Age-related differences in facial identity recognition and emotion categorization are well established, but whether these differences extend to dynamic stimuli remains underexplored. We compared younger and older adults’ performances in dynamic emotion categorization (phase 1) and identity recognition (phase 2) tasks, incorporating different types of facial occlusion to test their influence on both tasks. Stimuli included whole faces and two types of occlusion (surgical masks, white rectangles). In phase 1, participants observed videos of neutral expressions transitioning to emotional ones and categorized the emerging emotion. In phase 2, static neutral faces were judged as either previously seen or new. Occlusion impaired performances in both groups, with older adults struggling more in emotion categorization. Age had no effect on identity recognition, and occluded faces were better remembered than whole faces. The findings highlight the interplay between emotion processing and identity recognition, stressing the importance of using dynamic stimuli in aging research.
AbudarhamN.YovelG. (2019). Same critical features are used for identification of familiarized and unfamiliar faces. Vision Research, 157, 105–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2018.01.002
2.
AviezerH.HassinR. R.RyanJ.GradyC.SusskindJ.AndersonA.MoscovitchM.BentinS. (2008). Angry, disgusted, or afraid? Studies on the malleability of emotion perception. Psychological Science, 19(7), 724–732. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02148.x
3.
BeckA. T.SteerR. A.BrownG. K. (1996). Manual for the Beck depressio inventory - II. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
4.
BennettsR. J.Johnson HumphreyP.ZielinskaP.BateS. (2022). Face masks versus sunglasses: Limited effects of time and individual differences in the ability to judge facial identity and social traits. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 7(1), 18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-022-00371-z
5.
BlaisC.FisetD.RoyC.Saumure RégimbaldC.GosselinF. (2017). Eye fixation patterns for categorizing static and dynamic facial expressions. Emotion (Washington, DC), 17(7), 1107–1119. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000283
6.
BoscoA.SpanoG.CaffòA. O.LopezA.GrattaglianoI.SaracinoG.PintoK.HoogeveenF.LancioniG. E. (2017). Italians do it worse. Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) optimal cut-off scores for people with probable Alzheimer’s disease and with probable cognitive impairment. Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, 29(6), 1113–1120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-017-0727-6
BruceV.YoungA. W. (2012). Face perception. Psychology Press.
9.
CannitoL.Di CrostaA.PalumboR.CeccatoI.AnzaniS.La MalvaP.PalumboR.Di DomenicoA. (2020). Health anxiety and attentional bias toward virus-related stimuli during the COVID-19 pandemic. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 16476. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-73599-8
10.
CarbonC.-C. (2020). Wearing face masks strongly confuses counterparts in reading emotions. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 566886. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.566886
11.
CarstensenL. L.MikelsJ. A. (2005). At the intersection of emotion and cognition: Aging and the positivity effect. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(3), 117–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00348.x
12.
CarstensenL. L.MikelsJ. A.MatherM. (2006). Fifteen—Aging and the intersection of cognition, motivation, and emotion. In BirrenJ. E.SchaieK. W.AbelesR. P.GatzM.SalthouseT. A. (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of aging (6th ed., pp. 343–362). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012101264-9/50018-5
13.
CarstensenL. L.Turk-CharlesS. (1994). The salience of emotion across the adult life span. Psychology and Aging, 9(2), 259–264. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.9.2.259
14.
CeccatoI.La MalvaP.Di CrostaA.PalumboR.GattiM.MomiD.LogriecoM. G. M.FasoloM.MammarellaN.BorellaE.Di DomenicoA. (2022). “When did you see it?” The effect of emotional valence on temporal source memory in aging. Cognition & Emotion, 36(5), 987–994. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2022.2069683
15.
ChoJ.ImH. Y.YoonY. J.JooS. J.ChongS. C. (2023). The effect of masks on the emotion perception of a facial crowd. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 14274. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-41366-0
16.
D’ArgembeauA.Van Der LindenM. (2004). Identity but not expression memory for unfamiliar faces is affected by ageing. Memory, 12(5), 644–654. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210344000198
17.
DearyI. J.DerG. (2005). Reaction time, age, and cognitive ability: Longitudinal findings from age 16 to 63 Years in representative population samples. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 12(2), 187–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/13825580590969235
DerntlB.SeidelE.-M.KainzE.CarbonC.-C. (2009). Recognition of emotional expressions is affected by inversion and presentation time. Perception, 38(12), 1849–1862. https://doi.org/10.1068/p6448
20.
Di CrostaA.CeccatoI.BartoliniE.La MalvaP.GattiM.D’IntinoE.CannitoL.MarinA.PalumboR.MammarellaN.Di DomenicoA.PalumboR. (2023). With or without the mask: Age differences in perceived trustworthiness and Health during the COVID-19 pandemic. Behavioral Sciences, 13(3), 195. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13030195
21.
Di CrostaA.PalumboR.MarchettiD.CeccatoI.La MalvaP.MaiellaR.CipiM.RomaP.MammarellaN.VerrocchioM. C.Di DomenicoA. (2020). Individual differences, economic stability, and fear of contagion as risk factors for PTSD symptoms in the COVID-19 emergency. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 567367. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.567367
22.
Di DomenicoA.PalumboR.MammarellaN.FairfieldB. (2015). Aging and emotional expressions: Is there a positivity bias during dynamic emotion recognition?Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1130. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01130
23.
DuesenbergM.WeberJ.SchaeuffeleC.FleischerJ.Hellmann-RegenJ.RoepkeS.MoritzS.OtteC.WingenfeldK. (2016). Effects of hydrocortisone on false memory recognition in healthy men and women. Behavioral Neuroscience, 130(6), 635–642. https://doi.org/10.1037/bne0000170
24.
DurbinK. A.RastegarS.KnightB. G. (2020). Effects of age and mood on emotional face processing differ depending on the intensity of the facial expression. Neuropsychology, Development, and Cognition. Section B, Aging, Neuropsychology and Cognition, 27(6), 902–917. https://doi.org/10.1080/13825585.2019.1700900
25.
EbnerN. C.JohnsonM. K. (2009). Young and older emotional faces: Are there age group differences in expression identification and memory?Emotion (Washington, DC), 9(3), 329–339. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015179
26.
EbnerNatalieC.RiedigerMichaelaLindenbergerUlman. (2018). FACES: A database of facial expressions in young, middle-aged, and older women and men (publicly available datasets). Max Planck Society. https://faces.mpdl.mpg.de/imeji/collection/IXTdg721TwZwyZ8e
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA.-G.BuchnerA. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
29.
FaustmannL. L.EckhardtL.HamannP. S.AltgassenM. (2022). The effects of separate facial areas on emotion recognition in different adult age groups: A laboratory and a naturalistic study. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 859464. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.859464
30.
FernandesC.MacedoI.GonçalvesA. R.PereiraM. R.Ferreira-SantosF.BarbosaF.Marques-TeixeiraJ. (2023). Effects of aging on face processing: An ERP study of the own-age bias with neutral and emotional faces. Cortex; a Journal Devoted to the Study of the Nervous System and Behavior, 161, 13–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2023.01.007
31.
FernandesN. L.PandeiradaJ. N. S.SoaresS. C.NairneJ. S. (2017). Adaptive memory: The mnemonic value of contamination. Evolution and Human Behavior, 38(4), 451–460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2017.04.003
32.
FischerA. H.GillebaartM.RotteveelM.BeckerD.VliekM. (2012). Veiled emotions: The effect of covered faces on emotion perception and attitudes. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3(3), 266–273. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550611418534
33.
FusiG.PalmieroM.LavolpeS.ColauttiL.CrepaldiM.AntoniettiA.Di DomenicoA.ColomboB.Di CrostaA.La MalvaP.RozziniL.RusconiM. L. (2022). Aging and psychological well-being: The possible role of inhibition skills. Healthcare, 10(8), 1477. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10081477
34.
GradyC. L.BernsteinL. J.BeigS.SiegenthalerA. L. (2002). The effects of encoding task on age-related differences in the functional neuroanatomy of face memory. Psychology and Aging, 17(1), 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.17.1.7
35.
GrahlowM.RuppC. I.DerntlB. (2022). The impact of face masks on emotion recognition performance and perception of threat. PLoS One, 17(2), Article e0262840. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0262840
36.
GraingerS. A.HenryJ. D.PhillipsL. H.VanmanE. J.AllenR. (2017). Age deficits in facial affect recognition: The influence of dynamic cues. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 72(4), 622–632. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbv100
HargisM. B.CastelA. D. (2017). Younger and older adults’ associative memory for social information: The role of information importance. Psychology and Aging, 32(4), 325–330. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000171
39.
HaxbyJ. V.HoffmanE. A.GobbiniM. I. (2000). The distributed human neural system for face perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(6), 223–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01482-0
HenkeL.GusevaM.WagemansK.PischeddaD.HaynesJ.-D.JahnG.AndersS. (2022). Surgical face masks do not impair the decoding of facial expressions of negative affect more severely in older than in younger adults. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 7(1), 63. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-022-00403-8
42.
HoffmannH.KesslerH.EppelT.RukavinaS.TraueH. C. (2010). Expression intensity, gender and facial emotion recognition: Women recognize only subtle facial emotions better than men. Acta Psychologica, 135(3), 278–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.07.012
43.
KelloughJ. L.KnightB. G. (2012). Positivity effects in older adults’ perception of facial emotion: The role of future time perspective. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 67B(2), 150–158. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbr079
44.
KensingerE. A.BrierleyB.MedfordN.GrowdonJ. H.CorkinS. (2002). Effects of normal aging and Alzheimer’s disease on emotional memory. Emotion (Washington, DC), 2(2), 118–134. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.2.2.118
45.
KretM. E.De GelderB. (2012). Islamic headdress influences how emotion is recognized from the eyes. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 110. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00110
46.
La MalvaP.PreteG.Di CrostaA.CeccatoI.MammarellaN.PalumboR.Di DomenicoA. (2023). The effect of aging and emotions on time processing. Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, 35(11), 2783–2795. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-023-02563-z
47.
LamontA. C.Stewart-WilliamsS.PoddJ. (2005). Face recognition and aging: Effects of target age and memory load. Memory & Cognition, 33(6), 1017–1024. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193209
48.
LederH.CarbonC.-C. (2005). When context hinders! Learn–test compatibility in face recognition. The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology, 58(2), 235–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/02724980343000936
49.
LeeJ. H.LeeT. L.KangN. (2021). Transcranial direct current stimulation decreased cognition-related reaction time in older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ageing Research Reviews, 70, 101377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2021.101377
LightL. L.Kayra-StuartF.HollanderS. (1979). Recognition memory for typical and unusual faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 5(3), 212–228. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.5.3.212
52.
LinT.FischerH.JohnsonM. K.EbnerN. C. (2020). The effects of face attractiveness on face memory depend on both age of perceiver and age of face. Cognition & Emotion, 34(5), 875–889. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2019.1694491
53.
LiuZ.-X.ShenK.OlsenR. K.RyanJ. D. (2018). Age-related changes in the relationship between visual exploration and hippocampal activity. Neuropsychologia, 119, 81–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.07.032
54.
LoganA. J.GordonG. E.LofflerG. (2017). Contributions of individual face features to face discrimination. Vision Research, 137, 29–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2017.05.011
MariniM.AnsaniA.PaglieriF.CaruanaF.ViolaM. (2021). The impact of facemasks on emotion recognition, trust attribution and re-identification. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 5577. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-84806-5
57.
MarzoliD.D’AnselmoA.MalatestaG.LucafòC.PreteG.TommasiL. (2022). The intricate web of asymmetric processing of social stimuli in humans. Symmetry, 14(6), 1096. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14061096
58.
MatherM.CarstensenL. L. (2003). Aging and attentional biases for emotional faces. Psychological Science, 14(5), 409–415. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.01455
59.
MatherM.KnightM. R. (2006). Angry faces get noticed quickly: Threat detection is not impaired among older adults. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 61(1), P54–P57. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/61.1.P54
60.
McCrackinS.CapozziF.MayrandF.RisticJ. (2021). Face masks impair basic emotion recognition: Group effects and individual variability. Social Psychology, 54(1-2), 4–15. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000470
61.
NasreddineZ. S.PhillipsN. A.BédirianV.CharbonneauS.WhiteheadV.CollinI.CummingsJ. L.ChertkowH. (2005). The Montreal Cognitive assessment, MoCA: A brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 53(4), 695–699. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x
62.
NoyesE.DavisJ. P.PetrovN.GrayK. L. H.RitchieK. L. (2021). The effect of face masks and sunglasses on identity and expression recognition with super-recognizers and typical observers. Royal Society Open Science, 8(3), 201169. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.201169
63.
PetrovicP.KalischR.PessiglioneM.SingerT.DolanR. J. (2008). Learning affective values for faces is expressed in amygdala and fusiform gyrus. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 3(2), 109–118. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsn002
PreteG.CeccatoI.BartoliniE.Di CrostaA.La MalvaP.PalumboR.LaengB.TommasiL.MammarellaN.Di DomenicoA. (2024). Detecting implicit and explicit facial emotions at different ages. European Journal of Ageing, 21(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-024-00805-1
PreteG.FabriM.FoschiN.TommasiL. (2016). Face gender categorization and hemispheric asymmetries: Contrasting evidence from connected and disconnected brains. Neuroscience, 339, 210–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.10.021
68.
PreteG.FontanesiL.PorcelliP.TommasiL. (2020). The psychological impact of COVID-19 in Italy: Worry leads to protective behavior, but at the cost of anxiety. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 566659. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.566659
RichozA.-R.LaoJ.PascalisO.CaldaraR. (2018). Tracking the recognition of static and dynamic facial expressions of emotion across the life span. Journal of Vision, 18(9), 5. https://doi.org/10.1167/18.9.5
72.
RigoulotS.D’HondtF.Defoort-DhellemmesS.DespretzP.HonoréJ.SequeiraH. (2011). Fearful faces impact in peripheral vision: Behavioral and neural evidence. Neuropsychologia, 49(7), 2013–2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.03.031
73.
RuffmanT.HenryJ. D.LivingstoneV.PhillipsL. H. (2008). A meta-analytic review of emotion recognition and aging: Implications for neuropsychological models of aging. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 32(4), 863–881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.01.001
74.
SchienleA.PotthoffJ.SchönthalerE.SchlintlC. (2021). Disgust-related memory bias in children and adults. Evolutionary Psychology: An International Journal of Evolutionary Approaches to Psychology and Behavior, 19(2), 1474704921996585. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474704921996585
75.
SlessorG.InschP.DonaldsonI.SciaponaiteV.AdamowiczM.PhillipsL. H. (2022). Adult age differences in using information from the eyes and mouth to make decisions about others’ emotions. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 77(12), 2241–2251. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbac097
76.
StanislawH.TodorovN. (1999). Calculation of signal detection theory measures. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers: A Journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc, 31(1), 137–149. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03207704
77.
StatSoft Inc. (2013). STATISTICA v.12. Data Analysis Software System. Tulsa, OK: StatSoft Inc.
78.
Van KleefG. A. (2009). How emotions regulate social life: The emotions as social information (EASI) model. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(3), 184–188. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01633.x
79.
VenturaM.PalmisanoA.InnamoratoF.TedescoG.ManippaV.CaffòA. O.RivoltaD. (2023). Face memory and facial expression recognition are both affected by wearing disposable surgical face masks. Cognitive Processing, 24(1), 43–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-022-01112-2
80.
VuilleumierP. (2005). How brains beware: Neural mechanisms of emotional attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(12), 585–594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2005.10.011
81.
WatsonD.ClarkL. A.TellegenA. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063
82.
WegrzynM.VogtM.KirecliogluB.SchneiderJ.KisslerJ. (2017). Mapping the emotional face. How individual face parts contribute to successful emotion recognition. PLoS One, 12(5), Article e0177239. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177239
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
