Few studies have examined older adults’ behavior and attitudes within the context of intergenerational shared site (IGSS) environments, where children and older adults receive services at the same facility and typically share space and resources on an ongoing basis. This natural study examined the behaviors of older adults participating in two senior center programs that were co-located with child care facilities. Data collection involved participant observation and in-depth interviews with staff members at each IGSS. The data were systematically coded and analyzed for themes. Although positive informal intergenerational interactions occurred at both centers, many older adults demonstrated negative behaviors and attitudes when their programs shared space and/or relinquished resources to children’s programs. Implications for research and practice are provided.
AdjayeJ. K.AborampahO.- M. (2004). Intergenerational cultural transmission among the Akan of Ghana. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 2(3/4), 23-28.
2.
AuerbachC. F.SilversteinL. B. (2003). Qualitative data. An introduction to coding and analysis. New York: New York University Press.
3.
BalesS.EklundS. J.SiffinC. F. (2000). Children’s perceptions of elders before and after a school-based intergenerational program. Educational Gerontology, 26(7), 677-689.
4.
BarnesS. (2006). Space, choice and control, and quality of life in care settings for older people. Environment and Behavior, 38(5), 589-604.
5.
BresslerJ.HenkinN. Z.AdlerM. (2005). Connecting generations, strengthening communities: A toolkit for intergenerational program planners handbook. Philadelphia: Temple University Center for Intergenerational Learning.
6.
CarpF. M. (1970). The elderly and levels of adaptation to changed surroundings. In PastalanL. A.CarsonD. H. (Eds.), Spatial behavior of older people (pp. 162-181). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan–Wayne State University.
7.
CarpF. M.CarpA. (1980). Person-environment congruence and sociability. Research on Aging, 2(4), 395-415.
8.
CookP.WhiteW. (2006). Risk, recovery and resilience: Helping young and old move together to support South African communities affected by HIV/AIDS. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 4(1), 65-77.
9.
CorbinJ.StraussA. (2008). Basics of qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
de SouzaE. M. (2004). Intergenerational relationship in health promotion programme: The experience of Brazil. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 2(2), 95-100.
12.
EatonJ.SalariS. (2005). Environments for lifelong learning in senior centers. Educational Gerontology, 31(6), 461-480.
13.
EpsteinA. S.BoisvertC. (2006). Let’s do something together: Identifying the effective components of intergenerational programs. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 4(3), 87-109.
Gordon-SalantS.FitzgibbonsP. F. (2004). Effects of stimulus and noise rate variability on speech perception by younger and older adults. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 115(4), 1808-1817.
17.
HeineH. C. (2002). Intergenerational programs and practice in the Marshall Islands: Implications for cultural preservation. In KaplanM.HenkinN.KusanoA. (Eds.), Linking lifetimes. A global view of intergenerational exchange (pp. 135-149). New York: University Press of America, Inc.
18.
HerrmannD. S.Sipsas-HerrmannA.StaffordM.HerrmannN. C. (2005). Benefits and risks of intergenerational program participation by senior citizens. Educational Gerontology, 31(2), 123-138.
19.
HoffmanJ. (2004). . . . the (unbearable) “in-betweeness” of being: A postmodern exploration of intergenerational practices in Africa: A framework towards programming. In LarkinE.FriedlanderD.NewmanS.GoffR. (Eds.), Intergenerational relationships. Conversations on practice and research across cultures (pp. 197-214). Binghampton, NY: Hawthorn Press.
20.
JarrottS. E.BrunoK. (2007). Shared site intergenerational programs: A case study. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 26(3), 239-257.
21.
LarkinE.SadlerS. E.MahlerJ. (2005). Benefits of volunteering for older adults mentoring at-risk youth. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 44(3/4), 23-37.
22.
LawtonM. P. (1977). The impact of the environment on aging and behavior. In BirrenJ. E.SchaieK. W. (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of aging (pp. 276-301). New York: Van Nostrand.
23.
LawtonM. P. (1982). Competence, environmental press, and the adaptation of older people. In LawtonM. P.WindleyP. G.ByertsT. O. (Eds.), Aging and the environment: Theoretical approaches (pp. 33-59). New York: Springer.
24.
LawtonM. P. (1985). The elderly in context: Perspectives from environmental psychology and gerontology. Environment and Behavior, 17(4), 501-519.
25.
LawtonM. P. (1989a). Behavior-relevant ecological factors. In SchaieK. W.SchoolerC. (Eds.), Social structure and aging: Psychological processes (pp. 57-78). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
26.
LawtonM. P. (1989b). Three functions of the residential environment. Journal of Housing for the Elderly, 5(1), 35-50.
27.
LawtonM. P.NahemowL. (1973). Ecology and the aging process. In EisdorferC.LawtonM. P. (Eds.), Psychology of adult development and aging (pp. 619-674). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
28.
LynottP. P.MerolaP. R. (2007). Improving the attitudes of 4th graders toward older people through a multidimensional intergenerational program. Educational Gerontology, 33(1), 63-74.
29.
MeshelD. S.McGlynnR. P. (2004). Intergenerational contact, attitudes, and stereotypes of adolescents and older people. Educational Gerontology, 30(6), 457-479.
30.
MullerJ. H. (1995). Care of the dying by physicians-in-training: An example of participant observation research. Research on Aging, 17(1), 65-88.
31.
OswaldF.WahlH.- W.NaumannD.MollenkopfH.HieberA. (2006). The role of the home environment in middle and late adulthood. In WahlH.- W.BrennerH.MollenkopfH.RothenbacherD.RottC. (Eds.), The many faces of health, competence and well-being in old age: Integrating epidemiological, psychological and social perspectives (pp. 7-24). Heidelberg, the Netherlands: Springer.
32.
PadgettD. K. (2008). Qualitative methods in social work research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
33.
ParkerC.BarnesS.McKeeK.MorganK.TorringtonJ.TregenzaP. (2004). Quality of life and building design in residential and nursing homes for older people. Ageing & Society, 24(6), 941-962.
34.
PinquartM.WenzelS.SorensenS. (2000). Changes in attitudes among children and elderly adults in intergenerational group work. Educational Gerontology, 26(6), 523-540.
35.
RuggianoN. (2010). Grant and contract management within an intergenerational shared site organization: A case study. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 29(4), 455-474.
36.
SarkisianN. A. (2005). Kin support in black and white: Structure, culture, and extended family ties. Amherst: University of Massachusetts.
37.
SalariS. M. (2002). Intergenerational partnerships in adult day care centers: Importance of age appropriate environments and behaviors. The Gerontologist, 42(3), 321-333.
38.
SalariS. M.BrownB. B.EatonJ. (2006). Conflicts, friendship cliques and territorial displays in senior center environments. Journal of Aging Studies, 20(3), 237-252.
39.
ScheidtR. J.WindleyP. G. (2006). Environmental gerontology: Progress in the post-Lawton era. In BirrenJ. E.Warner SchaieK. (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of aging (pp. 105-125). Burlington, MA: Elsevier Inc.
40.
SerenyM. (2011). Living arrangements of older adults in China: The interplay among preferences, realities, and health. Research on Aging, 33(2), 172-204.
41.
SilversteinM.CongZ.LiS. (2006). Intergenerational transfers and living arrangements of older people in rural China: Consequences for psychological well-being. Journal of Gerontology, Series B, 61(5), S256-S266.
42.
StantonG.TenchP. (2003). Intergenerational storyline: Bringing the generations together in North Tyneside. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 1(1), 71-80.
43.
StraussA. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
44.
StraussA.CorbinJ. (1994). Grounded theory methodology: An overview. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 273-285). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
45.
VanderVenK. (2004). Intergenerational theory in society: Building on the past, questions for the future. In LarkinE.FriedlanderD.NewmanS.GoffR. (Eds.), Intergenerational relationships: Conversations on practice and research across cultures (pp. 75-94). Binghamton, NY: The Haworth Press.
46.
WahlH.- W.OswaldF.ZimprichD. (1999). Everyday competence in visually impaired older adults: A case for person-environment perspective. The Gerontologist, 39(2), 140-149.
47.
WahlH.- W.WeismanG. D. (2003). Environmental gerontology at the beginning of the new millennium: Reflections on its historical, empirical, and theoretical development. The Gerontologist, 43(5), 616-627.
48.
WeintraubA. P. C.KillianT. S. (2007). Intergenerational programming: Older persons’ perceptions of its impact. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 26(4), 370-384.
49.
WingfieldA.McCoyS. L.PeelleJ. E.TunP. A.CoxC. (2006). Effects of adult aging and hearing loss on comprehension of rapid speech varying in syntactic complexity. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 17(7), 487-497.
