMC Public Health, 22(1), 2359. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-14801-6Article.
4.
AnsteyK. J.WoodJ.LordS.WalkerJ. G. (2005). Cognitive, sensory, and physical factors enabling driving safety in older adults. Clinical Psychology Review, 25(1), 45–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2004.07.008
5.
BaringerK.LopezJ.SoudersD. J. (2024). Using online videos to improve attitudes toward shared autonomous vehicles: Age and video type differences. Future Transportation, 4(1), 299–320. https://doi.org/10.3390/futuretransp4010016
6.
BatboldT.SoroA.SchroeterR. (2025). Older adults perspectives on automated vehicles: Open issues and future opportunities. Transportation Research Part F: Psychology and Behavior, 113, 481–499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2025.05.008
7.
BlumenthalM. S.Fraade-BlanarL.BestR.IrwinJ. L. (2020). Safe enough: A taxonomy of approaches to acceptable safety for automated vehicles. RAND Research Report (RR-A569). https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA569-1.html
BrownL. B.OttB. R.PapandonatosG. D.SuiY.ReadyR. E.MorrisJ. C. (2005). Prediction of on-road driving performance in patients with early Alzheimer’s disease. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 53(1), 94–98. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53017.x
10.
CharnessN.YoonJ. S.SoudersD.StothartC.YehnertC. (2018). Predictors of attitudes toward autonomous vehicles: The roles of age, gender, prior knowledge, and personality. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(2589), 2589. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02589
11.
ChoiJ. K.JiY. G. (2015). Investigating the importance of trust on adopting an autonomous vehicle. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 31(10), 692–702. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2015.1070549
12.
ClassenS.MasonJ.HwangboS. W.WersalJ.RogersJ.SisiopikuV. (2021). Older drivers’ experience with automated vehicle technology. Journal of Transport & Health, 22, 101107. Article 101107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2021.101107
EdwardsJ. D.RossL. A.AckermanM. L.SmallB. J.BallK. K.BradleyS.DodsonJ. E. (2008). Longitudinal predicors of driving cessation among older adults from the ACTIVE clinical trial. The Journals of Gerontology: Serie Bibliographique, 63(1), 6–12. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/63.1.P6
FoleyD. J.HeimovitzH. K.GuralnikJ. M.BrockD. B. (2002). Driving life expectancy of persons aged 70 years and older in the United States. American Journal of Public Health, 92(8), 1284–1289. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.92.8.1284
FreemanE. E.GangeS. J.MuñozB.WestS. K. (2006). Driving status and risk of entry into long-term care in older adults. American Journal of Public Health, 96(7), 1254–1259. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2005.069146
23.
GhazizadehM.LeeJ. D.BoyleL. N. (2012). Extending the technology acceptance model to assess automation. Cognition, Technology & Work, 14(1), 39–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-011-0194-3
GreenwoodP. M.BaldwinC. L. (2022). Preferred sources of information, knowledge, and acceptance of automated vehicle systems: Effects of gender and age. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 806552. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.806552Article.
HartwichF.WitzlackC.BeggiatoM.KremsJ. F. (2019). The first impression counts – A combined driving simulator and test track study on the development of trust and acceptance of highly automated driving. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 65, 522–535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2018.05.012
29.
HavlíčkováD.GabrhelV.AdamovskáE.ZámečníkP. (2019). The role of gender and age in autonomous mobility: General attitudes, awareness and media preference in the context of Czech Republic. Transactions on Transport Sciences, 10(2), 53–63. https://doi.org/10.5507/tots.2019.013
30.
HoboltS. B.TilleyJ.WittrockJ. (2013). Listening to the government: How information shapes responsibility attributions. Political Behavior, 35(1), 153–174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-011-9183-8
LiuP.XuZ.ZhaoX. (2019). Road tests of self-driving vehicles: Affective and cognitive pathways in acceptance formation. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 124, 354–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2019.04.004
33.
LiuP.ZhangY.HeZ. (2019). The effect of population age on the acceptable safety of self-driving vehicles. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 185, 341–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2019.01.003
34.
MasonJ.ClassenS.HwangboS. W.SisiopikuV. P. (2023). Age and technology readiness influences on adults’ experiences with highly automated vehicles. Transportation Research Record, 2677(6), 161–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981221145128
35.
MolnarL. J.EbyD. W. (2008). The relationship between self-regulation and driving-related abilities in older drivers: An exploratory study. Traffic Injury Prevention, 9(4), 314–319. https://doi.org/10.1080/15389580801895319
36.
MoodyJ.BaileyN.ZhaoJ. (2020). Public perceptions of autonomous vehicle safety: An international comparison. Safety Science, 121, 634–650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2019.07.022
37.
National Center for Mobility Management. (2018). Autonomous vehicles: Considerations for people with disabilities and older adults.
38.
Office of Highway Policy Information. (2024). Distribution of licensed drivers – 2022 (revised): By sex and percentage in each age group and relation to population. U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Policy and Governmental Affairs. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/policyinformation/statistics/2022/dl20.cfm
SisiopikuV. P.YangW.MasonJ.McKinneyB.HwangboS. W.ClassenS. (2023). Examining the impact of age and gender on drivers’ perceptions towards autonomous vehicles before and after autonomous driving simulator exposure. International Journal of Transport Development and Integration, 7(2), 85–93. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijtdi.070203
SoudersD. J.BestR.CharnessN. (2017). Valuation of active blind spot detection systems by younger and older adults. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 106, 505–514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2016.08.020
Stefl-MabryJ. A. (2003). Social judgment analysis of information source preference profiles: An exploratory study to empirically represent media selection patterns. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(9), 879–904. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.10285
VenkateshV.MorrisM. G.DavisG. B.DavisF. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
