Intergenerational contact is important to older adults’ quality of life, but less is known about within-family differences in older parents’ contact between sons and daughters, especially in countries with patrilineal traditions. Applying latent profile analysis to data on 3,228 Korean older adults’ frequency of meeting and communication with each of their children, this study identified within-family patterns of intergenerational contact. Nearly half of parents exhibited gender-balanced patterns of meeting across children, while 13% reported “more frequent contact with daughters” and 39% reported “more frequent contact with sons.” On the other hand, “equally high contact” (77%) was the most common pattern for communication. Multinomial regression results showed that the derived patterns were differentiated by parents’ education, marital status, region, economic satisfaction, health, and depressive symptoms. The results highlighted the enduring nature of patrilineal traditions as well as the differing patterns of contact that Korean older adults have with their children.
AngS. (2019). Life course social connectedness: Age-cohort trends in social participation. Advances in Life Course Research, 39, 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alcr.2019.02.002
2.
ChaiH. W.JunH. J. (2017). Relationship between ties with adult children and life satisfaction among the middle-aged, the young-old, and the oldest-old Korean adults. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 85(4), 354–376. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091415016685834.
3.
ChoJ. E. (2010). Mobile phone adoption and acceptance by elderly users: Implications for the digital divide. Korean Journal of Sociology, 44(5), 81–113.
ChoiH.NamB.KimS.ParkC. (2019). Contact with parents and parents-in-law, gender, and marital satisfaction in Korea. Journal of Marriage and Family, 81(5), 1192–1205. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12594
6.
ChoiS.-K.ChoiS.-E. (2012). A study on intergenerational affective solidarity in Korean families. Survey Research, 13(1), 89–112.
7.
ChunH.Das GuptaM. (2022). ‘Not a bowl of rice, but tender loving care’: From aborting girls to preferring daughters in South Korea. Asian Population Studies, 18(2), 169–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441730.2021.1944408
8.
ChungS.JeonH.SongA.KimJ.-H. (2019). Developmental trajectories and predictors of social exclusion among older Koreans: Exploring the multidimensional nature of social exclusion. Social Indicators Research, 144(1), 97–112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-018-2045-6
9.
ChungW.GuptaM. D. (2007). The decline of son preference in South Korea: The roles of development and public policy. Population and Development Review, 33(4), 757–783. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2007.00196.x
CollinsL. M.LanzaS. T. (2010). Latent class and latent transition analysis: With applications in the social, behavioral, and health sciences. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470567333
12.
CongZ.SilversteinM. (2008). Intergenerational support and depression among elders in rural China: Do daughters-in-law matter?Journal of Marriage and Family, 70(3), 599–612. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2008.00508.x
DaveyA.JankeM.SavlaJ. (2004) Antecedents of intergenerational support: Families in context and families as context. In SilversteinM. (Ed.), Annual review of gerontology and geriatrics, Vol. 24: Intergenerational relations across time and place (pp. 29–54), Springer.
15.
DeaneG.SpitzeG.WardR. A.ZhuoY. A. (2016). Close to you? How parent-adult child contact is influenced by family patterns. The Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 71(2), 344–357. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbv036.
16.
FanJ.ZhangW.MiH. (2023). Intergenerational proximity to aging parents and depression among married persons in China. Research on Aging, 45(3–4), 347–360. https://doi.org/10.1177/01640275221107320
17.
FingermanK.MillerL.BirdittK.ZaritS. (2009). Giving to the good and the needy: Parental support of grown children. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71(5), 1220–1233. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2009.00665.x
18.
FingermanK. L.HuoM.BirdittK. S. (2020). A decade of research on intergenerational ties: Technological, economic, political, and demographic changes. Journal of Marriage and Family, 82(1), 383–403. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12604
19.
GruijtersR. J. (2017). Intergenerational contact in Chinese families: Structural and cultural explanations. Journal of Marriage and Family, 79(3), 758–768. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12390
20.
GrundyE. (2005). Reciprocity in relationships: Socio-economic and health influences on intergenerational exchanges between Third Age parents and their adult children in Great Britain. British Journal of Sociology, 56(2), 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-4446.2005.00057.x
21.
GuoM.ChiI.SilversteinM. (2011). Family as a context: The influence of family composition and family geographic dispersion on intergenerational relationships among Chinese elderly. International Journal of Social Welfare, 20(s1), S18–S29. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2397.2011.00793.x
22.
HanG.-H.YoonS.-E. (2004). The bilateralization of the kinship relations in Korean families: Focused on the intergenerational exchange. Korea Journal of Population Studies, 27(2), 177–203.
23.
HenrettaJ. C.SoldoB. J.Van VoorhisM. F. (2011). Why do families differ? Children’s care for an unmarried mother. Journal of Marriage and Family, 73(2), 383–395. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00813.x
24.
HogerbruggeM. J. A.SilversteinM. D. (2015). Transitions in relationships with older parents: From middle to later years. The Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 70(3), 481–495. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbu069.
25.
HuA. (2017). Providing more but receiving less: Daughters in intergenerational exchange in mainland China. Journal of Marriage and Family, 79(3), 739–757. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12391
HuoM.GrahamJ. L.KimK.BirdittK. S.FingermanK. L. (2019). Aging parents’ daily support exchanges with adult children suffering problems. The Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 74(3), 449–459. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbx079.
28.
IhmJ.HsiehY. P. (2015). The implications of information and communication technology use for the social well-being of older adults. Information, Communication & Society, 18(10), 1123–1138. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1019912
29.
JiangQ.LiX.FeldmanM. W. (2015). Bequest motives of older people in rural China: From the perspective of intergenerational support. European Journal of Ageing, 12(2), 141–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-014-0330-z
30.
KalmijnM. (2013). How mothers allocate support among adult children: Evidence from a multiactor survey. The Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 68(2), 268–277. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbs110.
31.
KimJ.-H.LeeY.-S.KimP.-S. (2017). Intergenerational transfers between young adult children and their parents in Korea. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 48(2), 217–241. https://doi.org/10.3138/jcfs.48.2.217
32.
KimK.FingermanK. L.BirdittK. S.ZaritS. H. (2016). Capturing between- and within-family differences in parental support to adult children: A typology approach. The Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 71(6), 1034–1045. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbv029.
33.
KimK.ZaritS. H.FingermanK. L.HanG. (2015). Intergenerational exchanges of middle-aged adults with their parents and parents-in-law in Korea. Journal of Marriage and Family, 77(3), 791–805. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12185
LiS.FeldmanM. W.JinX. (2004). Children, marriage form, and family support for the elderly in contemporary rural China: The case of Songzi. Research on Aging, 26(3), 352–384. https://doi.org/10.1177/0164027503262477
37.
LightmanN.LinkC. (2021). Gender, class and the cost of unpaid care: An analysis of 25 countries. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 52(2), 206–244. https://doi.org/10.3138/jcfs-52-2-004
38.
LinI.-F.GoldmanN.WeinsteinM.LinY.-H.GorrindoT.SeemanT. (2003). Gender differences in adult children’s support of their parents in Taiwan. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65(1), 184–200. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2003.00184.x
39.
NortonE. C.DowdB. E. (2018). Log odds and the interpretation of logit models. Health Services Research, 53(2), 859–878. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12712
40.
ParkH.-J. (2021). Does filial piety still matter? A filiality-based perspective on intergenerational solidarity and cooperation. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 19(1), 78–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/15350770.2021.1868232
41.
ParkK.-S.PhuaV.McNallyJ.SunR. (2005). Diversity and structure of intergenerational relationships: Elderly parent-adult child relations in Korea. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 20(4), 285–305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10823-006-9007-1
42.
ParkS.SmithJ.DunkleR. E. (2014). Social network types and well-being among South Korean older adults. Aging & Mental Health, 18(1), 72–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2013.801064
43.
PrendergastD. (2021). From elder to ancestor: Old age, death and inheritance in modern Korea. Brill.
44.
SuitorJ. J.GilliganM.KincaidR.HouY.StepniakC.PengS. (2022). How widowhood and gender shape the impact of maternal favoritism on adult children’s psychological well-being. The Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 77(1), 224–236. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbab120.
45.
SuitorJ. J.GilliganM.PillemerK.FingermanK. L.KimK.SilversteinM.BengtsonV. L. (2018). Applying within-family differences approaches to enhance understanding of the complexity of intergenerational relations. The Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 73(1), 40–53. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbx037.
SunR. (2002). Old age support in contemporary urban China from both parents’ and children’s perspectives. Research on Aging, 24(3), 337–359. https://doi.org/10.1177/0164027502243003
48.
TangC.MaC. H.ShiJ. Q. (2009). Ethic and fairness of daughter’s supporting to her parents’ family: Gender study on intergenerational family relation in rural areas of eastern Zhejiang Province. Sociological Studies, 24(6), 18–36.
49.
TsutsuiT.MuramatsuN.HigashinoS. (2014). Changes in perceived filial obligation norms among coresident family caregivers in Japan. The Gerontologist, 54(5), 797–807. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnt093
50.
UmbersonD.PudrovskaT.ReczekC. (2010). Parenthood, childlessness, and well-being: A life course perspective. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72(3), 612–629. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00721.x
51.
ValtortaN. K.KanaanM.GilbodyS.RonziS.HanrattyB. (2016). Loneliness and social isolation as risk factors for coronary heart disease and stroke: Systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal observational studies. Heart, 102(13), 1009–1016. https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2015-308790
WongE. L.-Y.LiaoJ. M.Etherton-BeerC.BaldassarL.CheungG.DaleC. M.FloE.HusebøB. S.Lay-YeeR.MillardA.PeriK. A.ThokalaP.WongC.-H.ChauP. Y.-K.ChanC. Y.ChungR. Y.-N.YeohE.-K. (2020). Scoping review: Intergenerational resource transfer and possible enabling factors. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(21), E7868. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17217868
YooJ.RussellD. W. (2021). The association between oldest son status and co-residence with parents across periods and cohorts in South Korea. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 52(1), 27–46. https://doi.org/10.3138/jcfs.52.1.004
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
