This study examines how individuals (regulators) manage emotion in their social partners (targets) and whether the age of the regulator or the age of the target influences extrinsic emotion regulation strategy preference. An online questionnaire was used to assess extrinsic emotion regulation among 580 participants aged 18–87 years (M = 50.04, SD = 18.13). Participants (regulators) indicated the extent to which they would be likely to use different strategies when interacting with a younger or older target who was upset. Results of multi-level modeling showed that older regulators endorsed less use of situation modification than younger regulators, but age differences in regulators’ use of other strategies were not significant. After adjustment for relationship-specific covariates, regulators endorsed less use of attentional deployment and cognitive change, for older targets than younger targets. Results are discussed in the context of lifespan perspectives on social behavior and emotion regulation.
AllardE. S.KensingerE. A. (2018). Cognitive emotion regulation in adulthood and old age: Positive gaze preferences across two strategies. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 25(2), 213–230.
2.
AllenV.WindsorT. (2017). Age differences in the use of emotion regulation strategies derived from the process model of emotion regulation: A systematic review. Aging & Mental Health, 23(1), 1–14.
3.
AronA.AronE. N.SmollanD. (1992). Inclusion of other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(4), 596–612.
4.
BirdittK. S.FingermanK. L. (2003). Age and gender differences in adults’ descriptions of emotional reactions to interpersonal problems. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 58(4), P237–P245.
5.
BirdittK. S.FingermanK. L.AlmeidaD. M. (2005). Age differences in exposure and reactions to interpersonal tensions: A daily diary study. Psychology and Aging, 20(2), 330–340.
6.
Blanchard-FieldsF. (2009). Flexible and adaptive socio-emotional problem solving in adult development and aging. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, 27(5), 539–550.
7.
ButlerE. A.EgloffB.WilhelmF. H.SmithN. C.EricksonE. A.GrossJ. J. (2003). The social consequences of expressive suppression. Emotion, 3(1), 48–67.
8.
CarstensenL. L.FungH. H.CharlesS. T. (2003). Socioemotional selectivity theory and the regulation of emotion in the second half of life. Motivation and Emotion, 27(2), 103–123.
9.
CarstensenL. L.IsaacowitzD. M.CharlesS. T. (1999). Taking time seriously: A theory of socioemotional selectivity. American Psychologist, 54(3), 165–181.
10.
EldesoukyL.EnglishT. (2018). Another year older, another year wiser? Emotion regulation strategy selection and flexibility across adulthood. Psychology and Aging, 33(4), 572–585.
11.
FingermanK. L.CharlesS. T. (2010). It takes two to tango: Why older people have the best relationships. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19(3), 172–176.
12.
FingermanK. L.MillerL.CharlesS. (2008). Saving the best for last: How adults treat social partners of different ages. Psychology and Aging, 23(2), 399–409.
13.
FiskeS. T.CuddyA.GlickP.XuJ. (2002). A model of stereotype content as often mixed: Separate dimensions of competence and warmth respectively follow from status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 878–902.
14.
GrossJ. J. (1998). The emerging field of emotion regulation: An integrative review. Review of General Psychology, 2(3), 271–299.
15.
HainesS. J.GleesonJ.KuppensP.HollensteinT.CiarrochiJ.LabuschagneI.GraceC.KovalP. (2016). The wisdom to know the difference: Strategy-situation fit in emotion regulation in daily life is associated with well-being. Psychological Science, 27(12), 1651–1659.
16.
HatfieldE.BensmanL.ThorntonP. D.RapsonR. L. (2014). New perspectives on emotional contagion: A review of classic and recent research on facial mimicry and contagion. Interpersona, 8(2), 159.
17.
HeddenT.GabrieliJ. D. (2004). Insights into the ageing mind: A view from cognitive neuroscience. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5(2), 87–96.
18.
IsaacowitzD. M.LivingstoneK. M.RichardM.Seif El-NasrM. (2018). Aging and attention to self-selected emotional content: A novel application of mobile eye tracking to the study of emotion regulation in adulthood and old age. Psychology and Aging, 33(2), 361–372.
19.
JohnO. P.GrossJ. J. (2004). Healthy and unhealthy emotion regulation: Personality processes, individual differences, and life span development. Journal of Personality, 72(6), 1301–1334.
20.
JonesT. S.BodtkerA. (2001). Mediating with heart in mind: Addressing emotion in mediation practice. Negotiation Journal, 17(3), 217–244.
21.
LavyS.EshetR. (2018). Spiral effects of teachers’ emotions and emotion regulation strategies: Evidence from a daily diary study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 73, 151–161.
22.
LitmanL.RobinsonJ.AbberbockT. (2017). TurkPrime.com: A versatile crowdsourcing data acquisition platform for the behavioral sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 49(2), 433–442.
23.
LittleL. M.GootyJ.WilliamsM. (2016). The role of leader emotion management in leader–member exchange and follower outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 27(1), 85–97.
24.
LittleL. M.KluemperD.NelsonD. L.GootyJ. (2012). Development and validation of the interpersonal emotion management scale. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 85(2), 407–420.
25.
LittleL. M.KluemperD.NelsonD. L.WardA. (2013). More than happy to help? Customer-focused emotion management strategies. Personnel Psychology, 66(1), 261–286.
26.
LivingstoneK. M.IsaacowitzD. M. (2019). Age similarities and differences in spontaneous use of emotion regulation tactics across five laboratory tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 148(11), 1972–1992.
27.
LuongG.CharlesS. T.FingermanK. L. (2010). Better with age: Social relationships across adulthood. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 28(1), 9–23.
28.
MartinsB.FlorjanczykJ.JacksonN. J.GatzM.MatherM. (2018). Age differences in emotion regulation effort: Pupil response distinguishes reappraisal and distraction for older but not younger adults. Psychology and Aging, 33(2), 338–349.
29.
MasumotoK.TaishiN.ShiozakiM. (2016). Age and gender differences in relationships among emotion regulation, mood, and mental health. Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/2333721416637022
30.
McCannR. M.DaileyR. M.GilesH.OtaH. (2005). Beliefs about intergenerational communication across the lifespan: Middle age and the roles of age stereotyping and respect norms. Communication Studies, 56(4), 293–311.
31.
MillerL. M.CharlesS. T.FingermanK. L. (2009). Perceptions of social transgressions in adulthood. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 64B(5), 551–559.
32.
MontepareJ. M.DobishH. (2013). Younger and older adults’ beliefs about the experience and expression of emotions across the life span. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 69(6), 892–896.
33.
NivenK.GarciaD.van der LöweI.HolmanD.MansellW. (2015). Becoming popular: Interpersonal emotion regulation predicts relationship formation in real life social networks. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1452.
34.
NivenK.HenkelA. P.HanrattyJ. (2018). Prosocial versus instrumental motives for interpersonal emotion regulation. Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology, 3(2), 85–96.
35.
RauschenbachC.GöritzA. S.HertelG. (2012). Age stereotypes about emotional resilience at work. Educational Gerontology, 38(8), 511–519.
36.
ReeckC.AmesD. R.OchsnerK. N. (2016). The social regulation of emotion: An integrative, cross-disciplinary model. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(1), 47–63.
37.
ReedA. E.ChanL.MikelsJ. A. (2014). Meta-analysis of the age-related positivity effect: Age differences in preferences for positive over negative information. Psychology and Aging, 29(1), 1–15.
38.
RiedigerM.SchmiedekF.WagnerG. G.LindenbergerU. (2009). Seeking pleasure and seeking pain: Differences in prohedonic and contra-hedonic motivation from adolescence to old age. Psychological Science, 20(12), 1529–1535.
39.
RuppD. E.VodanovichS. J.CredéM. (2005). The multidimensional nature of ageism: Construct validity and group differences. The Journal of Social Psychology, 145(3), 335–362.
40.
ScheibeS.SheppesG.StaudingerU. M. (2015). Distract or reappraise? Age-related differences in emotion-regulation choice. Emotion, 15(6), 677–681.
41.
SchirdaB.ValentineT. R.AldaoA.PrakashR. S. (2016). Age-related differences in emotion regulation strategies: Examining the role of contextual factors. Developmental Psychology, 52(9), 1370–1380.
42.
SheppesG.CatranE.MeiranN. (2009). Reappraisal (but not distraction) is going to make you sweat: Physiological evidence for self-control effort. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 71(2), 91–96.
43.
ShiotaM. N.LevensonR. W. (2009). Effects of aging on experimentally instructed detached reappraisal, positive reappraisal, and emotional behavior suppression. Psychology and Aging, 24(4), 890–900.
44.
SnijdersT. A. B.BoskerR. J. (2012). Multilevel analysis (2nd ed.). Sage.
45.
StraussG. P.OssenfortK. L.WheartyK. M. (2016). Reappraisal and distraction emotion regulation strategies are associated with distinct patterns of visual attention and differing levels of cognitive demand. PLoS One, 11(11), e0162290.
46.
StroughJ.BergC. A.SansoneC. (1996). Goals for solving everyday problems across the life span: Age and gender differences in the salience of interpersonal concerns. Developmental Psychology, 32(6), 1106–1115.
47.
SungK. T.KimB. J.Torres-GilF. (2010). Respectfully treating the elderly: Affective and behavioral ways of American young adults. Educational Gerontology, 36(2), 127–147.
48.
UrryH. L.GrossJ. J. (2010). Emotion regulation in older age. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19(6), 352–357.
49.
VigilJ. M. (2007). Asymmetries in the friendship preferences and social styles of men and women. Human Nature, 18(2), 143–161.
50.
YbarraO.BurnsteinE.WinkielmanP.KellerM. C.ManisM.ChanE.RodriguezJ. (2008). Mental exercising through simple socializing: Social interaction promotes general cognitive functioning. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(2), 248–259.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
