Functional assessment methods are an important element in multidimensional neuropsychological evaluations, particularly in older adults. The Adults and Older Adults Functional Assessment Inventory is a new measure of basic and instrumental activities of daily living. Rasch model analyses were used to analyze the psychometric characteristics of the instrument in a sample of 803 participants. The original categories did not provide an optimal assessment of functional incapacity. The scale was dichotomized to achieve a better reliability score and item fit. The final 50 items revealed a moderately high variability in item difficulty, acceptable fits to items and persons, and a good Person Separation Reliability score. The scores were able to discriminate between normal controls and clinical patients. None of the items showed Differential Item Functioning associated with age, gender, or education. The instrument is able to achieve measures of functional incapacity with the useful properties of the Rasch model.
AndrichD. (1978). A rating formulation for order response categories. Psychometrika, 43, 561–573.
2.
AndrichD. (1988). Rasch models for measurement. London, England: Sage.
3.
AndrichD.de JongJ.SheridanB. E. (1997). Diagnostic opportunities with the Rasch model for ordered response categories. In RostJ.LangeheineR.. (Eds.), Applications of latent trait and latent class models in the social sciences (pp. 59–72). Munster, Germany: Waxmann Verlag.
4.
AraújoF.Pais RibeiroJ. L.OliveiraA.PintoC. (2007). Validação do Índice de Barthel numa amostra não institucionalizada [Validation of the Barthel Index in a community-dwelling older adults sample]. Revista Portuguesa de Saúde Pública, 25, 59–66.
5.
AraújoF.Pais RibeiroJ. L.OliveiraA.PintoC.MartinsT. (2008). Validação da escala de Lawton e Brody numa amostra de idosos não institucionalizados [Validation of the Lawton and Brody scale in a community-dwelling older adults sample]. Proceedings of the 7th National Health Psychology Congress, 217–220.
6.
BenjaminiY.HochbergY. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B, 57, 289–300.
7.
BondT. G.FoxC. M. (2007). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
8.
Bourdel-MarchassonI.HelmerC.Fagot-CampagnaA.DehailP.JosephP. A. (2007). Disability and quality of life in elderly with diabetes. Diabetes and Metabolism, 33, S66–S74.
9.
BreithauptK.McDowellI. (2001). Considerations for measuring functioning of the elderly: IRM dimensionality and scaling analysis. Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology, 2, 37–50.
10.
BurnsA.LawlorB.CraigS. (2004). Assessment scales in old age Psychiatry (2nd ed.). London, England: Taylor & Francis Group.
11.
CraneP. K.HartD. L.GibbonsL. E.CookK. F. (2006). A 37-item shoulder functional status item pool had negligible differential item functioning. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 59, 478–484.
12.
FieoR. A.AustinE. J.StarrJ. M.DearyI. J. (2011). Calibrating ADL-IADL scales to improve measurement accuracy and to extend the disability construct into the preclinical range: a systematic review. BMC Geriatrics, 11, 42.
13.
FinlaysonM.MallinsonT.BarbosaV. M. (2005). Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) items were stable over time in a longitudinal study on aging. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 58, 338–349.
14.
GalaskoD.BennettD.SanoM.ErnestoC.ThomasR.GrundmanM.FerrisS. (1997). An inventory to assess activities of daily living for clinical trials in Alzheimer’s disease. The Alzheimer’s disease cooperative study. Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders, 11, 33–39.
15.
GélinasI.GauthierL.McIntyreM.GauthierS. (1999). Development of a functional measure for persons with Alzheimer’s disease: The Disability Assessment for Dementia. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 53, 471–481.
16.
GillT. M. (2010). Assessment of function and disability in longitudinal studies. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 58, 308–312.
17.
GrangerC. V.DeutschA.LinnR. T. (1998). Rasch analysis of the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) Mastery Test. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 79, 52–57.
18.
GreenM. F.KernR. S.HeatonR. K. (2004). Longitudinal studies of cognition and functional outcome in schizophrenia: Implications for MATRICS. Schizophrenia Research, 72, 41–51.
19.
HobartJ.CanoS. (2009). The Rasch measurement model. Health Technology Assessment, 13, 19–32.
20.
HoeymansN.FeskensE. J. M.van den BosG. A. M.KromhoutD. (1996). Measuring functional status: Cross-sectional and longitudinal associations between performance and self-report. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 49, 1103–1110.
21.
HollandP.ThayerD. (1988). Differential item performance and the Mantel-Haenszel procedure. In WainerH.BraunH. I.. (Eds.), Test validity (pp. 129–145). Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.
22.
Instituto Nacional de Estatística. (2009). Projecções da população residente em Portugal 2008–2060[Projections about the Portuguese population 2008-2060]. Lisboa, Portugal: Author.
23.
KatzS.FordA. B.MoskowitzR. W.JacksonB. A.JaffeM. W. (1963). Studies of illness in the aged. The index of ADL: A standardized measure of biological and psychosocial function. Journal of the American Medical Association, 185, 914–919.
24.
KeithR. A.GrangerC. V.HamiltonB. B.SherwinF. S. (1987). The functional independence measure: A new tool for rehabilitation. Advances in Clinical Rehabilitation, 1, 6–18.
25.
KnutssonI.RydstromH.ReimerJ.NybergP.HagellP. (2010). Interpretation of response categories in patient-reported rating scales: A controlled study among people with Parkinson’s disease. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 8, 61–69.
26.
LandiF.OnderG.CasariM.ZamboniV.RussoA.BarillaroC., … Silvernet-HC Study Group. (2006). Functional decline in frail community-dwelling stroke patients. European Journal of Neurology, 13, 17–23.
27.
LaPlanteM. P. (2010). The classic measure of disability in Activities of Daily Living is biased by age but an expanded IADL/ADL measure is not. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 65B, 720–732.
28.
LawtonM. P.BrodyE. M. (1969). Assessment of older people: Self-maintaining and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living. Gerontologist, 9, 179–186.
29.
LinacreJ. M. (2002). Optimizing rating scale category effectiveness. Journal of Applied Measurement, 3, 85–106.
30.
LinacreJ. M. (2012). A user’s guide to WINSTEPS & MINISTEP. Rash-Model Computer Programs. Program Manual 3.74.0. Chicago, IL: winsteps.com.
31.
LindeboomR.VermeulenM.HolmanR.de HaanR. J. (2003). Activities of daily living instruments: Optimizing scales for neurologic assessments. Neurology, 60, 738–742.
32.
MahoneyF. I.BarthelD. W. (1965). Functional evaluation: The Barthel Index. Maryland State Medical Journal, 14, 61–65.
33.
MarengoniA.Aguero-TorresH.CossiS.GhislaM. K.MartinisM. D.LeonardiR.FratiglioniL. (2004). Poor mental and physical health differentially contributes to disability in hospitalized geriatric patients of different ages. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 19, 27–34.
34.
MarsonD.HebertK. R. (2006). Functional assessment. In AttixD. K.Welsh-BohmerK. A.. (Eds.), Geriatric neuropsychology: assessment and intervention (pp. 158–197). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
35.
McGroryS.ShenkinS. D.AustinE. J.StarrJ. M. (2013). Lawton IADL scale in dementia: Can item response theory make it more informative?Age and Ageing, 43, 491–495.
36.
MooreD. J.PalmerB. W.PattersonT. L.JesteD. V. (2007). A review of performance-based measures of functional living skills. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 41, 97–118.
37.
MortonN. A.KeatingJ. L.DavidsonM. (2008). Rasch analysis of the Barthel Index in the assessment of hospitalized older patients after admission for an acute medical condition. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 89, 641–647.
38.
NitiM.NgT. P.ChiamP. C.KuaE. H. (2007). Item response bias was present in instrumental activity of daily living scale in Asian older adults. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 60, 366–374.
39.
ØsteråsN.BrageS.GarrattA.BenthJ. S.NatvigB.GulbrandsenP. (2007). Functional ability in a population: Normative survey data and reliability for the ICF based Norwegian Function Assessment Scale. BMC Public Health, 7, 278.
40.
Palacios-CeñaD.Jiménez-GarcíaR.Hernández-BarreraV.Alonso-BlancoC.Carrasco-GarridoP.Fernández-de-las-PeñasC. (2012). Has the prevalence of disability increased over the past decade (2000–2007) in elderly people? A Spanish population-based survey. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 13, 136–142.
41.
PfefferR. I.KurosakiT. T.HarrahC. H.ChanceJ. M.FilosS. (1982). Measurement of functional activities of older adults in the community. Journal of Gerontology, 37, 323–329.
42.
PotterG. G.AttixD. K. (2006). An integrated model for geriatric neuropsychological assessment. In AttixD. K.Welsh-BohmerK. A.. (Eds.), Geriatric neuropsychology: Assessment and intervention (pp. 5–26). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
43.
PrietoG.DelgadoA. R. (2007). Measuring Math Anxiety (in Spanish) with the Rasch Rating Scale Model. Journal of Applied Measurement, 8, 149–160.
44.
RaschG. (1960). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Copenhagen, Denmark: Danish Institute for Educational Research. (Expanded edition, 1980. Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
45.
ReckaseM. D. (1979). Unifactor latent trait models applied to multi-factor tests: Results and implications. Journal of Educational Statistics, 4, 207–230.
46.
RoyallD.LauterbachE.KauferD.MalloyP.CoburnK.BlackK. (2007). The cognitive correlates of functional status: A review from the Committee on Research of the American Neuropsychiatric Association. The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 19, 249–265.
47.
SauvagetC.YamadaM.FujiwaraS.SasakiH.MimoriY. (2002). Dementia as a predictor of functional disability: A four-year follow-up study. Gerontology, 48, 226–233.
48.
SousaL. B.SimõesM. R.FirminoH.PeisahC. (2013). Financial and testamentary capacity evaluations: Procedures and assessment instruments underneath a functional approach. International Psychogeriatrics, 14, 1–12.
49.
SousaL. B.SimõesM. R.PiresL.VilarM.FreitasS. (2008). Inventário de Avaliação Funcional de Adultos e Idosos (IAFAI): Manual de administração e cotação[Adults and Older Adults Functional Assessment Inventory (IAFAI): Administration and scoring manual]. Coimbra, Portugal: Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences—University of Coimbra.
50.
SousaL. B.VilarM.PiresL.FreitasS.SimõesM. R. (in press). Desenvolvimento de um instrumento de avaliação funcional para a população portuguesa: o Inventário de Avaliação Funcional de Adultos e Idosos (IAFAI) [Development of a new instrument for functional assessment in Portuguese population: The Adults and Older Adults Functional Assessment Inventory (IAFAI)].
51.
SpectorW. D.FleishmanJ. A. (1998). Combining activities of daily living and instrumental activities of daily living to measure functional disability. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 53B, S46–S57.
52.
TennantA.PallantJ. F. (2006). Unidimensionality matters. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 20, 1048–1051.
53.
TennantA.PentaM.TesioL.GrimbyG.ThonnardJ. L.SladeA.PhillipsS. (2004). Assessing and adjusting for cross-cultural validity of impairment and activity limitation scales through Differential Item Functioning within the framework of the Rasch model: The PRO-ESOR project. Medical Care, 42, 37–48.
54.
ThomasM. L. (2011). The value of item response theory in clinical assessment: A review. Assessment, 18, 291–307.
55.
ThomasV. C.RockwoodK.McDowellI. (1998). Multidimensionality in instrumental and basic activities of daily living. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 51, 315–321.
56.
WadaT.IshineM.SakagamiT.KitaT.OkumiyaK.MizunoK.MatsubayashiK. (2005). Depression, activities of daily living, and quality of life of community-dwelling elderly in three Asian countries: Indonesia, Vietnam, and Japan. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 41, 271–280.
57.
WalkerJ.BöhnkeJ. R.CernyT.StrasserF. (2010). Development of symptom assessments utilizing item response theory and computer-adaptative testing: A practical method based on a systematic review. Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology, 73, 47–67.
58.
WestS. K.RubinG. S.MunozB.AbrahamD.FriedL. P.Salisbury Eye Evaluation ProjectTeam. (1997). Assessing functional status: Correlation between performance on tasks conducted in a clinical setting and performance on the same task conducted at home. Journal of Gerontology: Medical Sciences, 52A, 209–217.
59.
WoodK.EdwardsJ.ClayO.WadleyV.RoenkerD.BallK. (2005). Sensory and cognitive factors influencing functional ability in older adults. Gerontology, 51, 131–141.
60.
World Health Organization. (2000). WHODAS-II Disability Assessment Schedule: Training manual, a guide to administration. Geneva, Switzerland: Author.
61.
World Health Organization. (2001). International classification of functioning, disability and health: ICF. Geneva, Switzerland: Author.
62.
World Health Organization. (2002). Active aging: A police framework. Geneva, Switzerland: Author.
63.
WrightB. D. (1999). Model selection: Rating scale or partial credit?Rasch Measurement Transactions, 12, 641–642.
64.
WrightB. D.DouglasG. A. (1976). Rasch item analysis by hand(Research Memorandum No 21). Statistical Laboratory, Department of Education, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
65.
YehY. C.LinK. N.ChenW. T.LinC. Y.ChenT. B.WangP. N. (2011). Functional disability profiles in amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment. Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders, 31, 225–232.
66.
ZwickR.ErcikanK. (1989). Analysis of differential item functioning in the NAEP history assessment. Journal of Educational Measurement, 26, 55–66.
