Friendships are cited as important contributors to physical, mental, and cognitive health, but many studies rely on single-time-point measures and models that conflate within- and between-person variation. Using data from 23,248 middle-aged and older adults in the Health and Retirement Study, we applied advanced longitudinal models—specifically STARTS variants of ARTS and RI-CLPM—to examine reciprocal associations between friendship characteristics (number, contact frequency, quality) and health indicators (self-rated health, depression, cognition) over a 16-year period. Cross-lagged effects were consistently small, and more robust evidence emerged for health predicting friendship outcomes than the reverse. The best-fitting models accounted for occasion-specific variance, suggesting traditional lagged models may overestimate these effects. Our results raise doubts about strong causal claims linking friendships to health and underscore the need for more careful modeling of temporal dynamics. Findings highlight the importance of decomposing trait-like and state-like variation to clarify the role of friendships in healthy aging.
AchatH.KawachiI.LevineS.BerkeyC.CoakleyE.ColditzG. (1998). Social networks, stress and health-related quality of life. Quality of Life Research: An International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care and Rehabilitation, 7(8), 735–750. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1008837002431
2.
AlsarraniA.HunterR. F.DunneL.GarciaL. (2022). Association between friendship quality and subjective wellbeing among adolescents: A systematic review. BMC Public Health, 22(1), 2420. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-14776-4
3.
AnusicI.LucasR. E.DonnellanM. B. (2012). Dependability of personality, life satisfaction, and affect in short-term longitudinal data. Journal of Personality, 80(1), 33–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2011.00714.x
4.
AugustssonE.CelesteR. K.ForsS.RehnbergJ.LennartssonC.AgahiN. (2025). Friends and trends: Friendship across life phases and cohorts. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 135, 105872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2025.105872
5.
BélandF.ZunzuneguiM.-V.AlvaradoB.OteroA.del SerT. (2005). Trajectories of cognitive decline and social relations. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 60(6), P320–P330. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/60.6.p320
6.
BerryD.WilloughbyM. T. (2017). On the practical interpretability of cross‐lagged panel models: Rethinking a developmental workhorse. Child Development, 88(4), 1186–1206. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12660
7.
BliesznerR.OgletreeA. M.AdamsR. G. (2019). Friendship in later life: A research agenda. Innovation in Aging, 3(1), igz005. https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igz005
8.
CattellV. (2001). Poor people, poor places, and poor health: The mediating role of social networks and social capital. Social Science & Medicine, 52(10), 1501–1516. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0277-9536(00)00259-8
9.
CheungG. W.RensvoldR. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9(2), 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem0902_5
10.
ChoiH.SchoeniR. F.MartinL. G.LangaK. M. (2018). Trends in the prevalence and disparity in cognitive limitations of Americans 55-69 years old. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 73(suppl_1), S29–s37. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbx155
11.
ChopikW. J. (2017). Associations among relational values, support, health, and well-being across the adult lifespan. Personal Relationships, 24(2), 408–422. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12187
12.
CrimminsE. M.KimJ. K.LangaK. M.WeirD. R. (2011). Assessment of cognition using surveys and neuropsychological assessment: The health and retirement study and the aging, demographics, and memory study. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 66(Suppl 1), i162–i171. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbr048
13.
CuiM.JiaoD.LiuY.ZhuY.LiX.ZhuZ.ZhangJ.AlponaA. B.WangY.QianM.SawadaY.MiuraK. W.WatanabeT.TanakaE.AnmeT. (2024). Longitudinal assessment of the relationship between frailty and social relationships among Japanese older adults: A random intercept cross-lagged panel model. BMC Public Health, 24(1), 706. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-18234-1
14.
FarrellA. K.StantonS. C. E. (2019). Toward a mechanistic understanding of links between close relationships and physical health. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28(5), 483–489. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721419855657
15.
FioriK. L.WindsorT. D.HuxholdO. (2020). The increasing importance of friendship in late life: Understanding the role of sociohistorical context in social development. Gerontology, 66(3), 286–294. https://doi.org/10.1159/000505547
16.
GilesL. C.GlonekG. F. V.LuszczM. A.AndrewsG. R. (2005). Effect of social networks on 10 year survival in very old Australians: The Australian longitudinal study of aging. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 59(7), 574–579. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2004.025429
17.
HallquistM. N.WileyJ. F. (2018). MplusAutomation: An R package for facilitating large-scale latent variable analyses in M plus. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 25(4), 621–638. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2017.1402334
18.
HamakerE. L.KuiperR. M.GrasmanR. P. (2015). A critique of the cross-lagged panel model. Psychological Methods, 20(1), 102–116. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038889
HernánM. A.ColeS. R. (2009). Invited commentary: Causal diagrams and measurement bias. American Journal of Epidemiology, 170(8), 959–962. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwp293
21.
HillP. L.PfundG. N.AllemandM.KiviM.BergA. I.ThorvaldssonV.HanssonI. (2024). Between-and within-person longitudinal associations between personality traits and social support across relationships during older adulthood. European Journal of Personality, 38(5), 743–756. https://doi.org/10.1177/08902070231214815
22.
Holt-LunstadJ. (2017). Friendship and health. In HojjatM.MoyerA. (Eds.), The psychology of friendship (pp. 233–248). Oxford University Press.
23.
Holt-LunstadJ. (2018). Why social relationships are important for physical health: A systems approach to understanding and modifying risk and protection. Annual Review of Psychology, 69(1), 437–458. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011902
24.
Holt-LunstadJ.UchinoB. N.SmithT. W.HicksA. (2007). On the importance of relationship quality: The impact of ambivalence in friendships on cardiovascular functioning. Annals of Behavioral Medicine: A Publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine, 33(3), 278–290. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02879910
HuL. t.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
27.
KennyD. A.ZautraA. (1995). The trait-state-error model for multiwave data. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63(1), 52–59. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-006x.63.1.52
28.
KimE.ChopikW.ChenY.WilkinsonR.VanderWeeleT. (2023). United we thrive: Friendship and subsequent physical, behavioural and psychosocial health in older adults (an outcome-wide longitudinal approach). Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences, 32, e65. https://doi.org/10.1017/S204579602300077X
29.
KristensenS. M.UrkeH. B.LarsenT. B.DanielsenA. G. (2023). Hello darkness, my old friend: Moderating a random intercept cross-lagged panel model of loneliness and symptoms of anxiety and depression. Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology, 51(3), 383–397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-022-00995-1
30.
KuiperJ. S.ZuidersmaM.ZuidemaS. U.BurgerhofJ. G.StolkR. P.Oude VoshaarR. C.SmidtN. (2016). Social relationships and cognitive decline: A systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal cohort studies. International Journal of Epidemiology, 45(4), 1169–1206. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyw089
31.
LaBelleO. P.WardeckerB. M.ChopikW. J.EdelsteinR. S. (2015). Attachment processes. In SweenyK.RobbinsM. (Eds.), Wiley encyclopedia of health psychology.
32.
LarsonR.MannellR.ZuzanekJ. (1986). Daily well-being of older adults with friends and family. Psychology and Aging, 1(2), 117–126. https://doi.org/10.1037//0882-7974.1.2.117
LernerR. M.SchwartzS. J.PhelpsE. (2009). Problematics of time and timing in the longitudinal study of human development: Theoretical and methodological issues. Human Development, 52(1), 44–68. https://doi.org/10.1159/000189215
35.
LucasR. E. (2023). Why the cross-lagged panel model is almost never the right choice. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 6(1), Article 25152459231158378. https://doi.org/10.1177/25152459231158378
36.
LucasR. E. (2025). PanelCodeR: An R package to create and run models for analyzing panel data.
37.
LucasR. E.WeidmannR.YangH. (2025). Typical patterns of stability in longitudinal data: Implications for model choice. https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/rs7eu
38.
LüdtkeO.RobitzschA. (2021). A critique of the random intercept cross-lagged panel model.
39.
LuoJ.ZhangB.EstabrookR.GrahamE. K.DriverC. C.SchaletB. D.TurianoN. A.Spiro IIIA.MroczekD. K. (2022). Personality and health: Disentangling their between-person and within-person relationship in three longitudinal studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 122(3), 493–522. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000399
40.
LuongG.CharlesS. T.FingermanK. L. (2011). Better with age: Social relationships across adulthood. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 28(1), 9–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407510391362
41.
MacdonaldS. J.LesleyD.JackieN.AbisopeA.AnnaG.JacquelineK.GillianE.DebbieM.AbolajiI.SylviaS.SamoukaD.HighmoreL. (2018). The invisible enemy’: Disability, loneliness and isolation. Disability & Society, 33(7), 1138–1159. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2018.1476224
42.
MurayamaK.GfrörerT. (2024). Thinking clearly about time-invariant confounders in cross-lagged panel models: A guide for choosing a statistical model from a causal inference perspective. Psychological Methods, 30(6), 1311–1325. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2018.147622410.1037/met0000647
43.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (2022). MPlus version 8 user’s guide. Muthen & Muthen.
44.
OrthU.ClarkD. A.DonnellanM. B.RobinsR. W. (2021). Testing prospective effects in longitudinal research: Comparing seven competing cross-lagged models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 120(4), 1013–1034. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000358
45.
OswaldA. J.ProtoE.SgroiD. (2015). Happiness and productivity. Journal of Labor Economics, 33(4), 789–822. https://doi.org/10.1086/681096
46.
ParsonsS.McCormickE. M. (2024). Limitations of two time point data for understanding individual differences in longitudinal modeling — What can difference reveal about change?Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 66, 101353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2024.101353
47.
RadloffL. S. (1977). The CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1(3), 385–401. https://doi.org/10.1177/014662167700100306
RohrerJ. M.MurayamaK. (2023). These are not the effects you are looking for: Causality and the within-/between-persons distinction in longitudinal data analysis. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 6(1), Article 25152459221140842. https://doi.org/10.1177/25152459221140842
50.
SlatcherR. B.SelcukE. (2017). A social psychological perspective on the links between close relationships and health. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26(1), 16–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721416667444
SonnegaA.FaulJ. D.OfstedalM. B.LangaK. M.PhillipsJ. W. R.WeirD. R. (2014). Cohort profile: The health and retirement study (HRS). International International journal of epidemiologyournal of epidemiology, 43(2), 576–585. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyu067
53.
UsamiS.MurayamaK.HamakerE. L. (2019). A unified framework of longitudinal models to examine reciprocal relations. Psychological Methods, 24(5), 637–657. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000210
54.
Van der HorstM.CofféH. (2012). How friendship network characteristics influence subjective well-being. Social Indicators Research, 107(3), 509–529. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-011-9861-2
55.
ViethG.EnglundM. M.SimpsonJ. A. (2022). Developmental antecedents of friendship satisfaction in adulthood. Developmental Psychology, 58(12), 2401–2412. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0001437
56.
ViethG.RothmanA. J.SimpsonJ. A. (2025). Mapping the integration of adult friends into the study of close relationships and health. Personal Relationships, 32(1), Article e12583. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12583
57.
WestfallJ.YarkoniT. (2016). Statistically controlling for confounding constructs is harder than you think. PLoS One, 11(3), Article e0152719. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152719
58.
WrzusC.HänelM.WagnerJ.NeyerF. J. (2013). Social network changes and life events across the life span: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 139(1), 53–80. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028601
59.
WysockiA. C.LawsonK. M.RhemtullaM. (2022). Statistical control requires causal justification. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 5(2), Article 25152459221095823. https://doi.org/10.1177/25152459221095823
60.
XieJ.FanX.YinP.GuJ.YangC. (2022). Association between childhood friendship and cognitive ageing trajectory in later life: Evidence from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS). BMC Geriatrics, 22(1), 494. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-022-03181-6
61.
YangH.WeidmannR.ChopikW. J.LucasR. E. (2024). Revisiting reciprocal links between well-being and functioning in aging: A STARTS and constrained modeling approach. European Journal of Personality, 08902070251369070. https://doi.org/10.1177/08902070251369070
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
