The use of digital technology by older adults has improved in recent years in response to the need for their functional adaptation to an increasingly technological social context. Understanding this type of technological adaptation has recently become an important field of inquiry in both social and gerontological studies. Working within this framework, the aim of this study is to identify the main determinants that influence the intention of older people to use digital technology in their daily lives, using the Technological Acceptance Model. A study was carried out with the participation of 1155 people over 65 years of age in Spain. Confirmatory Factor Analysis and structural equation models (SEM) were performed. The results show that the TAM is a useful model to explain the intention of older adults to use Digital Technology, showing a high predictive power, highlighting Perceived Usefulness and Perceived Ease of Use as the main predictor variables.
AbdullahF.WardR. (2016). Developing a general extended technology acceptance model for E-learning (GETAMEL) by analysing commonly used external factors. Computers in Human Behavior, 56(March), 238-256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.036.
AstellA. J.McGrathC.DoveE. (2020). That’s for old So and So’s!”: Does identity influence older adults’ technology adoption decisions?Ageing & Society, 40(7), 1550–1576. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X19000230
4.
BagozziR. (2007). The legacy of the technology acceptance model and a proposal for a paradigm shift. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 8(4), 244–254. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00122
5.
BillippS. H. (2001). The psychosocial impact of interactive Computer use within a vulnerable elderly population: a report on a randomized prospective trial in a Home health Care setting. Public Health Nursing, 18(2), 138-145. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1446.2001.00138.x.
6.
BagozziR. P.YiY. (2012). Specification, evaluation, and interpretation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(1), 8–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-011-0278-x
7.
BargFKHuss-AshmoreRWittinkM. N.MurrayG. F.BognerH. R.GalloJ. J. (2006). A mixed-Methods approach to understanding loneliness and depression in older adults. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 61(6), S329–S339. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/61.6.S329
8.
BerkowskyR. W.SharitJ.CzajaS. J. (2017). Factors predicting decisions about technology adoption among older adults. Innovation in Aging, 1(3), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igy002
9.
BettsL. R.HillR.GardnerS. E. (2019). “There’s Not enough knowledge out there”: Examining older adults’ perceptions of digital technology use and digital inclusion classes. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 38(8), 1147–1166. https://doi.org/10.1177/0733464817737621
10.
BoiseL.WildK.MattekN.RuhlM.DodgeH. H.KayeJ. (2013). Willingness of older adults to share data and privacy concerns after exposure to unobtrusive in-home monitoring. Gerontechnology, 11(3), 428-435. https://doi.org/10.4017/gt.2013.11.3.001.00.
11.
BollenK. A.LongJ. S. (1993). Testing structural equation models. Sage.
12.
BraunM. T. (2013). Obstacles to social networking website use Among older adults. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 673–680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.12.004.
13.
Cabero AlmenaraJ.Llorente CejudoM. (2020). La adopción de las tecnologías por las personas mayores: Aportaciones desde el modelo TAM (Technology Acceptance Model). Publicaciones, 50(1), 141–157. https://doi.org/10.30827/publicaciones.v50i1.8521
14.
CacioppoJ. T.HughesMEWaiteLJHawkleyLCThistedRA (2006). Loneliness as a specific risk Factor for depressive symptoms: Cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses. Psychology and Aging, 21(1), 140–151. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.21.1.140
15.
CarpenterB. D.BudayS. (2007). Computer use among older adults in a naturally occurring retirement Community. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(6), 3012–3024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2006.08.015
ChenK.ChanA. H. (2014). Gerontechnology acceptance by elderly Hong Kong Chinese: A senior technology acceptance model (STAM). Ergonomics, 57(5), 635–652. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2014.895855
18.
ChenK.LouV. W. Q. (2020). Measuring senior technology acceptance: Development of a brief, 14-item scale. Innovation in Aging, 4(3), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaa016
19.
ChoiE. Y.KimY.ChipaloE.LeeH. Y. (2020). Does perceived ageism widen the digital divide? and does it vary by gender?The Gerontologist, 60(7), 1213–1223. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnaa066
20.
ChoiM.KongS.JungD. (2012). Computer and internet interventions for loneliness and depression in older adults: A meta-analysis. Healthcare Informatics Research, 18(3), 191–198. https://doi.org/10.4258/hir.2012.18.3.191
21.
CimpermanM.Makovec BrenčičM.TrkmanP. (2016). Analyzing older users’ Home telehealth services acceptance behavior—applying an extended UTAUT model. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 90, 22-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.03.002.
22.
CodyM. J.DunnD.HoppinS.WendtP. (1999). Silver surfers: Training and evaluating internet use Among older adult learners. Communication Education, 48(4), 269–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634529909379178
23.
Cohen-MansfieldJ.CreedonM. A.MaloneT. B.KirkpatrickM. J.IIIDutraL. A.HermanR. P. (2005). Electronic memory aids for community-dwelling elderly persons: Attitudes, preferences, and potential utilization. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 24(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/0733464804271277
24.
ConciM.PianesiF.ZancanaroM. (2009). Useful, social and enjoyable: mobile phone adoption by older people. In GrossT (Ed), IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT2009. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03655-2_7 (pp. 63–76)
25.
CottenS. R.FordG.FordS.HaleT. M. (2012). Internet use and depression among older adults. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(2), 496–499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.10.021
26.
CrouchE.GordonN. P. (2019). Prevalence and factors influencing use of internet and electronic health resources by middle-aged and older adults an a US health plan population: Cross-sectional survey study. JMIR Aging, 2(1), e11451. https://doi.org/10.2196/11451
27.
CzajaS. J.BootW. R.CharnessN.RogersW. A.SharitJ. (2018). Improving social support for older adults through technology: Findings from the PRISM randomized controlled trial. The Gerontologist, 58(3), 467–477. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnw249
28.
CzajaS. J.CharnessN.FiskA. D.HertzogC.NairS. N.RogersW. A.SharitJ (2006). Factors predicting the use of technology: Findings from the center for research and education on aging and technology enhancement (CREATE). Psychology and Aging, 21(2), 333–352. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.21.2.333
29.
DavisF. D.BagozziR. P.WarshawP. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982–1003. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
30.
Di GiacomoD.RanieriJ.D'AmicoM.GuerraF.PassafiumeD. (2019). Psychological barriers to digital living in older adults: Computer anxiety as predictive mechanism for technophobia. Behavioral Sciences, 9(9), 96. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs9090096
31.
DogruelL.JoeckelS.BowmanN. D. (2015). The use and acceptance of new media entertainment technology by elderly users: Development of an expanded technology acceptance model. Behaviour & Information Technology, 34(11), 1052–1063. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2015.1077890
32.
ElliotA. J.MooneyC. J.DouthitK. Z.LynchM. F. (2014). Predictors of older adults’ technology use and its relationship to depressive symptoms and well-being. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 69(5), 667–677. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbt109
33.
EllisD.AllaireJ. C. (1999). Modeling computer interest in older adults: the role of age, education, computer knowledge, and computer anxiety. Human Factors, 41(3), 345–355. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872099779610996
34.
FazeliP. L.RossL. A.VanceDEBallK (2013). The relationship between computer experience and computerized cognitive test performance among older adults. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 68(3), 337–346. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbs071
FokkemaT.KnipscheerK. (2007). Escape loneliness by going digital: A quantitative and qualitative evaluation of a dutch experiment in using ECT to overcome loneliness among older adults. Aging & Mental Health, 11(5), 496–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607860701366129
37.
FornellC.LarckerD. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
38.
GattiF. M.BrivioE.GalimbertiC. (2017). “The Future is ours too”: A training process to enable the learning perception and increase self-efficacy in the use of tablets in the elderly. Educational Gerontology, 43(4), 209–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/03601277.2017.1279952
39.
GelbrichK.SattlerB. (2014). Anxiety, crowding, and time pressure in public self-service technology acceptance. Journal of Services Marketing, 28(1), 82–94. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSM-02-2012-0051
40.
GoherK. M.MansouriN.FadlallahSO (2017). Assessment of personal Care and medical robots from older adults’ perspective. Robotics and Biomimetics, 4(1), 5–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40638-017-0061-7
41.
GranićA.MarangunićN. (2019). Technology acceptance model in educational Context: a systematic literature review. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(5), 2572–2593. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12864
42.
GunerH.AcarturkC. (2020). The use and acceptance of ICT by senior citizens: a comparison of technology acceptance model (TAM) for elderly and young adults. Universal Access in the Information Society, 19(2), 311–330. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-018-0642-4
43.
HairJ. F.JrSarstedtM.RingleC. M.GuderganS. P. (2017). Advanced issues in partial least squares structural equation modeling. Sage.
44.
HaJ.ParkH. K. (2020). Factors affecting the acceptability of technology in health care among older Korean adults with multiple chronic conditions: A Cross-sectional study adopting the senior technology acceptance model. Clinical Interventions in Aging, 15, 1873-1881. https://doi.org/10.2147/cia.s268606.
45.
HoferM.HargittaiE.BüchiM.SeifertA. (2019). Older adults’ online information seeking and subjective well-being: The moderating role of internet skills. International Journal of Communication, 13, 4426-4443.
46.
HoqueR.SorwarG. (2017). Understanding factors influencing the adoption of mhealth by the elderly: An extension of the UTAUT model. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 101(May), 75-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.02.002.
47.
HuangJ. C. (2011). Exploring the acceptance of telecare among senior citizens: an application of back-propagation network. Telemedicine and E-Health, 17(2), 111–117. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2010.0118
48.
Jansen-KosterinkS.VarenbrinkP.NaafsA. (2019). The gezelschapp a Dutch mobile application to reduce social isolation and loneliness. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies for Ageing Well and e-Health - ICT4AWE, Funchal, Madeira, Portugal, 22–23 March, 2018, (pp. 142–147). https://doi.org.10.5220/0006732501420147
49.
KaminS. T.LangF. R.BeyerA. (2017). Subjective technology adaptivity predicts technology use in old age. Gerontology, 63(4), 385–392. https://doi.org/10.1159/000471802
50.
KaravidasM.LimN. K.KatsikasS. L. (2005). The effects of computers on older adult users. Computers in Human Behavior, 21(5), 697–711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2004.03.012
KavandiH.JaanaM. (2020). Factors that affect health information technology adoption by seniors: a systematic review. Health & Social Care in the Community, 28(6), 1827–1842. https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.13011
53.
KlineR. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford Press.
54.
KnowlesB.HansonV. L. (2018). Older adults’ deployment of ‘distrust. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 25(4), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1145/3196490
55.
LagunaK.BabcockR. L. (1997). Computer anxiety in young and older adults: Implications for human-computer interactions in older populations. Computers in Human Behavior, 13(3), 317–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0747-5632(97)00012-5
56.
LarssonE.Larsson-LundM.NilssonI. (2013). Internet Based activities (ibas): seniors' experiences of the Conditions required for the performance of and the influence of these conditions on their own participation in society. Educational Gerontology, 39(3), 155–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/03601277.2012.699833
57.
LeeM. S. (2019). Effects of personal innovativeness on mobile device adoption by older adults in South Korea: the moderation effect of mobile device use experience. International Journal of Mobile Communications, 17(6), 682–702.
58.
Lévy-ManginJ. P.VarelaJ. (2006). Modelización con estructuras de covarianzas en ciencias sociales. Temas esenciales, avanzados y aportaciones especiales. Netbiblo.
59.
LundM. L.NygårdL. (2003). Incorporating or resisting assistive devices: different approaches to achieving a desired occupational self-image. OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health, 23(2), 67–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/153944920302300204
60.
MacdonaldB.HülürG. (2021). Internet adoption in older adults: Findings from the health and retirement study. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 24(2), 101–107. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2019.0736
61.
MarchewkaJ. T.KostiwaK. (2007). An application of the UTAUT model for understanding student perceptions using course management software. Communications of the IIMA, 7(2), 10. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJDET.2019070101
62.
MarianoJ.MarquesS.RamosM. R.de VriesH. (2021). Cognitive functioning mediates the relationship between self-perceptions of aging and computer use behavior in late adulthood: Evidence from two longitudinal studies. Computers in Human Behavior, 121(August), 106807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106807.
63.
MartínF. H. (2009). Buenas prácticas TIC. La alfabetización digital en mayores. Teoría de la educación. Education in the Knowledge Society (EKS), 10(2), 48–65. https://doi.org/10.14201/eks.7508
64.
Martín-GarcíaA. V.MuñozJ. M.SerrateS.MurcianoA. (2021). Intención de participación en programas universitarios de mayores en modalidad a distancia. Identificación de perfiles mediante análisis de segmentación. Pedagogía Social. Revista Interuniversitaria, (39), 105-122. DOI:10.7179/PSRI_2021.39.07.
65.
McConathaD.McConathaJ. T.DermignyR. (1994). The use of interactive computer services to enhance the quality of life for long-term care residents. The Gerontologist, 34(4), 553–556. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/34.4.553
66.
McDonaldR. P.HoM. H. (2002). Principles and practice in reporting structural equation Analyses. Psychological Methods, 7(1), 64–82. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.7.1.64
67.
MerkelS.HessM. (2020). The use of internet-based health and care services by elderly people in europe and the importance of the country context: Multilevel study. JMIR Aging, 3(1), e15491. https://doi.org/10.2196/15491
MorgaJ. J. (2016). Mobile commerce adoption in older adults: A quantitative study [doctoral dissertation. Capella University.
70.
MorrisM. G.VenkateshV. (2000). Age differences in technology adoption decisions: implications for a changing work force. Personnel Psychology, 53(2), 375–403. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2000.tb00206.x
71.
MostaghelROghaziP (2017). Elderly and technology tools: A fuzzyset qualitative comparative analysis. Quality & Quantity, 51(5), 1969–1982. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135
NiehavesB.PlattfautR. (2014). Internet adoption by the elderly: employing IS technology acceptance theories for understanding the age-related digital divide. European Journal of Information Systems, 23(6), 708-726. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2013.19
74.
NurosisM. (1993). SPSS.Statistical data analysis. SPSS Inc.
75.
OlsonM. M.RussellC. S.WhiteM. B. (2002). Technological implications for clinical supervision and practice. The Clinical Supervisor, 20(2), 201–215. https://doi.org/10.1300/J001v20n02_15
PanS.Jordan-MarshM. (2010). Internet use intention and adoption among Chinese older adults: From the expanded technology acceptance model perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(5), 1111–1119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.015
78.
PeekS. T.WoutersE. J.Van HoofJ.LuijkxK. G.BoeijeH. R.VrijhoefH. J. (2014). Factors influencing acceptance of technology for aging in place: A systematic review. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 83(4), 235–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.01.004
79.
Peral-PeralB.Arenas-GaitánJ.Villarejo-RamosÁ.-F. (2015). Of the digital divide to the psycho-digital divide: older people and social networks. Communicate: Scientific Journal of Communication and Educationn, 23(45), 57–64. https://doi.org/10.3916/C45-2015-06
80.
PeralB. P.GaitánJ. A.Ramón-JerónimoM. Á. (2014). Technology acceptance model y mayores: ¿la educación y la actividad laboral desarrollada son variables moderadoras?Revista Española de Investigación de Marketing ESIC, 18(1), 43–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1138-1442(14)60005-X
81.
PetrovčičA.FortunatiL.VehovarV.KavčičM.DolničarV. (2015). Mobile phone communication in social support networks of older adults in Slovenia. Telematics and Informatics, 32(4), 642–655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2015.02.005
RanieriJ.GuerraF.AngioneA. L.Di GiacomoD.PassafiumeD. (2021). Cognitive reserve and digital confidence Among older adults as new paradigm for resilient aging. Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, 7, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1177/2333721421993747.
84.
RobertsA. R.De SchutterB.FranksK.RadinaM. E. (2019). Older adults’ experiences with audiovisual virtual reality: Perceived usefulness and other Factors influencing technology acceptance. Clinical Gerontologist, 42(1), 27–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/07317115.2018.1442380
85.
RosenbergL.KottorpA.WinbladB.NygårdL. (2009). Perceived difficulty in everyday technology use among older adults with or without cognitive deficits. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 16(4), 216–226. https://doi.org/10.3109/11038120802684299
86.
ScerraW. A. (2016). Factors impacting older adults’ adoption of mobile technology in emergency communications. Doctoral dissertation, Walden University.
87.
SchehlB.LeukelJ.SugumaranV. (2019). Understanding differentiated internet use in older adults: A study of informational, social, and instrumental online activities. Computers in Human Behavior, 97(August), 222-230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.03.031.
88.
SchererR.SiddiqF.TondeurJ. (2019). The technology acceptance model (TAM): a meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach to explaining teachers’ adoption of digital technology in education. Computers & Education, 128(January), 13-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.009.
89.
SeifertA.CottenS. R.XieB. (2021). A double burden of exclusion? Digital and social exclusion of older adults in times of COVID-19. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 76(3), e99–e103. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbaa098
90.
SeifertA.KaminS. T.LangF. R. (2020). Technology adaptivity mediates the effect of technology biography on internet use variability. Innovation in Aging, 4(2), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igz054
91.
SelwynN.GorardS.FurlongJ.MaddenL. (2003). Older adults’ use of information and communications technology in everyday life. Ageing and Society, 23(5), 561–582. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X03001302
92.
ShahS. G. S.NoguerasD.van WoerdenH. C.KiparoglouV. (2021). Evaluation of the effectiveness of digital technology interventions to reduce loneliness in older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23(6), e24712. https://doi.org/10.2196/24712
93.
ShapiraN.BarakA.GalI. (2007). Promoting older adults’ well-being through internet training and use. Aging & Mental Health, 11(5), 477–484. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607860601086546
94.
ShiY.MaD.ZhangJ.ChenB. (2021). In the digital age: A systematic literature review of the E-health literacy and influencing factors among Chinese older adults. Journal of Public Health, June, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-021-01604-z.
95.
SimonovaI.PoulovaP.PrazakP.KlimovaB. (2020). Older adults as the internet users: Age and gender approach. International Journal of Innovation and Learning, 27(4), 467–482. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJIL.2020.107610
96.
SlegersK.Van BoxtelMPJollesJ (2008). Effects of computer training and internet usage on the well-being and quality of life of older adults: A randomized, controlled study. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 63(3), P176–P184. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/63.3.P176
97.
SoudersDJBestRCharnessN (2017). Valuation of active blind spot detection systems by younger and older adults. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 106(September), 505-514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2016.08.020.
98.
TsaiT.-H.LinW.-Y.ChangY.-S.ChangP.-C.LeeM.-Y. (2020). Technology anxiety and resistance to change behavioral study of a wearable cardiac warming system using an extended TAM for older adults. Plos One, 15(1), e0227270. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227270
99.
VaportzisE.ClausenM. G.GowA. J. (2017). Older adults perceptions of technology and barriers to interacting with tablet computers: A focus group study. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(October), 1687. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01687.
100.
VenkateshV. (2000). Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Information Systems Research, 11(4), 342–365. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.11.4.342.11872
VulpeS.CrăciunA. (2020). Silver surfers from a European perspective: Technology communication usage among European seniors. European Journal of Ageing, 17(1), 125–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-019-00520-2
103.
WestG. S.FinchF. J. YCurranP. J. (1995). Structural equation models with nonnormal variables: problems and remedies. In HoyleR. H. (Ed), Structural Equation Modeling: Concepts, Issues, and Applications (pp. 56–75). Sage Publications, Inc.
104.
WongK. T.TeoT.RussoS. (2012). Influence of gender and computer teaching efficacy on computer acceptance among Malaysian student teachers: an extended technology acceptance model. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(7), 1190–1207. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.796
105.
YangK.-C.ShihP.-H. (2020). Cognitive age in technology acceptance: at what age are people ready to adopt and continuously use fashionable products?Telematics and Informatics, 51(August), 101400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2020.101400.
106.
ZhouM.ZhaoL.KongN.CampyK. S.QuS.WangS. (2019). Factors influencing behavior intentions to telehealth by Chinese elderly: an extended TAM model. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 126(June), 118-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.04.001.
